Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paint is a free programme on any Windows PC. But don't worry, the choice here is not either perfection or nothing. As you say, use your scanner, save the file ... and then use the "choose files" option when you post to CAG to add the file. We can do all the redacting and converting to the correct file type at this end.  The important thing is just to get the info to us. Why not do an experiment this afternoon and see if the above works?  
    • I see they're trying to round up asylum seekers and lock them up for about three months so they can be put on planes to Rwanda. I'm a bit surprised that this is legal.  
    • thought for the day "Prime ministers need a big strategy that tells you where you’re going, you need a bunch of tactics that get you there, and you need the ability to take everybody else with you."   Now I know you are all thinking 'why is the  UKs destination Rwanda ???
    • Asset Link filed for a default CCJ against me, in relation to an old Barclaycard debt which I apparently signed an agreement for back in 2000.   I did not own a Barclaycard in 2000 so I know this is not true.  The CCJ notice was sent to an old address so I did not receive it.  Years later when I found out about the CCJ when I applied for credit, I put an application in to have the CCJ set aside.   As part of the set aside case, I was asked by the judge to provide a draft defence, should the CCJ be set aside.   The defence I provided was that I did not admit to the debt as I had not been provided with any evidence of an original loan agreement.   I won the case and the CCJ was set aside.   Link then filed to court again to make me pay the debt.   We both filed directions questionnaires and the judge allocated the claim to the small claims track.   As part of the directions, additional directions given were as follows ' Additional Directions in a claim for an Assigned Debt - Because the claim is in respect of an assigned debt the Court makes the following directions for the management of claim.  The claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless, before that time, the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents'  It then listed various documents such as an original agreement, deed of assignment, notice of default, statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement etc.     The Claimant failed to provide these documents within the deadline provided and instead I received a copy of a bundle of documents provided by them in preparation for the court date, this was received weeks after the deadline.    I have called the Court to ask if it has been automatically struck out and they advised that it is not automatic and that I should still send my witness statement by the deadline provided, which is Wednesday.  This does not give me much time to prepare my witness statement.   I have never done anything like this before and I am unclear what my witness statement should include.  My thoughts were that I should keep it simple and stick to the facts, like the fact thy have not provided evidence of the original agreement, or the deed of assignment of the debt.   They have provided a copy of a default notice from Baclaycard dated 2015, this states a figure of £550 but the debt they say I owe is £10k.   I am not sure what makes a valid default notice?   I have previously requested proof of the debt from Barclaycard directly and have evidence of emails between us where they have been unable to provide me with the agreement or any documents at all relating to the debt.   Should I include these as an appendix?  Are there any other documents I should include in my bundle?    I have also tried to mediate with the claimants, to save the court costs and time, on a without prejudice basis, but the claimants solicitors refused to mediate.   Should i state this in my witness statement too to show the judge that I have been reasonable and they haven't? Many thanks   Louise
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESPORTA £20 penalty and 15 weeks notice?


Its WAR
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5145 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My son missed his monthly payment beginning of January and Esporta have levied a £20 penalty (just like the banks). My son decided to cancel his membership , but they have said he has to pay up to 30 April, because he has to give 3 full months notice. It sems odd that a monthly account doesnt have a monthly notice. 3 months plus, seems a bit unfair to me. If they refuse to allow one month, and my son still hasnt paid his January amount, I am guessing they wont let him use the club in Feb, Mar or April. Al;so, is there a risk of a default on his credit file?

Its WAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whether he gets a black mark is NOT up to the debt collector.

 

He has to have given permission for Esporta to report his financial dealings to a CRA. If the contract did not specifically state this, he has nothing to worry about. However, if they DO - then they may already be showing him as being in default of his agreement, so it may be best to check.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that normal consumer contracts don't get monthly reporting via experian & equifax, as this is really aimed at reporting on CREDIT related payments on loans, cards & mortgages. With subscription type contracts these will only show up on experian/equifax if it goes to court and a CCJ is issued. I doubt a health club would bother to go to court as they just generally send out threatening letters dressed up to look like solicitors letters rather than an actual court summons, which would cost them money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have moved this to the gym forum - have a read around there as well

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that normal consumer contracts don't get monthly reporting via experian & equifax, as this is really aimed at reporting on CREDIT related payments on loans, cards & mortgages.

 

WRONG.. And how!

 

Ask amyone who has a mobile phone contract - perhaps the most prevelant (mis) use of reporting 'credit'. It originally started to record credit dealings, then was extended to include Electroal Registers, County Court Judgements, and in fact ANYTHING the consumer has actually agreed to disclosure. I would warrant there are more non-credit (CRA compliant) records stored on the systems of the 3 CRA's than only the 'credit' ones you believe they are interested in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing in all this that hasn't been mentioned is the stupidity of individuals to sign contracts without reading them. Most of the anguish expressed on these threads could have been easily avoided by applying a little common sense at the beginning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WRONG.. And how!

 

Ask amyone who has a mobile phone contract - perhaps the most prevelant (mis) use of reporting 'credit'. It originally started to record credit dealings, then was extended to include Electroal Registers, County Court Judgements, and in fact ANYTHING the consumer has actually agreed to disclosure. I would warrant there are more non-credit (CRA compliant) records stored on the systems of the 3 CRA's than only the 'credit' ones you believe they are interested in.

 

Mobile phone contracts are however "credit" based as they don't ask you to pay for your calls "up front" like you do with PAYG, so this is different from a Gym contract where you generally have to pay each month's rental "in advance" so there is no element of credit involved. Also with a mobile contract you often get the handset often worth £400+ "for free" when you agree to a contract, the the monthly payments are in effect payments for that expensive hardware, so again very different from a Gym contract where no actual goods are involved, apart from perhaps a "free sports towel" when you sign up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

'Credit' is an often misunderstood term, however in maaters like these there is no room for them to be misconstrued. Mobile phone companies exend 'credit' in much the same way as taxi drivers do. They do not ask for you to pay for your journey in advance of making it. Similarly, you are required to pay your mobile bill in full every month, no credit is extended, and neither is there any interest added to cover the period of idebtedness.

 

No phones are provided 'for free' they are an inducement to agree to the contract, in much the same way certain sport clubs will bundle additional services (for which there is usually an additional charge) for one or two months for your agreed contract period. This can often be for a minimum of 12 months, followed by 3 month notice period - but only a fool would think that anything is 'free'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would think that customer recruitment and retention would be a prime focus to sports clubs. I dont get why they would them push £20 penalties. Havent they learnt anything from the banks.

 

So the moral of the story is DONT JOIN ESPORTA.

 

If you work for Esporta, read it again. DONT JOIN ESPORTA.

Its WAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Until you want to leave..... The problem with the contravt is that when it is introduced to you to sign, you want to join, so you can often be convinced by your wish to join, to gloss over the detail in the contract. I would bet no body (having noticed the 3 month notice section), would thensay to the staff member " sorry I am not joining because I dont like the notice period". They would just sign, because at that time, joining is high on the agenda, leaving is low.

Its WAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know a number of people who have left without a problem. They simply follow the rules they agreed when they joined. It seems some people want to cheat the system all the time.

 

Also when at my club I often hear prospective members being signed up and the 3 month clause is always mentioned to them by the sales staff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, well the OFT agree with me, they too are very concerned regarding the 3 month period. Yes you are right, some people do want to cheat some systems........Funny how its only the bad ones like Esportas.

Its WAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So, my son missed the january payment (approx £60.00) They charged him £20. My Son cancelled and also missed the Feb payment whilst waiting for a reply ....debt now £146. But a letter just arrived from ARC stating a balance oweing is now £302. Despite Esporta ignoring the dispute and not replying to the correspondence.

 

Artmo......these are the boys you are happy to give your money to. I reckon who you give your custom to is just as important as the product you buy. Whilst sports club membership is often a good product, I maintain DONT BUY IT FROM ESPORTA. Why would anyone choose to give such firms a penny when their contract is rubbish? Their retention policy is worse and the probability of insolvency so high. I would choose a company that knows how to look after and retain their customers. In these difficult times, it will be those companies that resolve concerns, retain customers and prepare themselves to take full advantage of better trading conditions as the recovery occurs, that will prosper.

 

So, is it certain that Esporta will mark a default on a credit file or only if they win a ccj? Its my guess they will ignore a summons and just send threats, but use the default report instead of the courrt.

 

Does anyone know for sure?

Its WAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reporting to CRA requires everyone to give their explicit permission to do so. If they wanted to do this, it will be stated in your sons contract with Esporta - so you should look to this for guidance, rather than assume.

 

As for avoiding them - why? They are just keeping their side of the contract. What you have to ask yourself is this. Why would anyone want to sign up to a legally binding contract for something as inconsequential as this? (Same holds true for mobiles). If you want a Gym - go to one that doesn't require a contract and use it instead.

 

Just because it is 'expected' is no reason to be a lemming like everyone else. Once this becomes the issue is should be, these firms will be forced to end this cosy arrangement they've created for themselves, and earn their money directly for the services they actually provide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had the boy given 3 months notice in January he would have paid about £180 in total and had full use of the club until the end of March. Pity he didn't consider this at the time. Has he been into the club and had a face-to-face meeting with the manager?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, like many young people, they buy things (sign up for membership) when times are good. When times are bad, they need to stop buying things. In Esportas case, they work on the fact that most people do not read every single piece of small print. Most people just consider they want to join at that point. People generally do not consider that they actually want to leave at all. The repercussions are not explained.

 

Can you imagine Esportas staff saying that "Of course Mr xxxx, when you want to leave, you have to give a rolling 3 month notice and if you miss a payment, we will charge you £20, and if you fail to pay anything in 5 weeks it will be £300. Oh, and we will ignore your letters of complaint and just pass the matter to a debt collector" They wouldnt sell one single membership.

 

Buzby is exactly right. I reckon we should read every detail of the agreement and cross out the bits we dont like. Then get them to agree. If they wont agree, we wont buy...........Trouble is , we want to buy, what we dont want is the rubbish service if we ever want to leave.

Its WAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It seems that once you have missed the payment, Esporta require the full balance of the contract. So, thats why the 2 missed payments suddenly increases to the amount of 4 months worth. Anyway, I have paid the fee up to 1st May to get the bill paid, I deducted the £50 in charges and they will let me know if its accepted.

Its WAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

These gyms ignore disputes because as far as they're concerned your hooked for 12 months minimum, if your not happy and try to cancel enter ARC then someone like Trevor Munn.

 

They'll bully and threaten for a while, Trever will send a faux legal letter about county court proceedings but will do nothing. Eventually selling the debt on to another even more tawdry collection agency, it'll just rumble on and on until eventually all your son will here are automated messages left on what ever contact number they have for him.

 

In terms of credit referencing, I'm not an expert but I do have a terrible credit rating, to my knowledge nothing about David Lloyd though (the gym I had a tussle with.) For credit ratings I'd only worry about CCJ's and your son won't get one on account of this, any CAB officer will say the same thing. They're just playing the odds, hoping he'll he'll eventually cough up.

 

As mentioned above, you can't join a gym without agreeing to the contract terms, but defaulting rarely leads to anything more than a series of threatening letters or these weird recorded computer voices on your voice mail. I now get a fair bit of exercise from goading companies like ARC and Trevor Munn, if you can get them to lose their temper on the phone (use the record function on your mobile) it works wonders as a bargaining chip.

 

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...