Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advent Computer Training (Barclays Partner Finance)Info and discussion thread


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3926 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've had only one letter from BPF, the same fob off one everyone seems to have had. I replied...

 

"Dear Mr Carey

 

Thank you for your letter dated 16 February 2010, which did not address any of the issues raised in my previous 2 letters. It said nothing bar the vague open-ended promise of ‘sourcing an alternative training provider to complete your course’ that I’ve already been fed on the phone. I should point out the fact that it has taken Barclays a whole month to even write to its customers following Advent’s demise! Considering Barclays are apparently instrumental in Advent’s collapse by withdrawing funds from it in the first place, I would say that is very poor customer relations.

For the record, I am not happy to accept ANY training provider sourced by Barclays (what does a bank know about IT training?) and instead of being fobbed off onto another distance learning course not of my choosing, I insist on a full refund of my £4,950 course fees. You are legally obliged to return this to me as you are jointly liable under S75 of the Consumer Credit Act, and the training I contracted for is not being provided as arranged.

 

I have been advised by Consumer Direct to write to you again requesting a refund, enclosing copies of my previous letters, and to ask for a response within 14 days of date of this letter. The Financial Ombudsman has also written to you on my behalf.

I await your prompt reply and will be taking this further if I don’t get a satisfactory response to my request".

:mad:

 

I've signed the petition, written to Watchdog etc too.

The protest is a great idea. Barclays need to be publicly shamed. It may well force their hand at refunding everyone...bad publicity is something I'm sure they'll hate!

Financial Ombudsman told me that they can take up my complaint 8 weeks after Advent's first declaration, as they consider that a reasonable time for Barclays to have acted to resolve this situation. I suggest everyone does that too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I have just recieved my first letter from barclays (not bad only 5 weeks since advent went bust ) stating they are close to appointing another provider. does anyone know if we have to except this provider or can we refuse and demand a refund? as i signed up with advent for the training i expect to finish my training with them and nobody else. if i wanted a different provider i would have signed with them in the first place. seems a bit like paying for a bmw only to be told that they have gone bust so we have got you a ford instead. (no offence to fords if you know what i mean ) is it writen in the credit agreement that if the company goes bust we have to except a different provider?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Financial ombudsman told me that they can take up my complaint 8 weeks after Advent's first declaration, as they consider that a reasonable time for Barclays to have acted to resolve this situation. I suggest everyone does that too.

 

Hi Fuzzbutt

The first letter I got from BPF was on the 28/1/10 saying Advent had ceased to trade. So was the website notice up before then? do you know cos that could be the start of the 8weeks. is that right? and I like your letter I've already given them 14days to reply to me re cancelling and I think that's why Trading Standards told me to go back this week cos the time'll be up on Friday

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just recieved my first letter from barclays (not bad only 5 weeks since advent went bust ) stating they are close to appointing another provider. does anyone know if we have to except this provider or can we refuse and demand a refund? as i signed up with advent for the training i expect to finish my training with them and nobody else. if i wanted a different provider i would have signed with them in the first place. seems a bit like paying for a bmw only to be told that they have gone bust so we have got you a ford instead. (no offence to fords if you know what i mean ) is it writen in the credit agreement that if the company goes bust we have to except a different provider?

 

Hi Mantaxi this is my personal opinion at the moment so can't give you any solid advice at the min. but I will be arguing the point with BPF I have been trying to find a legal standpoint to refuse an alternative provider I can't see how they can force us to sign up with another provider when so many of us don't want that from BPF But I will be refusing that in fact I've already written to them objecting to them trying to force me to do that. According to what the Trading Standards have told me they are going on the fact that this is a link loan that has been broken with Advent therefore BPF are also liable so I was told yes you have a case against them. hopefully we'll get a result ie refund.

(wish I was more confident):-)

and no it's not written anywhere I can see that they will provide an alternative provider

Edited by Bluedo
forgot a bit
Link to post
Share on other sites

It is written in the contracts that due to a collapse or insolvency we must accept the alternative training provider as provided by the finance supplier, ie barclay's but barclay's have been playing a nasty little game all along and this is why some of us are standing on Parliament Square next Sunday to get this situation publicized a lot better than it has been.

 

If we do nothing but talk and not act then Barclay's etc will have the run of us and all our money and you know they will. If you wanna act, then get to Parliament Square next Sunday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I have only just now seen the news about Advent and have been trying to look through the formus for advice but its all a bit overwhelming

 

I was wondering if someone can give me a few answers if possiable.

 

There is a Proof of Debt form we can fill out on the PKF - website, does this allow us to get money back?

 

I paid off my loan with BPF using some of it on credit card but i did have to pay off some interest too. would i still be able to get money back since i have paid it all off, I assume i would as i am no longer able to complete the course i have paid for.

 

Is there anything else you think i should do to start a process of getting a refund?

 

Thanks to anyone that can help

Adam

Link to post
Share on other sites

Financial ombudsman told me that they can take up my complaint 8 weeks after Advent's first declaration, as they consider that a reasonable time for Barclays to have acted to resolve this situation. I suggest everyone does that too.

 

Hi Fuzzbutt

The first letter I got from BPF was on the 28/1/10 saying Advent had ceased to trade. So was the website notice up before then? do you know cos that could be the start of the 8weeks. is that right? and I like your letter I've already given them 14days to reply to me re cancelling and I think that's why Trading Standards told me to go back this week cos the time'll be up on Friday

 

Hi Bluedo

I think the notice was posted on 27 Jan - that's when the email announcement is dated anyway, although I didn't see it for a couple of days as it ended up in my junk mail. I wrote my first letter dated 1 Feb due to this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is written in the contracts that due to a collapse or insolvency we must accept the alternative training provider as provided by the finance supplier, ie barclay's but barclay's have been playing a nasty little game all along and this is why some of us are standing on Parliament Square next Sunday to get this situation publicized a lot better than it has been.

 

If we do nothing but talk and not act then Barclay's etc will have the run of us and all our money and you know they will. If you wanna act, then get to Parliament Square next Sunday.

 

Hi there Benny.

 

Can you confirm where in the contract it states that if the contract is broken that we have to accept an alternative training provider?

 

I haven't seen this anywhere.

 

Thanks.

 

First post by the way. I have read through the whole thread though. Thanks for all the help everyone. My situation is that I am 3 payments into the loan after the 1 year 'interest free' period. I wrote to Barclays on 08/02 regarding CCA 1974 and stated that I wanted a refund and was giving them 14 days. I definately do not want another provider like most on here. I have had no reply other than the fobbing off letters. I know my letter was received as it was tracked by Royal Mail. They have had 21 days now and no resolution so I will be calling CD and the FO tomorrow for further advice and will be sending another letter.

 

I would have loved to have attended the protest next week but I am in Edinburgh so can't sadly. I have signed the petition though and joined the Facebook group.

 

I will fight Barclays all the way and so should everyone. Let's not cave in to these dodgy b******s.

 

T

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays actually managed to reply to my letter, and I received another bland reply yesterday (Saturday). Assured me that they are fully investigating my complaint and will 'contact you by 9 March with a detailed response. You may at this stage refer the matter to the Finance and Leasing Association (FLA)'.

 

Hmmmm.....looking at the FLA's website it doesn't look like they have any teeth to resolve this, just act as go-between. It says they can't offer legal advice or enforce any action on Barclays so I'm pretty suspicious this is a fob-off bollocks/red herring!:x

 

I'll go to the Financial Ombudsman, though I have to wait out a another 4 weeks before they can step in on a complaint. Barclays aren't going to squirm out of this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everone i have my finance agreement with hitachi but have been following this thread with interest. I am disscusted by the way these a**ehole banks flex their muscles! I have my current accounts and savings with Barclays but I am in the process of switching to another bank! I have an appointment with my bank manager on tuesday and I plan to air my views about this situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received another fob off letter from BPF "I can confirm we are in discussions with a suitable alternative provider which we hope to conclude shortly"

 

No reference to anything I wrote to them about freezing the account or about cancellation or paperwork copies I've requested.

 

Has anyone had a reply to their letters regarding anything they requested from them ie freezing acc or even a request to cancel acc.

 

They don't seem to want to put anything in writing to me except the fob off letter.

they keep advising me to phone them but I've tried to keep to writing

 

Hi m8 yes i got a letter the other week stating that my account had been put on hold and they cancelled my dd so get them to do it your paying for somethin your not getting but make sure you get it in writing

Link to post
Share on other sites

just phoned bfp about the new provider. asked them for a name so i could check them out on th net to see if they match advent. was told that they do not have that information and if they did they would no reveal it because it is confidential. i think that when we do get the name they should be checked out at compannies house to see how long they have been trading and not just set up by bfp. seems strange to me that after all this time that they do not have a name or even tell me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just phoned bfp about the new provider. asked them for a name so i could check them out on th net to see if they match advent. was told that they do not have that information and if they did they would no reveal it because it is confidential. i think that when we do get the name they should be checked out at compannies house to see how long they have been trading and not just set up by bfp. seems strange to me that after all this time that they do not have a name or even tell me.

 

Considering 85% of the staff in Glasgow are getting the can in the near future, I'm suprised that many of the staff there don't just say 'Ah sod it'

Still if you calls are being monitored I suppose they don't have a choice.

 

I noticed that BPF letters refer to 'a' provider, not providers. Be interesting to know who they think can suddenly take on several thousand extra customers and still provide any service whatsoever.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, but I think Barclays are bluffing and full of bull**** with 'we are confident we can find same if not better training provider' & 'we will be writing soon with details etc'. I think they're stalling in the hope some of us will give up in despair and drop the attack, or they can figure out a way to legally wriggle out of liability. :-x

 

I'm waiting for a call back from Trading Standards Office now and will post here with what they tell me. Consumer Direct passed my case on to the local office as that's the next step apparently after following Consumer Direct's advice to write to BPF (letter & 14 days to respond). I want to ask TS specific questions...

 

  1. Even if barclays DO find another training provider, are we obliged to accept it or can we insist on a refund anyway (nothing in contract says we have to accept Barclays choice)?
  2. If Barclays are legally obliged to refund us in that case, what recourse do we have to force them to act? Financial Ombudsman or small claims court?
  3. Should we still, as a matter of course, put in a claim to insolvency practioner PKF?

 

If anyone has other questions they think we should ask, do please post them up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is written in the contracts that due to a collapse or insolvency we must accept the alternative training provider as provided by the finance supplier, ie barclay's but barclay's have been playing a nasty little game all along and this is why some of us are standing on Parliament Square next Sunday to get this situation publicized a lot better than it has been.

 

If we do nothing but talk and not act then Barclay's etc will have the run of us and all our money and you know they will. If you wanna act, then get to Parliament Square next Sunday.

 

I was combing through my Barclays PF agreement contract but can't see this either BennyBelton...could you point out where it says that please? Don't think I've thrown any paperwork away accidentally, but all I can see is if a supplier goes bust you can sue them (Barclays) under Consumer Credit Act.

Or am I misunderstanding and was it something Advent sent you?

Edited by Fuzzbutt
Link to post
Share on other sites

It is written in the contracts that due to a collapse or insolvency we must accept the alternative training provider as provided by the finance supplier,

 

Well, unless I need a trip to Specsavers...no it's not.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys for all the reply's

Phoned BPF The account will be frozen from today and DD cancelled.

and a letter will be sent out.

They can't deny receiving the letters cos I have Royal Mail tracking numbers and can see who signed for them. so why didn't they just freeze it then. had to phone to get it done.

Asked them to cancel they said "Can't Cancel you're still liable because they're getting a new provider"

Told them No I don't want another provider They said "you're still liable"

Wonder if they talk in their sleep and say "you're still liable?"

I'm hanging onto Trading Standards thoughts on this as they saw all the paperwork and said yes we have a case against them as the links broken

 

Tricia thanks for asking about Address I sent the 14day notice letter to London address. So I'll send future ones to Glasgow.

 

Fuzzbutt, good idea to get questions ready we want answered from TS I'm going in on Friday to see them again so won't do any harm to ask same questions and see if different TS are in agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been told by Trading Standards Office (Consumer Direct referred my case on to them) that in no uncertain terms can Barclays withhold repaying back the BPF loans and offer another training provider instead. The helpful man who called said he was surprised Barclays were insisting on doing that, as they normally just refund loans in these circumstances. He thought it odd and agreed they will be in breach of S75 Credit Act and due to pay back the money. I said it was being speculated Barclays were just trying to get out of paying back the money to students and he said that was indeed possible as there was no justification for their action.

I sent scanned copies of all the loan agreements, Advent contract etc and they are taking up the complaint on my behalf, contacting PKF as well as Barclays.

 

Just goes to show what a lying bunch of [problematic] Barclays bank is, eh? :-x:shock: GRRR!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been told by Trading Standards Office (Consumer Direct referred my case on to them) that in no uncertain terms can Barclays withhold repaying back the BPF loans and offer another training provider instead. The helpful man who called said he was surprised Barclays were insisting on doing that, as they normally just refund loans in these circumstances. He thought it odd and agreed they will be in breach of S75 Credit Act and due to pay back the money. I said it was being speculated Barclays were just trying to get out of paying back the money to students and he said that was indeed possible as there was no justification for their action.

I sent scanned copies of all the loan agreements, Advent contract etc and they are taking up the complaint on my behalf, contacting PKF as well as Barclays.

 

Just goes to show what a lying bunch of [problematic] Barclays bank is, eh? :-x:shock: GRRR!

 

 

Thanks FuzzButt. It's good to know loads of people are pushing for the same outcome rather than most people sitting back and waiting for others to do the work. Keep up the good work everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Saying "your still liable" in their sleep priceless :lol:

 

But on a more important note i sent my cancellation letter, 14 days have gone past and no response.

 

If they were that sure that they were in the clear with this i think they would have written back by now!

Edited by Mustard2243
Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3926 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...