Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks all, especially the information about Kev! Yes, I'll make the mods you all suggest, especially the client bits (didn't realise it was a one man band). The only thing I'm not sure of, is the best way to "sign off", especially as the Keeper is not so keen to sign. So I'd much rather send it from our pet dog. BTW does anyone know about the landowners at Harlyn Bay? I did try to find out last year but couldn't find anything useful, and whether it is worth raising this massive cash generator scam with them. I'm guessing the landowners get a small percentage, so happy to go along with it?
    • I haven’t reply, so the hearing hasn’t been decided 
    • whitelist - the same with mine....the battery had a mind of its own. i bought it for my Son...he'd shut it down and it would be completely off but the power light would either stay on or flash...also it wouldnt start properly, had cmos errors on boot and other stuff.   i bought it through HP store on ebay ..brand new. after 6 days of receipt i recieced an email from HP asking if i was happy...i returned an email saying no and that i want to send it back as it was faulty (basically the email served as a reminder for me to leave them good feedback lol...not as a geniune enquiry to actually make sure i was happy with as they didnt reolve the issue when i was not) after trying to sort it for a couple of months with HP not replying, not offering a solution etc i finally got passed tech support who confirmed it was faulty. i then had to return it to their factory. this is where its gets beyond worse...waited 3 times for parcelforce to collect - they didnt. in the end HP sent me a label which i had to take to the post office - not good as im disabled with a mobility disability. then they asked for my bank account number to issue the refund. they hardly ever replied to my emails and it took over a month and a half to refund me once they had received the laptop back. no explanation, no progress emails, no updates. i kept emailing them on a daily basis as no one would reply to my emails through the website, forum, internal email addresses and even phoned 3 different departments who basically had no idea what to do or what was going on and did not help...they couldnt even tell me when the refund would be issued, let alone why it hadnt been done already. on the forums theres other customers who've had to wait 6 weeks , 2 months , over 2 months etc...it seems as though HP like to with hold peoples money to earn interest on the money in their account. i spents days phoning and emailing them - even sent a recorded letter. at the begining i phoned citizens advice and they said i am entitled to put back into the same financial position as before i lost the out of pocket expenses ie: compensation for my time and recorded letter sent etc. ive started a martin lewis 'resolver' case with them and basically in a snotty reply they told me im not entitled to compensation which is contradictory to what citizens advice told me. i was just wondering if theres any .gov website or law/legislation that i could reply with and say "no your wrong - please compensate me"
    • LBC is here. Complete with a note showing a phantom payment. What to do next?
    • I suppose it doesn't make a massive amount of difference as Kev has never had the guts to do court - well at least not yet - but to me the number of cards played still needs to be reduced.  Given the OP has already referred to the "very busy and overflowing car park" in the appeal I'd refer to that and tell Kev to go and look up case no.3JD08399.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4613 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok, well neither time has the paperwork been left in a sealed envelope for my partner it has just been put through the letterbox.

 

I just dont understand what purpose he was knocking on my neighbours door for? After the first visit when my neighbour came out of his door surely that confirmed along with his door number on the door that my partner didnt live there! So what is the need to disturbing the poor man again!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 179
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

They will also use neighbours to try to confirm things like what you do for a living, thus getting some idea of your income. I recently fought a case against a firm of bailiffs and they had confirmed with neighbours that I was a Headteacher so knew I must be earning decent money. Unfortunately they had got this off the internet, not my neighbour, as I had not worked as a Headteacher for over three years, but my name still came up under an internet search. They were somewhat embarassed by this fact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will also approach eandomers parked in the street and ask if you are anything to do with the address they are trying to get a levy at, as in maybe wanting to levy my motor as I was parked up on the phone adjacent to an address they were visiting

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi

My partner owes some council tax which has been with the bailiffs for some time now. He has been in contact with the office and was due to pay £50 today and then they would look into starting an arrangement. This morning I have had a letter posted through the door detailing a car I drive which is owned by my dad. I know I should have probably parked down another road, but I have a number of problems with my neck and shoulder since a car accident in 2009 and struggle to carry things from the car to the house. So last night as I was on my own with our two small children I just parked near the house. What do I need to do to prove the car is not mine as I am not sure my parents still have the receipt for the car.

Thanks

Stressed2009

Edited by stressed2009
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the V5 have you as the RK?, your parents could do a Statutory Declaration to the effect that they are the Owner, and you are borrowing it, on a long term basis, so are RK for insurance/VED reasons. others will know more

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

the bailiffs should have checked also if it is solely your partners debt then they cant touch your property regardless of what it is. as long as the debt isnt yours just have proof of ownership also do you have a list of fees if so what are they as they can only charge set amounts.

I know my rights Mr DCA I'm with the CAG......hello hello where you gone Mr DCA8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with padja here, if the debt was for another property owed prior to your partner moving in then they cannot touch your goods, unfortunately bailiffs are notorious for assuming everything around and in the premises belong to the debtor, they want fees like an urban fox sniffing food in a bin. My suggestion about the Stat Dec, was to thwart the bailiffs and avoid having to start a letter chain to remove an unlawful levy, and the consequential nuisance if they actually clamp the car. If you search the site for threads answered tomtubby, ploddertom and hallowitch, among others, you may also gain an insight of what to do, and I'm sure they may well be along at some stage to offer advice.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok right after my initial upset I have looked into it a bit more this is an old one from several years ago which I was actually listed on as I lived with him on and off so I am responsible and do want to pay off.

The car is registered in my name for insurance purposes but was bought by my mum and dad. I am allowed to use it until I can afford to buy my own car. I don't think I would come under vulnerable categories I have had a look but can't see anythat would apply. Although I have quite bad shoulder problems following my car accident which I am under a consultant for. I require my car to get my daughter to school I don't know if this is relevant but there is no way of getting her there using public transport. Also, I use the car for driving my sister around who is registered disabled not sure if this is relevent either.

If my parents still have the invoice/receipt should I still do a stat dec? Will the bailiff accept either of these as he is accusing me of trying to hide my property?!

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

My mum has looked they don't have a receipt any more :(

 

As your father bought it and still owns it even without the receipt he could lawfully and properly swear the stat dec imho

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you checked with the council how much the LO is for and when it was taken out

 

sounds strange this has just come out of the woodwork?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My partner checked what he owed with the council a while back and he says the amounts on the letters are correct and as I say was due to pay an payment to the bailiffs today and then set up an arrangement. To be honest he has been dealing with all this as I am having a lot of issues dealing with the problems I have following my accident. I am happy to pay off anything we may owe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well bailiffs head office say a stat dec is not sufficient it would have to be a receipt.

 

Get the copy of the receipt, and present that , but if they regularly choose to ignore a proper notarised Stat Dec, then the bailiffs may well find themselves in trouble when the council get the formal complaint for a wrongful levy imho They are on a sticky wicket if they chose to ignore a stat dec imho, others can advise further also

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Sorry its another question, after extensive reading of several threads on here (and thank god I did before paying the fees) I have come up with another issue! There are 3 liability orders he has attended on the same days for yet I am being charged 3 x 42.50, so in total for the visit fees its £127.50! Several posts on here seem to be saying that if he is attending for 3 LOs on the same day he can only charge the fee once - am I reading this correct?

 

Also, a trivial one as I will be proving the vehicle is not mine, but can they levy on the same vehicle for each of the LOs and charge a levy fee on each one?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cannot levy the "same" goods on all three as with the second and third they are effectively levying their own property, having seized it with the first, so I think all three would then be invalid, but others will know more

 

In any case all three levies and the subsequent fees would be invalid as the vehicle seized doesn't belong to you. They really are very silly if they ignore the evidence and actually tow and try to sell the motor. the Council would then be the target in any action with their agent the bailiff as co-defendant.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to ask again but I will need to get what fees I owe paid tomorrow.

 

Can they take possessions when all the amounts outstanding on the LO's all paid and it's just the fees outstanding as I dispute the amounts? How many visit fees can they charge when enforcing 3 liability orders?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

no they cant if fees are in dispute, however they probably will treaten you for all the fees there is good letter on a council tax thread to send to bailiffs about there charges, I would personally copy in the CEO of council too to let them know how their appointed agents have acted thoroughly illegally and leaving council open to legal action.

I know my rights Mr DCA I'm with the CAG......hello hello where you gone Mr DCA8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to make the council executive officers aware of how the bailiffs wrongful actions, legally can come back and bite them on the bum. the councils will think their bailiff can do no wrong after all there are "guidelines" (which the bailiffs conveniently ignore in search of extra fees), the service level agreement, etc etc, so are hard to convince. A Letter before Action to the CEO naming them as joint defendants with the bailiff in a complaint may work

also check out this sticky by tomtubby?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?262730-Has-a-bailiff-quot-levied-quot-upon-a-car-that-is-NOT-owned-by-you-...-LOCAL-GOVERNMENT-OMBUDSMAN-S-Report-!!!!

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...