Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all, Love this site and it's no nonsense advice, have dipped in and out of the consumer forums over the years, mostly to assure myself that what I was doing was the right thing when dealing with various businesses (almost 100% success rate, thanks in part to reading and more reading here.). Anyway, the time is almost approaching where I might need to ask for some specific help and I have a couple of queries that I can't see definitively answered. Due to financial mismanagement and severe anxiety issues I stopped paying all unsecured debt in December 2018 (one slipped to the first week in Jan 2019 when the last payment was made having rechecked my bank statement from that period - all my unsecured debt direct debits were cancelled in early Jan 2019). This has left half a dozen debts;  a couple of credit cards, a bank loan, Shop Direct and some Hitachi Finance stuff having been sold on and passing the rounds through the usual suspects, Lowells, Link, PRA Group, others related to them, and then back to them again. I have somehow successfully managed to maintain radio silence and avoided anything more worrying than their begging letters.  I have blocked their phone calls and texts, bumped all emails to the spambox and had a chuckle at their desperate letters.  I've never had anybody at the door.  I have been at the same address since before I defaulted and all correspondence comes to my current home address.  I have NEVER contacted them or admitted any debt. In anticipation of them perhaps ramping up action at the last minute I've had a look at my credit report on Credit Karma (rec'd from this very place) and I see that the default dates on these range from May 2019 to November 2019. Also in preperation I've been reading, reading and reading lots here as advised. Obviously being in Scotland there are a lot fewer posts relating to these matters and it's always quite annoying when OP's do not follow up with any outcome on their cases - how rude! This has also left me a bit confused of when I am able to finally breathe easy (although cancelling all the direct debits in Jan 2019 was the biggest sigh of relief as I knew it was all going to be unmanageable and, well, default one, default all.). I've been reading that defaults should be filed 3-6 months after the missed payment but one of my larger debts was defaulted on 27th August 2019 when the last payment I made was 10th December 2018, meaning the first missed payment was 10th Jan 2019.   My query for now is - when should I infer that these debts are prescribed?  From when the payment was missed, or taking the default date plus 5 years from the credit report?   The three I have with the May date are moot anyway as either way they are gone - some letters from Lowell offering me 90% off to settle is what got me thinking these must have been near SB status, however I have one big 10k+ with a July date and another 10k+ at the end of August so I am feeling a bit anxious again, even though I know there is nothing to worry about with the begging letters.  Reading the various forums I am not sure why the OC's didn't take action against me when I read time and again the surprise that other posters haven't already been taken to court for lesser amounts - I'm also surprised I've avoided any action this long as there are plenty in this forum and sub forum who are whisked off to the court by the beggers minions after only a year or so after defaulting.  There are no CCJ/decrees listed on my credit report and I have not received any such judgements against me.  I still just regularly receive the begging emails to the spambox, the blocked phone calls and the letters from the they.   I'm also reading that there is no need in Scotland to send an LBC so what should I be looking out for to know that the time has come to engage with CCA requests etc?   I'm afraid in a fit I threw a lot of the paperwork out but I have a box of stuff I'm going to go through which may have the original letters from the OC's.   Thanks in advance for any advice.  
    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

jd williams cca help urgently needed


dgs82
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4849 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi, does anyone know the factual legistration for an unenforceable cca with a catalogue company (jd williams)

 

i opened an account with jd williams end of november 2006. as far as i am aware i never received or sign any form of credit agreement.

 

i opened my account over the phone. not the internet or application form via the post.

 

i have tried everything i can regarding this situation that has now been going on for just over two years. jd williams will not accept any lower payment nor are they willing to listen. they just keep adding charges to my account and getting debt collection agencies to send letters threatening cout action if not apid in full the day i recieve the letter and to contact them immediately if i have problems paying the full outstanding balance.

 

however when i do contact them they will not accept payment other than the full amount.

 

also, without my request, permission and knowledge jd williams also opened another credit account in my name just a week or so after the first one. i have used the catalogue but is this not legal?

 

what i really need to know:

 

1, is there any rules/laws etc in 2006 that would prevent me going the cca route.

 

2, does the 2004 electronic signiture valid on telephone applications or is it just on internet website applications?

 

3, does anyone know of any lawful reason why a catalogue company would not have a signed by me cca in 2006.

 

in my mind, if this company had any enforcable cca, then they would have started court preceedings ages ago surely. at present i am receiving letters from debt collectors at least one every 14 days threatening legal action for at least one full year.

 

does anyone know if this is the way it goes?

 

also as far as the signed cca is concern i am a little confused as 5 people i know at christmas all opened accounts with this company. all accounts were opened via the internet with the tick in the box but all 5 received cca's in the post either after items were despatched or just after recieving items to sign with t+c on the back. the have to sign and send back.

 

three of which have not been signed and accounts still running as norm.

 

anyone know factual info?

 

all help very great fully received.

 

cheers

Edited by dgs82
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, does anyone know the factual legistration for an unenforceable cca with a catalogue company (jd williams)

 

i opened an account with jd williams end of november 2006. as far as i am aware i never received or sign any form of credit agreement.

 

i opened my account over the phone. not the internet or application form via the post.

 

i have tried everything i can regarding this situation that has now been going on for just over two years. jd williams will not accept any lower payment nor are they willing to listen. they just keep adding charges to my account and getting debt collection agencies to send letters threatening cout action if not apid in full the day i recieve the letter and to contact them immediately if i have problems paying the full outstanding balance.

 

however when i do contact them they will not accept payment other than the full amount.

 

also, without my request, permission and knowledge jd williams also opened another credit account in my name just a week or so after the first one. i have used the catalogue but is this not legal?

 

what i really need to know:

 

1, is there any rules/laws etc in 2006 that would prevent me going the cca route.

 

2, does the 2004 electronic signiture valid on telephone applications or is it just on internet website applications?

 

3, does anyone know of any lawful reason why a catalogue company would not have a signed by me cca in 2006.

 

in my mind, if this company had any enforcable cca, then they would have started court preceedings ages ago surely. at present i am receiving letters from debt collectors at least one every 14 days threatening legal action for at least one full year.

 

does anyone know if this is the way it goes?

 

also as far as the signed cca is concern i am a little confused as 5 people i know at christmas all opened accounts with this company. all accounts were opened via the internet with the tick in the box but all 5 received cca's in the post either after items were despatched or just after recieving items to sign with t+c on the back. the have to sign and send back.

 

three of which have not been signed and accounts still running as norm.

 

anyone know factual info?

 

all help very great fully received.

 

cheers

i had the same with little woods,send them the cca request enclosing £1 po for the fee and send it recorded delivery a.s.a.p.

i agree that if they know they have the correct paper work for this acc you would have been in court by now!

does your threatograms say we may do this we may do that ?,this is usual lowlife threats to be taken with a pinch of salt.

if no cca after the 12+2 days then send them tha acc in despute and stop paying them until they supply your legal requirment cca.

letters in the template library.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Glad to see you made it....lol

 

The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Electronic Communications) Order 2004 came into force in December 2004 any online agreements entered into prior to this date still need a signed executed credit agreement.

 

Electronic signatures weren't considered valid until this date.I dont think over the phone is compliant but not sure

 

The SI is here: The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Electronic Communications) Order 2004

 

Also it would still have to contain all of the prescribed terms to be valid

 

I have just posted this in another thread as an alternative to the CCA request letter quoting Carey V HSBC

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re 12345678910

 

With reference to the above account, I would be grateful if you would send me a copy of this credit agreement.

 

I refer to the recent judgement in the Manchester Mercantile Court Carey v HSBC bank Ltd [2009] EWHC 3417 where Judge Waksman set new case law regarding copies of agreements under the CCA1974

 

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77−79), I am entitled to receive a copy of my credit agreement on request. I enclose a payment of £1.00 which represents the fee payable.

 

The copy may be reconstituted from your records but must comply with the requirements set out in Carey V HSBC however I would prefer a photocopy of the original document

 

I understand a copy of my credit agreement should be supplied within 12 working days and after this time you must advise me whether you hold a copy on file after this period you may not enforce the agreement and I may withhold payment as in Casey V HSBC para 150

 

If the agreement has been varied you must supply a copy of the original along with the current terms and conditions Casey V HSBC para 108

 

If you provide a reconstituted copy you must advise me of this and explain why it may differ from the original as per para 57 and OFT draft Guidelines

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

  • Haha 1

Live Life-Debt Free

Link to post
Share on other sites

dgs82: Have a look at threads which mention JD Williams, Simply Be or Reliable Collections. All the same company.

 

Lots of experience on CAG about dealing with these monkeys. Usually you send the £1 CCA request, they reply to say they can't find it, or don't reply and go into default, or reply and try to con you into signing a new CCA document.

 

Once they are in default you can reply to their next demand and point that out, then ignore them. They'll try phoning, sending more letters and all that, but they have to show that they have valid documentation that they would reply upon if they (ever) took a case to court.

 

You mention ticking a box on-line. Sadly, that can be seen has having a valid agreement for many who apply on-line, but you say you did yours on the phone, so the tick box option is not valid for them.

 

They are a greedy company who add charges to accounts when they are fully aware the customer is unable to make payments, often due to losing a job or whatever.

 

There are some areas that are unclear, like they took out a second agreement and you used the catalogue - why on earth do that? You had an account with them and using a second account could have it's own implications. That is muddying the waters a little.

 

People you know who have taken out new agreements have nothing to do with your case, so ignore that. It's not relevant.

 

All you can do is request the CCA, follow procedure, and see what they do. If you are getting demands from (un)Reliable then that's just in-house.

  • Haha 1

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all and thanks for your replies.

 

themagcian: yea its just the normal rubbish they write like "formal demand", "would like an amicable settlement" and "will not hesitate to commence legal proceedings". all of these things have been on every letter for over a year.

 

b3rty: yea i made it lol thanks for pointing me in the right direction with how to do a thread lol and that letter looks brilliant i had already downloaded and printed off my letter to the collectors but think i may use this one now. and thanks for the 2004 act will have a read through it.

 

hillards: i am not getting letters from reliable anymore they are bored of me ignoring them. it is a company in scotland however it is exactly the same useless threats as reliable. the reason i used the account was credit limit was low on both. i had just moved to a new place and needed domestic items. at the time i was in full time employment and was making regular monthly payments. they responded by increasing my credit accounts over 6 months to quite a large. unfortunatly end of summer 07 i was burguled so i used the accounts to help replace electricals. i was however quite sensible when buying and did not use all of the credit which in total of the accounts would have been well over £2000. mid 08 i lost my job and this is where the problems started. i have not paid them any money since at all since feb 09 11 months ago in protest to the lack of willingness to first of listen to me and secoundly to even consider my monthly repayment suggestions. had they of been helpful in the first place i would be paying them monthly installments to clear the debt and would not be writing this now.

 

after what i have read on this site in the last 24 hours and i ahve read a lot about 8 hours i have read altogether, i firmly believe that these company have no enforceable cca things would have been moving along before now in terms of legal proceedings considering that i have not paid any money for 11 months. i may be wrong we will see when i post the cca request to them first thing monday morning recorded delivery.

 

thanks again for the replies guys, all info is welcome. the more info the better.

 

will keep u all up to date

Link to post
Share on other sites

o hillards,

 

i take your point on other peoples accounts with this company. however in my mind the fact they are sending out cca's for new customers to be signed, dated and then returned is a statement in itself. i.e. these tick box for this company is somewhat useless as why would they waste money and time sending out cca's if the tick box on the screen or even over the phone is a legal bidding cca that is enforceable?

 

i am not saying i am right, i may be very far from the truth and jumping the gun. it just strikes me as a little strange and bad bussiness sense to waste money obtaining something you already have in your records. this company mentioned above is greedy. they wouldnt waste money like that surely?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This company, in my opinion is despicable. Their relentless disregard for peoples privacy and underfanded abuse of peoples knowledge of the law infuriates me.

They try an impose ( by their own right) intrest charges of 138% and involve debt collection companies, to collect on their part... parasites ( cant swear here, to tell you the real feelings).

Link to post
Share on other sites

OH Yes.. these ppl anger me more than i can explain.

My mother was on her death dead, and these f****** N morons persisted in tryin to call the hospital to harras her. i got involved n told them where to go... but the harm they caused was not forgotten... after she died a week later.

Edited by SL8R
Link to post
Share on other sites

that is sickening!!! but it does supprise me with this company. can i ask have u got anywhere with them and if so whats happened if u could it i would be very great full

Link to post
Share on other sites

I simply told them that their interest rates were extorsonate, and no court in this country would uphold them, then told then to p***s of, not heard from them since.

 

They prey on people who fall into unfortunate situations and try to bleed them dry.... tell them to put up or shut up( that's polite). personally i would set fire to them all..... and laugh at them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i totally agree with you them taking advantage of people. esp with the elderly. an elderly family member who has had problems in the past with them has had an account for years. however, slowly but surely people are getting wise and learning how to challenge these people. i have learnt so much today about the cca law/rules. i am convinced the dont have a cca for me after what ive read. and i know for a fact they defo will not have one for my family member. lets hope you dont get bothered by them anymore.

Edited by dgs82
Link to post
Share on other sites

i have re- read this thread from the start, and i appologise fro the confusion. I thought you were critisising my mother( who if it where yours) you would have been protective of?

 

Anyway i see what you are saying and appologise to you...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok i have unapproved a few posts. Glad you have seen the comments made were not aimed at you SL8R.

 

Lets shake hands and move on with the problem at hand.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok i have unapproved a few posts. Glad you have seen the comments made were not aimed at you SL8R.

 

Lets shake hands and move on with the problem at hand.

 

That would be good to move on however when i get pm's regarding my mother, (copy of which i shall forward to yourself) its hard to move on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

JDW made the news at ten last week. It showed inside theeir call centre. Out of 800 staff half didn't turn up for work. Said it was due to the snow but I suspect it was due to the dimwits not wanting to do their nasty job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate these people too!!!

 

I am currently helping my wife deal with them as she is too unwell to cope.

 

They keep sending statements each month with massive interest and admin charges, even though I have CCAed them and got the usual piece of paper with no signature.

 

How can I get them to put up or shut up?

 

Should I write and tell them she has no intention of paying and to take her to Court or go away. I have been to Court over three of my cards and successfully defended each time so I am not worried about the prospect of this at all.

 

Pookey

I'm in the DCA kicking business ..........and business is good!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi thanks pookey, i dont know about ppi's i am afraid.

 

from what i can make out, if you have sent a cca to jd williams, they have 12+2 to reply with either a legally signed cca that is enforceable or a letter informing of why they cannot provide this.

 

after the 12+2 days, if you have not recieved a enforcable cca then, as far as i am aware you are legally entittled to stop paying without further notice until such a time they can provide a cca.

 

at this point i would then write to them, i would say that i am not satisfied with the poor attempt to fulfill my legal request. i would tell them that i am not legally binded to any lawful cca which in effect means no outstanding debt. i i would also send a s.10 requesting them to give a detailed explanation of why they feel they have a legal right to share my personal data with third parties. i would then request that they immeditely stop sharing my data as there is no lawful reason as to why they are doing this.

 

(there are articles and legal terms of s.10 on this site, i cant remember all the info)

 

i would also consider sending a SAR.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
o hillards,

 

i take your point on other peoples accounts with this company. however in my mind the fact they are sending out cca's for new customers to be signed, dated and then returned is a statement in itself. i.e. these tick box for this company is somewhat useless as why would they waste money and time sending out cca's if the tick box on the screen or even over the phone is a legal bidding cca that is enforceable?

 

i am not saying i am right, i may be very far from the truth and jumping the gun. it just strikes me as a little strange and bad bussiness sense to waste money obtaining something you already have in your records. this company mentioned above is greedy. they wouldnt waste money like that surely?

 

Sorry, missed this earlier

 

What they do is send out a document to sign so they make sure they have a legally binding agreement, rather than take any chances on not being able to find the original. Some people are daft enough to sign and return it.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

This is a problem I have. In 2008 I bought goods from them because I was going abroad for a few months and paid upfront. No mention of credit agreement and I certainly didn't ask for one. Whilst abroad my mum told me that I had letters back home to say that I had a credit limit with them. That I hadn't asked for! Fair enough, I said, though I didn't plan to use it as I learnt my lesson a decade earlier, in my early twenties, with store card debt. Well whilst abroad I went through a bad break up with my then boyfriend and before I got back I also had experienced a traumatic phsycial injury. I decided to 'treat myself' to some nice new clothes using the credit, after all, it can't hurt right? Fast forward to 2010 and as quickly as I was paying off the limit I had, they were putting it up. It started at just £150 and was over 2,000 by last year. At one point I was paying them £150 a month just to try to pay it off but the interest kept accruing. Anyway I am now in 2,250 debt to them and they are trying to get repayments.

My query is - I know what I'm like when it comes to store credit, hence why I didn't ask for credit and paid upfront for the goods. I was fine for ages but then a little vulnerability/crisis in my life and bang they had me by the short and curlies. Personally I think it should be illegal. They have effectively committed fraud by opening a credit account without my knowledge. There was honestly no mention at the time I paid for the goods, I wouldn't have done it otherwise. Yes I shouldn't have ordered anything from them but it's human nature to do that and these sick companies prey on human nature. If I had asked for credit then I would take responsibility but I didn't even ask for it in the first place, and feel positively shafted.

What can I do, if anything??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...