Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Odd one this, I recieved 2 notice's for the 18th and 19th April stating that I overstayed on Wigan Robin Retail Park. Permitted Minutes 180. They state I was there 355 minutes on the 18th and 388 minutes on the 19th. Both times I was there around 10 minutes getting my wife a brew from costa after dropping the kids off at school.  On both days I had passed through there a second time around 3pm, again to get a brew then left. Both notices have 2 images each, Entrance and exit.  This is the interesting bit. The Entrance images both timestamped actually clearly show I am exiting the retail park not entering it. And the exiting images they provided show me leaving the carpark after visiting a second time later in the day. In the attachments You'll see all 4 images show that I am exiting, none of them are of me entering. I understand most if not all that see this post won't know the area but if the look at the map link i gave you'll see the road I was on leading up to the main road. g24 ltd 1.pdfg24 ltd 1.pdf GoogleMap view of the road I am on in the entrance images I would have had dashcam footage but I since formatted the memory card. I tried recovery tools but I couldn't get the files back.  
    • An update: I just got another PCN. I get the feeling that someone in the residence is calling OPS, as it's dated for a few mins after I parked. I won't appeal of course. Interestingly, our cleaner was also parked but didn't get a PCN. I asked them why and apparently they're whitelisted. I did ask the MA if they could whitelist me and they said they couldn't. Clearly they decided not to tell the truth. Surely, this would resolve all of the issues entirely i.e. we'd keep non-residents from parking, whilst allowing for residents to park without issue? Also, could OPS now take me to court for both PCNs separately, or could it be one case?    
    • I was with sse broadband until Jun 2023 at which point without notifying me they passed me to origin broadband who I was unaware is my supplier now -  My broadband at home kept working and I was under the impression that sse are taking direct debit payments from my bank account and everything is fine because the Internet has continued to work.  To my horror I have just noticed that origin broadband has been sending me PDF bills for £39 a month and the email heading has been showing as just no reply so I thought it was junk and never bother to check it.  I have now noticed a bill every month and now I owe them some £350. I did instruct origin to supply me Internet and therfore don't feel responsible for this debt.  What are my rights and is it a legal debt considered I did not sign any agreements with them - their first contact with me tho was very clever back in July 2023 trying to lure me into an agreement however because I just saw that email now I'm not sure what to do because I owe them 400 pounds nearly supposedly at 39 per month.  Our agreement with sse was for 26 per month but they shut shop and passed us to origin without asking our consent.    The following is what origin email said back in July before they stated sending invoice every month for payment.    We hope you're enjoying your reliable phone and broadband with us. We're just letting you know your phone and broadband package will end on 30 Jun 2023. Thankfully, good things don't need to come to an end - read on to decide what you want to do next.   Below you'll find the details of your current package and some other great options to compare it to.   What can I do - shall I just pay the debt and cancel it and move elsewhere or is there any way I can fight this as they are more or less enforced upon us with out permission by sse who most Likly sold our accounts to them.    Any help greatly appreciated 
    • whyisthis - Oh bless ya, it's so easily done.  Not worth losing sleep over; listen to the guys here, they know their stuff.  They won't take you to court, they'd get laughed out of it x
    • Monk - you are an experienced and respected member of this forum. Surely you realise how vitally important it is to respect court deadlines. There was no lack of knowledge.  You knew the deadline date.  You calculated it yourself in post 5.  It was written on the claimform.  Defence deadlines are written on probably a thousand threads on the forum. Sorry, but if you're up for a legal fight you also have to be up for organising yourself properly. As for now - 1.  pay it within 30 days and the CCJ disappears, or 2.  don't pay, nothing "legal" will happen, but you'll have a CCJ for six years.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The morals & ethics of being in debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4708 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Rebel, I just gone through to mediation session arising from the intransigence of a DCA flatly refusing to listen

or even understand what the debtors situation was financially at the time or what it may become, until the face to face

meeting between the parties with myself speaking for the debtor,did the fact dawn on the DCA representative that the

debtor wa already on the bread line mentally ill to boot, luckily this one has a happy but confidential ending.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 173
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Never said it did, I said I understand why they do it - get your facts right.

 

OK so you understand why they do this, so do I for years before the advent of the internet, people felt that they were the only ones in the position of not being able to pay their debts, and the only places to go were the CAB and maybe some other charities, which understandably enough most people would rather avoid a complete stranger knowing their affairs, and the DCA's knew that must people did not know enough about laws and procedures in place to counteract the dca threats etc. (I mean I did not know anything about CCA requests etc until I found this forum)

 

So the DCA's held the upper hand throwing out demands and threats of court, stat demands, etc, even their names are designed to intimidate, (Intrium Justitia, Powertocollect) etc, all their letters had fancy fonts and red titles and came from departments with legal sounding names like Pre_court division (moorcrap) or you got a letter from some in-house pet solicitor at the next desk, all designed to frighten you into paying more than you could afford.

 

Then came the internet and people started researching and found the CAG and other forums and were able to access the OFT and TS and FSA websites and lo and behold, these cretins arent so clever after all, and most of their threats are just that threats, now if they dont change their spots they are going to lose this lucrative market, but and it is a big but they still have the mind set that they are allowed to carry on as before.

 

Well listen up, that era has gone, more and more people know their rights and of course they are going to question these firms, if the come in all heavy handed, and it helps no one if posters like the ghost try and justify thier tactics.

 

Anyway I have had enough of ths thread, people are arriving daily with requests for help and my time on th CAG is better spent trying to ensure they are not ridden roughshod over by a bunch of threat monkeys from some dodgy back street organisation that fails to adapt to the times of people knowing their RIGHTS

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is so true,it Empowers me to say to the''Ghost'' I WILL RESPOND TO HIS POSTS AND THAT I WILL NOT BE

INTIMIDATED INTO NOT DOING SO!!!!!:!::madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Problem is He/She is a joke but in no way funny:madgrin::jaw:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The big big gold fish seen around the sewage works:madgrin::fish2:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the one who started this thread back in the year dot (it seems like), it has been interesting to see the different reactions of CAG members.I confess here & now to being a 'won't pay' - why ?, because I am not prepared to be bullied, and I am not prepared to accept the right of a DCA, that has 'bought' my debt from the OC, to collect it from me without some documentary evidence of that right.Show me the agreement, and I'll pay up to the best of my ability. It is that simple. Start to threaten me, and I'll see you in court and plead abject poverty.LSP

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the one who started this thread back in the year dot (it seems like), it has been interesting to see the different reactions of CAG members.I confess here & now to being a 'won't pay' - why ?, because I am not prepared to be bullied, and I am not prepared to accept the right of a DCA, that has 'bought' my debt from the OC, to collect it from me without some documentary evidence of that right.Show me the agreement, and I'll pay up to the best of my ability. It is that simple. Start to threaten me, and I'll see you in court and plead abject poverty.LSP

 

 

But you are only following your rights, to not be bullied and to see documentary evidence of alleged debt, if dcas cannot do that well tough and that is what irkes them xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LS that is the point I have tried to make owe the money or not no one should be subjected to threats , abuse and harassment from DCA's who have no moral or legal

authority what so ever they are just greedy profit takers on the back of people who are often already on the poverty line!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if we keep replying to this thread that it takes away the help from people that really need it the ghost must be happy about this as it is obvious that this is a power kick to him well rip ghost because the people at CAG are not that stupid we have the power and the help that we need I forone will never read or reply to this tread again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LS that is the point I have tried to make owe the money or not no one should be subjected to threats , abuse and harassment from DCA's who have no moral or legal

authority what so ever they are just greedy profit takers on the back of people who are often already on the poverty line!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Quite so, Brigadier - quite so, Sir. LSP

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel that if a company has the right to wipe of a debt and sell on for pennies, therefore they claim it against their taxes, then the alleged debtor should have first right to buy it for pennies if they can prove they have been true and offered reasonable payments they can afford through some sort of mediation. Hence stopping the bottom sniffers making vast profits for claiming the original amounts plus whatever they add also or try to.

 

We need to see in such unfair proven cases of alleged debtor being treat unfairly for the courts to wipe more of the debts clear to teach the pond life a lesson.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Question should we ask the site team to close this thread?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if we keep replying to this thread that it takes away the help from people that really need it the ghost must be happy about this as it is obvious that this is a power kick to him well rip ghost because the people at CAG are not that stupid we have the power and the help that we need I forone will never read or reply to this tread again

 

I fully agree with you, VictoriaHeather, I think that my thread has run its course. It has made people think, and provoked many opinions, but now is the time to get on with fighting these DCA bullies. Thank you everyone. LSP

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4708 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...