Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
    • Thank you so much. Yes, I wish I had done my research and not paid. It's all for the same car park. Here is one of the original PCNs, they are all the same bar different dates. PCN-22.03.24-1.pdf PCN-22.03.24-2.pdf
    • Hi Clou, Welcome to the Forum and thank you for reading first before you posted. There seems to be many problems with Cornwall and getting a signal to use your a phone which could be why these parking companies don't use alternatives. It is a shame you paid the first one as you would probably have not had to pay that one either.  Was the car park at which you paid the same parking company as the one sending you these PCNs? On the subject of PCNs could you please post them up so we can see if they comply with the Act.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MKDP Claimform - Barclaycard **Claim Discontinued**


Nivagey
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2411 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Claim has been discontinued...there is no claim

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 275
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi DX,

Thanks for the reply, what happens with the Court though?

If they have applied to have the claim transferred where does it stand?

 

 

I submitted my defence and MKDP gave up on it so where are RB going with it down the Court rout?

 

 

Do I have to do anything with the Court?

 

 

Surly it would be a new claim?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

it doesn't say that

 

 

read it properly

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scan the order/notice and upload it...remove any identifiable data first.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at the " Multiple " on the Order...it is an application to change claimant on all claims.....in general...as yours was discontinued before their application yours is now dead.

 

File it:-)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nivagey,

 

I had the same letter in December too and have since had several letters from Robinsons Way but nothing to concern me.

 

It's good news that they discontinued because the statute barred clock pauses when a claim is issued and doesn't re-start unless the court case is dismissed/won or it is discontinued.

 

The last letter I had was a couple of weeks ago and referred to a change in my financial circumstances. It claimed that recent activity on my credit file suggested that I 'MAY' have made a significant payment to one of my financial accounts. In view of this, I should contact them to arrange an affordable repayment plan ...........................etc

 

I'm not tempted in the slightest! :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dotty50,

 

Hmmm not really understanding this now :(

 

My last payment to B/C was 12/2009 so Statute barred would be 12/2015? six year continuous no payment made on the account.

 

They put a claim in 10/2012 and discontinued it 12/15.

 

So what you are saying the clock stopped on 10/2012 when the claim was made to the CC

and then Discontinued 10/2015

 

So does this mean the time between the claim and discontinue has to be taken from the 6 year period?

 

Leaving the Original SB start on 12/2009 stopping on the CC Claim date 10/2012 being 2 years 10 months?

 

Now with the gap up to the discontinuance date 12/2015 being 3 years 2 months

does this now mean my SB will be extended that 3 years 2 months

then the 6 year period will now be another 3 years 2 months?

 

My head hurts now :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry giving you a headache wasn't my intention! :-)

 

This was something I learned elsewhere,

so I've got a claim from years ago that will never become SB but I don't lose any sleep over it.

I should have applied for a strike out at the time it became 'stayed''

but I didn't realise the importance of it at the time.

 

But it doesn't extend the period it just pauses it so now they've discontinued,

it's as if the claim was never issued so the original SB period remains the same.

 

The clock doesn't stop, it just pauses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey no worries Dotty50 :)

 

I appreciate you help, I see now that makes sense :) I can handle all and anything they throw at me but as long as I'm 100% clear about the SB date and know they cant go through the courts that's all that matters to me.

 

Thanks again :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're very welcome Nivagey.

 

My biggest debt went SB last month. I literally ticked off each day on my calendar but the relief to get it to SB was enormous.

 

I've got one more to go this month and by the end of the year, all the defaults will disappear.

 

Three have already dropped of and three more to go.

 

It's been a long six years!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry giving you a headache wasn't my intention! :-)

 

This was something I learned elsewhere,

so I've got a claim from years ago that will never become SB but I don't lose any sleep over it.

I should have applied for a strike out at the time it became 'stayed''

but I didn't realise the importance of it at the time.

 

But it doesn't extend the period it just pauses it so now they've discontinued,

it's as if the claim was never issued so the original SB period remains the same.

 

The clock doesn't stop, it just pauses.

 

You cant really strike out a stayed claim Dotty..there are no legal grounds.....but a stayed claimed after a period would become irrelevant with regards to the Statute of Limitation...as the claimant never acted or intended to ever proceed.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

 

Thanks for that info, I am pretty sure that I was told to apply for a strike out on one of my claims after it became stayed but I couldn't afford it at the time.

 

But it was a few years ago so it isn't a concern for me.

 

I was trying to find the post in my thread but can't find it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's great news Dotty50 :) much the same for me got till August then my last one is SB Yep 6 years IS a very long time. If I had taken the advice from one of the many Debt management company's who offer the world to set you free I would be in a hell of a financial mess for many years to come still. :) As they say knowledge is power and I'm very grateful for most on here for their advice and support, you very much included :)

 

I will keep you posted :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

nivagey

as the guys say, they'll have difficulty arguing that the 2012 -2015 period extended the limitation period, let alone starting another claim, after discontinuance. happy days :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ford,

 

Well I hope so mate, heard too many horror story's how these unscrupulous debt collection company's work, seems like there is no limits to their ways of trying to get money from people :(

 

Will see in the next few weeks what their next steps will be :)

 

All the best :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I expect you will just get letters from them every couple of weeks asking 'nicely' for you to pay.

 

Just be aware that they have started using brown envelopes, very much like the on's that areused when a court claim is issued so don't panic if you see one drop through the letterbox. (I did!) :!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just a quick update, had a letter from RW today saying they will accept 50% to clear the debt in one payment or If I am unable to pay a lump sum they may be able to agree for me to pay in monthly instalments or tell them what I can afford and they will work with me to find a resolution!

 

File with the rest of them? :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

begging letter

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even I have had begging letters from robbers way, jokers sent assignment for hoist and demand in same envelope... and yep brown tax looking envelopes....

 

And had a, pay what I can afford letter with a request for my current financial status letter.

 

And a lovely phone call from them asking me security questions, think they were left very clearly that they can whistle dixy.

 

Think as DX has said, begging letters to get some money back from the MKDP purchase.

 

tigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi, Quick question.

 

I should be well in to statute barred on this account my credit report states that B/C sold/assigned to MKDP on the 31/05/2011 and shows "Satisfied" registered against B/C.

 

It now belongs to Hoist.

I have 2 other CC defaults that have now dropped off my credit file both of which I'm sure I had PPI on them as well.

 

One of them a Halifax card which has now been discontinued by the debt agency confirmed in writing to me (it was one where Halifax messed up the Default notice and closed the account before the resolution date).

 

The B/C account was opened in 1983 and I'm sure I had ppi on it.

Is it worth me going on the the B/C website

and filling out a PPI claim for the credit card?

 

Am i right in thinking now the debt was sold the original creditor B/C are liable for the PPI claim and Hoist can not intervene?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Poss or use the fos one

Its better to have all the statements mind

SAR time?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...