Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Default/CCJ Advice


irishboy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5293 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

I have the following default registered against me on one of my credit files

Status- Defaulted, Date Updated- 05/03/2009, Start Date- 29/09/2002, Date last delinquent- 03/06, Default Date- 31/03/2006

I have checked and found that this company were awarded a decree against me at my local court on 29/08/2002.

Can the above be correct since the date of the default is nearly 4 years after the CCJ.

I was going to see if I could get it removed from my credit file but dont want to stir up any trouble.

I would be grateful for any advice.

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to the forums.

 

Can I ask for a little bit more information please.

 

First, are you in Scotland as the rules are different there.

Second, what was the debt for and how much is involved?

Finally, it sounds as if you weren't aware of the CCJ? Is that correct? Have you moved house since 2002?

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi reallymadwoman

Thanks very much for replying. Yes i live in Scotland.

I cant be sure if I knew about the judgement or if i ignored it. It was a credit agreement for a car. Thed car was repossessed but I cant remember when and the total amount was £4600. I didnt defend the judgement and it was issued in 2002. Since then I had no contact with the creditor and made no payments. Their solicitor however obtained an inhibition against me in January 2009. I am in the process of selling my house so thay will get the money due from the proceeds as far as im aware.

I cant be sure, but think that the ccj wasnt on my credit file. If it was, it no longer is. I dont know where the default came from as there were no payments made to the account.

This is now the only "bad" entry on my file and obviously if i can have it removed as the judgement was 7 1/2 years ago it would be beneficial.

Do you know if a company can lodge a default against an account if there has been no payments since the judgment.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Irish Boy

 

Car Credit Agreements Are My Area

 

Who Was The Finance Co

 

AND TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION

 

NO THEY CANT DEFAULT YOU AFTER A CCJ

AN ACCOUNT NEEDS TO BE TERMINATED PRIOR TO A CCJ,

 

THIS SMELL OF A DCA

 

ARE ANY DCA CONTACTING YOU

 

 

IS THE DEFAULT REGISTERED UNDER THE FINANCE CO OR A DCA

Link to post
Share on other sites

The company is Proton finance. The company on the inhibition notice is a solicitors call EGC Turnbull. Their address is the same as the finance company.

Forgot to say, I moved to my current address in 1999. The car was taken back before then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The last time I made a payment was roughly 1998/99. Before the car was taken back.

The only reason i know a ccj was issued is because a sheriff officer arrived at my house last year with an inhibition order. Attached to the notice is a letter to the court stating that a decree was granted on 29/08/2002. A phone call to the court confirmed this.

I have been monitoring my credit files over the last 6 months and saw this default but just thought that this was normal. It was only when i found the notice of inhibition in a drawer last week that things didnt seem to add up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WELL THE GOOD MEWS NOW

 

ILL DRAFT A LETTER FOR YOU TO SEND THE SOLS

 

THIS DEFAULT WILL BE REMOVED, ITS SERIOUSE FOR THE FINANCE COMPANY

 

THIS DEBT IS STATUTE BARRED AS NO PAYMENT OR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT HAS BEEN MADE DURING THE PREVIOUSE SIX YEARS, FIVE IN SCOTLAND.

 

THEY HAVE MADE THEM SELF OPEN FOR A CLAIM OF COMPENSATION.

 

ILL POST THAT IN A MO

CHECK BACK TOMOROW FOR THE LETTER

 

THIS IS GOING TO PUT THE WIND UP THEM, BIG TIME

 

ITS THE LAST PARAGRAPHS ILLEGAL DEFAULT AND THE PENALTIES

 

AN ACCOUNT NEEDS TO BE TERMINATED VIA A DEFAULT NOTICE BEFOR COURT ACTION CAN START

 

THIS NEW DEFAULT IS DEFAMATION AND SLANDER

 

Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1561)

 

 

Quote:

SCHEDULE 2

FORM OF DEFAULT NOTICE BEFORE A CREDITOR OR OWNER CAN BECOME ENTITLED, BY REASON OF ANY BREACH BY THE

DEBTOR OR HIRER OF A REGULATED AGREEEMENT, TO TERMINATE THE AGREEMENT, DEMAND EARLIER PAYMENT OF ANY

SUM, RECOVER POSSESSION OF ANY GOODS OR LAND, TREAT ANY RIGHT CONFERRED ON THE DEBTOR OR HIRER BY THE

AGREEMENT AS TERMINATED, RESTRICTED OR DEFERRED OR ENFORCE ANY SECURITY

Regulation 2(2)

Details of agreement

 

1

A description of the agreement sufficient to identify it.

 

Parties to agreement

2

(1) The name and a postal address of the creditor or owner.

(2) The name and postal address of the debtor or hirer.

 

Details of breach of agreement and action required to remedy, or pay compensation for, the breach

3

A specification of:--

(a) the provision of the agreement alleged to have been breached; and

(b) the nature of the alleged breach of the agreement, specifying clearly the matters complained of; and either

© if the breach is capable of remedy, what action is required to remedy it and the date, being a date [not less than

fourteen days] after the date of service of the notice, before which that action is to be taken; or

(d) if the breach is not capable of remedy, the sum (if any) required to be paid as compensation for the breach and

the date, being a date [not less than fourteen days] after the date of service of the notice, before which it is to be paid.

 

relevant case law is this too...

 

DEFAULT NOTICE

 

The Need for a Default notice

Notwithstanding the above, it is also drawn to the courts attention that no default notice required by s87 (1) Consumer Credit act 1974 has been attached to the petition.

It is denied that any Default Notice in the prescribed format was ever received and the Defendant puts the Claimant to strict proof that said document in the prescribed format was delivered to the defendant

Notwithstanding the above points, I put the claimant to strict proof that any default notice sent to me was valid. I note that to be valid, a default notice needs to be accurate in terms of both the scope and nature of breach and include an accurate figure required to remedy any such breach. The prescribed format for such document is laid down in Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1561) and Amendment regulations the Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) (Amendment) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/3237)

Service of a default notice is a statutory requirement as laid out in sections 87,88 and 89 Consumer Credit Act 1974. Section 87 makes it clear that a default notice must be served before a creditor can seek to terminate the agreement or demand repayment of sums due to a breach of the agreement. therefore without a valid default notice, I suggest the claimants case falls flat and cannot proceed and to do so is clearly contrary to the Consumer Credit Act 1974

Failure of a default notice to be accurate not only invalidates the default notice (Woodchester Lease Management Services Ltd v Swain and Co - [2001] GCCR 2255) but is a unlawful rescission of contract which would not only prevent the court enforcing any alleged debt, but give me a counter claim for damages Kpohraror v Woolwich Building Society [1996] 4 All ER 119

__________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Post ggj.

 

just a quickie:). On reading this forum I came to the opinion that the debt cannot be time barred as a ccj was issued and there is no time limit on this. Hence the inhibition order i think. Is this not the case?

 

i realise that I owe the money and if they get it when i sell my house so be it. But to get the default removed would mean i have a clean credit file.

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Ccj Is Not Timed Barred As Such, Only Default Notice Are Timed Barred.

 

With A Ccj

 

If The Creditor Fails To Do Any Enforcement Action With In The Six Years, Five In Scotland,

 

The Creditor Would Then Need The Permission Of The Court To Enforce

 

Being To Lazy With In The Time Scale Is A No No And Ive Not Come Accros A Ccj Being Enforced Over The Six Year Time Limit

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...