Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • all DYL's are subject to a TRO. looking at this newish, ever increasing as old ind units have gotten removed, estate, there are only lines on one side, on the other there is a parking lane with traffic calming through which you mention. i seriously doubt your mate has any clue what he is talking about.!! its not a private housing assoc estate. so its a public council owned road. no construction co can just decide to draw their graffiti on a road. the DYLs are certainly there pre 2016 even before his home was built. now ive had a quick look to see if the main access to royal park road has signs. there is no royle park road even on your map but there is a royal barn road which leads to where you are parked royal road has a restriction sign on the pole by the fence of the electric substation jnc with gipsy lane there does not appear to be one leading in from the other end - tesco petrol station
    • Hi All. I was driving in Stevenage down a 40 road.  After coming off the motor way i noticed my car felt a little "weird" so i accelerated, then slowed the car down.  Shortly after i got stopped by a manned police car with a laser. During the stop the officer stated i was doing 54 in a 40, the conversation was short, but he said i would unlikely get a awareness course and it was most likely 3 points and a fine.  Mrs thought it was a good idea to have dairy when she is lactose intollerant on date night, so we just got on our way.  At the time, i didnt admit to the offence, but did say i didnt realise and had slowed down in any case. The officers chest camera was recording and on. At the stop, he asked where to send the fine to, as i knew i would be travelling to visit family up north, i provided my temporary details at that location in Yorkshire. It is now 05/05 and i havent recieved anything at either my home address in Stevenage or the temporary address. 1. Is there a time limit in which paperwork needs to be sent to me. 2. SHould i query the ticket as i dont want to miss any deadlines (if so who do i check with?) OR should i keep queit. 3. Given nothing has arrived in 20 days, is there a chance of appeal if and when it comes through? Many thanks CrazeUK
    • Hi All. A family friends car was having issues when she was on a trip visiting family up north at the begining of January.  She ended up leaving it at my friends garage in the same location, who parked it on his forecourt to investigate the issue, howver he said most likely it is beyond economical repair as its a serious gearbox fault. In the meantime i replaced her car with one of my spare cars. The insurance on the car then expired in at the end of January.  When the insurance expired, I sent a paper V890 paper as i didnt have her V5 Reference number in hand to do it online (i have a copy of this).  She didnt mention she hadnt recieved any confirmation as she didnt know if she would get one.  She then cancelled her road tax at the end of March (i think) as she was paying by DD. She then was travelling up north so didnt get her ,ail until last week. She recievd a letter dated 09/04/2024 stating she had failed to insure the vehcile and there was a £100 fine which could be reduced to £50 if she respons by 11/05/2024.  As soon as we noticed, i got her to dig  out the V5 and SORN'd the vehicle.   My friend has been a bit slow in checking the fault, however i suspect it will still be scrapped and is still on his forecourt. Is this possible to appeal?
    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cahoot flexiloan and Moorcroft


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4858 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just because everyone else has crawled out of the woodwork, this one has appeared!

Moorcroft Pre Court Division have sent a NOTICE OF INTENDED LITIGATION

Lots of ifs and mays follow, with a list of costs if court action follows.

I have looked at the Cahoot threads and the agreement matches all the rest from 2002.

Has anyone had any success?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is just a bog standard 'Threat-o-gram' cyrmuambyth. ;)

 

The onus is on Moorcroft to prove to U that they have been either assigned the legal right to collect any 'alleged' debt or are acting as collecting agents of the Original Creditor.

 

Providing that U have NOT previously acknowledged any 'alleged' debt to them, they can be dealt with by way of establishing the Unenforceability of any properly executed Credit Agreement that they may or may not have a true copy of, or even exist elsewhere!!!

 

Just be wary that Default data may STILL be processed by a CRA + that an Enforceable Credit Agreement MAY turn up at some time in the future before SoLA has taken effect, even if NOT having an Enforceable Credit Agreement is admitted to by them, any other DCA, or even the Original Creditor. :(

 

McGuffick v The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc [2009] EWHC 2386 (Comm) (06 October 2009)

 

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your replies. I'm going to have to go through all my paperwork because I think another DCA supplied all the information, which seemed legitimate and then passed it on!

It looks like another CCA request will be on its way unless I can find my original buff and then an account in dispute.

The problems seems to be that no one knows whether the flexi loans are enforceable or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Moorcroft 'have requested relevant documentation ...... all cooection activity ... put on hold'.

'We believe that it may be of assistance to all parties if we also take this opportunity to ensure that any potential areas of dispute are addressed prior to any possible court action or further investigation. To this end can you provide an indication of the information you will be relying upon, when giving evidence to the court or information to the relevant statutory authorities in relation to the alleged subject matter of this account.

Please could you provide this information by return as this will ensure that all possible areas of dispute are identified as quickly as possible thereby minimizing potential costs and delays'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't ya just lurve moorcr@p :rolleyes:

 

How these imbecilies are still in business amazes me -- do they EVER get anybody to pay them anything.

 

Out of all the DCA's they must just have the WORST colection record on the planet

 

Mind you their "Pre Court" (or more affectionally known on these Forums as "Pre School") and "Home Collection" Division don't even consist of a tin shed with two cans connected by a piece of String for use as a telephone.

 

I'm convinced that on the rare cases where they actually phone someone they've gone down to a Public Telephone Box.

 

These idiots are very easy to see off.

 

I wish we all got them instead of others like Crappyquest or Lowell.

 

Cahoot were part of "The Shabby National" group -- now Santander.

 

I doubt whether these old loans from Cahoot have any worthwhile paperwork that would stand up in Court these days and I'm sure in the Santander takeover a lot of paperwork is inevitably going to get lost -- so I'd sit tight and see what's next.

 

It might get passed to Crapbot who are also relatively easy to see off.

 

I had one of these -- I think the original DCA Equidebt admitted they couldn't get hold of the CCA and passed the debt on to moorcroft -- also illegal while a debt is indispute.

 

I sent moorcroft the usual "Go and Make a Sexual Move with a Duck" type of letter --nothing heard again from them.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Edited by jimbo45
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your comments, which are hopefully correct:)

The only rider I will add is that Nottsdave is being taken to court by Cabot over one of these and pt thought that the CCA supplied was enforceable:eek:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/214790-cabot-court-claim-4.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

I think there's plenty of Caggers who can help you with the legality or otherwise of the CCA -- I can't help you on that as I'm not a Lawyer.

 

If the CCA is en-enforceable then you are in clover.

 

Get the S.A.R as well -- you can check if hidden "charges" or "collection fees" have been added. There's loads of posts on these forums about fighting unfair charges at the CCJ stage anyway.

 

I really wouldn't worry a TOSS about Experian and Credit References etc -- by the time you've got this sorted out (hopefully successfully) you probably won't even want to LOOK at a credit card again -- much less ever use one.

 

Sometimes when they haven't got anything else a DCA will threaten you with "Your Credit record will be impaired" etc hoping you'll pay up when you don't need to.

 

I often wonder if Honest and DCA can even be said in the same breath.

 

Why is this byusiness so full of LIES, THREATS, EXTORTION etc. - No wonder people are learning to do everything they can against these ****.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Link to post
Share on other sites

interested thread..

 

I have got a cahoot flexi loan which i am sick of. initially the intrest rate was about 6% now about 30%. I have not paid them anything for last 2 years. they are still holding on to it. I offered to do full and final for around 25% they were not intrested.

 

not sure what to do

Me V Natwest

Me V Egg

Me V Barclays

Me V Northern Rock

Me V Mint

Me V Cahoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

ps.. Have you noticed when type moor crap the standard way it corrects the spelling, hee hee.

 

hi there

do it this way

moor@crap

 

 

BTW you could suggest to them what they WOULD take if 25% is unacceptable.

 

They turn might round and say 75%

 

you can suggest a bit less.

 

Be pepared for a game of Letter Tennis if you go down this route -- incidentally a sweetener might be the following:

 

explain that if they take something in settlement you can clear the debt off quicker otherwise it will take YEARS as even if they have a case to go to court the court will only order you to pay what it thinks you can and that will be a lot less than the DCA wants.

 

They often use COURT action to threaten people -- but actually if you have to going to court isn't too horrific.

 

If you've already offered something that will act in your favour in any court case.

 

Of course if there is invalid paperwork etc then you don't have to pay anything -- you need to follow the legal threads to go down that process.

 

Cheers

 

jimbo

Edited by jimbo45
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Oh well 2 letters!

Santander have said that they had sent a letter transferring the management of loan to themselves and that there will be monthly statements.

Moorcroft cannot comply with CCA request as they are no longer dealing with and have sent a cheque for £1. Took them 5 months!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

It has now become Debt Managers Limited!

URGENT FINAL DEMAND (and the first from them)

Your overdue account has been referred to DML from Santander for immediate collection.

SETTLEMENT is required now

COURT ACTION may be taken unless you make contact with this office

COURT COSTS may be added to your debt

FAILURE TO RESPOND to this demand may affect your ability to obtain CREDIT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Moorcroft had said that they were no longer dealing witrh this accont and returned a £1 cheque 5 months after the request had been made.

As they had said no longer dealing and santander said that they were now administering this account, is this letter http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/574-letter-when-account-has-been-passed-on-whilst-agreement-request-is-in-dispute appropriate or shall I just start from the beginning with a CCA request?

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...