Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
    • I've looked at your case specifically more.   Term 8bii reads " when, in accordance with instructions from the Customer or the Consignee, the Consignment is left in a safe place" Their terms choose to not define safe, so they are put to proof that the location is safe. If your property opens onto a street its a simple thing of putting a google earth image and pointing out that its not a safe place
    • New rules and higher rates resulted in a jump in the number of savers opening accounts at the start of this year's Isa season.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

50p surcharge on groceries under 5quid - Legal?


Thailand
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5660 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Peeps,

 

It seems that now that I am addicted to this site I now bump into potential consumer issues everywhere I go?!

 

I hope this doesn't seem petty but it really gets my back up. I have just purchased my hangover removal stimulants totalling 3.48 and because I only had my debit card to pay with was told there was a 50p charge - I'd completely forgotten about shopping in this particular establishment if I wasn't carrying cash (the hangover:( ). Oh and the charge applies if you're not spending 5+.

When I lived in Manc many moons ago this charge was 25P.

 

I'm sure I was told somewhere that this practice is now or always was illegal.

 

Could somebody let me know how the ground lies on this, because if it is illegal, or doesn't fall within guidelines, I've a mind to help the community around here and send the franchisee a letter.

 

When I think thats along the lines of an extra 13% mark up for nothing!!

 

Danke

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thailand,

 

This charge is lawfull & legal it is a charge for a service-it cost the business terminal fees,process fees for each transaction plus VAT.So for £3.48 the business would proably only get about £3.00 back and on this amount very little profit (which is why the person is in business).

 

When I think thats along the lines of an extra 13% mark up for nothing!!
-NOT for NOTHING for a service.

 

As a small business owner we used to take debit and credit cards and impose a 40 pence transaction fee for sales under £20.00 then along came Chip & PIN with which our providers said we had to have terminals with an increase in transaction fees and dearer monthly rental.We decided enough was enough and no longer take any cards -initially customers were annoyed to pay cash -but we are only 500m from an ATM - and now they know we only take cash or cheques with bankers card there is not a problem.

Nationwide Total settlement for first claim £810.92 (Charges £570.00) total charges £2579.00 (Another 4 claims to make)

 

Tesco personal Finance -NO penalty charges see post end thread

Egg DPA complaint sent to ICO see thread

Egg also trying to get defaults removed

Abbey National/MBNA credit Card - Eventually settled in FULL:)

 

Citibank Preliminary sent 19/08/06

MBNA DPA sent 30/07/06

Mrs CharlieHo v Providian DPA sent 30/07/06

 

MORE TO FOLLOW

 

Advice & opinions of CharlieHo are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that charlieho - clears that up. I can understand that small businesses would need to cover thier costs. I will be sure to go to coop down the road though, as they dont charge! Maybe the huge costcutter franchisee

knows thier on a winner.

 

Or maybe i'm too sceptical

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
I'm sure I was told somewhere that this practice is now or always was illegal.

 

My recollection (which may be incorrect) is that the merchant's were prohibited from charging more for a card transaction but many (15? 20?) years ago this prohitition was lifted - not sure if the prohibition was found to be unlawful or just the regulations changed to allow different prices for different payment methods.

Halifax (current accounts, credit card, old mortgage, secured loan)

thread here

 

MBNA (three credit cards)

thread here

firstdirect (a current account, two mortgage accounts, old loans, old credit card)

they've sold my current account. thread here.

 

Royal Mail

Claim issued by former employer Royal Mail, thread here.

I counterclaimed and won. They paid in full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For a shop owner Streamline have various tariffs for the chip and pin machines, there is a monthly rental and also transaction charges. Credit cards cost the shop a different rate to debit cards. This is why as stated above they will recoup this on lower transactions to help with the cost they incur.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can get you a Streamline tariff guide to show how much a shop has to pay to provide debit/credit card chip and pin service. Cant see how it can be illegal to charge for a service like this, bit like some cash machines charge to take money out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use streamline. There are many different charges, some are a percentage of the transaction, some are a straight fee. On average 26p if its not a percentage. However I am not allowed to charge for taking the transaction. It is there to provide a service but it is also a benefit to both the trader and the customer. There is usually a limit imposed by the trader whereby he or she will not accept a card transaction under a certain amount, maybe £5 or £10. This is fair because there is also the rental of the machine and the phone line rental to be taken into consideration.

A trader does need to cover costs so its understandable that when taking a £5 sale you would not want to lose out. Where I am we have a £5 limit, the machine is not used constantly, we are not like a major store, and each month we divide the rental costs by the number of transactions to see what is the average the machine is costing. We certainly dont lose out by using the machine and there is no reason to pass on a charge for the customer. The machine also helps in terms of banking and carrying cash. I personally would refuse to shop in a shop where they try to impose a charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...