Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Is this a new parking event or have you posted about it before please? HB
    • Hi folks, The keeper received correspondence today from DCBL.  The keeper has received previous correspondence from (Possibly) Parking Eye and Debt Recovery Plus, all of which has been ignored with zero contact with either company. The keeper has moved house twice since the original PCN but has kept DVLA informed of every move and V5 updated accordingly. The driver recalls entering the car park but didn't see any signs indicating payment required. The drivers friend happened to be in the same car park a few days after original PCN was received. Friend is a truck driver and said there is a sign but at truck windscreen height. Driver was in a small vehicle and, due to being careful as to where they were driving, did not see the sign. Original paperwork has been lost while moving but keeper still has scans of paperwork from Debt Recovery Plus. Driver was on site for approximately one hour after a long drive and was resting. After having read previous cases on here, is it still safe to ignore? 1 Date of the infringement 15th September 2020   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Unsure    3 Date received A/A 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] A/A 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Driver recalls there was a screenshot of the reg plate, but it wasn’t a very good one.  6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No.   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up A/A  7 Who is the parking company? Parking Eye?   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] MFG ESSO Cobham Gravesend  DCBL 30:04:24 Redacted.pdf
    • Hi all, hope you can help. I've received a £4k repair estimate from the main dealer after my 2016 F30 330e developed the dreaded drivetrain error. The qoute is for a replacement cell module and associated labour and various bits and bobs to get it done. I initially had them investigate the issue when it first popped up a year ago. They replaced the auxillary battery which 'fixed' the issue for a few months before returning. Last Novemner the issue escalated to 'Battery not charging' which would clear after powering off the car , and disappear. Took it into the dealer and they diagnoised a faulty high voltage battery under the boot but could not do any work as they needed to schedule more cars for this 'specialist high voltage work'. So they said I could continue to drive the car until they got in touch when the car could be booked in for repairs. Roll on to April, the issue became severe (battery not charging error not going away, car in limp mode one morning) and car completly died at a traffic light same day (dashboard flashing all over the place), couldnt engage in 'Drive' and had to be recovered by AA to the dealer. Turns out car was now only running on the 12v battery in the boot and that had run flat as the hybrid function had stopped working altogether. My question is whether this is a reasonable estimate. Could this be done cheaper elsewhere? The dealer has servived this car from new hence took it them in the hope they'd not point fingers at any other party. Should I be paying for this at all since I raised the issue with them before it escalted and resulted in a now expensive fault? I also suspect the KLE may have gone too based on other posts, but the dealer hasnt qouted for that yet. I worry they'll' 'discover' that after I've already shelled out for a new cell module and end up lumbered with another bill to replace the KLE. Feels like I know about what they need to do than they do. The Service Advisor has been completely useless. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    • The Petrol Station is Shell Garage Wickham (Hampshire ) Another person obviously had the same issue as they had called the garage previously-
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

private landlady refusing to return deposit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5348 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all hope someone can give me some advice in april 2007 we rented a property through a letting agent, were told it was long term let and 5 months later we received a letter from the landlady stating unless we could provide a extra 100 per month she would have to put the property on the market.

We agreed to this on a short term basis as we liked the property and didnt want the hassle of finding a suitable alternative property.

 

we were hassled every month by text message asking if the rent was going to be paid ok,we never missed a single month and on most occasions paid up to a week early

 

may this year my husbands work hours were cut and could no longer afford to stump up for the extra 100 pounds the landlady was requesting each month.

 

The property next door became available at 150 pounds per month cheaper than we were paying and decided to make the move, the landlady was given 30 days notice by a recorded delivery letter,all rent was paid and up to date and thats when the fun started!!!

 

She wanted us out at 9:30am 30 days later and at the time she received the letter to the exact minute, the house was cleaned top to bottom and all carpets profesionally cleaned,the landlady ignored us on handover day and left her boyfriend to do all the talking, we were told they had to put together a detailed report and check for unpaid bills which we made sure were up to date.

 

15 days later and still no report!!!!!,when i saw him at the property yesterday i politely asked if the report was available yet to be told very rudely that i wasnt getting my owed deposit as there was mold under the fridge,carpets replaced and urine stained mattress (WHAT????),the house was in a better state than when we took the tenancy on,he also claims to have photographic evidence and she works for a barister thats happy to take on her case if we decided to take legal action.

 

where do we stand as we where not in the deposit protection scheme and deposit was collected by landlady from the letting agency 6 months after we moved and she went self managed.

 

700 pound is alot of money to us at the minute, sorry for the long post but any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all hope someone can give me some advice in april 2007 we rented a property through a letting agent, were told it was long term let and 5 months later we received a letter from the landlady stating unless we could provide a extra 100 per month she would have to put the property on the market.

We agreed to this on a short term basis as we liked the property and didnt want the hassle of finding a suitable alternative property.

 

we were hassled every month by text message asking if the rent was going to be paid ok,we never missed a single month and on most occasions paid up to a week early

 

may this year my husbands work hours were cut and could no longer afford to stump up for the extra 100 pounds the landlady was requesting each month.

 

The property next door became available at 150 pounds per month cheaper than we were paying and decided to make the move, the landlady was given 30 days notice by a recorded delivery letter,all rent was paid and up to date and thats when the fun started!!!

 

She wanted us out at 9:30am 30 days later and at the time she received the letter to the exact minute, the house was cleaned top to bottom and all carpets profesionally cleaned,the landlady ignored us on handover day and left her boyfriend to do all the talking, we were told they had to put together a detailed report and check for unpaid bills which we made sure were up to date.

 

15 days later and still no report!!!!!,when i saw him at the property yesterday i politely asked if the report was available yet to be told very rudely that i wasnt getting my owed deposit as there was mold under the fridge,carpets replaced and urine stained mattress (WHAT????),the house was in a better state than when we took the tenancy on,he also claims to have photographic evidence and she works for a barister thats happy to take on her case if we decided to take legal action.

 

where do we stand as we where not in the deposit protection scheme and deposit was collected by landlady from the letting agency 6 months after we moved and she went self managed.

 

700 pound is alot of money to us at the minute, sorry for the long post but any advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

I would call her bluff.

 

This gives a good basic guide:

How to complain - How to solve problems with your landlord - Your rights - Which? Advice

 

If you paid your deposit on 6 April 2007 or later

 

Your landlord should have paid your deposit into an authorised Tenancy Deposit Scheme and provided details of the scheme to you within 14 days of receiving your deposit.

Step one

 

Write to the landlord, asking for their reasons for withholding the deposit. Ask them to return it within a fixed time or provide you with a list of reasons, and receipts, to justify why they are withholding it. Say that you will be contacting the Tenancy Deposit Scheme if this matter is not resolved to your satisfaction. If you don't have details of the Tenancy Deposit Scheme that your deposit is held in, ask your landlord to provide them.

Step two

 

If you are not happy with their response, contact the Tenancy Deposit Scheme. It will have a free and independent arbitration service that will decide how much of your deposit should be returned.

Step three

 

If your landlord didn't pay your deposit into an authorised scheme, apply to your local county court for a court order. You can visit the court or the court service website for information and advice about this. If your landlord or agent has not put deposit into a Tenancy Deposit Scheme when they should have, they may be ordered to pay three times the amount of the deposit to you.

 

You have nothing to lose calling her bluff and everything to gain.

 

Or you can go straight for taking her to a small claims court. Send her a letter stating you want the deposit returned in full within 14 days.

 

If she doesn't start proceedings against her.

 

There is a straight-forward site https://www.moneyclaim.gov.uk/ which allows you do a small claims online. Just follow the steps.

 

This gives more info about moneyclaim:

Make a small claim online with â??Money Claim Online

 

Hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds to me that maybe SHE wasn't paying the mortgage on the property if she's acting that way, getting you to pay £100 extra on the rent for nothing in particular is very suspect.

 

I think that they are chancing their arm, the way I would deal with this is to report her to the taxman and write to the local council stating that she is 'sub letting without any valid boiler checks etc' that should put the wind in her sails.

 

I doubt very much that she is working for a barrister, and they are pulling a fast one with the deposit money. Sadly the deposit scheme seems to have more loopholes that a mouldy carpet....

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi thanks for the response you are spot on we had a visit from her mortgage lender he was very surprised to find us as tennents his visit was to discuss the 5 months missing payments before it went for repossession also the gas fire never worked we kept asking for a certificate which never materialised so we decided to leave which seems to have made her very angry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depending on the actual date, it may be that the deposit should have been protected. The leglisation came into force on the 6th of April 2007. Was your original tenancy commencement date on or after that date?? Please let us know this.

 

She cannot just increase the rent after 5 months.

 

Not provided a gas certificate is CRIMINAL OFFENCE and should be reported to the Health and Safety Executive.

 

LL has a responsibility to ensure repairs are carried out.

 

If no proper check-in, which you agreed with and signed, was carried out at the start of the tenancy, she cannot prove that the condition of the property at the end of the tenancy is any difference from the condition at the start.

 

She was letting without permission from her mortgagee - this could invalidate the house insurance.

 

She obviously has not been telling the taxman. Can you prove payment of the extra £100 pcm? Did you pay by cheque. If by cash, did you get receipts?

 

She may well work for a barrister, but being taken to court for non-compliance with so many tenancy laws, particularly the one regarding gas safety certificate, will not enhance her standing with her employer one bit!!

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...