Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
    • I am extremely apprehensive about burning our files.... I do not know why, so it is becoming an endless feedback loop. Scared to pull the trigger to speak in the desire not to mess up my file. 
    • Hi All, So brief outline. I have Natwest CC debt £8k last payment i made was 7th November 2018 Not a penny since. So coming up to the 6 year mark. Can't remember when i took out the  credit card would be a few years before everythign hit the fan. Moved house 2020 - updated NatWest as I still have a current account with them. Then Lowells took over from Moorcroft and were writing to me at my current address. I did get a family member to speak to them 3 years ago regarding the debt explained although it may be in my name I didn't rack it up then went contact again. 29th may received an email from overdales saying they were now managing the debt. I have not had any letter yet which i thought is odd?  Couple of questions 1. Does my family member speaking to lowell restart statute barred clock? 2. Do you think overdales aren't writing to me because they will back door CCJ to old address even though Lowells have contacted me at current address never at previous? ( have no proof though stupidly binned all letters  ) Should I write to them and confirm my address just incase? Does this restart statute barred clock? 3. what do you think best course of action is?   Any help/advice is appreciated I am aware they may ramp up the process now due to 7th December being the 6 year mark.   Many Thanks in advance! The threads on here have been super helpful to read.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Thesis - and my student loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3849 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Its my first post and I am looking for a bit of advice.

 

I had been happily paying off my student loan to a debt collection agency via direct debit until earlier this year when the payments stopped being taken from my account. I have about £2000 left to pay.

 

Now I am having Thesis getting in touch with me looking for payment. I am getting royally hacked off with having repayment set up and working only for someone else to take it over.

 

I have a few questions that I would like help with.

 

1) The Student Loans Company indicates on some of their letters that Thesis are the people to contact regarding 'Thesis administered accounts'. Are Thesis a separate entity from SLC?

 

2) Thesis have recently contacted my father and grandmother by phone (who were the original guarantors on the Student Loan). Is this an acceptable practice? And what is the best way of dealing with it?

 

3) If Thesis have bought the debt at a knock down price from SLC should I offer to pay 20% now in return for them closing the debt?

 

3) Is there any grounds for disputing the debt? Statute Barred probably won't apply as I had been making payment to the previous debt collection agency but I haven't acknowledged the debt to Thesis.

 

4) I will be sending a CCA template letter to Thesis today. I will let you know how I get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You can probably complain along the lines of poor quality of service.

Not your fault they took over payments and they stopped taking payments during the transfer, you didn't cancel the payments.

 

Thus any charges/extra interest during the period of non payment don't apply, as its not your fault. If they argue take them to the FOS/OFT.

 

If they were guarantorrs - i am not sure, but arguablly as long as they do not harrass them then probably not a big issue. That said now the loan is being managed by a debt company the guarantoor element may not apply.

 

Plus during the handover you would argue they'd get all pertinant informaiton from the old debt collection agency, another tick in the crap quality of service box

Veester

 

"Challenges are what make life interesting; overcoming them is what makes life meaningful." -- Joshua J. Marine‏ ;)

 

Better than the truth itself is truthful living.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are other threads about Thesis on this site. As I understand it SLC have been selling tranches of student loan debt to Thesis for a while now.

 

I'm astonished that there hasn't been a political stink about this. Thesis are Link Financial by another name. Link are an odious debt buyer/ collector.

 

My understanding is that, among the debts sold, are those where payments are not required because the debtor is earning below the repayment threshold. Putting these sorts of accounts in the hands of a company link Link, given their normal business practices, is simply appalling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys.

 

Thanks for getting back so quickly. Here is some more details on my situation.

 

The Student Loans date back to 1996, 1997, and 1998 when I was at university. Thesis have the loans for the first two years. The SLC still has the final loan and I am paying this off direct to them.

 

After university I did go off the radar for a bit and moved flat nearly once a year for about 5 years. I was self-employed and had my head buried in the sand with regards to my debt. Eventually I got round to facing up to my debt and got back in contact with the Student Loans Co a few years ago to sort it out. Part of the debt had been passed on to a DLC and I was paying off to them in installments.

 

MARKWHEETY - To be honest I want to find out if I can avoid paying off Thesis. Could use the money to feed and clothe my expected newborn baby.

 

"The student loan has never been a credit agreement and thus they have no right to sell it on...." please can you fill me in with more details on this.

 

I have sent off a CCA letter to Thesis. What do they need to enforce the repayment and if they do not have certain documents does this mean I can avoid repayment and tell them to go away? Can they legally enforce payment or could it lead to me getting a CCJ against me?

 

I will keep you updated on what I get back from Thesis.

 

I would still appreciate any other comments, advice or help from other members. Cheers for the help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is totally unbelievable and should be made more public.... I cant see how the SLC can have had the right to sell on your student loan (basically government money).

 

I would go down the route of SARS requesting the SLC and get all information they hold on you and then find out where the have the right to sell your agreement onto a commercial company. This is a government backed organisation selling your debt commercially.

 

At the end of the day the idea of the loan was when you reach a threshold to pay it back through your tax code (new loans or not) and regardless of if you went off the radar then you should be repaying this through your tax code / employer not to a seedy debt collection agency (ie deductions before you get your wage slip) this practise has got to be damn right immoral.....

 

Even it does turn out to be a credit agreement I bet it will not be enforceable.

 

Get more info and post it up here!

 

This has really got to me, will offer any support I can....

Link to post
Share on other sites

GYOS - That looks exactly like the Loan Agreement forms I signed all those years ago. I might have original copies somewhere but I am not sure.

 

It's the old style loan & the chances of them being enforceable are slim. ;)

 

Was there a clear period of six years where no payment or acknowledgement of the debt was made? If so they/it will be Statute Barred anyway.

 

From the time the loans were taken out I did not acknowledge the debt until I made a first payment to DCA Credit Solutions on 28th April 2007. I don't think I ever sent any deferment form back to SLC during this time either. Since 28/04/07 I have made regular payments to THREE different DCA's and Thesis is the fourth. Do I therefore still qualify for Statute Barred?

 

If I am correct in saying there was at least a clear 6 years before I acknowledged debt and even though I started paying a DCA and I have the same loan agreement as GYOS posted, does that mean I can tell Thesis to take a hike, case closed with no further consequences?

 

I have not yet acknowledged the debt to Thesis only ask that they send me a letter with details when they first called. I have been dodging their calls ever since. Probably why they started bothering my Dad and Gran.

 

This forum has been a great help and an inspiration and I have only been on here 24hrs. Great work guys. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I am correct in saying there was at least a clear 6 years before I acknowledged debt and even though I started paying a DCA and I have the same loan agreement as GYOS posted, does that mean I can tell Thesis to take a hike, case closed with no further consequences?
Yes, they have to prove there wasn't a six year gap where no payment or written admission was made. Send them this; http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/599-letter-sent-when-debt-is-statute-barred
Link to post
Share on other sites

When does a Student Loan become due? Once you graduate, once you start working, once you start paying it off????

 

The handy pop-up info when you hover over 'Statute Barred' gives me even more confidence.

 

"In principle, a debt cannot be enforced after 6 years from the date upon which it became due.

The 6 years runs from the last time that the debt was acknowledged in any way or from the last time that a payment was made towards the debt.

Once a debt has lapsed, it cannot be revived - even through a subsequent acknowledgement or payment.

The relevant law is contained within the Limitation Act 1980."

 

So basically my understanding now is that there was a period of over six years that I didn't acknowledge the debt or make repayments. Even though I have subsequently made payments. The Limitation Act 1980 makes any claim any party has to persue this debt null and void.

 

What do I need to ask Thesis for, for proof that I MUST pay them under the law? And if they cannot provide the relavant documents is there an appropriate template letter to send them?

 

Or what documents can I provide to Thesis to proved that they have no legal right to persue this debt?

 

Or can I just send Letter M (http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html) from the Templates Thread. Would I need to add an additional paragraph stating the period I was out of contact before I started paying or will it work without?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically my understanding now is that there was a period of over six years that I didn't acknowledge the debt or make repayments. Even though I have subsequently made payments. The Limitation Act 1980 makes any claim any party has to persue this debt null and void.
Yes

 

What do I need to ask Thesis for, for proof that I MUST pay them under the law? And if they cannot provide the relavant documents is there an appropriate template letter to send them?

You do not have to ask them for anything, they must prove that the debt is enforceable.

 

If you want a belt and braces approach you could send a sar to get copies of statements proving when payments were made towards the a/c, but personally I wouldn't waste the £10. The ball is in their court once you send the SB letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The ball is in their court once you send the SB letter.

 

The SB letter states "The last payment of this alleged debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time."

 

Will I need to change this to reflect my circumstances and indicate the period that I am referring to or can I just send the letter as written and see what Thesis comeback with?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not 100% sure how that would work (SB) because in this case you can defer this loan every year until your 60 - but the debt still exists until its write it off at that point.

 

Just because you went off the radar for 6 years in this case could have been treated as a deferment rather than a "missing person" as such.

 

Just a thought!

Edited by MARKWHEETY
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because you went off the radar for 6 years in this case could have been treated as a deferment rather than a "missing person" as such.

 

Nope. Doesn't work like that unfortunately. :(

 

To defer, you MUST return the deferment forms and proof of income each year. If you don't then you must start making the scheduled payments. If you have gone "off radar", then no deferment will happen and you will start building up arrears of payments, even in your absence.

 

Been there and done that...... :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

as an aside and I do not want to hijack this thread, logically if the goverment can and has sold these loans to dca's then I am hoping they are going to put the banks on notice that unless they start repaying their loans they too will be put in the hands of debt collecters, QED I think

Link to post
Share on other sites

Despicable, thank you Blair & Brown!

Student loans: private companies tighten grip on graduates’ wallets|11Oct08|Socialist Worker

 

This will no doubt lead to another nail in the PM's proverbial coffin.

 

Interesting isn't it?

 

Link Financial t/a Thesis took over these student loans debts in October 2008, this was around the very time when we were all complaining to Caerphilly/Lambeth Trading Standards about the Link Financial Unfair Business Practices;both TS offices were not helpful and in my opinion attempted to water down the complaints.

 

We then went on to make a mass complaint to the OFT...

 

At the time it was surmised that, there was a bias on the side of TS caused probably by the opening of the new Link Financial office in Caerphilly, which of course brought new employment into the Caerphilly area, thus the possible bias by TS.

 

However, we know now about the off loading by the Gov. of these Student Loans to the private sector, at the time when the Gov. were bailing out the Banks with millions of pounds of taxpayers money!

 

This government has wrecked this country and now they are intent on ruining the lives of the future of the country; the students.

 

IMHO, it was morally incorrect to sell of the Student Loans to private debt collector(s) such as Link Fianancial who use covert Unfair Business Practices employed in their cesspit world of debt collection.

 

Personally speaking, I am appalled, the matter is an utter scandal...SHOCKING

 

http://www.abcmoney.co.uk/news/15200740000.htm

 

AC

Edited by angry cat
Link to post
Share on other sites

I know as a teacher how can i tell my students..study hard..get the grades...go to university...weigh yourself down with 20 to 25 thousand pounds worth of debt..and wait for the dca's to come crawling out of the woodwork when you finish

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...