Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though.     A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees.   https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
    • China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What are my chances?!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5181 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I would just like to say what a fantastic website first off, truly fantastic and long may it continue!

 

I would like to know from readers if they think i stand a good chance of winning at employment tribunal (or out of court settlement) for the following case of what i believe to be unfair dismissal....

 

I was told on the 8th of July by a line manager that i just wasn't needed anymore and that they were really sorry that things had not worked out for me and that i was free to leave. (which i did with little fuss due to the shock!)

 

i then received a letter dated on the 6th of July (two days before being 'released') to which it stated that the MD was very thankful for all my hard work and that he was sorry that things did not go ahead as planned. and that i would be paid until the end of the month.

 

I was keen to move on but then just two days later i received ANOTHER letter saying that i had been dismissed for gross misconduct! i was really shocked and decided that i really had better appeal against the decision. - due to it being completely untrue. (not managing a contract to the standard expected even though my job role was loosely linked to the contract but certainly not to manage it)

 

i had the appeal meeting yesterday whereby i was told that i could have the misconduct charge quashed in return for me not moving forward with legal proceedings, however if i decided to move forward with a tribunal case then the misconduct wrap would still stand!

 

I have nearly had one years service close to three days and i think that the the only reason i have been let go by the firm is because i wouldn't take part in any fraud to improve the financial status of the company. (this has been refuted at appeal) surprise surprise

 

i have spoken to a lawer who is keen to move forward but i would like to hear opinions on the case and would welcome any thoughts.

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for the response, I'm trusting the lawyer but understand that it is my decision. I feel very strongly that it needs to be taken further to get the correct result.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have not completed a full 12 months service then you can not take your employer to a tribunal.....be carefull if these employment lawyers they are all in it for themselves.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

i started work for the company on the 13th July 2008 and was told to leave on the 8th of July 2009 and was first told that i had a one week notice period. but due to the gross misconduct allegation i am short of the one years notice. i am very confused but my lawyer has informed me that in this circumstance it should be OK to move forward with a claim through ET.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you were "let go" on 8th July with payment to the end of the month, then the lawyer is working on the theory that your notice period takes you passed the 12 month mark. Also, if it looks like the employer has tried to "manipulate" your departure to avoid your achieving 12 months service then you can claim unfair dismissal.

 

As said above, if the lawyer is confident you have a case then you should be OK. Has he taken your case on a no win no fee basis?

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be on the safe side i suggest you put in a claim to the employment tribunal and let them decide....that way you will know where you stand,

 

I would do this without the lawyers assistance...get it done by the Citizens advice bureau.

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as you told someone senior to you in the company about your unwillingness to forge signatures (excluding the 5 members of the management team involved) you should be OK.

 

Just to be clear by, 'which i have been very reluctant to take part in'

you mean did not take part in, don't you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have since been told that I should expect to wait 21 days for a full investigation to be carried out! I am very much sure that this is simply delaying time and perhaps they think this will all just go away in time!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd write to them,

1. Agreeing to delay taking further action until 21 days from the appeal meeting (17/08/09?).

2. Asking for a copy of their notes of the appeal meeting.

3. Ask what exactly they are investigating.

Sent it recorded delivery and keep a copy. (for the tribunal)

 

It would be normal for them to send you a final decision within 14 days of the appeal meeting. Agreeing to the extension not only makes you appear reasonable it also makes them look 'guilty' (for want of a better word).

 

They wouldn't need 21 days to investigate whether you'd managed a contract to the required standard. They would however need the time to investigate your whistleblowing if that was the real reason for your dismissal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have finally received a copy of the appeal minutes which I requested nearly three weeks ago! Does anyone know how much weight these have at Tribunal?

Surprise Surprise my last employer has written to me stalling the appeal decision to add another 3 weeks! They will have had 6 weeks to make a decision against my appeal! Any thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do they include this part:

 

i had the appeal meeting yesterday whereby i was told that i could have the misconduct charge quashed in return for me not moving forward with legal proceedings, however if i decided to move forward with a tribunal case then the misconduct wrap would still stand!

Link to post
Share on other sites

barty

I've read your pm of the 'minutes'

 

I asssume that their notes are a slightly cleaned up, in their favour, version of the meeting?

 

Did you mention at the meeting that you felt that the real reason you were dismissed was your unwillingness to take part in the fraud?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they've asked you to sign a copy of their 'minutes' and return it to them, don't.

 

You have been sufficiently patient.

 

Send this to the person who held the Appeal meeting:

 

Your address

Date

 

Dear Sir,

 

I received on (date) your abridged notes relating to the Appeal meeting held on 27th July 2009.

I notice that there are several omissions.

In particular there is no reference to my stating that I felt that the real reason for my my dismissal was my refusal to participate in the fraud taking place within the Company that I had brought to the attention of ...(Name of person you informed).

 

I informed (Name) *****

 

I understand that you also wish to delay making a decision for a further three weeks.

In the circumstances, I do not find this reasonable.

 

If I do not receive your decision by Friday 28th August I will be compelled to persue further action.

 

Yours etc.

 

Where it shows ***** explicitly describe the fraud in as much detail as possible.

 

Amend where appropriate.

Make two copies, keep one for yourself and send the other by recorded/special delivery.

 

They will be aware that even though they have carefully omitted the reference to the fraud this letter effectively brings it out into the open as you can use it at a tribunal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best thing to do is request copy of all notes made at these meetings. Employment law according to the Citizens Advice says " If an employer has excepted poor standars in work previously then it is classed as unfair dismissal"

 

If no previous warning has been given then again it is unfair. They seem eager to stay out of a tribunal & if you win the tribunal can request the charge to be removed.

 

Good Luck. Power to the People

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Date now set for hearing - March 2010! My employer have denied most of my points raised and stated that I have received adequate training to complete my previous role..... which I disagree of course! It seems at this stage it will be my word against theirs so now I will prepare and sit tight until March.

I welcome any suggestions.

Happy Christmas :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...