Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yup, for goodness sake she needs to stop paying right now, DCA's are powerless, as .  Is it showing on their credit file? Best to use Check my file. All of the above advice is excellent, definitely SAR the loan company as soon as possible.
    • Hi all, I am wandering if this is appealable. It has already been through a challenge on the Islington website and the it was rejected. Basically there was a suspended bay sign on a post on Gee st which was obscured by a Pizza van. The suspension was for 3 bays outside 47 Gee st. I parked outside/between 47 & 55 Gee st. I paid via the phone system using a sign a few meters away from my car. When I got back to the car there was a PCN stuck to the windscreen which I had to dry out before I could read it due to rain getting into the plastic sticky holder.  I then appealed using the Islington website which was then rejected the next day. I have attached a pdf of images that I took and also which the parking officer took. There are two spaces in front of the van, one of which had a generator on it the other was a disabled space. I would count those as 3 bays? In the first image circled in red is the parking sign I read. In the 2nd image is the suspension notice obscured by the van. I would have had to stand in the middle of the road to read this, in fact that's where I was standing when I took the photo. I have pasted the appeal and rejection below. Many thanks for looking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This is my appeal statement: As you can see from the image attached (image 1) I actually paid £18.50 to park my car in Gee st. I parked the car at what I thought was outside 55 Gee st as seen in image 2 attached. When I read the PCN issued it stated there was a parking suspension. There was no suspension notice on the sign that I used to call the payment service outside number 55 Gee st. I looked for a suspension notice and eventually found one which was obscured by a large van and generator parked outside 47 Gee st. As seen in images 3 and 4 attached. I am guessing the parking suspension was to allow the Van to park and sell Pizza during the Clerkenwell design week. I was not obstructing the use or parking of the van, in fact the van was obstructing the suspension notice which meant I could not read or see it without prior knowledge it was there. I would have had to stand in the road to see it endangering myself as I had to to take images to illustrate the hidden notice. As there was no intention to avoid a parking charge and the fact the sign was not easily visible I would hope this challenge can be accepted. Many thanks.   This is the text from the rejection: Thank you for contacting us about the above Penalty Charge Notice (PCN). The PCN was issued because the vehicle was parked in a suspended bay or space. I note from your correspondence that there was no suspension notice on the sign that you used to call the payment serve outside number 55 Gee Street. I acknowledge your comments, however, your vehicle was parked in a bay which had been suspended. The regulations require the suspension warning to be clearly visible. It is a large bright yellow sign and is erected by the parking bay on the nearest parking plate to the area that is to be suspended. Parking is then not permitted in the bay for any reason or period of time, however brief. The signs relating to this suspension were sited in accordance with the regulations. Upon reviewing the Civil Enforcement Officer's (CEO's) images and notes, I am satisfied that sufficient signage was in place and that it meets statutory requirements. Whilst I note that the signage may have been obstructed by a large van and generator at the time, please note, it is the responsibility of the motorist to locate and check the time plate each time they park. This will ensure that any changes to the status of the bay are noted. I acknowledge that your vehicle possessed a RingGo session at the time, however, this does not authorize parking within a suspended bay. Suspension restrictions are established to facilitate specific activities like filming or construction, therefore, we anticipate the vehicle owner to relocate the vehicle from the suspended area until the specified date and time when the suspension concludes. Leaving a vehicle unattended for any period of time within a suspended bay, effectively renders the vehicle parked in contravention and a Civil Enforcement Officer (CEO) may issue a PCN. Finally, the vehicle was left parked approximately 5 metres away from the closest time plate notice. It is the responsibility of the driver to ensure they park in a suitable parking place and check all signs and road markings prior to leaving their vehicle parked in contravention. It remains the driver's responsibility to ensure that the vehicle is parked legally at all times. With that being said, I would have to inform you, your appeal has been rejected at this stage. Please see the below images as taken by the CEO whilst issuing the PCN: You should now choose one of the following options: Pay the penalty charge. We will accept the discounted amount of £65.00 in settlement of this matter, provided it is received by 10 June 2024. After that date, the full penalty charge of £130.00 will be payable. Or Wait for a Notice to Owner (NtO) to be issued to the registered keeper of the vehicle, who is legally responsible for paying the penalty charge. Any further correspondence received prior to the NtO being issued may not be responded to. The NtO gives the recipient the right to make formal representations against the penalty charge. If we reject those representations, there will be the right of appeal to the Environment and Traffic Adjudicator.   Gee st pdf.pdf
    • Well done.   Please let us know how it goes or come back with any questions. HB
    • Incorrect as the debt will have been legally assigned to the DCA and they are therefore now the legal creditor. Read up on debt assignment.   Andy
    • Thanks Man in the Middle and everyone it's greatly appreciated form was filled in online yesterday now just have to wait and see
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Urgent Help - baliff and clamp - unpaid parking fine.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Right, woke up this morning to find a notice on the door mat to say the car had been clamped due to an unpaid parking fine. Rang the number on the notice to ask whats going on, to be told it relates to a parking ticket issued on 23/9/08, and that I have been written to about it, both by Newlyn and council. Having moved house twice since last september, and honestly not receiving anything to do with said parking fine, what can I do? According to the baliff, its been to court and Newlyn have written, but I honestly have not received anything. The car is parked on a private drive, and belongs to finance company, but mr baliff says that doesn't matter, as he's working for 'the courts' he can do as he pleases and take it anyway.

I offered to pay in installments, both me and gf on benefit, with baby on way in august and 3 other kids, but he wouldn't hear of it, had to be the whole £450.

So, now I've got the family transport stuck outside with a clamp on, a fine that I've heard nothing about until now and no idea what to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick one, notice thru the door has the wrong name on it, 1st 5 letters of surname are the same, but last bit is wrong, says ridge, not dice. They've clamped my car and its the name they've put on the clamping notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On line search to check if a Bailiff is Certificated is the baillif certifacated

 

If you do not know anything about this PCN then it is VERY LIKELY that this PCN and all styatutory notices had been sent to a previous address or been wrongly addressed.

 

In the first instance you need to contact the Traffic Enforcement Centre on 08457 045 007 for details of the Warrant of Execution and confirmation of the address of the Warrant. HOWEVER....you will need the PCN number. This will start with 2 letters followed by 8 numbers.

 

If you did not receive the PCN or Notice to owner then you will need to file an Out of Time late Statutory Declaration. The Traffic Enforcement centre will provide a copy to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, woke up this morning to find a notice on the door mat to say the car had been clamped due to an unpaid parking fine. Rang the number on the notice to ask whats going on, to be told it relates to a parking ticket issued on 23/9/08, and that I have been written to about it, both by Newlyn and council. Having moved house twice since last september, and honestly not receiving anything to do with said parking fine, what can I do? According to the baliff, its been to court and Newlyn have written, but I honestly have not received anything. The car is parked on a private drive, and belongs to finance company, but mr baliff says that doesn't matter, as he's working for 'the courts' he can do as he pleases and take it anyway.

I offered to pay in installments, both me and gf on benefit, with baby on way in august and 3 other kids, but he wouldn't hear of it, had to be the whole £450.

So, now I've got the family transport stuck outside with a clamp on, a fine that I've heard nothing about until now and no idea what to do.

.

 

This is VERY SIMPLE.

 

You need to file an Out of Time late Stautory declaration with the Traffic Enforcement Centre.

You will need to IMMEDIATELY telephone TEc on 08457 045 007 and they will e-mail the form to you. You will need the PCN number to hand.

 

PS: The telephone line gets VERY busy....

 

MOST bailiff's will REMOVE the clamp once advised of the Out of Time.

 

I would suggest contacting the bailiff straight away to ask him for the address on the Warrant. If this does show you new address, then please do ask TEC to confirm where the ORIGINAL notices had been sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, have spoken to boro council, and newlyn, before I read the replies. All notices and letters were sent to a previous address, where I left in April 08. The Address the baliff gave me was the address the letters had been sent to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have also tried the online search, either Its not working or they not on there. Tried the 2 balliff's names I've got, and Newlyn, and juist comes back as nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ministry of Justice Public Register of Bailiffs on 020 3334 6355

 

phone to confirm that they are not bailiffs

 

then phone the council and inform them that MR XXXX and MR xxxx who clamped your car are not certificated bailiffs

 

Certificated bailiffs — enforce a variety of debts on behalf of organisations such as local authorities. They can seize and sell your goods to cover the amount of the debt you owe. They also hold a certificate, which enables them, and them alone, to levy distress for rent, road traffic debts, council tax and non-domestic rates.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you P M the bailiffs names please and the area you live in

if you don't want to then thats OK i understand some people wont want to give out the info

 

On line search to check if a Bailiff is Certificated this was only posted on 23/7/09 and I would like to try and keep a database of these name so that i can see how many times there names come up and if bailiff firm still employ after the council in voled are aware that they are not bailiffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to Tomtubby's invaluable help, the clamp is now off and the balliff's have left. Forms have been faxed and posted to the TEC, and what started out as a nightmare this morning has now been made a lot better, thanks to Tomtubby.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to Tomtubby's invaluable help, the clamp is now off and the balliff's have left. Forms have been faxed and posted to the TEC, and what started out as a nightmare this morning has now been made a lot better, thanks to Tomtubby.

 

I am glad that I could be of help and that commonsense has prevailed in that the bailiff has now removed the clamp.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incompetence is allowed - if you owed someone for something, and the clamping itself is legitimate, then you might complain about it's accuracy of name - but not the fact that you are the debtor otherwise identified.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to drag this back up again, something been bugging me. After they clamped the car, a notice was stuck to the side window stating the obvious, that the car had been clamped, and that any damage caused to the clamp or any attempt to remove it would be illegal (or words to that effect). I was under the impression that damage to it was not allowed, but there was nothing to stop me removing it as long as I didnt damage it? Or could I have taken the grinder to it? :-) Also, this may be a stupid question, but are there any rules etc regarding how said clamp is attached to a vehicle? As in should it be just to the wheel, or is it ok for the chain to be wrapped around the driveshaft and wishbone?

Finally, their van had 2 cameras attached to the outside, pointing at either side kerb, which turned out to be Anpr cameras. Any problems with that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recieved 3 letters today from Newlyn, regarding outstanding parking fines. Now, according to Newlyn, who clamped my car on Tuesday, these letters had been sent to me previously. Car was clamped on 28th, letters are dated 29th. Thanks to Tomtubby's help, 3 x stat decs were filed on tuesday so what do I do about these letters, as they're headed as FINAL NOTICE, BALLIFF REMOVAL, and not to ignore them. The charges are as follows, £310.33, £276.88 and £558.73. Now on tuesday, I was told the total they were collecting was £692, now its over £1k. It just seems strange that they were told, and they confirmed, that letters had been sent to an old address hence stat dec, now these 'new' letters turn up, am I likely to be graced with a return visit from them and my car clamped again, as they seem to be threatening. What do I do? Do I need to contact them to tell them again that stat dec has been filed? Or is it safe to ignore them and wait to hear from Tec/council?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recieved 3 letters today from Newlyn, regarding outstanding parking fines. Now, according to Newlyn, who clamped my car on Tuesday, these letters had been sent to me previously. Car was clamped on 28th, letters are dated 29th. Thanks to Tomtubby's help, 3 x stat decs were filed on tuesday so what do I do about these letters, as they're headed as FINAL NOTICE, BALLIFF REMOVAL, and not to ignore them. The charges are as follows, £310.33, £276.88 and £558.73. Now on tuesday, I was told the total they were collecting was £692, now its over £1k. It just seems strange that they were told, and they confirmed, that letters had been sent to an old address hence stat dec, now these 'new' letters turn up, am I likely to be graced with a return visit from them and my car clamped again, as they seem to be threatening. What do I do? Do I need to contact them to tell them again that stat dec has been filed? Or is it safe to ignore them and wait to hear from Tec/council?

 

 

The Traffic Enforcment Centre would have already advised the local authority that Out of times had been received and they in turn would have advised Newlyn.

 

If not.....they would have already been back to take the car!!

 

To be certain though you should ring TEC on 98457 045 007 for confirmation.

 

 

PS: Write to Newlyn for a full and detailed freakdown of the fees and charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a look at the Notice of Seizure they gave me for one of the tickets. The breakdown on it is Penalty - £110.00 and balliff fees inc vat £363.23 total £473.23. Notice i received today with same ref number, total has jumped to £558.73.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have filed Ot of Time stat Decs and therefore you will need to await the outcome and the cases are on hold.

 

In the meantime you now have the opportunity to write to the bailiff co to request a copy of the screen shot of your account as you have serious concerns as to the level of charges applied to your account.

 

You need to mark your letter....SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would just like to say make sure you get the FULL screen shot, I asked chandlers for this 5 tmes and all I got sent twice was a break down of charges. It wasnt until I got the defence from the bailiff that I saw her screen shot was a lot more detailed than mine, had notes of the conversations we aledgedly had on it !! Good Luck :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Right, last year i managed to get 4 council pcn's over a 3 month period. Totally forgot about them until woke up 1 morning to find car clamped and balliffs outside. After making stat dec now have until 3rd september to pay. Before I go ahead and just pay up, can I request to see any evidence, photo's etc relating to the tickets? Its Ipswich Borough Council if thats any help, have seen them taking photo's when issuing tickets so I assume there's photo's to go with my tickets.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I appealed 3 of the 4 tickets, 2 of parked on single yellow line, 1 of failing to display ticket. The fail to display appeal was accepted and penalty overturned, and 1 of the single yellows overturned. I'd queried the fact that the single yellow line looked a bit iffy and that there was no signage in the vicinity, which they accepted and agreed that the signage is missing from that area. Bearing in mind that the ticket was recieved last year, and other people may have been ticketed for same 'offence', and the situation with sign still hasn't been remedied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably the lack of repair/signage is a result of the parking appeals team being seperate from the traffic/highways maintenance team (whatever they're called). It's unlikely they routinely swap information.

 

If you feel public spirited, phone them or write to them directly at the council address and request they undertake repairs. If not, it will likely stay that way until someone else gets on their case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...