Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

pregnant at work- dilema


farmlama
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4572 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

well wait to see what the formal letter offers.

and if you want to go back, speak to your area manager. and see what he says about your issues..

plus you will have everything in letter and know exactly where you stand.

me personally would not just quit at least until i got a full picture of facts and offer etc..

then make an informed decision

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have never just quit a job before, but at that moment in time i wasnt really thinking properly, i had finished at 3 and phoned my mum and burst into tears as soon as she answer and i realised how horrible i was finding it and just wanted out straight away if you get me

Link to post
Share on other sites

well like you said that "problem" person has gone.

maybe seeing what on offer in the letter is a start for you to "think clearly".

my concern if i quit my job now would be is there another to replace it????

 

also i been to an industrial tribunal with my ex..

and too be honest the experience we had was quite relaxed and we never felt any pressure,

just stated the case as honest and to the best of our ability.

*was cause she was unfairly sacked*

Also the people hearing the case where really proffessional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yer that is my concern, i have been scouring the job centre, i had 2 interviews today and both of them said i would have been the perfect candidate for the job if it wasnt for the restrictions on some of the hours i can work due to having the girls and childcare so im a bit worried i suppose that i wont be able to find another job and gunna have to struggle along on income support which is a bit of a hit on my confidence too as ive always had pride that i work hard for what i get

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're confident that the company is truely remorseful for what has happened, and you're confiden that you both can move on, then I'd say take the reinstatement.

The problem here is that if you refuse their offer, you face a real uphill battle to prove that all trust and confidence was destroyed.

Let's hope that they're a decent company who value you and understand that 'doing the right thing' is the best policy (flippin' few & far between!), rather than a very canny, HR savvy outfit who know a valid ET claim when they see one and are inviting you back so they can slowly shaft you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You know? I was going to reply.

Then you put 'lol' at the end of your post.

Suddenly, any sympathy I might have had for you was lost.

lol.

 

I think you will find that the 'lol' is in reference to it being an 'essay', not in reference to the subject.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you will find that the 'lol' is in reference to it being an 'essay', not in reference to the subject.

It's still not acceptable, Conniff. You site team need to police these things, or CAG will end up like facebook.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes the lol was reference to the essay and me trying to keep upbeat in a rubbish situation, not to the situation itself as it has been far from a laughing matter. im still waiting for the letter but will keep you updated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

sorry this a long confusing story and very personal too so i apologise if i am too open but i think i have to include certain aspects to give the full story.

 

i was working for a pub/restaurant chain and was management, i left in june this year after 11 1/2 months service because i was treated badly by the company. when i left i admit i walked out on shift because i felt there had been a breakdown of trust and confidence due to their treatment of me, i had been living on site but moved back home a couple of weeks before i quit and the only possetion of mine that was left there was a sofa bed.

 

i had a grievance meeting a couple of weeks later and my area manager apologised and admitted that i had been unfairly treated and we discussed that i may be offered a new position or my old position back due to the fact that a new general manager was due to start at the site i had been working.

 

this is the personal bit, but relevant to this. the start of july i was sexualy assaulted (the police are dealing with this and he has been charged etc) it was a guy i had been 'seeing' who used to work at the pub but left a couple of months before i did. while the grievance was still being decided as in i may be offered my position back, this guy was re-employed at the premises.

 

i believe that when he re-applied he should have been asked to disclose any convictions/bail etc (bearing in mind he wasnt allowed to contact me and the company may have been offering me my job back there meaning it would be putting me in a situation where it would be impossible for me to return) also this making it extremely difficult for me to return to collect my sofa, also a few of the staff knew my situation including the supervisor.

 

i had arranged a couple of times for a friend of a friend to collect the sofa for me as he had a van but he turned out to be unreliable and kept cancelling. i had also spoken to the supervisor who is now acting general manager so he is aware that i would want my sofa back but had the issue of not being able to collect it myself due to my attacker working there.

 

my sister moved house today and had a van and i asked her if her husband would be able to pick it up for me and he said yes so i phoned the pub and asked if he would be able to collect it after closing as then it wouldnt disrupt service and the acting general manager (the same one who knows my situation and also was aware i wanted to be able to collect my sofa) told me it had gone and he didnt know where.

 

so i suppose my question would be what action can i take, i know it has been 4 months but as they were aware that i wanted it, they didnt have my permission to dispose of it and they employed my rapist making it near impossible to collect it. do i send a letter before action and go through small claims court or would it be something to take to ET?

 

thank you for reading and for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the value is about £300 and i spoke with the acting general manager 3 weeks ago about it and he assured me it was still there then, so they couldnt assume i no longer wanted it, and surely if they were to dispose of it in anyway i would have to be contacted before hand to ask my permission?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This would come under the 'Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977'

 

The landlord is under a legal obligation to take care of tenant's possessions and in Tort becomes an involuntary bailee with a duty to act reasonably in regard to the goods left on the premises. The law relating to uncollected consumer goods is covered by the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977

 

The Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 allows a landlord to sell goods left in a property if reasonable efforts to trace the tenant or owner of the goods fail. The Act further states that if the tenant is traced, the landlord must serve notice stating its intention to dispose of the items, how to arrange collection, and that disposal of the items will not begin until the notice has expired.

 

A suggested procedure for legally disposing of uncollected tenant's goods:

• Make every effort to trace the tenant/s to their new address or contact them through any forwarding address you may have.

 

•If you are owed monies you must keep goods for 3 months before disposing of them. If you are not owed money a reasonable period, typically 28 days is acceptable before selling the goods.

 

• Write to the tenant by registered post or recorded delivery with a legal notice. This will notify them that the goods are available for collection and that they will be kept for up to three months.

 

• Make sure your notice clearly identifies you as the landlord and gives full contact details for yourself as landlord and include complete contact details.

 

• If the goods remain unclaimed after 3 months you can sell them to a buyer, who will receive good title to them. The original owner will therefore lose all rights to the goods.

 

• Once you have covered your expenses in this process and any rent arrears etc, any proceeds left over will belong to the original owner - your tenant, if they should turn up and claim within six years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

when i asked if i could collect it i was told that he didnt know where it was anymore or who has taken it, do i contact the police over theft? or do i just send letter before action and go to small claims court. i know i shouldnt have left it for so long but i have had bigger things to deal with

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...