Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've not seen it personally but I think that's the letter Dad has had from Overdales. I'll see it tomorrow. It states balance: zero
    • Agreed as you clearly have little faith in your star runners, mind you - I have less - conditional on the welcher clause I defined being part, and that we are talking about the three defined candidates: Tice Farage and Anderson - not anyone anywhere as reform might (outside chance) get someone decent to run somewhere. If any of the three dont run - they count as a loss.   welcher clause. "If either of us loses and doesn't pay - we agree the site admin will change the welchers avatar permanently to a cows ass - specific cows ass avatar chosen by the winner - with veto by site on any too offensive - requiring another to be chosen  (or of course, DP likely allows you can delete your account and all your worthless posts to cheapskate chicken out and we'll just laugh) "
    • This is the full details, note they have made an error (1) in that paragraph 5 stated 14 days before hearing not 7. Surely a company of their size would proof read and shouldn't make basic errors like that 1) The Claimant respectfully applies for an extension of time to comply with paragraph 5 of the Order of Deputy District Judge XXX dated XX March 2024 i.e. the evidence upon which the parties intend to rely shall be filed and served not later than 7-days before the hearing. 2) The Claimant seeks a short extension of time allow them to further and properly investigate data provided to them by Royal Mail which is of importance to the proceedings and determination of the Claim. 3) The Claimant and Royal Mail have an information sharing agreement. Under the agreement, Royal Mail has provided data to the Claimant in respect of the matters forming the basis of these proceedings. The Claimant requires more time to consider this data and reconcile it against their own records. The Claimant may need to seek clarification and assurances from Royal Mail before they can be confident the data is correct and relevant to the proceedings i.e. available to be submitted as evidence. 4) The Claimant's witness is currently out of the office on annual leave and this was not relayed to DWF Law until after the event which has caused a further unfortunate delay. 5) The Court has directed parties to file and serve any evidence upon which they intend to rely not later than 14- days before the hearing i.e. by 4pm on 6 June 2024. Regrettably, the Claimant will have insufficient time to finalise their witness evidence and supporting exhibits as directed. We therefore respectfully apply to extend the time for filing/serving evidence so that the evidence upon which the parties intend to rely by filed and served not later than 7-days before the hearing i.e. by 4pm on 13 June 2024. 6) This application is a pre-emptive one for an extension of time made prior to the expiry of the deadline. In considering the application, the Court is required to exercise its broad case management powers and consider the overriding objective. 7) In circumstances where applications are made in time, the Court should be reticent to refuse reasonable applications for extensions of time which neither imperil hearing dates nor disrupt proceedings, pursuant to Hallam Estates v Baker [2014] EWCA Civ 661. 😎 It is respectfully submitted that the application is made pursuant to the provisions of CPR 3.1(2)(a) and in accordance with the overriding objective to ensure the parties are on an equal footing when presenting their cases to the Court. The requested extension of time does not put the hearing at risk and granting the Application will not be disruptive to the proceedings.   They have asked for extension Because 2) The Claimant requires additional time to consider and reconcile data received from Royal Mail which is relevant to these proceedings against their own data and records in order to submit detailed evidence in support of this Claim.
    • i was merely pointing out if the OP did put in an N244 it required a bundle. as for what they need to do now.... it might be an idea to post a link to your thread then the OP can read it and understand where your guidance is coming from and the ongoing process he will have to follow... dx
    • The notes entered into circulation yesterday and are proving popular with collectors, who will be hoping to snap up examples with low serial numbers.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debt Help?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5424 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I am new to this site so I hope I placed this in the correct section.

 

I have been getting harrassed for some time not by O2 about a contract phone I apparrently had with them, needless to say that they have gotten a DCA involved, I have contacted both companies regarding this and telling them I don't have a clue about this phone, I have writen Letters about it and stating that I feel that my details have been used without my knowing and that I am not willing to pay the ammount they say I owe.

 

The DCA have mentioned that some money had been paid towards this "Debt", but at the time I started recieving the DCA letters I was in Debt with Capital One at the time and the letters were bassicly the same so I assumed they were from the Capital One Debt.

 

The DCA have contacted me more recently about it saying that if I can proove I didn't have this contract then they will drop it..... "If I can proove I didn't have it"??? how am I spose to do this?

I have contacted O2 and requested that they send me some kind of copy of the contract or something so that I can proove that I didn't have this, they took some details and told me thier fraud team will be in contact within 48hrs.

a month later no word from the Fraud team, I contact them again and was told that I have to pay it cos the details matched those that were used in the initial contract, which stands to reasonif someone was using my details.

 

I had nto gone to see anyone about fraud as I don't know what to do about it, I don't know who to see or speak too.

 

Any help or advise regarding this would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome,

 

I'll move this thread to the Telecoms Forum, you'll get help in there.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DCA have contacted me more recently about it saying that if I can proove I didn't have this contract then they will drop it.....

 

That is a typical DCA nonsense. It is they who have to prove the contract not you. You cannot prove a negative.

 

My advice to you is

 

a) stop phoning anybody except O2 fraud - get everything in writing. Send you letters recorded delivery.

 

b) Do not communicate with the DCA in anyway particularly by phone. If they phone you refuse their security questions and they cannot continue. If they try to do so put the phone down. Sounds rude but you should not give your security details to anyone over the phone unless it is you have initiated the call. It is a favourite trick of indentity thieves to impersonate a DCA.

 

c) communicate only with O2 and then only in writing. Keep all correspondence. One exception - if O2 fraud communicate with you it is sensible as a matter of urgency to use the phone.

 

 

You have done the right thing to request a copy of the contract if it is in writing. If it was a phone contract they must send you the recording - if there is no recording there is no contract. You believe that the contract they say they have is a fraud - make them prove it. It is not enough for them to say that the contract must be yours simply because it has the right details. As you say it would have wouldn't it. You must offer to help their fraud department by actually seeing the paper or hearing the phone contract. It is very likely that as this is a fraud there is something in a paper contract that proves it and a phone contract will not have your voice. One wonders how good their fraud dept. is if this is the outcome of their investigation. Have you had any direct communication from the fraud department. If you have not I suspect it was never passed to them for investigation.

 

 

When you have sorted O2 you can go back to the DCA for the money they say was paid into the fraudulent account or have it applied to the CAP1 account.

 

You should be seriously worried about indentity theft. For all you know there may be bank accounts and credit cards out there in your name running up thousands of pounds in debt. Immediately (this moment!) go online to Experian and request a report online (costs £2) and check. O2 or the DCA may have already put a default marker on a CRA file.

 

 

Keep us informed.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Funnily enough i did not speak to anyone in the fraud Dept now u mention it

 

also the Cap1 Debt has been paid up and is sorted since about a year ago now.

 

I will write a letter to O2 AGAIN stating that I request that they provide relevant information and such regarding this matter.

 

any ideas on what I should write? me being me I am not good at this sort of thing

 

thanks also :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are doing this the wrong way round!

 

Get a copy of your Credit Report. Have you been defaulted? If you this will bear the required information to go to O2 and (a) Ask them to prove the contract was taken out by you (b) Remove the adverse data on your file immediately (or when they prove that their information can be proved to be accirate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you requested a copy of your credit report yet! ?

 

If you have not been defaulted by O2 or the DCA you will find nothing about this disputed account on your report. They do not report acccounts until there is a default. or a poor payment record.

 

The importance is that there could be identity theft here and you must check this - not the O2 account but other accounts in your name opened by a fraudster.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes with the credit report, I did that last year at some point, it did say it was defaulted

 

i will see about getting another one done though to make sure there is nothing else on there

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cannot 'multiple default' you for the same debt, but armed with the latest info, you can go back to the network armed with this information and require them to explain in detail what the default was, and all the information concernng it. If they cannot, you need to insist that they remove it immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

This letter might help..... basically asking them to prove it....

I've just used it for a debt I don't recognise. (thanks to this wonderful site!!! :grin:)

 

Dear Sir

ref: XXXXXX

 

You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself.

 

I would point out that I have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to XXXXXXXX (company name)

I am familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance, which states that it is unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my liability for the debt in question.

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

 

Yours truly,

Hopefully this should make them check their facts.

 

there is also a template on here somewhere for a cease & desist letter telling them to contact you in writing only, I'll see if I can find it.

 

I would also co operate fully with O2 as suggested in this thread.

 

Maybe a subject access request would clear some things up too?

 

I'm new to this site too, but have found it to be full of absolutely amazing individuals, who offer great advice and support at a time when you feel like you're alone in the world fighting the big guns...

 

CAG - empowering the people!!!

:D

Keep checking back and I'm sure that someone with a lot more knowledge & experience than me will be able to advise you further, and good luck!

 

regards

hunni:-)

 

Please note I have NO legal training.... My opinions are my own, based on knowledge gained through life in general, and this wonderful site, and are merely suggestions.... what you do is up to you.:grin:

My fight so far:

 

hunni2006 V Halifax Bank: Charges £963.11 refunded nov 2006:D

Cabot financial V hunni2006: defending court summons, ongoing... July 09 :-x:-x:-x don't even get me started about them....grrr still battling

 

hunni2006 V Capital One: SA request & CCA issued, ongoing.. July 09 OC 'checking the archives...' Sept 09, no agreement, files closed!:D

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< please feel free to tip my scales if I've been helpful!

:DLearning more, every day.....

 

I have No legal training, any opinions and advice posted are entirely my own opinion, and based on life experiences and knowledge gained on this great site. Ultimately, what you do is up to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info guys, and hunni that leter is very informative and I shall start working on one of them for myself now

hope it helps.:-)

 

still looking for that other letter... I've read so many lately....:rolleyes:

My fight so far:

 

hunni2006 V Halifax Bank: Charges £963.11 refunded nov 2006:D

Cabot financial V hunni2006: defending court summons, ongoing... July 09 :-x:-x:-x don't even get me started about them....grrr still battling

 

hunni2006 V Capital One: SA request & CCA issued, ongoing.. July 09 OC 'checking the archives...' Sept 09, no agreement, files closed!:D

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< please feel free to tip my scales if I've been helpful!

:DLearning more, every day.....

 

I have No legal training, any opinions and advice posted are entirely my own opinion, and based on life experiences and knowledge gained on this great site. Ultimately, what you do is up to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
hope it helps.:-)

 

still looking for that other letter... I've read so many lately....:rolleyes:

There is a template letter in parking and traffic forums that should do the job. Feel free to butcher it as you see fit.

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Re: Your letter dated [dd/mmmm/yyyy] Reference[#]

 

I refer to previous correspondence.

 

I do not feel that you are acting reasonably in this matter.

 

I have asked you to provide evidence to substantiate your claim against me and you have not done so. I feel that I have done all that I can to assist you. Unless you provide evidence to substantiate your claim against me I shall be unable to help you further in this matter.

 

This alleged debt therefore remains disputed by me. Save for supplying the evidence referred to above I must ask you to cease and desist correspondence with me unless it is to offer a resolution or close this matter.

 

Other than as described above, any further correspondence from you or any other party in relation to this matter may result in a complaint to the authorities under the Protection From Harassment Act 1997.

 

Yours faithfully

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes - that'll do it. Harassment? Here we go again. Show me a court that supports the sending 10-16 letters n pursuit of a debt (whether real or imagined) is criminal 'harassment'.

 

It is this nonsense that fools people into believing they have some special powers to use in the event of recieving a few nastly letters, when in fact - it is perfeclty lawful.

 

I bet they won't stop laughing for WEEKS!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Show me a court that supports the sending 10-16 letters n pursuit of a debt (whether real or imagined) is criminal 'harassment'.

 

It is this nonsense that fools people into believing they have some special powers to use in the event of recieving a few nastly letters, when in fact - it is perfeclty lawful.

 

 

Criminal harassment it is not, unlawful harassment contrary to the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 it is.

 

Ferguson v British Gas Trading Ltd 21 January 2009

The advice I give in relation to benefits should be viewed as general advice and not specific to your individual claim circumstances. I cannot give specific advice on your claim as I cannot access the claim.

 

If you find the advice useful please click on my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me see - so in order to PROVE that this was unlawful harassment, the Gas customer had to take them to court, win then find the money for a possible appeal?

 

Very democratic. I've suffered long and hard at the hands of Scottish Gas, and had no help whatsoever from Energywatch who stood round like headless chickens, clucking quietly, as the onslaught of calls from BG's debt collectors kicked up a notce.

 

Whilst this Appeal does have use - it is very limited, as quoting it will not cause BG to stop their 'lawful' debt collection proceedures. And since each case will be based on its own particular merits, the next challenge could just as easily go the other way.

 

In my own case, I got my MP involved, which made them quit harassing and start negotiationg. I got mt supposed 'debt' wiped, and my current supply nill waived. I then switched away to a differnet firm.

 

So, a resulkt - and I didn;t go near a court. In the absence of a pot of money to seek solace in the courts, it is always best to exhaust the free options before the paid for ones are required, because for many of us, that isn't an optionLet me see - so in order to PROVE that this was unlawful harassment, the Gas customer had to take them to court, win then find the money for a possible appeal?

 

Very democratic. I've suffered long and hard at the hands of Scottish Gas, and had no help whatsoever from Energywatch who stood round like headless chickens, clucking quietly, as the onslaught of calls from BG's debt collectors kicked up a note.

 

Whilst this Appeal does have use - it is very limited, as quoting it will not cause BG to stop their 'lawful' debt collection procedures. And since each case will be based on its own particular merits, the next challenge could just as easily go the other way.

 

In my own case, I got my MP involved, which made them quit harassing and start negotiating. I got mt supposed 'debt' wiped, and my current supply bill waived. I then switched away to a different firm.

 

So, a result - and I didn't go near a court. In the absence of a pot of money to seek solace in the courts, it is always best to exhaust the free options before the paid for ones are required, because for many of us, that isn't an option.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol, they keep on calling the damn house phone!! I answered it and told them to stop calling cos it ****ing not only myself by my mum off also!, they asked if I could answer security questions to which I now answer NO.

 

They say I dont resond to the letters they have sent me!!! They havent sent any letters in a LOOONG time intead they constantly bombard the phone line, most of the time I not even been in the house!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

People I would like to thank all those who have provided me with help, it seems the situation has been resolved, I recieved a letter through the post this morning saying

 

"Having recieved your comments, we can now advise you that we have closed your account in our files and you will receive no further communicationfrom ourselves in this matter"

 

I was wondering, is there anyway I can be re-embersed for the money i payed to it by mistake?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm - if they have money of yours that they were not entitled to, you should ask for it back. However, it it was you simply paying off a debt and they've now agreed to wipe it, I think the chances of them payinganything back would be very slim....

Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunatly I payed money on it by mistake, like I said in an earlier post, I was in debt with Capitol One at the time and the letters were the exact same looking so I thought it was Capitol One.

 

but if I must make do I am glad that nightmare has FINALLY ended

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...