Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. Anyway I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

johanblog v arrow global


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5155 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

am also having problems with Arrow Global they sent me a letter saying i owes them a debt assigned by Orange for £1149.45, and if it as not paid they would issue a statutory demand.

 

i sent them a letter Subject Access Request letter and saying that i disputed owing this money and enclosed a cheque for £10.00.

 

They replied to me today saying that the agreement was not covered by the Consumer Credit act1974 so they were not obliged to provide copy documentation and if they did not hear from me in the next seven days they would continue with the action.

 

Can someone tell me where i go next??

Link to post
Share on other sites

am also having problems with Arrow Global they sent me a letter saying i owes them a debt assigned by Orange for £1149.45, and if it as not paid they would issue a statutory demand.

 

i sent them a letter Subject Access Request letter and saying that i disputed owing this money and enclosed a cheque for £10.00.

 

They replied to me today saying that the agreement was not covered by the Consumer Credit act1974 so they were not obliged to provide copy documentation and if they did not hear from me in the next seven days they would continue with the action.

 

Can someone tell me where i go next??

 

be an idea to start ur own thread johan u will get far better responses. u need to state wot the debt is for loan/cred card etc, when it was taken out and for how much, dont use exact figs or dates just roughly. state wot u have dun up to now and wot responses u have had then people will be able to help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bill is for a mobile phone bill taken out abount 2003 most of the charges are made up of text messages sent to my phone even though i kept contacting Orange to have thm stopped, i have asked for the full details of what the charges are for and i have still not received a itemised bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

This thread might get more response in the Telecoms Forum, I'll move it there.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

A SAR is made under the Data Protection legislation and anybody keeping data on you is obliged to supply that data on your request.This has nothing to do with the CCA.

 

It is true that mobile phone accounts are not regulated under the CCA which regulates money and not services. But they are completely wrong to suggest they do not have to answer a SAR because of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can we have some more details?

 

When was the contract with Orange taken out?

Did you receive and keep a copy of the contract or any written terms and conditions for the account?

Up to what date is the amount that Orange claim?

Have you or Orange terminated the account?

What were the arrangements eg direct debit for paying this account?

What have you paid?

When did you ask Orange to stop text messages?.

Did your contract include a provision to charge for the receipt of text messages. If so was there a provision in the contract for you to refuse text messages?

Have you received a default notice or any letter saying that you owe them and have not paid?

Have you received a letter fron Orange that the account has been assigned to Arrow?

 

I believe you have asked for a itemised account from Orange. Have you received it? Do you dispute it?

 

It seems to me that mobile phone companies are using DCAs as the first method of collecting debt presumably because they get results because people have an unreasoning fear of DCAs. Though DCAs can take you to court they make all sorts of threats which they have no power to enforce. If they try court action this may well be best for you so do not be intimidated by the threat.

 

If you owe Orange there is no CCA to protect you and you will have to pay. However it is important that you agree with Orange what you owe and you should concentrate on this.

 

For the moment forget Arrow - if there is a dispute with Orange and you have not resolved this the account should not have been passed to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the account was opened in 2006 i received a statement from Orange in June 2008 saying that the account balance was £0.00. and that the debt had been written of on the 29th May

 

i had requested detailed copy of the bill that made up the charges they were asking me for.

 

i made many phone calls to Orange to have the text stopped and was always given the same information which was, send stop to the text when i received them and also a phone number to ring to complain about the company sending them, but the text just kept on coming all times of the day and night.

i paid the bill by cheque, there was no direct debit, i told orange to canell the phone because i had just paid a large phone bill,

 

i have not received any itemised bill either from orange or Arrow, just a letter saying there is ample evidence available to prove the existence of a agreement between you and the original creditor, in the circumstances we shall be obliged to receive your proposals for repayment of your debt.

 

The SAR i sent was copied from this site and a cheque for £10.00 was enclosed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get that itemised bill from Orange. Do not ask the DCA the paperwork is rarely passed to them. The request must be in writing and recorded delivery.

 

Did you send the SAR by recorded delivery? Have they cashed your cheque?

 

You do not deny that there was a contract between you and Orange but you say you cancelled it. All you require is the bill up to the date of cancellation. They must prove the amount if they are to take you to court.

 

Did you do all your business by phone? They will say you did not phone whenever it suits them- everything in writing in future and recorded delivery. They lose letters as a matter of course even recorded dlivery letters but you have the proof that they were were sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i never signed a contract with Orange, and yes i did send the SAR recoded deivery to Arrow because it is they who are about to issue the satutory demand, the £10.00 has been cashed,

Please see above the reply they sent about not sending the information i asked for.

All my comunication was done via the phone

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received another leter from Arrow today, saying they are in the process of requesting the documents relevant to my Data Protect Act 1998 request.

 

I did not sign a contract i was on pay as you go and when i rang to add funds to my phone they asked me why i did not go on the monthly charging i agreed and that was that, biggest mistake i have made.

 

They did not put a stamp on the envelope of the latest lettes and i had to pay £1.30 to the post office when i picked the letter up this morning

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a lot we do not know about this situation. A DCA can act in two capacities

 

a) as an agent for the original creditor (OC). They will get a commission on what they recover

 

b) They may own the debt - they buy it for a small amount (perhaps 10%) hoping that you will pay up the whole amount so they make a profit. To do this a proper deed of assignment has to be drawn up and the OC must inform you that the assignment as been made.

 

At some time you will need to know what the situation is but in the absence of a notice of assignment assume it is a).

 

First you must get rid of Arrow. They probably have no more information than the account number, your name, address, phone number and the amount of the alleged debt. Their reply to your Subject Access Request is a nonsense - you are not disputing the contract but the amount of the debt and in particular the charges for premium text messages.

 

So write to them in the following terms changing things where necessary. Recorded delivery !

 

Dear xxxx.

 

I do not acknowledge any debt to you or Orange.

 

Because I was not receiving information from you that could enable me to assess whether a debt ( and particularly its amount) is owed by me I sent you an Subject Access Request on xxxx. An Subject Access Request entitles me to all information that you hold on me including documents, computer records and recordings of telephone conversations. You appear to be treating this Subject Access Request as a request for a copy agreement under the CCA(1974). A Subject Access Request is made under the Data Protection Acts and you are bound to answer it.

 

Please therefore send the required information. Ignoring my rights in this matter will inevitably result in a complaint to the Information Commissioner.

 

It must be clear to you that this alleged debt is disputed with Orange. I would remind you that The OFT considers it unfair practice for a lender to pass on (in whatever capacity) a debt to a DCA which is in dispute. In addition the OFT holds that it is unfair for a DCA to pursue a debt that is in dispute.

 

I would therefore advise you, to avoid a complaint to OFT, to return the debt to Orange.

 

I will not communicate with further on this matter.

 

Yours xxx.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How annoying that Arrow are requesting information from Orange, I would still send the letter in my post iognoring their letter. I bet they are agents for Orange.

 

Text Messaging.

 

I only use mobile phones for emergencies and I have never seen the sense of the text messaging culture so I do not know a great deal about this.

 

It came as a great surprise to me that yu can be charged for receiving a text. This is too easily used by [problematic] and the phone operaters are not exactly going to police this adequately as it would reduce their profits. Its a bit like BT's initial attitude to rogue diallers.

 

It seems that in some way you have to request these messages but it could easily be arranged by a [EDIT] to start sending messages without request. Did you request them?

 

 

However it seems that you can stop receiving requested but unwanted texts by texting back 'STOP' or 'STOP ALL' Did you send such messages?

 

Obviously this 'STOP' techniique is very likely to be ignored by these [problematic]

 

If after sending the stop texts you still receive messages Orange require you to report this and they will sort it. You say you did report it but the nessages continued. Why should Orange stop an income stream?

 

It would seem to me that you have been scammed and you should not have to pay for these texts because Orange have ignored the situation.

 

How on earth can the telecom regulators allow this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

I received the records that Arrow have kept on me but no statments of account and no credit agreement, last week a guy came to the gate and asked for me i was not in, on Friday i received a letter saying they would be coming on Thursday to hand me a SD, i rang them and said the account is in dispute and you still have not provided me with the information requested without they guy on the phone sounded quite young and he said Orange did not send them the statements just an amount of £1100 as being unpaid, and i should write to them again and tell them the account is in dispute.

What should i do now wait for the SD or send a letter recorded delivery so they get it before thursday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt the visit will still go ahead regardless. Of course, you don't have to be there. As noted earlier in the thread, Arrow cannot provide statements and it is unreasonable to expect them to. They are there to collect a debt and make a profit. Similarly, there is no credit agreement so there is no requirement on them to show you one.

 

From what you said earlier, you do not dispute the debt was owed to Orange. The network advised you it has been 'written off' this is true, but it doesn't mean your responsibility to repay has ended, this will continue regardless. After 6 years it may become uncollectable, but it still remains as a debt owed.

 

How much was owed originally? Have you checked your credit file to see what it says was the amount in default? Global will be adding their fees and charges, but assuming you haven;t agreed to this you could agree to pay what the original debt was they can go whistle for the rest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When i could not get Orange to stop the unwanted text being sent to me i told them i was closing the account and to send me a statement of all the outstanding, i then destroyed the sim card and went back on a different network, i then received a letter telling me i owed them £1100 i aske for statement so that i could check just what i had been charged for, i never received these statements so i could never contest the charges for the text that were being sent almost every hour of the day and night.

 

In the above what you are saying is that even if a Subject Access request is sent Arrow do not have to comply with it!!!

 

Arrow have told me they are the inhouse collections for Orange

Link to post
Share on other sites

A SAR is not a magic pill that reveals information about a data subject you may be unaware of. All it does is require the firm who receives the request to provide all relevant data THEY HOLD about you.

 

You are not Arrow's customer - simply the subject of their attention. Therefore, all the information they may hold about you may be limited to simply your name and address, the name of their client (Orange) and the amount they have been asked to collect. There will then be a list of their interactions with you regarding the type and times of contact and your responses. Nothing relevant in letting you find out what or how these charges were calculated. Paying £10 just for this is a bit of an extravagance yes they so have to comply, but the information they hold will probably be inconsequential. If Arrow are Orange's in-house collection service, then your SAR should be to Orange themselves.

 

Now, Orange will hold all this information - but the longer you wait, the detailed information will be lost, and perhaps only summary data and totals with dates. Making it difficult to challenge if you've already disposed of the detailed information they sent to you at the time.

 

Because you effectively stopped communicating, the situation simmply rolled on and then returns to bite you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no such thing as a 'final statement' this is not a CCA regulated account, and as a service contract there will have been invoices and or statements, not a 'final' one - unless you wish one to prove the owed balance is zero.

 

Your expectation of what Arrow have or have not is not their concern. YOU called the shots, and if you send them a SAR they have to comply. They're not going to provide you with a shopping list of items they have to let you decide whether it is worthwhile making the request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well seeing that Arrow told me the debt now belongs to them i would have expected them to have all the documentation to back the debt up!! if you cannot prove the debt how on earth can you issue a SD??

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to. The debt is a commodity. Your liability is sold on (per your T&C's) and your indebtedness transfers. There is no requirement for the new outfit to hold any records to substantiate the debt - they'be paid the original firm (say) 20-60% of the amount owed, and the firm selling the debt confirms to them the amount is owed and lets them get on with it.

 

What your agreement was, what issues you had, and whether you were unhappy with their service is of no interest to them. They only want your money. The only way to call them off is to deal with the original company, who - if they agree there is an error, buy 'back' the debt that was sold (refunding the money the firm paid) and then writing off the debt with no liability for you.

 

Do also remember, your credit file has already been blighted, so settling with the DCA won't fix this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, having not been in this situation before i was not aware of this, i sent a request to Orange yesterday enclosing a payment of £10.00 and also sent a copy to Arrow and once again informed them the account was in dispute, i am quite prepared to pay the money i owe Orange but not for the unsolicited text. will Arrow still continue with the SD action??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldn't say. The unsolicited text thing is tricky - as this is an issue between you and the firm that sent the texts, as the networks T&C's make this clear. Legally, you have to pay the network and recover the cost directly from the texter (and complain to the Premium Rate service Regulator).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...