Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Egg loan/CapQuest threats, even when I live and work in China!


alisindebt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5349 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi! This is my first thread!

 

I have all the info needed here to get started and made it as short and succinct as possible.

 

In the early 2000's, I took out an Egg credit card and two unsecured loans. I kept all of the payments up to date and never missed a payment.

 

I then started to work abroad and came home for short break and paid off 5000 pounds on my Egg card, leaving a small balance. During a routine call to Egg, they started to question my circumstances. Once they knew I was working abroad they the card would be "frozen", so I could no longer use it, but I would still have to make the monthly payments as usual.

 

I used to make use of the interest free offers and then pay it off, so i guess I was an "unprofitable" customer, and i was amongst the first ever to be kicked out by Egg for that reason.

 

They said their customers have to be in the UK all the time. There followed a big row between me and them, whereby I said that if would not let me use the account due to being abroad, how come they would accept payments from my UK bank (Smile), which I still have to this date at my UK address.

 

I stopped payments for a while and then reinstated small monthly payments to the card and two loans.

 

I agreed with Egg three ways to contact me whilsst abroad: using their secure email on their banking website, using my personal email and to my UK postal address. This is not where I live, of course, just somebody who colleccts my post and forwards it to me around the world.

 

I explained that post to my UK address would be forwarded to me periodically. Needless to say, every time I received forwarded post, the bag was full of letters from Egg and a whole plethora of debt collection agencies.

 

I meticulously took the time to write letters and emails to each agent and also Egg, confirming once again what i initially had said, that I was working and living abroad.

 

Knowing this, Egg played a nasty trick of issuing a County Court summons (Northampton bulk court-surprise, surprise!) through a collection agency's solicitor and they won by default because I didn't even know about it at the time.

 

The claim was against one account only, one of the unsecured loan accounts. When a later batch of post was forwarded to me, I found the County Court judgment against me.

 

Firstly, I called the solicitor from abroad and said that he already knew I was abroad, and he seemed very embarrassed.

 

Then I wrote to the County Court with a whole load of info. This was copies of letters to all the agencies explaining that I was abroad, likewise letters repeating amny times, the same details to Egg, also a copy of my working agreement on a cruise ship, certified and witnessed by the Chief Petty Officer (Accountant).

 

Of course, the judgment was set aside and remains so to this day. I still maintain monthly payments at reduced rates.

 

Some considerable time later, in a subsequent batch of post, I received a letter from CapQuest saying that they had purchased one of the debts from Egg i.e. the one from the bulk County Court, one of the two unsecured loans.

 

So I switched my monthly payments to CapQuest. The credit card and second loan remain with Egg.

 

However, despite the fact that I am now working in China and also sent Capquest letters saying so (even some Chinese documentation) they have been repeatedly sending letters (right up until the present time)threatening County Court action to my UK address and emailing me weekly, also asking for higher monthly payments.

 

Furthermore, the unsecured loan debt at the time of default with Egg was around 2600 pounds. With late payment charges, added interest and other penalty charges it was bumped up to around 3800 pounds by the time it was sold to Capquest.

 

Now I note CapQuest are adding interest charges to the debt. Currently 800 pounds or so, taking it up to near 4600 pounds. I did not realise that debt collection agencies could add interest payments to purchased debts.

 

I recently sent by international DHL recorded courier delivery, two cheque payments of 1 pound and 10 pounds to CapQuest for a true copy of my original CCA and my Data Protection data, along with standard template letters asking for this information. It has been like pulling teeth.

 

They have cashed both cheques but refuse to send me the data Protection info.

 

Firstly, they don't want to use email to send the DPA stuff, as they say it is unsecure, despite using the same to ask me for payments and threat leagl action every few days for ages.

 

Secondly because I don't live in the UK (although they are quite happy to send letters, threaten County Court action and receive payments from my UK address) and thirdly, they claim to have lost my Chinese address.

 

This is despite the fact that DHL international couriers confirmed to me a signed delivery of the documents to Capquest's Fleet, hampshire, address, a few days ago. The package, by Chinese law, had to inform the recipient of the sender's address in China (i.e. my address).

 

Yesterday, they emailed me, saying that I was sending the letters and cheques from within the UK, which assumes that I am really living there (not in China), or that I have a contact who is fraudently signing my letters and cheques for me! They also refuse to acknowledge the set aside County court Judgement, saying that it never happened!

 

However, they did send a copy of the CCA. I have attached the two pages for your inspection.

 

I am not sure if you can read the scan, but it states the following:

 

Date of agreement: 26th May 2002

 

Signatures: mine and theirs, are both on the document.

 

Interest rate: 9.51% APR: 9.9%

 

Loan: 6000 pounds

 

Monthly instalments: 105.41 pounds

 

It also refers to various clauses in the personal loan agreement terms and conditions (e.g. clauses 6,7,8 or 9), however, as you can see, the CCA was only two pages long and there were no other documents included with it when I received it a few days ago.

 

I also note that does not mention a cooling off period.

 

So, there we have it. Any suggestions?

 

Many thanks from me here living and working in China to those who reply! A

 

img027.jpg

 

img028.jpg

Edited by alisindebt
Link to post
Share on other sites

it's too small, can you upload it to photobucket and re post?

 

also this may be of interest

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/188093-egg-credit-agreements-what.html

 

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

is it front and back? or any numbers or references to link the two together?

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ida

 

I see what you mean now. There could have been other pages missing, which would have been, for example, if my two pages were numbered 1 and 4. That would have meant two pages missing from the copy.

 

However, I have just double checked and there was no numbering onn the two pages that I scanned.

 

On that basis there could be a whole document that is part of the CCA, but it was not sent to me, and there is nothing in the page numbering to suggest that anything is missing, apart from referrals to terms and conditions, which were not part of the copy supplied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ida

 

As I am new, did I post this in the correct place? I only got replies from you. Looking through the forums, I note that sometimes there are many replies.

 

In the Bank Action group, there is section specifically about Egg. Should I have posted there?

 

Thanks for your help!

 

A

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi!

 

I have all the info needed here to get started and made it as short and succinct as possible.

 

In the early 2000's, I took out an Egg credit card and two unsecured loans. I kept all of the payments up to date and never missed a payment.

 

I then started to work abroad and came home for short break and paid off 5000 pounds on my Egg card, leaving a small balance. During a routine call to Egg, they started to question my circumstances. Once they knew I was working abroad they the card would be "frozen", so I could no longer use it, but I would still have to make the monthly payments as usual.

 

I used to make use of the interest free offers and then pay it off, so i guess I was an "unprofitable" customer, and i was amongst the first ever to be kicked out by Egg for that reason.

 

They said their customers have to be in the UK all the time. There followed a big row between me and them, whereby I said that if would not let me use the account due to being abroad, how come they would accept payments from my UK bank (Smile), which I still have to this date at my UK address.

 

I stopped payments for a while and then reinstated small monthly payments to the card and two loans.

 

I agreed with Egg three ways to contact me whilsst abroad: using their secure email on their banking website, using my personal email and to my UK postal address. This is not where I live, of course, just somebody who colleccts my post and forwards it to me around the world.

 

I explained that post to my UK address would be forwarded to me periodically. Needless to say, every time I received forwarded post, the bag was full of letters from Egg and a whole plethora of debt collection agencies.

 

I meticulously took the time to write letters and emails to each agent and also Egg, confirming once again what i initially had said, that I was working and living abroad.

 

Knowing this, Egg played a nasty trick of issuing a County Court summons (Northampton bulk court-surprise, surprise!) through a collection agency's solicitor and they won by default because I didn't even know about it at the time.

 

The claim was against one account only, one of the unsecured loan accounts. When a later batch of post was forwarded to me, I found the County Court judgment against me.

 

Firstly, I called the solicitor from abroad and said that he already knew I was abroad, and he seemed very embarrassed.

 

Then I wrote to the County Court with a whole load of info. This was copies of letters to all the agencies explaining that I was abroad, likewise letters repeating amny times, the same details to Egg, also a copy of my working agreement on a cruise ship, certified and witnessed by the Chief Petty Officer (Accountant).

 

Of course, the judgment was set aside and remains so to this day. I still maintain monthly payments at reduced rates.

 

Some considerable time later, in a subsequent batch of post, I received a letter from CapQuest saying that they had purchased one of the debts from Egg i.e. the one from the bulk County Court, one of the two unsecured loans.

 

So I switched my monthly payments to CapQuest. The credit card and second loan remain with Egg.

 

However, despite the fact that I am now working in China and also sent Capquest letters saying so (even some Chinese documentation) they have been repeatedly sending letters (right up until the present time)threatening County Court action to my UK address and emailing me weekly, also asking for higher monthly payments.

 

Furthermore, the unsecured loan debt at the time of default with Egg was around 2600 pounds. With late payment charges, added interest and other penalty charges it was bumped up to around 3800 pounds by the time it was sold to Capquest.

 

Now I note CapQuest are adding interest charges to the debt. Currently 800 pounds or so, taking it up to near 4600 pounds. I did not realise that debt collection agencies could add interest payments to purchased debts.

 

I recently sent by international DHL recorded courier delivery, two cheque payments of 1 pound and 10 pounds to CapQuest for a true copy of my original CCA and my Data Protection data, along with standard template letters asking for this information. It has been like pulling teeth.

 

They have cashed both cheques but refuse to send me the data Protection info.

 

Firstly, they don't want to use email to send the Data Protection Act stuff, as they say it is unsecure, despite using the same to ask me for payments and threat leagl action every few days for ages.

 

Secondly because I don't live in the UK (although they are quite happy to send letters, threaten County Court action and receive payments from my UK address) and thirdly, they claim to have lost my Chinese address.

 

This is despite the fact that DHL international couriers confirmed to me a signed delivery of the documents to Capquest's Fleet, hampshire, address, a few days ago. The package, by Chinese law, had to inform the recipient of the sender's address in China (i.e. my address).

 

Yesterday, they emailed me, saying that I was sending the letters and cheques from within the UK, which assumes that I am really living there (not in China), or that I have a contact who is fraudently signing my letters and cheques for me! They also refuse to acknowledge the set aside County court Judgement, saying that it never happened!

 

However, they did send a copy of the CCA. I have attached the two pages for your inspection.

 

I am not sure if you can read the scan, but it states the following:

 

Date of agreement: 26th May 2002

 

Signatures: mine and theirs, are both on the document.

 

Interest rate: 9.51% APR: 9.9%

 

Loan: 6000 pounds

 

Monthly instalments: 105.41 pounds

 

It also refers to various clauses in the personal loan agreement terms and conditions (e.g. clauses 6,7,8 or 9), however, as you can see, the CCA was only two pages long and there were no other documents included with it when I received it a few days ago.

 

I also note that does not mention a cooling off period.

 

So, there we have it. Any suggestions?

 

Many thanks from me here living and working in China to those who reply! A

 

Hi! This is my first thread!

 

I have all the info needed here to get started and made it as short and succinct as possible.

 

In the early 2000's, I took out an Egg credit card and two unsecured loans. I kept all of the payments up to date and never missed a payment.

 

I then started to work abroad and came home for short break and paid off 5000 pounds on my Egg card, leaving a small balance. During a routine call to Egg, they started to question my circumstances. Once they knew I was working abroad they the card would be "frozen", so I could no longer use it, but I would still have to make the monthly payments as usual.

 

I used to make use of the interest free offers and then pay it off, so i guess I was an "unprofitable" customer, and i was amongst the first ever to be kicked out by Egg for that reason.

 

They said their customers have to be in the UK all the time. There followed a big row between me and them, whereby I said that if would not let me use the account due to being abroad, how come they would accept payments from my UK bank (Smile), which I still have to this date at my UK address.

 

I stopped payments for a while and then reinstated small monthly payments to the card and two loans.

 

I agreed with Egg three ways to contact me whilsst abroad: using their secure email on their banking website, using my personal email and to my UK postal address. This is not where I live, of course, just somebody who colleccts my post and forwards it to me around the world.

 

I explained that post to my UK address would be forwarded to me periodically. Needless to say, every time I received forwarded post, the bag was full of letters from Egg and a whole plethora of debt collection agencies.

 

I meticulously took the time to write letters and emails to each agent and also Egg, confirming once again what i initially had said, that I was working and living abroad.

 

Knowing this, Egg played a nasty trick of issuing a County Court summons (Northampton bulk court-surprise, surprise!) through a collection agency's solicitor and they won by default because I didn't even know about it at the time.

 

The claim was against one account only, one of the unsecured loan accounts. When a later batch of post was forwarded to me, I found the County Court judgment against me.

 

Firstly, I called the solicitor from abroad and said that he already knew I was abroad, and he seemed very embarrassed.

 

Then I wrote to the County Court with a whole load of info. This was copies of letters to all the agencies explaining that I was abroad, likewise letters repeating amny times, the same details to Egg, also a copy of my working agreement on a cruise ship, certified and witnessed by the Chief Petty Officer (Accountant).

 

Of course, the judgment was set aside and remains so to this day. I still maintain monthly payments at reduced rates.

 

Some considerable time later, in a subsequent batch of post, I received a letter from CapQuest saying that they had purchased one of the debts from Egg i.e. the one from the bulk County Court, one of the two unsecured loans.

 

So I switched my monthly payments to CapQuest. The credit card and second loan remain with Egg.

 

However, despite the fact that I am now working in China and also sent Capquest letters saying so (even some Chinese documentation) they have been repeatedly sending letters (right up until the present time)threatening County Court action to my UK address and emailing me weekly, also asking for higher monthly payments.

 

Furthermore, the unsecured loan debt at the time of default with Egg was around 2600 pounds. With late payment charges, added interest and other penalty charges it was bumped up to around 3800 pounds by the time it was sold to Capquest.

 

Now I note CapQuest are adding interest charges to the debt. Currently 800 pounds or so, taking it up to near 4600 pounds. I did not realise that debt collection agencies could add interest payments to purchased debts.

 

I recently sent by international DHL recorded courier delivery, two cheque payments of 1 pound and 10 pounds to CapQuest for a true copy of my original CCA and my Data Protection data, along with standard template letters asking for this information. It has been like pulling teeth.

 

They have cashed both cheques but refuse to send me the data Protection info.

 

Firstly, they don't want to use email to send the Data Protection Act stuff, as they say it is unsecure, despite using the same to ask me for payments and threat leagl action every few days for ages.

 

Secondly because I don't live in the UK (although they are quite happy to send letters, threaten County Court action and receive payments from my UK address) and thirdly, they claim to have lost my Chinese address.

 

This is despite the fact that DHL international couriers confirmed to me a signed delivery of the documents to Capquest's Fleet, hampshire, address, a few days ago. The package, by Chinese law, had to inform the recipient of the sender's address in China (i.e. my address).

 

Yesterday, they emailed me, saying that I was sending the letters and cheques from within the UK, which assumes that I am really living there (not in China), or that I have a contact who is fraudently signing my letters and cheques for me! They also refuse to acknowledge the set aside County court Judgement, saying that it never happened!

 

However, they did send a copy of the CCA. I have attached the two pages for your inspection.

 

I am not sure if you can read the scan, but it states the following:

 

Date of agreement: 26th May 2002

 

Signatures: mine and theirs, are both on the document.

 

Interest rate: 9.51% APR: 9.9%

 

Loan: 6000 pounds

 

Monthly instalments: 105.41 pounds

 

It also refers to various clauses in the personal loan agreement terms and conditions (e.g. clauses 6,7,8 or 9), however, as you can see, the CCA was only two pages long and there were no other documents included with it when I received it a few days ago.

 

I also note that does not mention a cooling off period.

 

So, there we have it. Any suggestions?

 

Many thanks from me here living and working in China to those who reply! A

 

img028.jpg

 

img027.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

if or if not the CCA is enforceable i dont know, but it looks not, thats typical for egg.

 

now, i'd reclaim all charges & the unlawful interest added on all /.

 

this will have the nice benefit of puting them into dispute, so no more suprise CCJ's.

 

i'dalso seriously consider not paying anythingbut a reduced amount on any A/C that they have failed to respond to the cca request on.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if or if not the CCA is enforceable i dont know, but it looks not, thats typical for egg.

 

now, i'd reclaim all charges & the unlawful interest added on all /.

 

this will have the nice benefit of puting them into dispute, so no more suprise CCJ's.

 

i'dalso seriously consider not paying anythingbut a reduced amount on any A/C that they have failed to respond to the cca request on.

 

dx

 

Hello dx any chance of pointing out where you think egg loan agreements are defective, found 5 out of six of my cc agreements faulty but can't crack this one (:))

 

cds

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for the replies so far.

 

However, what I could really do with is knowing why the CCA could be deemed to be unenforceable.

 

The only things I spotted myself so far are two things, but I am not sure if this is enough to make it entirely unenforceable:

 

1) I note that there is no reference to a cooling off period.

 

2) It also refers to various clauses in the personal loan agreement terms and conditions (e.g. clauses 6,7,8 or 9), however, as you can see, the CCA was only two pages long and there were no other documents included with it when I received it a few days ago.

 

Many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for the replies so far.

 

However, what I could really do with is knowing why the CCA could be deemed to be unenforceable.

 

The only things I spotted myself so far are two things, but I am not sure if this is enough to make it entirely unenforceable:

 

1) I note that there is no reference to a cooling off period.

 

2) It also refers to various clauses in the personal loan agreement terms and conditions (e.g. clauses 6,7,8 or 9), however, as you can see, the CCA was only two pages long and there were no other documents included with it when I received it a few days ago.

 

Many thanks!

 

you should have been sent the full terms and conditions relevent at the time of the loan if they didn't send them they are in breach of your request. I too am having difficulty cracking this egg loan and hope dx will be back soon to clarify is statement.

 

cds

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have still not received any further replies and remain somewhat in the dark as to the status of the CCA.

 

Basically, is it enforceable or not?

 

I also wrote to the National Debt Lin e two weeks ago, but they are snowed under, they cannot respond in a timely manner.

 

The reason that this is important to me is that there are also two other debts that I have with Egg, for a credit card and a second unsecured loan. I will get copies of the CCAs shortly.

 

Therefore I need to decide whether to challenge or try and settle at a lower amount.

 

I prefer to challenge, but need to know how and the starting point is whether the CCA above is enforecable.

 

Many thanks!

 

Al

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

I managed to get some "official" legal advice on this and thought I would pass it on to anyone who has a similar CCA. CCA problems fall intto two categories. Firstly, badly executed agreements. If you dispute such an agreement the whole thing is put on hold, they cannot take payments from you or add any interest or charges. At least this buys valuable breathing space.

 

In the case of the agreement that Imposted above, it is more than likely unenforceable. This is because the "prescribed terms and conditions" are not included in the two page agreement. These terms should either be part of the agreement and therefore signed for, or if in a separate document that should also be signed by both parties and should be produced when the CCA request goes in.

 

Obviously, that is not the case here. Furthermore, they quote the amount of money borrowed and payment terms but they are supposed to quote the actual cgharge for credit as a separate figure, which obviously they have not. Finally, there is no indication of a colling off period.

 

Now don't necessarily think that the debt just goes away. yes, you can dispute it for years to come and it may be that other DCAs jump on the case.

 

Persoanlly, I know some would disagree with me, I would rather use this as a negotiation tool for a reduced settlement. I sent a letter to CapQuest drafted up by a Lawyer, sotty I cannot post it until I know the outcome,, but basically as a result of this CapQuest have gone very quiet, so I am anticipating the ability to settle F+F for a low figure very soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

To update this thread, it turns out that the agreement is none enforceable and even CapQuest have confirmed that in writing. therefore they cannot legally chase this money, besides which I live abroad and so the County court system does not stretch this far!

 

Furthermore, the same applies to a second Egg Loan, which is also disputed and on hold.

 

I also had a debt of just over 10000 pounds (ten thousand0 with Abbey and they sold the debt to Lowell's, who now say the card agreement is so old, there isno copy any more and they have written to me to say that they will not contact me any further to pursue the loan.

 

So to anyone out there reading this, get your CCA from your creditor and see if it can be disputed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Alis

 

sounds like good news for me to, I have an identical cca to the one above.

 

Where did you get the information from for your deductions?

 

there seems to be alot of comments on here regarding cc but egg loan agreements are few and far between.

 

best of luck

 

cds:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CDS

 

I had the same problem i.e ;ots of info on Egg cards and little on CCAs for loans. First, I got a solicitor to look over it who speicalises in this. I then sent a letter specifying that what they supplied me was not a true copy of the CCA and accordingly, they are in default. In a letter to me they accpeted this in writing, I have to say I was a little surprised, albeit pleasantly. Egg cannot supply anything else, because there isn't anything else signed, so the agreement is unenforceable. Quite simple if you stick to your guns.

 

Hi Alis

 

sounds like good news for me to, I have an identical cca to the one above.

 

Where did you get the information from for your deductions?

 

there seems to be alot of comments on here regarding cc but egg loan agreements are few and far between.

 

best of luck

 

cds:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to keep going on about this but I've been pulling my hair out over this one for months.

 

Did the cca they sent you have your signature on?

was it on two sheets of paper supposed to be back and front?

so no total loan amount including interest is significant error?

have noticed right to cancel and cooling off period missing myself.

 

cds:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CDS

 

I know how you feel, I had similar problems, although only over a shorter period than you.

 

The problem seems to be in two parts. Firstly, most of the posts are about Egg credit cards, presumably because Egg gave them out to anyone, like confetti at a wedding, so there are obviously more people questioning those CCAs. Secondly, the posts are full of well-meaning, but ill informed people, claiming that this is a reason to enforce, that is a reason not to enforce, etc.

 

now I am not a Lawyer, but as I understand it some things would allow the CCA to be disputed and therefore any collections action or payments or interest would have to be frozen until the dispute is resolved. An example would be an unsigned agreement. This can apparently be resolved in court, assuming that all parties turn up. Something like no cooling off period would not on it's own be enough to warrant unenforecability.

 

An unenforecable agreement is one where even the court is not allowed to make changes. This would have to be something like terms and conditions missing from the body of the Contract, as is the case in mine. they can, apparently, be in a separate booklet, but this would also have to be signed by both parties and I certainly never signed a second document.

 

Like I say, I am no lawyer, so I contacted one who knows about such things. he said that in his opinion my CCA was unenforecable, mainly because there were no signed terms and conditions included in the agreement, which was only two pages long (unumbered) and because the total charge for credit is not on the agreement. Secondary to that, there was no mention of any colling off period.

 

he drafted me a letter to send to them, and they responded by positively accepting that it is not a true copy of the original and the account is suspended-yes, I have it in writing. They are hoping that Egg will come up with something, but there is anything for them to produce.

 

Sorry to keep going on about this but I've been pulling my hair out over this one for months.

 

Did the cca they sent you have your signature on?

was it on two sheets of paper supposed to be back and front?

so no total loan amount including interest is significant error?

have noticed right to cancel and cooling off period missing myself.

 

cds:)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CDS

 

I know how you feel, I had similar problems, although only over a shorter period than you.

 

The problem seems to be in two parts. Firstly, most of the posts are about Egg credit cards, presumably because Egg gave them out to anyone, like confetti at a wedding, so there are obviously more people questioning those CCAs. Secondly, the posts are full of well-meaning, but ill informed people, claiming that this is a reason to enforce, that is a reason not to enforce, etc.

 

now I am not a Lawyer, but as I understand it some things would allow the CCA to be disputed and therefore any collections action or payments or interest would have to be frozen until the dispute is resolved. An example would be an unsigned agreement. This can apparently be resolved in court, assuming that all parties turn up. Something like no cooling off period would not on it's own be enough to warrant unenforecability.

 

An unenforecable agreement is one where even the court is not allowed to make changes. This would have to be something like terms and conditions missing from the body of the Contract, as is the case in mine. they can, apparently, be in a separate booklet, but this would also have to be signed by both parties and I certainly never signed a second document.

 

Like I say, I am no lawyer, so I contacted one who knows about such things. he said that in his opinion my CCA was unenforecable, mainly because there were no signed terms and conditions included in the agreement, which was only two pages long (unumbered) and because the total charge for credit is not on the agreement. Secondary to that, there was no mention of any colling off period.

 

he drafted me a letter to send to them, and they responded by positively accepting that it is not a true copy of the original and the account is suspended-yes, I have it in writing. They are hoping that Egg will come up with something, but there is anything for them to produce.

 

thanks again alis for taking the time to answer, all very useful.

 

cds:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI I HOPE YOU ARE WELL

 

WAS THE LETTER SENT LIKE THIS THE MAIN TRUST WAS THERE WAS NO TOTAL CHARGE FOR CREDIT.

 

I HAVE JUST READ YOUR TREAD

 

 

 

Simple THANKS TO PT

 

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

In respect of the credit agreement you have disclosed on the XXXXXXX 2009

 

After seeking legal advice from a Consumer Credit Law specialist i can comment as follows.

 

The agreement you disclosed is improperly executed, it is not compliant primarily with s61(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the consequences are that as it stands the agreement is unenforceable and requires an order of the court pursuant to section 65(1) CCA 1974 to be remedy this problem. you are invited to make such an application for the said order.

 

Upon such an application i will rely upon the following points

 

The agreement is a fixed sum credit agreement, the rate of interest under the agreement is fixed for the term of the loan, there are no items entering into the charge for credit which are likely to be subject to change or variation therefore the agreement requires a term stating the Total Charge for credit with or without a list of its constituent parts, the agreement does not contain this term and therefore breaches Regulation 2 and Schedule 1 Para 9 Consumer Credit Agreement Regulations 1983.

 

The agreement must as a consequence of para 9, also include a term stating the total amount payable, again this agreement does not contain such information and therefore the agreement also breaches Reg 2 and Schedule 1 para 11 Consumer Credit Agreement Regulations 1983 and therefore the agreement does not comply with the regulations made by the secretary of state under the powers given by s60(1) of the 1974 Act and accordingly the agreement doesn ot comply with the strict requirements of s61(1)(a) Consumer Credit Act nor did it comply with s61(1) © Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

These breachs are clearly prejudicial to me as on entering into the agreement i was not givne the informatiuon that the Consumer Credit Act required to be made clear, i was not aware of the true cost of borrowing.

 

I would further highlight that Lloyds TSB subscribes to the Banking Code, as a requiremento f the code, they are required to lend responsibly and they clearly have failed in their duty under the code

 

my contention is that the court should not make an enforcement order, my authority for this contention would primarily be the case of Wlaker v SPPL in the Chester High Court before HHJ Derek Halbert. however if the court were minded to make an order for enforcement my argument would fall directly upon Rank Xerox Finance Limited vs Hepple CCLR 1994 1 and in this case the court taking into account a single breach of schedule 1 Agrement Regs reduced the amount of debt from £5000 to £500 to compensate the debtor for the prejudice caused

 

in view of this and in view of the fact you require an order from the court to enforce this agreement as clearly set out within the act, and the House of Lords in Wilson and First County Trust 2003 UKHL 40, i would invite your proposals to settle my dispute. i would also advise that i am informed that , i am able to apply to the court to consider this matter pursuant to section 142(1) CCA 1974 if no suitable agreement can be met.

 

however i trust this will not be necessary

 

I look forward to your settlement proposals

 

regards

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This si waht I used and it worked perfectly. Unbelievebaly they wrote back saying that they weere asking the OC i.e. Egg for the true copy i.e. they admitted in writing that it was not a true copy!

 

Account In Dispute

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: my request under s78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Thank you for your recent letter sent to me dated **DATE**, the contents of which are noted. However, the reply received by me does not fulfil your requirements under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The Act demands that I be supplied with a true copy of any properly executed credit agreement that exists in relation to the above account. I may ask for this on demand providing that a fee of £1.00 is paid. This fee was sent with my original letter, dated **DATE**. Upon receipt of the original request the specified account legally entered into disputed status.

 

My request remains outstanding. The supplied documentation does not constitute a true copy of a credit agreement and that which you sent doesn't even contain all the prescribed terms and is not 'properly executed'. The statements sent do not correspond to the amount stated in your earliest correspondence and therefore they do not satisfy the requirement to supply me with a statement of account.

 

As you will know, under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, a judge is not permitted to make any enforcement order unless the creditor can provide a true signed copy of the original credit agreement. This means that unless you can produce such an agreement, this alleged debt is not enforceable in law.

 

You had until **12 days DATE** to provide me with the true copy I requested. After that date you entered into default of my request. Whilst the account is in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for any payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest on the account, nor make any further charges to the account. Additionally, you are not entitled to register any information on this account with any credit reference agencies (or any third party).

 

To register information with a credit reference agency, you must have written consent from the data subject to collate and share such information. This consent is given in the form of a signed credit agreement, so until you produce such an agreement, you may not do this.

 

The requirement for consent to share data is a clear requirement of the Data Protection Act 1998. Any such attempts to share my data without my consent will be met with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office.

 

The time limits, which are laid down in the Consumer Credit (Prescribed Periods for Giving Information) Regulations 1983 are clear. You must supply an executed credit agreement within 12 working days of a proper CCA request. If you fail to comply with a legitimate request the account enters a default situation. . You entered into a default on **12 Days DATE**

 

Therefore you have 7 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint, otherwise your conduct will be reported to the Office of Fair Trading, the Financial Ombudsman and Trading Standards. Any investigation undertaken by them may affect your ability to hold a consumer credit license in the future.

 

Take further note that continued telephone calls after the receipt of a request not to call may constitute a criminal offence under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003.

 

Communicate in writing and ONLY in writing, your telephone calls will NOT be answered.

 

To sum up, I will not be making any further payments to you until you provide me with the document I have requested. Should you not have any signed credit agreement in relation to this alleged debt, please confirm this in writing to me.

 

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

HI I HOPE YOU ARE WELL

 

WAS THE LETTER SENT LIKE THIS THE MAIN TRUST WAS THERE WAS NO TOTAL CHARGE FOR CREDIT.

 

I HAVE JUST READ YOUR TREAD

 

 

 

Simple THANKS TO PT

 

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

In respect of the credit agreement you have disclosed on the XXXXXXX 2009

 

After seeking legal advice from a Consumer Credit Law specialist i can comment as follows.

 

The agreement you disclosed is improperly executed, it is not compliant primarily with s61(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the consequences are that as it stands the agreement is unenforceable and requires an order of the court pursuant to section 65(1) CCA 1974 to be remedy this problem. you are invited to make such an application for the said order.

 

Upon such an application i will rely upon the following points

 

The agreement is a fixed sum credit agreement, the rate of interest under the agreement is fixed for the term of the loan, there are no items entering into the charge for credit which are likely to be subject to change or variation therefore the agreement requires a term stating the Total Charge for credit with or without a list of its constituent parts, the agreement does not contain this term and therefore breaches Regulation 2 and Schedule 1 Para 9 Consumer Credit Agreement Regulations 1983.

 

The agreement must as a consequence of para 9, also include a term stating the total amount payable, again this agreement does not contain such information and therefore the agreement also breaches Reg 2 and Schedule 1 para 11 Consumer Credit Agreement Regulations 1983 and therefore the agreement does not comply with the regulations made by the secretary of state under the powers given by s60(1) of the 1974 Act and accordingly the agreement doesn ot comply with the strict requirements of s61(1)(a) Consumer Credit Act nor did it comply with s61(1) © Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

These breachs are clearly prejudicial to me as on entering into the agreement i was not givne the informatiuon that the Consumer Credit Act required to be made clear, i was not aware of the true cost of borrowing.

 

I would further highlight that Lloyds TSB subscribes to the Banking Code, as a requiremento f the code, they are required to lend responsibly and they clearly have failed in their duty under the code

 

my contention is that the court should not make an enforcement order, my authority for this contention would primarily be the case of Wlaker v SPPL in the Chester High Court before HHJ Derek Halbert. however if the court were minded to make an order for enforcement my argument would fall directly upon Rank Xerox Finance Limited vs Hepple CCLR 1994 1 and in this case the court taking into account a single breach of schedule 1 Agrement Regs reduced the amount of debt from £5000 to £500 to compensate the debtor for the prejudice caused

 

in view of this and in view of the fact you require an order from the court to enforce this agreement as clearly set out within the act, and the House of Lords in Wilson and First County Trust 2003 UKHL 40, i would invite your proposals to settle my dispute. i would also advise that i am informed that , i am able to apply to the court to consider this matter pursuant to section 142(1) CCA 1974 if no suitable agreement can be met.

 

however i trust this will not be necessary

 

I look forward to your settlement proposals

 

regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

the simple letter give you the reference to the act.

 

So if they send the same again, used this letter, if you are happy with it.

 

the letter spells out what is wrong with the agreement

 

THE KILLER IS THERE NO TOTAL CHARGE FOR CREDIT,

 

SO IN LAYMAN TERMS YOU WHERE NOT MADE AWARE OF IT AT THE TIME OF SIGNING O HAPPY DAYS.

 

LILLY WHITE

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Almost!

 

The main point is that they did not state the actula amount of crdeit charges (in my case), nor did they mention a cooling off period, but most imporatnatly, they are missing what are called "prescribed terms".

 

Like I said, I am no lawyer, but in layman's language, the two pages of the agreement that I received referred to other terms and conditions. These should be included in the Contract, or at least there should be a separate document SIGNED BY YOU AND THE CREDIT CARD COMPANY as part of the CCA. These were all missing in my case, and my lawyer has stated in no uncertain terms, this is an unenforceable CCA.

 

the simple letter give you the reference to the act.

 

So if they send the same again, used this letter, if you are happy with it.

 

the letter spells out what is wrong with the agreement

 

THE KILLER IS THERE NO TOTAL CHARGE FOR CREDIT,

 

SO IN LAYMAN TERMS YOU WHERE NOT MADE AWARE OF IT AT THE TIME OF SIGNING O HAPPY DAYS.

 

LILLY WHITE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...