Jump to content


SB100 v HFC - is this default compliant? Court/Restons ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5114 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi SB,

 

If the Judge was anything like mine, then no he won't.

 

I'm sorry as I only got to page 17 that I am not fully up to date with everything that has gone on, but I get the impression that the courts do not look favourably on conduct such as this.

 

My gut feeling would to be proactive and get the strike out or UO. Six weeks is a bit of mickey take and if a company the size of theirs, with the resources that they have cannot get their act together to get information that in theory, they should have to hand by a set date, then it's unlikely that they do have it and will supply it.

 

Do you know what the costs are to do apply for the strike out?

 

Bel

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 611
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The AQ issue is still gnawing away at me too.. I just read this post of FairyBlue's thread and the court ordered that unless the listing fee and hearing fee were paid the claim would be struck out.

 

To the best of my knowledge Restons have not paid these in my case as they never completed the AQ.

 

IF I could get an unless order, could it be worded to draw the courts attention to this, and also for production of the original agreement (rather than the hearsay evidence they've offered to date)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Claimant failed to disclose documents as ordered by DJ xxxxxxxx dated,therefore exchange did not realise as the Claimant have throughout this case frustrated matters and failed to comply with the basic pleadings of the CPR.I feel it would be justified if the Claimants case would be struck out as their behavour throughout this case as not only hindered my case but as also shown total disregard to the County Court and the DJ.(name)

 

 

PS £35 without an hearing

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

And do I put the paragraph you suggest in box 3, 'What order are you asking the court to make and why?' or box 10, 'What information will you be relying on, in support of your application?'

 

Sorry to be so crap, and at the risk of repeating myself many, many times- thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And do I put the paragraph you suggest in box 3, 'What order are you asking the court to make and why?' or box 10, 'What information will you be relying on, in support of your application?'

 

Sorry to be so crap, and at the risk of repeating myself many, many times- thank you.

 

 

Box 3 The Order ie Strike out

 

Box 10 my paragraph

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, also 'who should be served with this application' assume Restons?

 

I'm not filling in box 6, length of hearing, have filled in the date of the trial, and I'm not attaching a draft of order. Hope this is correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a Special Delivery waiting for me at the post office apparently, wonder if its from Restons?
I would like to hope it is notification that a Premium Bond, or similar, has won you a fat prize!

 

However, I suspect it's more likely to be a poison pill package from Restons.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Edited by banker_rhymes_with
Can't type or spell!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that ;)

 

The Court should have the application now- I sent a covering letter containing my concerns too, and asking them to check if the fees have been paid for listing / hearing.

 

I can't see them being to impressed if they haven't....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Still nothing from Restons.

 

I have, however, received a 'General for of Judgement or Order' from the court;

 

1. The matter to be allocated to fast track

 

2. The defendants application for strike out will be considered first on the (day of the hearing)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...