Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree and I can see the BPA/IPC shoving their new single Code under the noses of the new ministers saying don't waste any more time with your code use ours.
    • Sadly I think the fault les with the parking rogues who do not want te Act to come into force and are doing everything to fight and stall it.
    • Hopgarden I have problems understanding your PCNs. On Post 5 you said that you had received a PCN  dated  26th May 2021 received on the 1st June and was incurred on the 28th April. On Post 7 you said you had received a PCN dated the 7th July , received on the 1st June and incurred on the 28th April. I assume the 7th July was a mistake and there is just 1 PCN. On Post 47 you received from DCBL in response to your snotty letter a note from them saying that the PCN was dated the 23rd April. So my question is do you have two PCN dated 23 April and the 28th April or is one of those related you parents PCN. DCBL seemed sure that the PCN they were responding to was t he one on the 23rd. Also could you please check and confirm that the good news about the discontinuance on AUG 23RD 2023 was for a PCN dated the 23rd or the 28th?  Could you please also confirm who is the keeper of your car and you are advising your parents how to handle Parking Eye by copying from how you handle your own PCN? If that is the case is it possible to post up their PCN as it is possible that their times, dates and wording may differ from yours which might make a difference. I noted for instance that you said in an early post that your parents didn't even park in a bay. Possibly the time in the car park was shorter too.  In any case, both of you were parked in a car park that only permit holders were supposed to park. This makes the signs prohibitive so cannot offer either of you a contract. So you cannot breach a contract that hasn't been offered despite what they seem to think. Or more importantly what they want you to think, so that makes you feel like you should pay them what they are asking. When you don't actually owe them anything at all.  
    • The UK Parliament petitions website closed today. It will reopen sometime after the general election when a new Petitions Committee is appointed. This means all open petitions have unfortunately had to close early.   The petitions  Immediately Reintroduce the Parking Code of Practice was only open a few wks but managed to collect 374 signatures  (His Change.Org petition has 1455 signings) Require communications from Private Parking companies to be traceable/trackable collected 300 signatures in the 5mths it was open. Thank you to anyone on the CAG forum who signed.   It seems the Parking Code of Practice has only temporarily been shelved until a new LUHC ministerial team is appointed. Let's hope the new ministers can consult and implement this code quicker than the previous ministers.
    • Don't think we can assume Labour will win the election with a majority. There are 5 weeks to go before polling day and anything can happen.  Labour are on average 21 points ahead in opinion polls, but these range from 12 point lead to a 27 point lead.  If the 12 point lead is most accurate and Labour lose support before polling day, we could be heading for a hung parliament. The opinion polls have proven to be inaccurate before.  The most important message must be for everyone to go out to vote. Last election only about 67% voted and for a third of eligible voters to not bother, suggests that they don't think their vote counts or they think it does not make any difference who gets into Government.  Website below notes election turnout percentages. Voter turnout in the UK 1918-2019 | Statista WWW.STATISTA.COM In the UK's general election of 2019, voter turnout was 67.3 percent, a 1.5 percent drop compared with the previous general election in 2017.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Instant Silver


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5341 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I have been contacted via telephone at work by a lady called Dawn from a debt recovery agency called Instant Silver. She is claiming that GE bank has passed on to them recovery of an debenhams account and are claiming I owe £200. I explained that any store card or account I had with Debenhams has beed payed up and that they should not bother me again. I contacted GE bank and quoted the ref no that Instant Silver had given me and they had no record of any such account and had not heard of Instant Silver. I have googled Instant Silver and can find no such company?? HAs anyone else heard of them and do i need to worry? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is certainly no company registered with the OFT called that, if they want to collect debts then they need a licence....if they call again ask what their OFT Consumer Credit Licence number is, get a phone number and address too...

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have just called again and there address is PO BOX Caerphilly CF83 2XE. Tel No 08001114425. She said the reason why there is no such an account with Ge Bank is because they sold the debt to link whom sold it to them. She told me I had to write to their Defence and Dispute Department.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have just called again and there address is PO BOX Caerphilly CF83 2XE. Tel No 08001114425.

 

That postcode does not trace exactly, however that's not unusual for a DCA. (It is in the general area of Link though.)

 

You need to stop talking to them on the phone, a DCA will tell you any old nonsense to get money. If they phone again, tell them to put it in writing and hang up on them.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep its link alright.

 

 

Registration Number: Z5504257

Date Registered: 01 June 2001 Registration Expires: 31 May 2009

 

Data Controller: LINK FINANCIAL LTD

 

 

Address:

CAMELFORD HOUSE

84-90 ALBERT EMBANKMENT

LONDON

SE1 7TP

Other Names:

ALSO AT ;

1/5 TRECENYDD INDUSTRIAL ESTATE

CAERPHILLY

FLEETWOOD COLLECTIONS

INSTANTSILVER

THESIS SERVICING

Cabot have been my friends for 2 years(EDIT) Sent packing statute barred.

past due credit have been friends for 1 week(EDIT) Sent back to arrow, now statute barred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

seems to be taking a long time to update their credit licence.

 

 

Application / Licence Details

 

 

 

Licence Number:0446835

Licence Status:Current

 

Current Applicant / Licensee:

 

Business NameCompany Registration NumberLink Financial Limited3504939

 

Categories:

 

Consumer credit Credit brokerage Credit reference agency Debt adjusting/counselling Debt collecting

 

Right To Canvass Off Trade Premises:Yes

 

 

Issued Date: 03-May-1998

Expiry Date: 02-May-2008

 

 

Legal Formation:

 

Body Corporate (incorporated inside UK)

Cabot have been my friends for 2 years(EDIT) Sent packing statute barred.

past due credit have been friends for 1 week(EDIT) Sent back to arrow, now statute barred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks you have all been very help full :). Things like this really worry me. Why would Link be going under another name?? Should i write to them? They do not have my new address and I am reluctant to give it to them. The original account was set up with Debenhams over 6 years ago. I am not sure what my next move should be. I am just about to buy my first house and am worried this will mess it up my chances although my credit rating with experian is excellant.:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks you have all been very help full :). Things like this really worry me. Why would Link be going under another name?? Should i write to them? They do not have my new address and I am reluctant to give it to them. The original account was set up with Debenhams over 6 years ago. I am not sure what my next move should be. I am just about to buy my first house and am worried this will mess it up my chances although my credit rating with experian is excellant.:(

When was the last time you acknowledged it in writing Spirit31?

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Things like this really worry me. Why would Link be going under another name??

 

Link were almost certainly one of the '13' previously warned by the OFT regarding their conduct.

 

As sanctions have been now been placed on 1st Credit & Mac Hall, (companies who were warned but ignored the warnings), they could be using this name in the hope that nobody 'joins up the dots'.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...