Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @jk2054 - I haven't started a claim with OIC or MIB yet, due to being unable to obtain the name of the other driver.  @BankFodder cheers for that, I'll go back to them with this info & update on here when I've had a response.
    • Andy thanks for your reply. No i am now being evicted from the house i moved into after that previous post. The letting agent lied to me when they said the landlord would not be selling the house. SHe did not mention that the landlord tried to sell the house last year, i was not told this, 4 months into the tenancy i got the eviction notice. Its obvious they lied to me and used me to fill in the gap between their attempts to sell the house. I have filled in the defence form as it was easy to follow the old one from my previous post. I will post it later on in the hope someone can give it the once over. It has to be in by the end of this month may 31st.  
    • It's a GR Yaris - Finance is with Alphera, who are part of BMW I believe. I'm sure the unit is very expensive to repair, I have even told them I would be happy with a refurbished/reconditioned unit, in trying to be reasonable as well.
    • Without seeing this envelope, document and sticker it is impossible to advise properly. However, just going on what you have told us, there are two ways you can deal with this: !. The easy way. This has the lowest risk but the guarantee of a penalty for speeding.  You can respond to the SJPN by pleading “Not Guilty” to both charges. In the “Reasons for pleading Not Guilty” box you can explain that you responded to the request for driver’s details but it was recently returned to you, seemingly not actioned. However, you are willing to plead guilty to the speeding charge providing, and only providing, the “Fail to Provide Driver's Details" (FtP) charge is dropped. You could also ask the court to consider sentencing you at the fixed penalty level (£100 and 3 points) as this prosecution seems to be the result of an administrative problem outside your control. 2. The not so easy way with higher risk. This could see you convicted of the FtP charge but has the possibility that you escape with no penalty whatsoever. You can do the same – plead not guilty to both charges. If you go down this route the speeding charge cannot succeed as they have no evidence you were driving. This comes from your response to the request for driver’s details which the police say they have not got. You can mention in the “Reasons” box that you returned the request for driver’s details as required. You will then face a trial for the FtP charge and you can produced your response together with the envelope and sticker showing it had been returned to you. The risk with this is that if your defence fails you will be fined a week and a half’s net income, pay a “Victim Surcharge” of 40% of the fine, pay prosecution costs of around £650 and have six points together with an endorsement code (MS90) which will see your insurance premiums rocket.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Invalid Default Notices


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4955 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Several of my UK Mail envelopes have had no date stamp on them, BTW.

 

 

 

Incidentally, I don't see how the envelope can show that it was delivered on the 16th. The franking date will be when Royal Mail received it from UK Mail, won't it, not when it was delivered?

 

 

UK Mail will not have a frank, but UK Mail is second class , so according to Ministry of Justice Civil Procedure Rules it is deemed to be served 4 working days after the date of posting, which would be the date on the enclosed letter.

My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Anyway, my thought about undated UK Mail envelopes was that if, in your confusion, you'd not kept the original envelope but had inadvertently attached a different, undated, UK Mail envelope (received from the same creditor) to your DN as evidence that it was sent second class, would anyone know how confused you'd become?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyway, my thought about undated UK Mail envelopes was that if, in your confusion, you'd not kept the original envelope but had inadvertently attached a different, undated, UK Mail envelope (received from the same creditor) to your DN as evidence that it was sent second class, would anyone know how confused you'd become?

 

 

Why would the same creditor be sending a letter within 2 or 3 days of sending you a DN?

 

 

You hit the nail on the head , how would the creditor prove they had sent the DN 1st Class when every other correspondence has been 2nd Class via UK Mail?

My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Several of my UK Mail envelopes have had no date stamp on them, BTW.

 

 

 

Incidentally, I don't see how the envelope can show that it was delivered on the 16th. The franking date will be when Royal Mail received it from UK Mail, won't it, not when it was delivered?

 

forget all about what the envelope shows

 

the poster made an "admission" that HE received the DN on the 16th

 

if it were to be shown in court that the poster and the defendant were one in the same and that in evidence the defendant had misled (lied) to the court in this respect- he would be in deep doo doo

 

I don't intend to engage further on this- i was merely attempting to point out that posters should not make such admissions on the forum .

 

you can lead some people to water..................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would the same creditor be sending a letter within 2 or 3 days of sending you a DN?

 

It doesn't need to be, since it's undated. It could be one that came weeks before or after. I assume it couldn't be shown not to be the one that came with the DN.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is important...

 

http://www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/parts/part06.htm#IDAUNJAC

 

 

 

6.3

 

It would seem that a DN sent second class breaches Civil Procedure rules?

Edited by GeoffreyAlby

My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't need to be, since it's undated. It could be one that came weeks before or after. I assume it couldn't be shown not to be the one that came with the DN.

 

 

But then the burden of proof is on the Claimant?

My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there been reading through the posts, i've got DNs but I'm still unsure as to whether or not they are pukka. Could someone have a look and tell me, I have another thread on here but this looks like a better place to pose the question. Also some of the DNs are a few years old does this make a difference. Cheers PM

http://i783.photobucket.com/albums/yy115/penmarine/CrapONE2s0001.jpg

CrapONEPG20001.jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

http://i783.photobucket.com/albums/yy115/penmarine/CrapONEDefaultpage1c0001.jpg

http://i783.photobucket.com/albums/yy115/penmarine/CrapOne1s0001.jpg

http://i783.photobucket.com/albums/yy115/penmarine/vanquispg10001.jpg

http://i783.photobucket.com/albums/yy115/penmarine/vanquispg20001.jpg

Edited by penmarine
And again I try to link different DNs. Sorry guys n girls!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PM,

They are all the same pic...;)

It's not actually a Default Notice, it's an Arrears Notice, which is just sent for information purposes only and is not a demand for payment.

 

DN's start off:

Important, You should read this carefully

Default Notice served...etc etc..

 

Elsa x

PS if its an error and you manage to sort it I'll take a look and edit this response.

:)

Edited by Undercover-Elsa
Link to post
Share on other sites

just to get this absolutely straight

 

the "rules" do indeed state that it will be assumed that second class postage has been used unless evidence as to first class postage is presented

 

HOWEVER

 

if you admit that you have received the document earlier than the 4th working day from the date of posting then the DN will be deemed to have been served on the day you state that you received it and NOT the fourth day.

 

the "purpose"" of the legislation is to "serve" the DN on the debtor

 

and the admission by the debtor that he received it on a particular day overrides the time for service that was "deemed" if that is an earlier date

 

i thought that you had admitted in an earlier post- receving the DN two days after it was posted (16th)- given the public nature of the forum i would advise that it would be very foolish to later declare otherwise

 

Several of my UK Mail envelopes have had no date stamp on them, BTW.

 

Incidentally, I don't see how the envelope can show that it was delivered on the 16th. The franking date will be when Royal Mail received it from UK Mail, won't it, not when it was delivered?

 

forget all about what the envelope shows

 

the poster made an "admission" that HE received the DN on the 16th

 

if it were to be shown in court that the poster and the defendant were one in the same and that in evidence the defendant had misled (lied) to the court in this respect- he would be in deep doo doo

 

I don't intend to engage further on this- i was merely attempting to point out that posters should not make such admissions on the forum .

 

you can lead some people to water..................

 

The main purpose of my statements was to illustrate that it is doubtful that keeping the envelope is really beneficial, for 2 reasons:

 

 

  • You can basically shoot yourself in the foot by keeping the envelope and noting the date of service. By doing so you could very easily bring “forward” the date you could have used should you not have kept a record. Whatever we think of RM, these letters do arrive well within the given timeframe on many an occasion.
  • As been pointing out by nks, the envelope will only reflect the date on which RM received the letter and not the date of service, proving the date of service will only be beneficial if there is a significant delay between RM receiving the letter and the date that you receive it (which is where most delays occur), and it seems that the envelope will fail to do just that. It will, however, proof the type of service been used.

 

So, my conclusion is that the only benefit of keeping the envelope is to proof the “Type of Service” but then you should have a record of the date of service anyway, unless you haven’t note the date and you are really unsure about the date, you can then use the arguments about date of service.

 

Just to make it clear, I have no intention to make any false statements about receiving this specific letter, I have enough other stuff, starting with the CCA, PPI, charges, etc. Because I have no such intention I decided to use it as an example (with the dates) to illustrate that by keeping the envelope and noting the date of service can backfire and the only way out of it would be to lie, which you should not do. Therefore, keeping the envelope and noting the date of service was a bad idea in this instance.

 

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PM,

They are all the same pic...;)

It's not actually a Default Notice, it's an Arrears Notice, which is just sent for information purposes only and is not a demand for payment.

 

DN's start off:

Important, You should read this carefully

Default Notice served...etc etc..

 

Elsa x

PS if its an error and you manage to sort it I'll take a look and edit this response.

:)

 

They do use the term "Default Charges" often, which is actually strange to me. Default charges would really mean that you will incur it by default, no matter waht you do. Maybe it is a reflection of their point of view?:eek::eek:

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your DN insufficiently identifies the agreement!!!

 

A description of the agreement sufficient to identify it, i.e. Account Number.

 

 

 

i.e. Account Number – for an example an account number, will be sufficient for a credit card agreement, (they have to provide the name and address of the creditor anyway).

 

Other examples:

The description needs to be sufficient to identify the agreement, not the account, therefore it should be something to identify the agreement, something like “This notice refers to a credit agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 under Account No. xxxxx”, therefore the agreement related to a specific account.

 

There could be more examples.

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do have this question in the back of my mind for some time now:

 

Does a Default Notice served on the back of an un-enforceable credit agreement have any value to the creditor? The purpose of the DN is after all to place them in a position to enforce the Credit Agreement. Doesn’t an un-enforceable credit agreement makes any DN served invalid anyway?

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not actually a Default Notice, it's an Arrears Notice, which is just sent for information purposes only and is not a demand for payment.

 

They're not all the same. The fifth one is a default notice:

 

CrapOne1s0001.jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

 

And the third one terminates the account:

 

CrapONEDefaultpage1c0001.jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

 

The DN, sent on 19/6/09 gives 28 days "from the date of this letter" to remedy the breach and the termination was sent by Capital One on 25/6/10.

 

This one is a DN from Vanquis but there's only one date visible on it. Was the account assigned (sold) by Capital One?

 

vanquispg20001.jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

Link to post
Share on other sites

The main purpose of my statements was to illustrate that it is doubtful that keeping the envelope is really beneficial

 

Isn't the sole purpose so that you can disprove any claim that the DN was sent Second Class? (And we know they invariably are sent Second Class).

 

you should have a record of the date of service anyway, unless you haven’t note the date and you are really unsure about the date, you can then use the arguments about date of service.

 

Why should you have a record of the date of service? (I don't record when my letters arrived.) No-one can prove the date of delivery and why would you remember the exact date anyway? And even if you do, why would you announce it in court if it's to your disadvantage?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This one is a DN from Vanquis but there's only one date visible on it. Was the account assigned (sold) by Capital One?

 

Actually the Vanquis remedy date is the day befote Capital One's DN so presumably they're different accounts. The Vanquis one doesn't have a date of issue, though, and can Vanquis issue a DN, anyway?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't the sole purpose so that you can disprove any claim that the DN was sent Second Class? (And we know they invariably are sent Second Class).

 

Why do you want to disprove that it was 2nd class? Do you mean disprove 1st class?

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually the Vanquis remedy date is the day befote Capital One's DN so presumably they're different accounts. The Vanquis one doesn't have a date of issue, though, and can Vanquis issue a DN, anyway?

 

It is 2 different accounts in fact, as you suggest. CrapOne and Vanquis. Vanquis do not have a date on the Notice itself but do send a letter attached to it with the date. You can argue (how successfull I am not sure) that the notice do not have a date on it and that the date on the letter shouldn't be use as part of the DN.

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. My point remains the same, though.

 

Yes, recording the date in unnecessary and the envelope only serves to prove that it was send 2nd class.

 

That is my understanding now.

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're not all the same. The fifth one is a default notice:

 

CrapOne1s0001.jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

 

And the third one terminates the account:

 

CrapONEDefaultpage1c0001.jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

 

The DN, sent on 19/6/09 gives 28 days "from the date of this letter" to remedy the breach and the termination was sent by Capital One on 25/6/10.

 

This one is a DN from Vanquis but there's only one date visible on it. Was the account assigned (sold) by Capital One?

 

vanquispg20001.jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

 

Hi NKS,

How strange! They aren't the same links as I am seeing in the post, what I'm getting is listed below. I've just checked each one again and I'm getting all identical Arrears Notices (probably some glitch from when PM edited as he does state he originally copied all the same one):

 

CrapONEPG20001.jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

CrapONEDefaultpage2c0001. jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

CrapONEDefaultpage2c0001. jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

CrapONEDefaultpage2c0001. jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

CrapONEDefaultpage2c0001. jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

CrapONEDefaultpage2c0001. jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

CrapONEDefaultpage2c0001. jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

CrapONEDefaultpage2c0001. jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

CrapONEDefaultpage2c0001. jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

CrapONEDefaultpage2c0001. jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

 

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4955 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...