Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ive locked the old thread post here now. it's how backdoor CCJ's work sadly as he didn't update his 'creditors' he had moved sadly quite legal and to be honest 9/10 nothing can now be done. paying it will NOT resolve the issue a CCJ shows for 6yrs regardless to paid or not or paying or not. you could poss ask whom is refusing his guarantor status for you that if the CCJ is paid, would the issue be resolved, but that will cost you the sum of the judgement. dx  
    • new thread created for this parking CCJ. please only post here now.  
    • So how can the courts then issue a CCJ?! Confirmed by Registry Trust? and issued by CNBC?! 😡  I'll phone again tomorrow and get all the details.
    • dx is wrong there. The reason they did the application with a hearing is likely that they had questions of the application that weren't answered in their wx. nothing to do with your N180 no they are just saying that they want the extension to make it 7.
    • its not a fine! it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Aic


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5280 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 166
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I thought he'd gone, but he must have been spending his AIC bonus in Barbados (or Southend).

 

Actually, Insolvencyman, your post gave me such a laugh. :D

 

Don't worry, Joolzy, no-one is going to do anything without a valid, enforceable credit agreement. I wish I could remember who once posted that next AIC will be threatening to send the plague of locusts and taking your first-born. If they got mine they would send her straight back. :)

 

Insolvencyman, if you mean to say, for example, "You are running out of time," but wish to abbreviate, it is "You're running out ....." You take the 'a' out of 'you are' and put the apostrophe in its place. Just goes to show what this site can offer: A free English punctuation lesson.

 

Loved the troll, lickthewallfatboy. Just what I needed after a long day hanging around outside the post office on the estate with my mobile. :D

 

Daniella

Link to post
Share on other sites

ISM's offensive quote removed

Yeah..up to our necks in debt & laughing at the likes of you coz we dont have to pay it back & know we can get away with it :D

I also think that your backside licking of the banks will backfire soon when they have to start pay back all the illegal bank charges.

I challenge the banks to bring any actions against the British people...oh how politically sensitive that will be :cool:

Your comments about the DCA's are just non sensical & a load of rubbish, they can litigate all they want, but its up to the court if they get anything & it will cost them money to bring any actions against people - they have no legal powers to do anything other than threaten.:rolleyes:

Thanks to sites like CAG - they are lucky if they get a £1 per month & the DCA's are out of pocket already before they even step foot in the court.

County courts = the debtors best friend :)

Edited by slick132
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Loved the troll, lickthewallfatboy. Just what I needed after a long day hanging around outside the post office on the estate with my mobile. :D

 

Daniella

 

I hope you had a really enjoyable day texting all yer mates while Insolvencyman was working his backside off to pay for your top up cards :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

PLEASE REFRAIN FROM MAKING PERSONAL INSULTS

 

if users persist in making personal insults, they will very quickly find their account being subject to moderation and all PM abilities removed.

;):)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PT2537,

 

Bill and I and many other people on this thread, and many caggers generally, have now been insulted. Can Insolvencyman now be removed, please?

 

Maybe Joolzy might want everything not related to the original subject of her thread to be edited out so we can get back on track? The guys and I have just been trying to get him to go away.

 

Daniella

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you believe in "Karma" & "what goes around comes around" etc.... Insolvencyman?

You need to learn a lesson in life pal that if you wish ill on other people or laugh at others not as fortunate as you, then life has a nasty habbit of coming back to bite you on the backside :)

So when you are on that plane to Florida..just remember that fate may have it in for you that day :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does seem like that everyones posts are bing removed & not IM's....rat & smell???????

erm, where, ive removed 5 posts from IM on this thread, probably before you even realised they were there!!

 

if however i missed one please let me know and i will review them and moderate where necessary

Link to post
Share on other sites

PT..can you just ban the troll & save us all the hastle...we have genuine people to be helping on here, not wasting our time on no-marks like him....

lol sorry Mr Ton, im not like a DJ where i can do requests, however, i think its safe to say we shall not be bothered again from our friend:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its fantastic that he's a squillionaire/travels the world & has the life of riley/woopey do for him etc....but mine & most others priorities is to help the not so fortunate one's on here who want/need help.

IM is a nobody...others on here are real people with real problems etc..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I would like to say that I am not offended by ISMs comments towards myself. I have come to expect that from the other side. I think ISMs posts should stand as testament to the understanding and sympathetic treatment debtors can expect from some DCAs/officialdom.

Personally, I didn't enjoy my holiday in Barbados last year. Too many lightweight Americans!.

 

Bill

 

(Now can we get back to the OP?)

Edited by Bill Shidding
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its fantastic that he's a squillionaire/travels the world & has the life of riley/woopey do for him etc....but mine & most others priorities is to help the not so fortunate one's on here who want/need help.

IM is a nobody...others on here are real people with real problems etc..

 

Agreed Mr T

 

In my opinion i think that Insolvency has obviously been rumbled and furthermore although it gripes some of us honest caggers, just iggy him and let the site team deal with him,there is no point in arguing as it does not benefit the OP, although we all have our reasons for hating AIC (especially me) for our own reasons.

 

The more you reply to the idiot the more he will respond.

 

Regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing with the trolls who come on here is...they all work in/or did in the industry to 1 degree or another.

They know full well that their industry is suffering thanks to sites like this & people being made more aware of their rights.

Human nature being the way it is these days sadly - its only natural that they will want to come on sites like this & lash out at what they see is the cause of their problems.

IM is unique in the troll department so far - he's the only one who has came on with a "i'm better/richer than you" attiude :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok enough, i've been peronally emailed by the "troll" and i need advice as how to forward it on to the team. I only ever came to this website for advice and help and now i seem to stuck in other peoples arguments. I reiteratate that all i ever wanted was help and not become a forum for some sort of slagging match. I really do appreaciate how everyone feels and now instead of being a victim i'm now going to stand up for myself but I need constructive help please. xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok enough, i've been peronally emailed by the "troll" and i need advice as how to forward it on to the team. I only ever came to this website for advice and help and now i seem to stuck in other peoples arguments. I reiteratate that all i ever wanted was help and not become a forum for some sort of slagging match. I really do appreaciate how everyone feels and now instead of being a victim i'm now going to stand up for myself but I need constructive help please. xx

if it was a PM then you need to click on the "forward" and forward it to me

 

if you go to your private messages, open the message in question and at the bottom you will see forward.gif , click on that symbol and type in my username pt2537 and it will come to me when you hit send

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry again, Joolz,

 

It really isn't supposed to be a forum for a slagging match, but trolls have to be sent away because they deliberately come on this forum to try to frighten people by giving totally misleading information. It's exactly the same as DCAs do on the phone, and of course they hate it if you say, "No agreement (in the correct format), no payment." (Unless, of course, you pay on your terms.)

 

Sadly, I am not surprised he has sent you a pm. Do you remember that song, "United we stand, Divided we fall."? That's why he has pm'd you.

 

I'm sure PT will advise you on what to do next.

 

DDxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok everybody here I am again, well those lovely people at AIC have sent me my "CCA". This comprises of the following. There are 2 pages (I won't bother uploading it, you'll see why in a minute). Page 1. At the top it says Credit card application report, and then underneath it says Internet Banking Application. Then the following info. My name, address, phone number, where I work, bank account number etc, basically all my personal info. Page 2. My mobile number. That's pretty much it. No terms, rates etc: The credit card number has been hand written on the top of page 1. The application date is 19 April 2007, strangely i,ve had this card for at least 10 years? Can someone please tell me what my next course of action should be?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey Joolzy, they've not pushed the boat out there then with their artwork / craft class have they. I had the misfortune of dealing with AIC earlier in the month for a staggering amount of........wait for it, 380.00pounds, given to them from Natwest, who are equally in my bad books. - all of which i'm disputing. If you go onto the OFT site and download the debt collection guidance for Unfair business practices, it clearly stipulates what you should expect to receive in terms of the CCA, and what you have received clearly does not define that. Again it looks like AIC are trying to scare you, and making it look like they know more than you do regarding the issue. Good luck and I hope you get it sorted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...