Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
    • That doesn't look like clacton ... Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage buys coastal home in Lydd-on-Sea WWW.KENTONLINE.CO.UK Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage bought a coastal home in the county, it has been reported.  
    • It's not a private road.  It's a small public street (with Resi houses) that leads into and from public road/ highway. The garages have land in front of the doors.  Then there's a yellow line. So there's a clear marker on what is private and what is public.  These people keep parking on the private land side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

egg/barclays/Lowells SD ****SET ASIDE & WON COSTS ***


mandyjayne
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5141 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all...

 

Can someone help me with where to start with this please..

 

Had a Barclays account 2000/2004ish went overdrawn due to a difficult time...tried to arrange to pay back but the charges were over taking the amount i was paying in.

 

Now getting letters from Lowells and Hamptons..any idea why two DCAs for the same debt??

 

I have just found an old cheque book from that account and the account number is completly different from the one the DCA has?

 

Do i need to subject access? if yes who to the DCA or Barclays?

 

many thanks whoever gets this..

 

I have just been successful in the legal issues with set aside of a ccj and removal of a charging order so i am very positive and will fight to the bitter end with this one as well!!:eek:

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 276
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It might be worthwhile to send the 'prove it letter' first & save £10, besides knowing Lowells and the age of the account if you haven't acknowledged the debt in writing or paid anything to it for a period of six years it'll be Statute Barred, or very nearly. (Five years in scotland).

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

**Edit to suit**

 

Remember, don’t sign the letter.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mandyjayne:)

 

I don't know if this is of any help.

 

I was informed on a thread I started re: a DCA buying an account from MBNA and paperwork turning up with an unrecognisable account number, that when the bank sells off your account they issue it with a new number before it passes to the new owner.

 

When we first received letters quoting this new number we were hoping that the DCA had ****ed things up. We were disinclined to contact the DCA quoting this number ourselves as we didn't want to appear to be acknowledging it, however neither did we want to draw their attention to a possible error on their part. We did write to them as we needed to send them the 'bemused/account in dispute' letter as we are in the process of reclaiming charges on the account, but we omitted to refer to the account number at all just in case. We have heard nothing from the DCA since 26th March.

 

Good luck with your fight!

 

Regards,

 

Landy x

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MJ, I agree with 42man and would be inclined to send off a SAR, to determine the extent of charges so that you can challenge them.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

 

Thanks for all the replys..all noted:D

 

Ok will go for the subject access request...now do i send it to my local branch of barclays or head office...any ideas?

 

and just double checking i do NOT send one also to DCA?

 

Cheers MJ

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys

 

Just done subject access request..the one geared towards dca on 42 mans link.

 

Bearing in mind this was an overdraft..do you actually sign a cca? i dont think you do..so would i be aiming to get back statements? When and if they arrive whats the next step please:D

 

Cheers mj:confused:

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok that sounds like a plan!!:D

 

will post on Monday so updates when and if

 

thanks

 

welshmam

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi guys

 

Sent sar to lowells as they are the ones who are supposed to "own" the debt. Hope this was correct.

 

Can some one advise.. once they receive it does that make the account now in dispute..can they still go along the court route?

 

ta MJ:)

 

bump

Edited by citizenB
merged posts where "bump " occurs same day

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It really should have been sent to the original creditor, Lowlife will only be able to provide you with information & data which has occurred between you & them. They might pass it on, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cerberusalert

 

Thanks for your help...

 

right it still has not been posted mum-in-law still has it...!!!

 

so will send to Barclays and the prove it letter to lowells..

 

On thinking, only thing i am worried about is i have a joint account in my now married name with Barclays but still the same address..not my choice to use Barclays was a woolwich one but they merged and it just went over there. Of course its a different surname and account number

 

question: once they receive sar are they likely to connect the two?

 

will wait for advise on this before posting

 

thanks MJ

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In all honesty I don't know, but in any case it would be safer if you opened a 'parachute' account with an unrelated banking group group such as the Co-operative. The problem is, banks are allowed to offset against accounts so if they do discover that you have a second a/c they will deduct monies from it if you have another a/c such as a credit card which is in arrears. Obviously this can lead to allsorts of problems such as bounced DDs and ultimately with charges make that second a/c overdrawn too, thus creating even more charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks again

 

well i cannot open another account due to the default given by lowells for this one!

 

There is no excess money in there and only £100 overdraft and i sail very close to that all the time, i have no credit cards, i am one that has learned from mistakes!! My husband has a seperate account, i use this one although its joint.

 

Any more thoughts???

 

mj

 

bump

Edited by citizenB
Merged posts where "bump" occurs same day

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi you say that you can't open another account due to the default, have you tried? You could try a basic account at a different bank / building society where you have no accounts. You may not get an od and there may be other restrictions but you should be able to find an account. I believe some people have had success with Abbey and Nationwide, you can apply online.

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all for help with this one..

 

ok i will give it go, in the meantime shall i send the prove it letter...i have received another letter from Lowells offering me a reduced balance if i pay now!

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks...will do that today..post with update when received:D

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I sent my prove it letter to Lowells on the 12th they got it on the 13th, but clearly have ignored it.:D

 

Today received a letter from Hamptons which says:

 

We refer to previous correspondence and note you have failed to enter into a repayment plan.

 

We are now going to request a copy of your credit file from Experian which will help us decide what form of litigation is best for us.

 

If you are a homeowner we could issue legal proceedings against you, if we are granted judgment we could then apply to the court for a charging order, if you the still persist with non payment we could apply for further enforcement and ask the court to grant an order of sale if granted this could mean you losing your home.

 

If you are not a homeowner blah blah blah:rolleyes: goes on about bailiff's and sheriff's and adding on court costs

 

But i still have time to bring this matter to an amicable end

.....Please call the number below to arrangement payment:p

 

lots of love

 

stephen hunter - Director

 

Help with how to respond to this PLEASE;)

 

LOL MJ:D

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hamptons is the another retard sat opposite Lowell, next to big bad Red :rolleyes:

 

Send this;

 

Dear Sirs

 

I refer to your letter of XXXXX 2009 which was received today.

 

Frankly, I am surprised of the need to advise a firm of solicitors about the terms and conditions surrounding my Consumer Credit Agreement request (Consumer Credit Act, 1974); dated XXXX 2009 for which I have proof of receipt . I can only assume therefore that they failed to inform you of their non compliance. Your client had until (date - 12+2 working days from date of sending CCA request) to comply with a legal request.

 

Should your client persist with threats of legal action as stated in your letter, I will welcome the opportunity for a judge to look at several defaults committed by xxxx under The Consumer Credit Act, 1974, as well as your client’s non-compliance with and total disregard for, both the banking code and OFT guidelines.

 

Also please note that I will ONLY communicate in writing, any calls made to me will be classed as harrassment and treated as such.

 

Yours faithfully

Print name do not sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...