Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a little something for consideration When a card is compromised, the replacements can be set up to automatically allow or manually re-add, old recurring transactions. The card issuer may ask you to confirm legitimate transactions which they would effectively 'migrate' to the new card Some do - some don't. Some staff on some cards seem to be entirely unaware/uncaring about this. Some card issuers expect you to sort it all out manually.   BUT if the leak is an ongoing lyca leakas it seems - as soon as you or your CC supplier give it to lyca/the leak source - compromised again     A note on security DONT use the same email or phone number for your banking as you do for sims etc. Although a bank eg santander leak would compromise this Infp seems to suggest that single/compromised multi factor authentication customers are priority targets, with more robustly secure cards being hit by 0.00 tests first Consider that the email address is one of the OTP recieving options AND one of the OTP security checks prior to sending the OTP - with the phone number being another So if they've got your card and email (same email for banking and end contact) - and you aren't forcing a phone OTP - you are compromised.  
    • Thanks for posting up the back of the NTK. The good news s that as it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act, it means that you are not liable for the charge as the keeper as I explained in a previous post.  The PC fails for two reasons. The first is that it does not specify the period of parking. All it does is list the arrival and departure times of your car. Obviously that does not include the time taken to drive to the car parking space, manoeuvre the car into the space and later drive from the space to the exit. Nor does their times include things like getting kids disabled people out of and into the car as well as things like returning the trolley whilst still being parked. All of which can add a fair bit of time to the parking period which can then be subtracted from their ANPR times and makes your actual parking time a lot shorter than 118 minutes they seem to think it is. The second reason is that they failed to ask the keeper to pay Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][e]  (e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges You as keeper are now in the clear which is a good reason for you to contact Sainsbury  stating that you are being pursued as the keeper when you are not liable under the Act as well as the oher things I suggested in my previous post. If you don't get it cancelled with Sainsbury this could drag on for months with endless letters unlawfully pushing the price up to scare you into paying.  
    • Brilliant! That's great to hear and honestly pleased I'm wrong, my advice was out of concern. I checked some of your previous posts last night and you've been giving great advice to others at times. Bringing a claim can be serious (counter-claims etc) and it didn't appear you were knowledgeable based on posts so far. Far from an expert myself, just interested and will try to help. I'll sit on the sidelines, best of luck with the claim!
    • Thank you so much for the advice  I will try and up my savings to £500 for the next 6 months. Although I do still have an uphill battle, I feel more able to deal with it.  I hope my experience with the cifas marker helps someone else who finds themselves in that quite horrible situation. It is a huge weight off my shoulders getting it removed.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How to Stop charges


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5546 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My wife could not keep up with new look store card repayments due to hardship we are facing which involves few other creditors. All this happened when i was told by my firm to become part time or face the redundancy, so i choose part time just to keep my job. My wife is unemployed and look after our 2 little kids. My wife wrotea letter to New Look offering them £2 PM and also stop any extra charges. anyway the problem is New Look has pass the account to Ikano who has phoned my wife few times forcing her to cough up the amount. My wife has offered them £2 PM but they refused and instead they have wrote 5 letters from mid Jan 09 up to now and in each letter asking to pay. I thought better write them another letter to inform our circumstances once again and yesterday when i looked at the letters they have sent i noticed each letter has higher amount than the previous letter. All i want to know what can i do / what sort of letter to write to get these charges stop by Ikano. Is there any strong ground we have to to stop charges? I would appreciate for the advice and help from any of you. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, welcome to Cag.

 

Firstly NEVER talk to these people on the phone, keep everything in writing so you have a full paper trail.

 

Second, why do you think they keep writing, YES, it's because THAT'S all can do. These people have no more legal rights over you than your postman.

 

Third, The charges are complete rubbish, they can profess to charge what they want, but it's all bluff. MOST charges are unfair and can be reclaimed.

 

Fourth, send them this letter

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/581-cca-request-letter.html

 

They have 14days to reply, enclose a £1 postal prder, DO NOT SIGN this letter.

 

Hope this helps

 

Jogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, welcome to Cag.

 

Firstly NEVER talk to these people on the phone, keep everything in writing so you have a full paper trail.

 

Second, why do you think they keep writing, YES, it's because THAT'S all can do. These people have no more legal rights over you than your postman.

 

Third, The charges are complete rubbish, they can profess to charge what they want, but it's all bluff. MOST charges are unfair and can be reclaimed.

 

Fourth, send them this letter

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/581-cca-request-letter.html

 

They have 14days to reply, enclose a £1 postal prder, DO NOT SIGN this letter.

 

Hope this helps

 

Jogs

 

 

Thank you havinastella, i have printed that letter and will post it on Monday. just curious this letter does not mention anything about the charges, and if its hidden in one of the Acts would Ikano revert those charges ? Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget the charges for now.

 

This letter will check if they have a valid agreement they can collect on. If they don't have that agreement, they can't collect.

 

If they do have a valid and enforceable agreement, we can look at the charges on the account and move on from there.

 

The most important thing here is NOT to worry, these monkeys will soon return up the trees. ;)

 

If you get a few minutes, just have a read at some of the threads on here, you'll be amazed at the infomation you can pick up, even I did :D

 

Have a good nights sleep, nothing really bad can happen from owing a few ££

 

 

Jogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget the charges for now.

 

This letter will check if they have a valid agreement they can collect on. If they don't have that agreement, they can't collect.

 

If they do have a valid and enforceable agreement, we can look at the charges on the account and move on from there.

 

The most important thing here is NOT to worry, these monkeys will soon return up the trees. ;)

 

If you get a few minutes, just have a read at some of the threads on here, you'll be amazed at the infomation you can pick up, even I did :D

 

Have a good nights sleep, nothing really bad can happen from owing a few ££

 

 

Jogs

 

Very well havinastella, I would have to wait for their reply and would inform you once its here. Good night and sweet dream

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am still waiting for their reply. In the mean time I have a question to ask. If a person (defendant unemployed) receives county court order from Northampton and there is a court fee too, is there a law or a way where a defendant get exemption from paying the court fee. I would be thankful for your reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am still waiting for their reply. In the mean time I have a question to ask. If a person (defendant unemployed) receives county court order from Northampton and there is a court fee too, is there a law or a way where a defendant get exemption from paying the court fee. I would be thankful for your reply.

 

Yes there is an exemption document to fill in and send to court.. if you are the defendant though why is there a court fee? the fee should be paid by the claimant as far as I'm aware.

 

Court fee remission explanation doc is here and actual form is here

 

PmW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes there is an exemption document to fill in and send to court.. if you are the defendant though why is there a court fee? the fee should be paid by the claimant as far as I'm aware.

 

Court fee remission explanation doc is here and actual form is here

 

PmW

 

Thanks for the reply and the forms, this is true the fees is paid by the claimant and it also has increased the final charges. so to reduce the final total I needed to find out if there is exemption for the unemployed defendant which is my wife.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...