Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I received this pack yesterday its an application notice to change claimants. Will they be chasing me for this as they were successful with the first claim? many thanks Webb 1.Application Notice N244rd.pdf 2.Asset Transfer Deed r.pdf 3.Notice of Assignment Part A Letter 1 & 2rd.pdf 5.Claim Form rd.pdf 6.Draft Order rd.pdf
    • Hi, If they haven't followed the court's directions there will be little tolerance of the court. Anyway please can you upload a copy of the court paperwork
    • Yes, you should have applied for an immediate strike out as soon as the deadline expired. Without the agreement, they are stuffed Forget Barclaycard, Asset link is now the creditor, and it is down to them to provide the agreement.  That needs to go into the witness statement. They have not provided the agreement contrary to directions of the court and request the court strike out the claim as to the original court directions.
    • I did not receive a notice via post but in my claim status it shows my claim was transferred to a court I requested in my DQ, as it is closer to me.    Defense I filed:  1.       The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2.       The defendant paid the lead tenant a fixed sum monthly bill without fail for the extent of the rental period of the accommodation their contract was associated with who was responsible to make payments to the claimant, ending in June 2023. 3.       After moving out, a month later, the claimant wrote to state that an outstanding sum existed. Further stating, as one of the 10 tenants at the time, I now owed them the full sum instead of my 1/10 proportion of said debt, as 10 students were at the dwelling. They also intimated that they were legally allowed to charge me the full sum if the other renters were not to pay their share under some equal and joint severity rule. 4.       Despite sending numerous requests prior to the court claim being raised for copies of said bills for said utilities covered by the agreement, the claimant failed to send any clear bills. This included a CPR 31.14 on xx/xx/xxxx sent via post. 5.       The defendants stress that they acted in good faith to settle the outstanding balance, as evidenced by the confirmation received from the claimant.  Any subsequent demands for additional payments are unwarranted and contradict the claimant's previous acknowledgment of settlement. 6.       Pursuant to OFGEM code of back billing rules the alleged charges relate to charges which have not been billed correctly by Co-operative Energy and are therefore prevented from charging. With the court’s permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to: - a) show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement. b) show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed. c) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim. 7.As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation                  that the money is owed. 8.It is therefore denied that the defendant is indebted to the claimant as alleged or at all.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Eon???? - what does Prepayment mean??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5511 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We were with Eon for Electricity Supply but about three months ago changed to Southern Electric. We have always had a prepayment meter but today received a final bill from Eon for £308 - my question is "how can you owe for electrictiy when you pre pay for it"?

 

Tried phoning them but just held in a line and never answered

Link to post
Share on other sites

They had system problems today so probably why you were held in a queue for what seemed like forever. You can get into debt with them through no fault of your own, just where they didnt recalibrate the meter when the prices increased. Call them again tomorrow and get them to justify it, which i doubt they can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What does it say on the bill?

Did you not have online billing with them ?

I would put something in writing or email them from their CS link on their website,giving them your contact number.I have always found them to respond pretty quickly-usually within 48 hours.

Will save their collection div sending you hassling letters (ECS)

Keep us posted.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are essentially 2 'common' reasons why a balance could build up on a prepayment meter.

 

a) You use your emergency credit button. Many people dont realise that when using emergency credit the meter cannot collect a standing charge, the suppliers know how much standing charge is due and will bill you for the difference on a closing or interim statement.

 

or

 

b) You have a token meter, token meter's are supposed to have been recalibrated when price rises were implemented - logistically this was a nightmare as many meter's were not accessible at the time of repeated engineer visits etc. This issue has been taken to the ombudsman and they have a specific policy concerning the back-billing of these charges I will edit with the correct figures when i get my hands on them but i seem to remember up to £90.

 

Please note that if you have a token meter currently it will(should) be replaced with a key/card meter on it's next recertification or any exchange.

 

C.B.A

Link to post
Share on other sites

C.B.A - we rarely go into the emergency credit as we put £50 per time into the meter - if we do go into emergency its for less than a day every time.

 

We have never had a token meter - always a key meter.

 

There arent many other possibilities that dont become impossible to determine without checking the details held on the pre-payment system.

 

Another possibility might be a debt that was 'loaded' onto the prepayment meter from a prior or previous credit account that was to be cleared as part of the prepayment scheme - that the meter hadnt been set to collect - that would remain unpaid and payable when the account was closed.

 

I've just listed posibilites that i'm aware of and could be easily identified, unfortunately pre-payment accounts building up 'debt' can usually be easily identified with the relevant systems. Without those systems it's not really possible for me to give anymore information.

 

Have you spoken to your provider about querying this bill ? if so what was their explanation or justification for the charges being over and above what you 'pre-paid' for ?

 

I might be able to translate any gibberish you get from the 'darkside'.

Edited by Could_Be_Anyone
splennig
Link to post
Share on other sites

The actual problem could be that when you were with E.On they had you down as being on a credit meter but you were actually on a pay as you go meter, first of all contact them and ask what meter details they have.

 

From there i would also ask what balance is on the account and where it came from becuase if it is a pay as you go meter you may well have somebodys else's debt on your hands which should be rightfully removed if so, either way get in touch with them asap and ask about the meter they have you down as first!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are essentially 2 'common' reasons why a balance could build up on a prepayment meter.

 

a) You use your emergency credit button. Many people dont realise that when using emergency credit the meter cannot collect a standing charge, the suppliers know how much standing charge is due and will bill you for the difference on a closing or interim statement.

 

or

 

b) You have a token meter, token meter's are supposed to have been recalibrated when price rises were implemented - logistically this was a nightmare as many meter's were not accessible at the time of repeated engineer visits etc. This issue has been taken to the ombudsman and they have a specific policy concerning the back-billing of these charges I will edit with the correct figures when i get my hands on them but i seem to remember up to £90.

 

Please note that if you have a token meter currently it will(should) be replaced with a key/card meter on it's next recertification or any exchange.

 

C.B.A

 

Hi there, Ive dealt with this query regarding token recalibration billing and the amount is £70.00.

ARGH COMPLAINTS!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...