Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5550 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Re my previous post. Equita have taken money from my wifes bank account £500 without any permision to do so, bank cant stop the transactionand we now cant afford to live for the month. Do we have anything we can do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely if you never agreed/permitted the transactions then you can ask for a chargeback on the transactions.

 

I found this in the consumer wiki Bailiffs: Get The Bailiff to Pay Off Your Debt - Consumer Wiki

 

perhaps not all of it applies to your problem, but sections of it may help you to get your money back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

she paid them 200 two weeks ago over the phone and said she would call when we had the money, having looked on here we realised it would be better to get the debt back to the council and that was the plan and pay of asap. We did not notice that the money was gone until my wife tried to buy our food. Gutted and feel sick that they could just take it upon themselves to take money without permision. Wife is in tears

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can't just take money without your permission, that's fraud, it's not a civil matter it's criminal.

 

Get a mod to merge your posts and keep adding to the same thread otherwise it gets confusing, and you haven't answered the questions I posted on your first thread, they are relevant to your situation because if they have taken money that they had no right to take then they have committed theft.

 

If money had been taken from MY account without my permission, I would be making a complaint to the police, unless there's something you haven't mentioned?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gutted and feel sick that they could just take it upon themselves to take money without permision. Wife is in tears

 

They can't.

 

As for the bank? If a fraud has been committed then they should be acting, and you should be telling them that you hold them responsible and if the money is not recovered by the police that you will recover it from them.

 

That's what I'd be telling them if it was me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have signed nothing, My wife panicked when she saw a folded piece of paper that had been put through the door saying that removal of goods would take place in 24 hours if balance not paid in full, she called the baliff and said that she could manage to pay £200 but was not possible to pay full amount because we just dont have it. He said that he would come round at the weekend and remove goods. She gave him her card details to make a payment of £200. In the meantime we had done a bit of reading on this forum and realised that this guy was talking bull! and so we had used the draft letters to send to baliff company (equita) and to Liverpool council saying that we had been making payments but were not happy with the way baliff ahd been treating us etc etc.

 

Yesterday we wnt to Asda to get the shopping in and her card declined when we got home £480 was missing from her account, and believe me she has every last penny accounted for so this was a shock and at this time we did not know who had or what had happened. To be honest TSB were not helpfull they just said that we had used our card which we had not. Eventually we got through to the credit system and they told us that we had put through a debit transaction for 480 but as yet they could not tell who it had been paid to, all they would say is that if you have given some one your card details you didnt't have a leg to stand on. again at thgis time were un aware that it was the baliff.

 

Just after 11pm last night the online statement updated and there it was Equita had without permission taken the money. Yes my wife gave the card details but for a 200 transaction on a previous date and they have banged though the rest of the debt on the last day of the month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, go to the police station and report a fraudulent card transaction.

Tell the bank the same.

 

 

And don't ever pay a bailiff directly ever again.

 

That's what I'd do.

 

 

This is happening so very often and unless people start doing something about it then bailiff will continue making unauthorised transactions from an account.

 

Debtors are making life EASY for a bailiff as they will continue paying a bailiff in cash without receipts, over the telephone without anything in writing etc and resorting to dealing with the bailiff over the mobile phone.

 

PUT EVERYTHING IN WRITING !!!! That way there is a "paper trail" as proof. This bailiff, I am CERTAIN will simply say that a payment was made of £200 and that he either received another call to advise him to take a further payment or that this was the agreement made at the time of the original call.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spoke to Equita they were very rude and snotty until I mentioned that I was going to the police and that the TSB fraud section were looking into this. I Have to email whats gone on to them tonight. My wife called the baliff and asked why he had taken money wihout permision, He said that she had agreed to pay at the end of the month, I know for a fact that she never said a thing its his word against ours is it worth going to the police with? will they take his word over ours ?...

 

Oh forgot his words were , well if you did't have the money the transaction would have failed, Yes the money was there but the Mortgage, water etc have all just bounced !

Link to post
Share on other sites

who have you to e-mail police bailiff tsb

 

 

just a thought to try get your money back a.s.a.p

when your phone the bailiff do you get the all calls recorded message if you do i would tell the bailiff you will sending them an s.a.r.for the transcripts of the calls and will be using this against them in your action against them for fraud/theft and a form 4 complaint as it will clearly show you did not give them permission to take £500 from your account you will also be asking for any charges for failed D.D. payments because of there action's

 

it may be worth a try i wish there was more i could do to help you this is shocking

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Whenever a company wishes to take payment over the phone for any product or service, they make an application to someone like Barclays merchant services.

They are charged a percentage of each transaction, and the percentage they are charged is based upon the level of authorisation needed before each transaction is accepted.

 

When I last made an application, their representative was very clear, he said that it was easy to get the service but not so easy to keep it. The card services have very strict policies about disputed transactions.

 

Think of it this way, if every time we made payments over the phone (to anyone), and had to accept the risk that that person might attempt to take money from our account once they had details of our credit card -- we would very soon cease using that service. The merchant services dependent on our confidence in their system.

 

So in a very long winded way, I'm trying to explain that although it may seem easy for someone (in this case a bailiff) to abuse the merchant services system, if there are enough complaints card merchant services will withdraw the facility, or, apply punitive charges to the account to deter their client from allowing it to happen again.

 

That's why you have to take the trouble to do something about this, you have to make a fuss in writing no matter what they say to you.

 

Good luck,

Chris.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok just got a reply from equita .

 

They are adamant that we agreed to pay the debt. and that the bailiff would not have suspended recovery unless told not to do so .

 

They believe that it was dealt with in a profesional matter and that they believe they did not break the law. they will be putting the funds back in my wifes account but now refuse any form of payment plan.

 

At the botom of the letter it says

Coulcil tax debt - 793.59

Recovery costs - 244.50

 

 

Surely those costs are a bit high can anyone advise please !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said earlier cancel the card so that no more payments can be taken from it. And NEVER give card details to a bailiff, or a DCA. They will fleece you. Go to the council and make a payment, they cannot refuse a payment from you, even if the account is with the bailiffs. Then make the same payment on the same date every month. It will look good on your record if you keep these payments up, even if you are in arrears. It shows you are willing to sort the problem out.

Next, challenge the bailiffs fees. If they have taken any money from you for fees, demand the money back. Nobody is obliged to pay bailiffs fees. S.A.R. them if neccesary.

Next, dont contact the bailiff again. They could call at your house for removal purposes but dont let them in. They normally check with the council before they make a visit, to see if any payment has been made.

I have done all the above, (except the payment by card bit) and it has worked for me and is still on going, and I have not heard anything at all from the bailiff. So good luck, and chin up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They believe that it was dealt with in a profesional matter and that they believe they did not break the law.

Then they should be able to prove, in writing, that permission was given to take the money in the first place.

If i gave you permission to drive my car today, would you come back later and say i gave you permission to take it when you wanted to. ?

 

they will be putting the funds back in my wifes account but now refuse any form of payment plan.

This is good news. And in my opinion an addmission of guilt.

Its even better news that you now know you dont even have to speak to them, let alone pay their extortionate fees.,

 

At the botom of the letter it says

Coulcil tax debt - 793.59

Recovery costs - 244.50

Stuff their costs.

 

Surely those costs are a bit high can anyone advise please !!!

Pay the council direct.

 

I hope you get things sorted soon.

 

Another classic example of why people, EVERYBODY, should have NOTHING to do with the bailiffs, EVER.

 

They have NO POWERS and rely on fear and intimidation.

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you get things sorted soon.

 

Another classic example of why people, EVERYBODY, should have NOTHING to do with the bailiffs, EVER.

 

They have NO POWERS and rely on fear and intimidation.

 

 

So are you saying I should ignore equita now and deal with the council?

The wife will start panicking again

Link to post
Share on other sites

So are you saying I should ignore equita now and deal with the council?

The wife will start panicking again

 

Thats EXACTLY what i am saying. If they have never been in your house, and in your own words

We have signed nothing

 

there is NOTHING they can do except throw their toys out of their prams.

 

Hand them this letter if they return. Tell them you now know your rights, and tell them where to go.

 

Template letter: Hand to bailiff at the door

Revokes a walking possessions fee

Amend as required

YOUR ADDRESS

LINE 2

LINE 3

POSTCODE

To: [NAME OF BAILIFF]

[DATE]

BY HAND

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: Your Reference

 

[NAME OF] Authority appears to have instructed you to recover [COUNCIL TAX ARREARS/PARKING TICKET/DESCRIPTION OF DEBT]

 

This notice directs that you are not being given entry to my home or to levy goods contained within. This notice revokes your entitlement to charge a Walking Possessions fee. Please be advised that if your fees are found to contradict [Regulation 45(2) of the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992/ Schedule 1 of Enforcement of Road Traffic Debts (Certificated Bailiffs)(Amended 2003) Regulations 1993] and you may be liable for criminal prosecution under section 1 to 5 of Fraud Act 2006, and I will automatically file a Form 4 complaint at your certificating court.

 

 

I confirm I am not refusing to pay this debt and I will pay the money direct to the council.

Please be advised it is not a "criminal offence" for me to deny a bailiff entry to my property, if a bailiff threatens me with getting a locksmith without a levy or tries to break & enter my home, I will automatically make a complaint to the police and the bailiff may receive a criminal record and will not be allowed to continue trading as a certificated bailiff.

 

Please provide me with a breakdown of your fees and pass them through the letterbox

 

 

Yours Faithfully

YOUR NAME

CC The Council.

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

P.S Make sure the money is back in your account first.:p

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Money is now back in account and letters printed, so do I just send a cjeque to the council for say £50 every month saying that this is a payment of my council tax for year 06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...