Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, welcome to CAG. Can you tell us more about what happened please? Who stopped you and which shop? Best, HB
    • You don't mention what the debts are, which is important, as it really depends on the details in deciding best course of action. So list types of debt e.g credit card, type of loan, utility bill; current owner bank or dca; approximate amount for each debt.  And do you own any property assets. There is no blanket advice regarding all types of debts. Whoever you contact regarding debt advice would want to know all of the information. The debt buying businesses deal with multi billions worth of debts. They can't issue Court claims for most debts as the cost of pursuing would be ruinous and don't have staff resources. Instead they rely on credit records being impacted and therefore people need to resolve the debts. And they rely on anxious debtors paying amounts after receiving threatening communications. If you know you are likely to be made redundant, start looking for other employment soon. Due to longer recruitment processes being followed by employers, it can take about 3 months between applying and starting a new job.
    • Hi I was caught shoplifting 4 items £20 worth, I’m petrified the Police will come to my house now please can you help. What can I do I worried about my job. 
    • I heard nothing more from J&P but have now had an email from the bank saying they have instructed IDR to act on their behalf?  so are they just passing it back? Selling it on again? I don’t know if this is a good or bad thing 
    • I posted a couple of years ago about our debt situation and have been trying to pay off our debt as best we can. It is a possibility I maybe made redundant in a few months time, so I am trying to find out everything I can about what happens in today’s world when you can’t pay. I keep finding conflicting advice on various sites so I wanted to post this quote to get thoughts. It claims basically that the dca will likely get enforceable documents these days and therefore it’s likely you will have to pay dca at some point during the 6 year process.    on here I read a lot of comments assuming the exact opposite of this. A lot of the threads on here state the beginning of the process but I never see conclusive stuff about what happened from start to finish to get insight into whether debts post 2015 have been enforced etc. I hear a lot here not to pay dca companies but most my debts are post 2015 debts I am all up to date on our debts but if I lose my job it is likely I’ll end up where I tried to avoid in the first place. Which is destroying our files and dealing with DCA. I’ll post it below so you can see what I mean.   It is likely that any debts incurred after 2007 will end up with all the documentation being provided and being enforceable. Therefore you should use the time while awaiting responses going through your Income & Expenditure and considering any possiblity of making a full and final settlement. It can take a number of months to reach the stage of a hearing date and exchange of witness statements and normally you would be able to settle or come to an arrangement to pay before the court hearing, once documents have been provided, although this isn’t guaranteed.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CABOT - their reply to my letter, what next?


joe1965
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5489 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I sent a letter to Cabots a fortnight ago (one of many) which is below.

 

You have stated in previous correspondence that you purchased the debt from Barclaycard

However, you are still contending that you purchased the rights but not the duties of the agreement. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by section 189. of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. As such, you are obliged to provide the credit agreement under sections 77-78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Section 189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties. In addition, as you hold a Consumer Credit Licence (No 0441205) you have a duty by law to carry out the request.

 

All the correspondence relating to this has now been passed onto the Trading Standards Office who has verified to me that you are stating a false position and that you are obliged by law to provide the necessary paperwork. They have passed on all paperwork to the Office of Fair Trading for them to deal with it in whatever way they wish.

 

I also issued you with a subject notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act.

Having been in touch with the Information Commissioners office, they are of an opinion that I have every right to request and for you to comply with the subject notice until such time that you provide the relevant documentation.

In addition, the Trading Standards Office has informed me that as you have failed to comply with my request under section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 you may NOT;

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

So either as a subject notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act, or under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, You have no right to be passing on ANY information to a third party.

 

I will expect confirmation from you within 7 days that all data sharing will cease until you can provide the relevant documentation.

 

If you continue to state you have a right to process my data I will have no other alternative but to consider litigation against you.

 

The Information Commissioners Office and the Office of Fair trading have already received an official complaint regarding your actions on this account.

 

This was the second letter giving them a section 10 to remove my data but as you will see from their reply which I recieved today they are still refusing to do so.

cabotreply.jpg

Can anyone advise me where I can go from here? I have never received a default notice from them but they placed the default on my credit file over a week before i had any contact with them. All I received from them was a notice of assignment from Barclaycard, printed by them!

Is it true they could counter claim if I tried to take them to court to get my data removed?

Any input would be welcome, especialy if someone could help me piece a letter together for these clowns as it is starting to stress me out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Not sure if this is an issue, but I don't like the way they hide behind "The Cabot Financial Group" A group of companies are ones where there is joint shareholding normally eminating from a common holding company. As we are talking here about the legal status of their position we should look at the legal entities they use.

If your Notice of assignment is the same as mine, Cabot Financial(UK) Ltd bought the debt, but you are being chased by Cabot Financial (Europe) Ltd, an entirely separate legal entity.

Have you given permission for CF (UK) to pass your data to CF(Europe) Ltd? Answer NO.

Your creditor is CF(UK) Ltd so they are hiding behind the "Group" statement.

Did your NoA state that CF(UK) now owned your debt, but that you must pay CF(Europe)? Mine did. I refused to pay CF(Europe)

It would be useful if someone more knowledgeable could comment my point.

regards,

Muscat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabot are, as always, talking through a hole in their knickers. They must provide you with a copy of the credit agreement as agents for the original creditor and until such times as they do you do not need to make any payment. Wait to see what they send, if anything. There is no need to reply to this, just keep it on file until you hear from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also rremember that, if they have not served you with a default notice correctly (registered or recorded delivery), they have not got the right to process your data as they have not perfected the debt purchase.

Beaten:

RBS: £4,500

AMEX: £4,200

Barclaycard Visa: £12,100

Barclaycard M/Card: £12,600

(Including the numerous DCAs they have set on me.)

PPI reclaims (into my bank account): £25,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can well understand how cabot are stressing you, standby for more im afraid, they never listen to reason.

 

Can i ask have you ever had a Default notice from barclaycard?

 

Can you confirm that you have sent a CCA request, and to whom?

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't be 100% sure but I don't think I ever received one from Barclaycard. However they did try taking it to court and I sent the template letters from the site under the Civil procedure rules, and that included asking for the CCA. It was stayed in court well over a year ago. They took this action because I sent a CCA & SAR request to them in the first place!

I just don't want these **** having the last word and if anyone knows an individual higher up within the company who the letter could be addressed to even better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok first, barclaycard have no right selling it (or doing anything else while the matter is in court), the judge would tear them to bits!

 

Write to cabot stating the matter is in court, with the claimant being barclaycard, and giving the claim number.

 

Cabot will then be off you case faster than lightening

 

Next, you have obviously defended, can you post up the Particulars of Claim, and your defence to it?

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also rremember that, if they have not served you with a default notice correctly (registered or recorded delivery), they have not got the right to process your data as they have not perfected the debt purchase.

 

Is this correct? Do DN have to be sent rec. to be deemed served correctly?:confused:

Cabot At Court Stage

Barclaycard Settled, Amount Written off :D 12/02/09

Cabot At Court Stage(2nd account)

Skycard Now with Capquest, Threatinging SD

Next No CCA received, in dispute sent. Nothing heard for over a year

HSBC No CCA received, in dispute sent

EGG S.A.R sent 04/02/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this correct? Do DN have to be sent rec. to be deemed served correctly?:confused:

 

No, it can be served by 1st class (two days) 2nd class (4 days) hand (same day), either way you can put them to strict proof of such in court.

 

The right to process your data is given by YOU in the agreement, it follows that if there isn't an agreement then they have no right.

 

This has nothing to do with a DN.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the claim form;

court.jpg

I sent both the CPR letters, and the day before my time was up I sent a defence in telling them I could not defend myself as Barclaycard had not provided the required information under CPR giving them copies of the CPR letters to Barclaycard and proof of delivery. I received this from the court.

hmcs.jpg

In the August I received another letter informing me it was stayed, however I can't find that one at the moment, (decorating the house at the moment so everything upside down).

As I said previously, on the day I received the first crapot lettter, I phoned up the court and it is still stayed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case you need to make an application to the court to have the case struck out, bump the thread tomorrow, for more guidance, tired eyes.

regards

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can make an application to the court to have the claim struck out, you can download the form from HMCS website (N244), it costs £75 i think, but you can claim this back from the claimant along with all you other expenses in defending this vexatious claim, should you be successful.

 

The POC is among the worst ive seen, and given the amount of time the claimant has sat on this, i think you have every chance of winning.

 

Make sure you write to cabot first though to kick them into touch

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...