Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fraud uncovered after 10yrs!


frettful38
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5426 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please could someone tell me if you have evidence that a creditor who petitions bankruptcy gets paid twice for the same debt is classed as fraud and dishonesty.

I have proof that the creditor who petitioned bankruptcy has been paid twice for one debt. He has been paid by the trustee in bankruptcy and he has been paid by my solicitors who arranged my remortgage.

 

I know that this bankruptcy was made by fraud and now I have the evidence to prove that he has been paid twice for the same debt, so before I go any further I would like to hear what peoples views are please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 174
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Please could someone tell me if you have evidence that a creditor who petitions bankruptcy gets paid twice for the same debt is classed as fraud and dishonesty.

I have proof that the creditor who petitioned bankruptcy has been paid twice for one debt. He has been paid by the trustee in bankruptcy and he has been paid by my solicitors who arranged my remortgage.

 

I know that this bankruptcy was made by fraud and now I have the evidence to prove that he has been paid twice for the same debt, so before I go any further I would like to hear what peoples views are please.

Do you have evidence that the bankruptcy was fraudulent?

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because this case is so long and complicated and has been going on for so long the only way for me to prove that the bankruptcy was done by fraud is to to show that he has been paid twice for the same debt. This proof I have only just discovered last week.

 

The proof I have with me will open the floodgates that he has committed fraud. It is this new evidence that I have and want to base on to re-open all the bankruptcy and bogus rent arrears claim he had against us

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the only thing you could do would be to issue a small claims against him. if it's 10 years, it may be outside the Statute of limitations.

Fraud is criminal, and must be proved "beyond reasonable doubt", to reclaim your money, you only have to prove "balance of probabilities".

 

First step would be to contact your local police station - they'll probably try to fob you off as "civil case", but insist on speaking to CID

Carpe Jugulum

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know what would happen if I could prove that this Landlord has been paid twice for one debt and he has done this deliberately, I mean if he can do this and get away with it then this would be enough reason to cast doubt on the whole bankruptcy case.

I think it sounds hopeful, but you have to get legal advice.

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks bigegg for your advice, I would love to go to the police, I don't think I am out of the statue time limit as I have only just got this information in my hands last week. That is when I truly have found this evidence. I have lost over £50,000.00 and not to mention the mental suffering, I don't think this is a case for the small claims court. It is too big, and I also believd that trhe trustee in bankruptcy is involved in this cover up, so its not a small case at all.

 

I did not want to start a thread until I was very sure I had the facts and proof, now that I have I am looking for advice and help on what to do

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have I got this right?

You remortgaged, and paid the landlord.

THEN the landlord made you bankrupt for the same debt?

Or were you made bankrupt by someone else, and the landlord asked for his cut, AFTER being paid?

 

If so, and you have proof that the landlord had been paid, AND KNEW HE HAD BEEN PAID!, before requesting the money again, then you shoud have a good case - AND, since you only just discovered this, limitations act won't apply (it applies from "point of action", which is when you DISCOVER that you are owed!)

 

 

OR:

Were you made bankrupt, which paid off the debt to the landlord, then at a later time, re-mortgaged, and your solictor paid the landlord?

 

If the latter, you will have a better claim against the solicitor.

Carpe Jugulum

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been advised by a solicitor to go to the police, I think I will do this first thing tomorrow.

I think my mortgage broker who arranged my remortgage so that we could pay off the trustee was also involved in this.

The only reason we had to remortgage was that my husband could pay off his bankruptcy debt. I think my mortgage broker knew how desperate we were to pay or lose our house, that he took advantage

Link to post
Share on other sites

i believe that may be different if you can prove the evidence has just come to light.

Ill have a look around, but i dont believe theres any statute on fraud.

I would seriously suggest a solicitor for this myself, however, dont look for those those cowboys that advertise no win no fee.

Find yourself a good local solicitor, with a decent reputation, and approach them.

If they wont take it, they usually find you one who will, and tho they dont advertise it, they do take cases on no win no fee, and all costs and insurance are covered by them.

Imo you cant afford not to cross every T and do every I in a case of fraud.

question everything!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ooh ok, good luck keep us updated tho, im really interested in this one.

a quick look at this uncovered something interesting.

Seems all the dca's here are commiting fraud on a daily basis.

 

The general offence of fraud may be committed by:

 

  • • false representation; the offender must know that the representation is wrong or misleading;
  • failing to disclose information;
  • abuse of position.

question everything!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I have found out, please tell me what you people think.

 

Bankruptcy debt was £8.000.44

 

Trustee in Bankruptcy paid the creditor (Landlord) £ +statutory interest = 7

My mortgage solicitors who arranged remortgage also paid to the creditor (Landlord)

In total he has received a sum of £

Edited by frettful38
Link to post
Share on other sites

The landlord was claiming £ this debt was increased when the trustee in bankruptcy got involved and started adding charges.

The sum of £ was paid to the landlord out of the £.00 claimed by the trustee in bankruptcy.

Then my solicitors who were handling my remortgage paid a further £ to the landlord, below is the information which hopefully makes more sense.

Edited by frettful38
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...