Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

OHs CAP ONEcard - Can i complain re no cca response/acknowledgement?


mysticpols06
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4729 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Rory, Hope you well! Anyways, Thanks for your post. Am wondering whether should put complaint in but not sure really whether it should be to Cabot for trying to enforce acc or Cap one for selling it on (presumably the latter, as to be honest Cabot haven't got too shirty YET and from what i can tell cap one were in the wrong first of all by passing it on. Also have gone back through paperwork from them & Have got letter from Cap One stating Thanks for request for copy of true executed agreement etc etc under ccact etc, whereas Cabot have stated that i apparently only asked them for copies of t&c's etc. So its obvious (& on paper) that they twisting it to play silly bu*gers etc. Can i ask what you think/would do please? Cheers hun, Mpols x

Edited by mysticpols06
My crappy humour lol

'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 171
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Doh - Fair few 'etc's' in that last post - naff english..blame the pixies in my keyboard :p soreeeee! x

'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would actually just make a complaint to the FOS as Cabot have given you their answer - which is "we're not going to do anything". I would also make a complaint to the OFT under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008. I would also inform Cabot that you have done this. Once you have done this they may reconsider their view on the matter.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rory - Soz late reply, have been reading reading reading! :D Soooo many threads!!!

Do i need to have complained officially to Cap One in order to get their 'final response' on the matter before can complain to anyone else? Hadn't done so yet as they passed acc so quickly to Cabot. Or do i ignore Cap One from now on and concentrate on Cabot? If so, samequestion applies please, ie, Do i have to complain to Cabot officially first before can to other bodies? Soz for sounding like complete twerp but have never got this far before. Thanks as always, Mpols x

'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again,

As I see it, you have a complaint to the FOS against crap1 as they shouldn't have sold it but you should complain first to Crabbybot before you go down the FOS route with them.

I've been wrong a couple of times in the last week(not something I'm used to :D) so I'm treading carefully.

Hope you're well

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi peeps, Have finally got letter sorted to send to oft will delete personal details & put up see what u think. Also, Is it ok to use the same lettering basically for complaint to fos aswell or is that a diff approach please? Is weird feeling - have never 'officially' complained bout anything before, except maybe the dinnerladies at school doh :-)

Thanks as always, Mpols x

 

Enquiries Unit

Office of Fair Trading

Fleetbank House

2-6 Salisbury Square

London, EC4Y 8JX

Dear Sir/Madam

Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUT)

Formal complaint against Capital one bank (Europe) plc and The Cabot financial group….

I am writing to complain under the above CPUT regulations. I have received letters from The Cabot Financial Group (Cabot financial (Eur) ltd) in respect of a purported debt which I understand is governed by the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

In accordance with the Consumer Credit Act I asked Capital one bank (Europe) plc to supply me with a true copy of the Consumer Credit agreement. This was in xxxx 2008. They have failed to do so, but did at least acknowledge my request by forwarding me a blank copy of their current terms and conditions. This document clearly failed to satisfy the Consumer Credit Act.

Before I had time to respond to their correspondence, I received a letter from a debt collecting agency named Cabot financial (Eur) ltd stating that they had ‘recently bought the account I held with Capital one and that all payments/queries should be made to them’.

I gained independent advice and sent Cabot a letter explaining to them that the account they had apparently bought was actually in Dispute and that it should be returned to the original creditor. They Responded initially by agreeing to contact the original creditor to investigate. I then received a letter from them stating that according to the original creditor, (Cap one bank (eur) plc), I had only requested a copy of the terms and conditions relating to that account, which they had sent me, therefore rendering the account apparently enforceable by them and not in dispute.

As you can see from the paperwork enclosed this is clearly not true.

Although these companies may be entitled to bring a legal action if they so wish, they have not done so and The Cabot financial group appear instead, to have given their final response on the matter, that as far as the original creditor are concerned the account is not in dispute, so the account will not be returned to Capital one bank (eur) plc as requested.

I consider that capital one bank (eur) plc are in default of my consumer credit act request, OFT collection guidelines and have also breached s10 data protection act request and that The cabot financial (eur) group are also in the wrong, by not insisting that the account be returned to capital one bank (eur) plc for resolution of these defaults and breaches, and instead insisting that they are legally permitted to enforce collection of monies on the account, as well as processing my information, which again is not permitted whilst the account is in dispute.

It is for these reasons that I am sending you this complaint.

I enclose examples of the letters from all parties which have been sent and received.

I would be grateful if you would acknowledge this letter and let me know what procedures you now intend to follow and what your targets for action are.

 

Yours faithfully

 

'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the FOS letter I would just take out that you are complaining under the CPUT, as it's the OFT that deal with those regs.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brill! Thanks for that hun. Will get sent off tomorrow me thinks. Will get a cover note sent to Cabot as well, notifying them of complaint as advised above.

Mpols x

'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just a query really - Hubby cca'd Cap one Nov (approx 13 weeks ago) but no response or acknowledgement, so with held payments & fully expected default etc or at least arrears letter, but still been nothing! Just wanted to check whether no response to a simple cca is enough to file complaint with the relevant bodies as presumably cap one in default of request since 8 weeks passed?

Should have done something sooner but been working on others doh!

Many thanks as always,

Mpols x

'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no need to complain whilst they're being quiet, it's when they or one of the pet DCAs start making demands. If you haven't sent the 'In Dispute' letter, send it now if you want. If they haven't supplied your CCA now the chances are that they never will.;)

 

Account In Dispute

 

Ref:

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

You have failed to respond to my legal request to supply me a true copy of the original Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

On **DATE** I made a formal request for a true signed agreement for the alleged account under consumer credit Act 1974 s77/8. A copy of which is enclosed for your perusal and ease of reference.

 

You have failed to comply with my request, and as such the account entered default on **DATE**.(12+2 days after you sent the CCA request)

The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executed agreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required terms and statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as defined in section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If the executed agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are also obliged to send me a copy of that document.In addition a full statement of this account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits to the account.

 

Furthermore;

 

You are aware that the Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for a request for a true copy of a credit agreement to be carried out before your client enters into a default situation. This limit has expired

 

As you are no doubt aware section 77(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)(a) He is not entitled , while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

As you have Failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, Failed to send a full statement of the account and Failed to provide any of the documentation requested. Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS. Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends. Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit. You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint. I therefore request a copy of your official complaints procedure which you are obliged to supply.

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for prompt reponse hun - will wait and see what/when they contact him again me thinks. Gotta feeling won't be long! ;)

Mpols x

PS. Hi guest, Come on in - the water's lovely! :)

'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am surprised the FOS is even considered. Surely that is a wasted exercise when based on a compliant regarding the supply of a Properly Executed Agreement?

 

http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t42/davey77_2007/FOSHalifax.jpg

http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t42/davey77_2007/FOSHalifax_0001.jpg

 

CCA'd Halifax March and again in June. 3 DCAs later, paperwork for the CCA received xmas eve (told the 2nd response to CCA was 'lost in transit'). Months to wait for the FOS decision only to be told to get lost.

 

I would say CPR letters would be the next step?

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a pathetic answer from the FOS.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a pathetic answer from the FOS.

 

I've got three others just like it :D

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi peeps, thanks Davey for joining thread. I have already had a think re fos with this as obvious that cap one being naff bout it & cabot not gonna care. Have got to write & inform them that complaint gone to oft already so will prob attach that to cpr letter me thinks. One question (bit thick me,) Do i send to cabot who now have debt or to cap one as o/c who passed debt while in dis or both? & also, should i enclose copy of the complaint that i sent oft? Have never done this kinda thing so not really sure doh! Thanks again. Take care, Mpols x

'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally i would deal with the organ grinder and not the monkey. In other words, the legal owner of the account in question at this point in time. (Ignoring for the moment the account was passed to them while in dispute.)

So the CPR should go to Cabot. I would simply state a complaint has been filed with the OFT under the CPUT Regs. I wouldn't give them any details as to what your complaint contained at this point in time personally. Let them guess.

 

Did you get a Notice of Assignment from Cabot with the 'welcome' letter?

 

I was suspicious of mine which arrived in the same envelope as the welcome letter although it proved to be valid after i wrote (twice) to the OC, Halifax.

 

"Dear Madam,

Would you please confirm that in relation to the above account that Cabot Financial (Europe) Ltd are now the Legal owners of this account and that the recently received Notice of Assignment is therefore valid and authentic.

 

Also therefore, that Halifax Plc have no further rights or governing interests towards the above account.

 

I would appreciate your prompt reply. Thank you."

 

 

No reply, so:

 

"Dear Madam,

Would you please reply to my letter dated 29 Dec 2009 to which I have not yet received a response.

 

If you have replied then you may ignore this letter but if not then I require an answer as the issues pertaining to this account may have to proceed to the County Court for Judgement in due course and I require the information for that purpose. (I enclose my previous correspondence for your reference)."

 

To which the reply was:

http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t42/davey77_2007/Halifax-1.jpg

 

Thereafter i dealt with Cabot directly as they are deemed to be 'the creditor' for all purposes.

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cap One never acknowledged cca request & no contact since cca request made (not even to remind/chase withheld payments) & still nothing till couple days ago with letter from Link.

Will send letter below & wait for it to all go round again. Ho Hum. :-|

 

This account that has been passed to You, is in dispute with Capital one bank (Europe) plc.

Not only is this a breach of OFT collection guidelines, but also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Data Protection Act 1998.

 

As Capital one bank (Europe) plc are in default of my Consumer Credit Act request, OFT Collection Guidelines, and have also breached s10 Data Protection Act request , I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

 

As we are all aware, while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default enforcement action is NOT permitted, under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law.

 

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to Capital one bank (Europe) plc for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as Link Financial Ltd cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

 

If Link Financial Ltd chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action.

 

After taking advice, I am of the opinion that any continued pursuit is in violation of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40 as well as breaching a number of the OFT Collection Guidelines.

 

I hope that this will not be necessary.

 

You have 21 days to reply accordingly which is an acceptable timeframe for an appropriate response.

 

Please note that I shall ONLY communicate in writing.

 

If i have put something wrong pls point it out - am never too confident with the facts. Many thanks to many peeps whose letters i have half-inched! :rolleyes:

 

Mpols x

Edited by mysticpols06

'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although yours currently sounds like it's not at the court stage, I am currently at the situation where the Judge is about to throw mine out of court due to improperly executed Notice of Assignment. Although I was warned that the original creditor could create a new one! It would have to be the original creditor and not Link though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Just an update - hiya all :-)

almost 5 months passed & after countless verbal & written requests for payment, to which we sent 2 more versions of the above & also complaints to mp, plus others etc, they have finally sent an acknowledgement of complaint letter & no more calls in a week. wow. hmmmm. wonder what will come next? I don't much like these ones. :( Any others that we have dealt with so far are almost comical in their predictability but these ones make me feel a tad unnerved if truth be known. Ah well, cest la vie! Hope all are well,

Mpols x

'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening all, just a quick update to say nothing else been received since sent complaints re the above, although they making up for it with another account (see other thread if interested in a possibly boring read )

Best wishes,

 

Mpols x

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/166869-cabot-aarghhhh.html

Edited by mysticpols06
adding link :-)

'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crapbot seem to have difficulty in supplying anything you ask for.

I ask for a signed credit agreement

What did I get, some print offs of the internal workings of the account from MBNA.

Although the info therein may be there downfall

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Morning all,

Have had letter from mp acknowledging receipt of ours. She had contacted the fsa chief exec, Mr Sants on our behalf who replied telling her that the concerns raised are "in fact not a matter for the FSA but for the OFT" & apparently forwarding copies of this correspondence to them.

We already complained to oft & got the standard reply so we will see if she does too maybe! At least our mp did something fairly quickly (although remains to be seen yet if she was merely passing the buck - we hope not).

No contact from link since their last letter - is tooooo quiet said custard! :D

Take care all, Mpols x

'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Received the following - Would very much appreciate any input as to whether this is real/enforceable or not please? It does have hubbys signature & date but seems to be more like an application form than an agreement regardless of what it states at the top of page & also ref no etc have been handwritten on before photocopied even tho' there is a barcode etc there too. hmmm. Please let me know what you think? Many thanks, Mpols x

cred006.jpg

cred009.jpg

cred010.jpg

 

(ps - am not 100% as to whether i have uploaded the images/edited them correctly - please comment if you cant view properly- thanks again) xx

'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...