Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Me & my Debts - Haydon DMP since 2001- they charge a £20PCM fee from my <£40 payment - CCA time? In Scotland too!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3287 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 237
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 1 month later...

Received a letter from Link recently as follows

Your debt was sold to Link Financial Limited effective from 2001 Although Link Financial is entitled to immediate repayment of £1,6**.**, We write now to give you the opportunity to clear this debt by monthly instalments of £8*.** per month by way of a direct debit mandate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

True enough Batman, but really does today's letter alter anything much? They havent sent a new document or anything. Perhaps the key thing here is that you havent paid anything toward this account since December 2007, which means that in about eight months this account will be statute barred (note to English colleagues, Blueda is in Scotland where statute barred is five not six years) and so after that they will get the square root of hee haw.

I would either ignore it, or send them another copy of your last rebuttal of their claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I received a letter from Cabot today as follows

Repaying your account

Weve tried to contact you on several occasions and its now vital that you contact Cabot urgently to discuss your account. You currently owe £2442.**

IF WE DO NOT HEAR FROM YOU

If you dont contact us we will have to move your account to the next stage of our collection process.

Contacting Cabot

The most important thing for you to do now is to get in touch with us urgently to prevent further action being taken. Call 0845 0700 116 and one of our helpful customer advisors will discuss the options for repaying your account.

Our aim is to help customers get their accounts cleared - so do contact us immediately

yours sincerely Customer Liaison Manager.

Should i send them an account in dispute letter reminder, all advice welcome folks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i would send it as a reminder to keep you paperwork in check

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

My OH's got a similar situation with Cabot. OH sent a letter saying this was a Final Response. Until such time as a valid copy of agreement was supplied no further correspondence would be be made by OH. Any further generic letters received would be filed but not responded to. That was a few years ago, and OH hasn't responded since.

 

During the past few years they've had periods of silence, then restarted the persistant calls, and more generic letters . Passed it to a new associate company, who also sent letters, and phoned a few times. More silence , then must have been returned to Cabot, who've just restarted calling again.

 

Fortunately a Truecall machine blocks all their numerous autodial numbers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

I received a response from Cabot this morning as follows

I understand you have made a request for a copy of your credit agreement with Barclaycard ( formerly Goldfish Bank Limited) the original lender pusuant to section 77/78 of the consumer credit Act 1974 and you are still waiting for the same.

Cabot credit management ( formerly the Cabot financial group) ( Cabot) purchased your debt from Barclaycard on ** ****** 2008.

We have requested the relevent information from Barclaycard, however we have been informed that they are unable to provide the required information.

Therefore, i can confirm that Cabot have taken the decision to no longer pursue collection of this account. Please note that this decision is not to be confused or or interpreted as a write off of the outstanding balance on your account as the debt legally remains.

I did have a Barclaycard debt years ago which i made regular payments to direct through a debt management company, Barclaycard never sold the debt and through debt management i paid an agreed sum as full and final payment on 2008, for which i have the letter of confirmation from Barclaycard and i never had a Goldfish account.:!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe you know have traced the account. :-)

 

How long has it been since you made a payment to this account now Blue?

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok well the ball is now in your court :-) Keep that letter locked away.

 

Now you know they don't have a cca, in some way yes they are correct that the debt still exists but they are tied as into what they can do to enforce it.

 

I am sure you have read threads like Monty's and RFCfan over the last year or two or maybe more :oops: where they were taken to court and won as no agreement as up here they have to aver to the agreement when issuing court action but it is not 100% straight forward as it is a judge lottery.

 

If you were in a position too, this could get you a good reduce full and final to close the door on it or watch the clock ticking

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...

Hi Folks, received a letter from Link financial today as follows

 

NOTIFICATION OF ACCOUNT TRANSFER TO AGENT

 

You have faied to reach an agreement with us regarding payment of this current outstanding debt.

 

Unless you contact us within the course of the next 7 days, we will instruct Instant Silver to take over the management of this account.

 

If you wish to prevent this, please contact us on 0800 *** ****.

 

We are able to take your call Monday Thursday 8 AM to 8.30 PM. Friday 8 AM to 5 PM and Saturday 9 AM- 6 PM.

 

No doubt this will be given your urgent attention.

 

I am going to send them a reminder that this account is in dispute, anyone heard of Instant Silver ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not me......I would ignore until you hear from anyone else and sent the dispute letter then ......like the rest lol

 

 

Is this not sb now?

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Instant Silver are Link by another name as are Link Financial Outsourcing and Thesis Servicing amongst others. I am sure that others will post their other alias'

 

It is now Statute barred as you are in Scotland so I would bear that in mind for if they get serious.

Dont let the parasite dca's prosper

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ida and batman, i have checked back on this thread and the account does not become statute barred until early May 2014 as i was continuing to pay them through debt management until May 2009 although challenging their right to collect since january 2009. interested to find out that Instant silver is Link, so it is a scare tactic being used as they can no longer call me as i cancelled the phone late last year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i think it is :madgrin:

 

 

And i can see you quivering in your sandals :lol:

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Received a letter from INSTANT SILVER today as follows

Dear *****

You currently owe Link Financial £1,6** .

We know that being in debt can be verry stressful, with to many:

Telephone calls

Agent visits

Collection letters

AT INSTANT SILVER WE WANT TO GIVE YOU THE OPPORTUNITY TO CHANGE THAT.

We will set you up with a repayment schedule that will give you an upfront discount of 25% of the current balance,

a single monthly payment and 0% interest.

Even better you will receive NO calls, NO collection letters,NO visits from today.

Your balance £1,6** Discount £40* New balance £1,2** New monthly payment £2* Term 48

We are not going to call to sell this offer, as we think it sells itself,

an easy way to get debt free and one less company to deal with.

Simply complete the direct debit form or standing order indicating if you wish to paying weekly or monthly and we will take £40*.** from the sum you owe.

If you would like to ask us a question or want any more information in relation to this offer contact one of the team on freephone 0800

or write to the address above.

Should you simply want to accept the offer complete the enclosed payment instructions and return to us within the next 15 days.

Instantsilver.

I am planning to send a letter to Instantsilver reminding them that the account is in dispute, any advice from fellow cagers is as always welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

discount letter

proves there is something very very wrong with the debt

 

pers i'd ignore them

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...