Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi on the notice of disqualification it lists the 2 speed offences and marks offence withdrawn? This is for both offences and then the other 2 is the MS90s which I’m fined for and the additional costs. R
    • Hi,    It has taken a while, but I have received an email from Auxillis -  hello, we are not dealing with this claim all we do is log accident for you isnurance - the claim has been passed to your underwriter markerstudy 0344 873 8183 as they are deal with fault cliams ion behalf of adrian flux. thankyou auxillis   I have made repeated attempts to phone Markerstudy in between working from home, struggling for energy and trying to find a cheap car so that I can keep my job (community support worker). Thankfully I have a supportive team and I am being given phone calls to make but it cant last too long. I had a severe migraine over the weekend and also have quite bad whiplash in my neck and back.    I found this in my insurance policy booklet -    Protection and Recovery If the insured vehicle cannot be driven following an incident leading to a valid claim under this section, we will pay: • the cost of its protection and removal to the nearest approved repairer, competent repairer or nearest place of safety; and • the cost of re-delivery after repairs to your home address; and • the cost of storage of the insured vehicle incurred with our written consent. If the insured vehicle is damaged beyond economical repair we will arrange for it to be stored safely at premises of our choosing. You should remove your personal belongings from the insured vehicle before it is collected from you. In the event of a claim being made under the policy we have the right to remove the insured vehicle to an alternative repairer, place of safety or make our own arrangments for re-delivery at any time in order to keep the cost of the claim to a minimum     I do about 20-25000 miles a year with the work I do, I have been getting quotes and putting that I have now have one accident and no no claims bonus and the cheap quotes from similar companies to markerstudy are more than double what i paid last year at 8-900 and aviva is offering 2600 which is simply out of my price range and more than the car i am looking at.  I am starting to wonder if it is even worth going ahead with the claim as i have no one to claim from. I have had no information from any of the enquiries I have made.  I have a full tank of vpower diesel in the car in the impound, i can strip it for parts and probably make what I will be offered by the insurance payout and get the money quicker.  As I have made contact and started the process can I back out, still keep my NCB and a claim free history? Also what happens with my injuries? I don't think there is any permanent damage but my dr refused to see me and just gave me a boat load of naproxen and codeine. What happens in the future if things don't get better and I cancelled this claim? Can you claim injuries off your own insurance because the other guy ran and you cant find him? I have tried to ask these questions off markerstudy but they keep me waiting for nearly an hour then end the call.     
    • Thanks for the response. Am I able to send you the documents I’ve received or can you message via instant message and I’ll send these? Reece
    • Regretfully it does. Have you actually seen any papers which show what you were charged with (rather than what you were convicted of)? It is unusual not to be “dual charged” but if you were not charged with both, you are where you are. If you had been charged with both offences and providing you were the driver at the time, you could, after performing your SD, have asked the prosecutor to drop the “Fail to Provide” (FtP) charges in exchange for a guilty plea to the speeding charges (you cannot be convicted of speeding unless you plead guilty as they have no evidence you were driving). You will have difficulty defending the FtP charges. In fact, it’s worse than that – you have no chance of successfully defending them at all because the reason you did not respond to the requests is because you did not receive them and that’s entirely your fault. No it’s not correct. Six months from 18/11/23 was 18/5/24 so, unless they were originally charged, the speeding offences are now “timed out.” There is one avenue left open to you. If you perform your SD you must serve it on the court which convicted you. You will then receive a date for a hearing to have the matters heard again. Your only chance of having the matters revert to speeding (and this is only providing you were the driver at the time of those offences) is to plead Not Guilty, attend court. When you get there you can ask the prosecutor (very nicely, explaining what a pillock you know you were for failing to update your  V5C) if (s)he is prepared to raise “out of time” speeding charges, to which you will offer to plead guilty if the FtP charges are dropped.   This is strictly speaking not lawful. Charges have to be raised within six months. Some prosecutors are willing to do it, others are not. But frankly it’s the only avenue open to you. There is a risk with this. I imagine you have been fined £660 (plus surcharge and costs) for each offence. The offence attracts a fine of 1.5 week’s net income and where the court has no information about the defendant’s means a default figure of £440pw is used.  If the prosecutor is not prepared to play ball you can revise your pleas to guilty. A sympathetic court should give you the full discount (one third) for your guilty pleas in these circumstances but they may reduce the discount somewhat. The prosecution may also ask for increased costs (£90 or thereabouts is the figure for a guilty plea). So it may cost you more if you have a decent income (I’ll let you do the sums). But MS90 is an endorsement code which gives insurers a fit of the vapours. One such endorsement will see your premiums double. Two of them will see many insurers refuse to quote you at all meaning you will have to approach "specialist" (aka extortionate) brokers. So you really want to exhaust every possibility of avoiding MS90s if you can. One warning: do not pay solicitors silly money to defend you. Making an SD before a solicitor should attract just a nominal sum (perhaps a tenner). That’s all you should pay for. You have no viable defence against the FtP charges and any solicitor suggesting you have is telling you porkies. The offer to do the deal is easily done by yourself and you can save the solicitor’s fees to put towards a few taxis and increased insurance premiums if you are unsuccessful. In the happy event you find out you were "dual charged", let me know and I'll tell you how to proceed. (Seems a bit odd hoping you were charged with four driving offences rather than two, but it's a funny old world!).    
    • Just the sort of people you despise eh Jugg  You would be much happier among your mates in that room with Rayner begging for votes 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Central Ticketing Limited -


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5147 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I attend a hospital regularly (every 1-2 months) for medical checkups in relation to my diabetes. The hospital charges via PnD machines for the Car parking. I have never once failed to pay the Pay and Display Charges in countless visits.

 

However, after having a bit of a nightmare morning and running very late I rushed out today for my appointments and parked up only to realise I had no money on me at all and no way of paying. I live 30 minutes from the hospital so didn't feel it was wiorthwhile going to get my wallet from home as it would waste the hospitals time massively and i may have my appointments cancelled as was already late :(

 

I returned to my car to find a very official looking ticket in a sealed yellow and black checkered outlined plastic wrapping. Similar to that style you'd expect if it had come from the police. It is from a company called Central Ticketing Limited in Birmingham.

 

Not wishing to be melodramatic but I'm living from day to day money wise at the moment and just about making sure the mortgage is paid so I physically cannot afford to pay the £35 let alont the £65 if not paid within 14 days nor the £105 if not paid within 7 days of the £65 falling due.

 

By appealing (they say that it will take up to 28 days on the ticket) surely they'll just not only reject my appeal being the same company that is demanding my money but then immediately demand the £105 and take me to court.

 

My anger at this is not that I simply don't think people should pay for parking (although paying for hospital parking is another damned matter imho) it's that I have been penalised for what seems an exhorbitant amount of money compared to the £1.80 parking fee it should have been for the time i was there and that if not paid within a very short amount of time it escalates alarmingly especially when I have paid repeatedly for every single other visit and this was a one off.

 

Can anyone offer any advice as to what I should do as I'm scared not to pay them but I simply have no means to pay them either. I just about afford to pay the bills and get to work. as it is.

 

There are multiple small car parks at the hospital and there was a large sign situated outside of the disabled spots ((separate car park area) I haven't been back to read the sign but I'm guessing it covers everythign such as park here and we own your vehicle, your soul and first born) but where I parked simply said Visitor Car Park Pay and Display with no conditions on it although the grey back of the larger sign can be seen from where I parked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I am not an expert in this (they will be along later) but this is a [problem] they at most have a civil contract with you for by your parking there. They can only claim damages they have lost with you not paying IE £1.80. I would ignore this as entering into any communication will only make them more aggressive. You will get 4 or 5 letters each more threatening than the last then they will go away.

 

 

I had a problem taking my B in law to hospital for treatment (cars parked on double yellow).

I could not get my car to the drop off point for his entrance so had to park in car park go and get a wheel chair and then push him into hospital for treatment (no easy task he weights 18 stone) When I asked security about these cars I was told not public property the police would not be able to do anything. So I believe the whole thing a [problem].

 

 

 

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry!

 

• do not pay

• do not contact them

ignore their letters, no matter how threatening

• they will give up and go away after 4 or 5

• they will not take you to court

 

As you didn't pay the £1 or whatever, that's all they're entitled to. Private companies cannot 'fine' you - they can only recoup their actual losses ie. the cost of a P&D ticket.

 

By all means send them a pound coin, but there's no point as they'll just keep on pestering you about the £105. The whole thing is a [problem], so just ignore them completely.

 

 

By appealing (they say that it will take up to 28 days on the ticket) surely they'll just not only reject my appeal being the same company that is demanding my money but then immediately demand the £105 and take me to court.

 

That's correct, apart from the court bit. No chance of that (of course they'll want you to think that they will)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will receive many suggestions of help from the excellent advisors on this site, and you are, of course, free to make up your own mind.

 

Either way, you are in a very powerful position, 'cos you haven't done anything wrong - well, avoiding paying in the first place is a bit naughty, but you didn't wilfully set out to do that, did you?

 

I would ignore their requests if it were me, but if you feel that you want to square it with them, by giving them what they are entitled to, then why not write back to them stating that:-

 

You will accept only ONE further letter from them; you are happy to EITHER pay them what they are LEGALLY entitled to, [£1.00 or £1.50 etc], or you are willing to attend court and let the court decide.

 

So, either £1.00, or court papers - they decide!

 

Make it clear that no other correspondence from them will be entertained.

 

Bet that pound to a pinch of Chinese excretement, that you don't go to court!!

 

That's my two pennorth

 

Sam the Eagle

All of these are on behalf of a friend.. Cabot - [There's no CCA!]

CapQuest - [There's no CCA!]

Barclays - Zinc, [There's no CCA!]

Robinson Way - Written off!

NatWest - Written off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers guys, sort of puts me a little more at ease, was panicking royally about this.

 

The ticket says that repeat offenders will be clamped and will be liable to "higher penalty charges". Whilst I have no intention of ever repeating the incident I assume that they cannot clamp me for simply ignoring this one and returning in future to the same site but paying?

 

I only ask as I'll be back at the hospital soon and i depend on my car daily. It would cost me my livelihood to lose access to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The ticket says that repeat offenders will be clamped and will be liable to "higher penalty charges". Whilst I have no intention of ever repeating the incident I assume that they cannot clamp me for simply ignoring this one and returning in future to the same site but paying?

 

My understanding about clamping (which I admit isn't great) is that clamping can only take place to remedy a current contravention, not any previous act in dispute.

 

For your peace of mind also, I would draw your attention to their use of the phrase "higher PENALTY charges". No private company can charge an individual a penalty so from that you can rest asured they are going no where near a court with their paperwork.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you crem and again thanks to everyone else. I think I'm going to ignore the company and see what happens. It not like I can pay them anyways unless they suddenly were going to accept the £1.80 an from what I've read on these forums there's little chance of receving a reasonable response from the company in question :(

 

cheers guys

 

I'll sleep a lot easier now :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ticket says that repeat offenders will be clamped and will be liable to "higher penalty charges

 

First one would be illegal and the second would just mean receiving a worthless piece of paper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would strongly suggest you don't contact them, and certainly don't offer them the "due" parking fee.

 

In order to write to you, they will have to get your details from DVLA. But DVLA only hold the deatils of the Registered Keeper - they have no way at all of knowing who was using the car.

 

If CTL had any claim at all it would be against whoever was driving, not the person registered with DVLA. For instance, I may have borrowed your car today - my own insurance covers me and I had to get to hospital in a hurry so you helped me out ;)

 

If you send them anything before they've contacted you as the keeper, and certainly if you offer them any sort of payment, then they might try to use that as evidence that you were driving. If I had borrowed your car, it's hardly likely that you'd accept the keys and a parking ticket back from me, is it?

:!:Nothing I post should be taken as legal advice. It is offered as an opinion only.:!:

 

This warning is in my signature because I'm not organised enough to remember to type

it in every post.

 

And you're considering trusting me????:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

I went shopping to Tesco in Ludlow on 07/11 and paid 50p to park in their car park. It was 11.49 and I did my shopping in Tesco and some other shops. I returned at 13.53 to find the dreaded yellow attachment to my car. My ticket had been placed on the dash but the high winds that day must have flipped it over via the air vent for the windscreen. The 'ticket' stated the reason as 'No Ticket' and was timed at 13.51. While examining this 'parking fine' the 'warden' approached and when I showed him the ticket which he had stated I didn't have, he informed me that it had expired by 2 minutes and I was 'fined' £70 but if I paid within two weeks it would be reduced to £40! As the amount seemed punitive and his attitude very tentative, I smelled a rat and luckily have found this website and all your comments - thank you. I am extremely disappointed with Tesco for employing these b.......ds and am seriously considering never using them again. As for their 'fine' they can stick this 'ticket' where the sun doesn't shine. By the way, my copy of the 'Adminstration of Justice Act 1970' doesn't seem to make any references to anything they can do to me, but is quite heavy on what they cannot do to harrass me into paying-up!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi I received a ticket from Central Ticketing at Tescos in Stoke on Trent as I assumed the car park was free on a sunday, most of the car park is except for about 30 spaces as I now know. my stupidity i know.

 

Legally do they have a leg to stand on if i refuse to pay as I begrudge paying a company £40 when i was actually in tesco for 10 minutes just before they shut on a sunday afternoon.

 

Any advice is appreciated

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi all, Just an update on my story above. I duly received a letter from Central Parking dated 10/12/09 stating 'Reason for Issue: No Ticket' and 'Time of Issue: 1:51pm' - remember I did have a ticket which expired at 1:49. It stated that the charge may now increase to £135 plus admin costs. I then received a letter from Roxburghe DCA dated 21/01/10 stating that £167 is now due. Lastly, a letter from Graham White, Solicitors, threatening County Court action with total additional costs of £207.25. Should I carry on ignoring this stuff or should I now seek legal advice? Thanks Taffchap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lastly, a letter from Graham White, Solicitors, threatening County Court action with total additional costs of £207.25. Should I carry on ignoring this stuff or should I now seek legal advice?
The key word here is 'threatening', the only time you'll need further legal advice is when they actually issue a claim, which has a 0.00001% of ever happening. Continue to ignore.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick update as this company seems to be causing other people issues.

 

I received a good 4-5 letters from various entities telling me that they had kindly doubled the "fine" each time to cover their legal costs and admin costs etc and that I would soon be in court with the judge no doubt awarding them all the fines and some extra costs.

 

Happily after completely ignoring every single one they haven't been in touch since and I havent heard from them in many months now.

 

Treat the scumbags with the contempt they deserve and simply ignore their BS attempts to extort money from you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I've just received my letter from Graham White solicitors demanding £207.25 and threatening what will happen. I still haven't replied and have no intention of doing so.

 

I had the debt collection letter around 4 weeks ago.

 

Hopefully they should get bored with me soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just to finish off this story, I wrote to Sir Terry Leahy, the Chief Executive of Tesco, and had a nice personal reply saying the action had been stopped and he added an apology. He didn't say anything about their use of Central Ticketing though! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

have just read all the comments relating to central ticketing......my daughter was parked up in a disabled bay y.day and had her clock set correctly, the clock was set at 12.30pm which meant she had until 3.30pm to return to her car, the ticket was issued at 1.13pm stating reason 0022, to which i dont know what this is, the fine is for £100.. but if paid within 14 days it goes down to £65.00, i have looked on their website on their is nothing on there so say what their codes are, my daughter is only 19yrs old and is absolutly gutted over this ticket as she does not have that kind of money.....:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...