Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Reclaiming Cascading Bank Charges


adridude
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6503 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Super to see that people are teaming together to fight causes such as this.

 

I have a question about cascading charges. If my bank charges me £180 or 3 cheques not going though several times, and that £180 was meant for a direct debit or standing order, then you get charged for not having the funds by both the bank and the person you are paying. Is this also claimable?

 

This would be interesting to see...

 

Regards

 

Adrian

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello,

 

I have a question regarding Lloyds TSB Visa/Electron debit card. Several months ago, I was buying bit and bobs on the internet, relying on the fact that a DEBIT card would say 'insufficient funds' when purchasing objects online.

 

All of the payment gateways I used, 'checked' the bank (so they said) for funds, then debited me.

 

When I found out in the morning that I spent about £800 before the payments stopped due to insufficient funds, I found out that I was £700 odd in credit.

 

Is this allowed? Surely a debit card lives by its name and only debits your account? Lloyds TSB stated that they saw that I was earning enough to pay off 'what was borrowed' and graciously allowed this without consent.

 

Any idea's as to what I can do?

 

Regards

 

Adrian

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

When I signed up with Lloyds TSB, I remember stricly asking the person at the desk to only give me a credit card as I do not wish to go into any debt.

They gladly gave me the account, a week later came the Visa/Electron debit card and that was that.

 

This all worked well until I used it online. I relied on the fact that the bank would refuse payment if I was trying to go past teh zero mark.

 

Infact, what happened is that they let me shoot £650 into the minus before they refused any payments.

 

Could someone explain this to me? I've spoken to the bank about it, and explained that I wanted a debit card for that exact reason. They laughed it off, told me to be more careful and sent me on my way?

 

Surely a debit card only debits your accout until the maximum allowed limit is reached?

 

Can someone tell me what to do about this?

 

Thanks

 

Adrian

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know sometimes that payments dont go off your account instantly (especialy online) and then when other debits go out of your account it puts you overdrawn when the online transactions finally go through. This happens to me sometimes, so i just make sure the money is available, ie check what is going out over the next 5 days first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still dont understand. I've tried using my old card, which is still in date, but deactivated, on the same payment sites, and it doesn't allow me to make a transaction.

 

The error I get is:

 

"Payment not accepted, please contact your card issuer to resolve this..."

 

Which means that checks are done?

 

Surely they also check to see if someone has the money?

 

Cheers

 

Adrian

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Just read your posts and I had a similar problem a couple of years ago. If you have say £700 in your current account and purchase something online for £200 this is put on hold as the transaction will actually take a couple of days to come out of your account and when checks are done by the online company, your account will show £700 balance. However, if you have for instance a mortgage payment or other direct debits going out around the same time this will affect your balance so it will put you overdrawn. The best way to avoid this is to check your account frequently as there's always someone waiting in the wings to snatch your money when you least expect it.

 

As you know, the banks are there to make money out of us at every opportunity so it's not in their interests to tell you you're overdrawn straight away.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Margarita

Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of interest, if one gets a doorknocker of a debt collector come to their property. What happens is some of the articles they want to take away aren't yours?

 

I was just wondering this ass my dad leant me a tv and a computer until my stuff comes across from the netherlands.

 

1) can they take something like a computer? mainly because i use it for work, and without it I'd have no income. not only that its my dads

 

2) can they take the tv as its not mine, and i should imagine that my dad wwould lose my rag if it got taken!

 

3) can they take heirlooms? for example a watch which has been in the family for years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can only take goods that belong to the debtor.

 

Family heirlooms can be taken as well as long as they belong to the debtor.

if the debtor is taking care of them on behalf of other family members they don't belong to the debtor.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would get someone to look after your heirlooms (your dad) until you've got yourself sorted and anything else you think they might like? get your dad to write a letter stating the items that belong to him and sign it, they cant touch it then, good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they can take things and you have to prove later that they are not yours..

Try not to let anyones in your home read up the following for more info:

Debt Basics - Bailiff Guide

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup basically dont let them in unless they have a court order and a police escort if they dont have them its all bluff tell them politely to go away from an upstairs window (if you want to talk to them at all) if they dont or they start causing a fuss by shouting at you then call the police

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you remove stuff (that is yours) from the property for the sole purpose of not having the baliffs take it to cover the debt you can get in serious trouble. As to stuff that isn't yours the baliffs will try take it unless you can 100% prove its not yours with receipts etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm affraid the above posts are totally off the mark...there is a major distinction between 'debt collectors' and a 'bailiff'. Only the former acting under a warrant is legally empowered to remove goods. A debt collector has no authority or power to do so.

 

This is how creditors scare people.....by using their own ignorance against them. They are aware that not many people are familiar with the distinction....as has been shown above.

 

....that is...only a bailiff is entitled to remove goods.....debt collectors have no such power...they only act as though they can....you can simply tell them where to go...if you so please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Zooman

And it also common place for bailiffs to also be employed as debt collectors, so when a bailiffs turns up you should always (without letting him in) ask to see the warrant.

 

And nice one SJ when I read the first few posts I was worried no had asked the OP to clear up if this was a bailiff or a debt collector.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you remove stuff (that is yours) from the property for the sole purpose of not having the baliffs take it to cover the debt you can get in serious trouble. As to stuff that isn't yours the baliffs will try take it unless you can 100% prove its not yours with receipts etc
How are they to prove you have removed things? How can you get into trouble? please explain? are you a bailiff?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly theres very little chance of getting caught on that well unless they have your house under cctv that is lol.

 

As for ignorance as the OP was posting about property being removed I think everyone just assumed he was talking about a bailiff is all

Link to post
Share on other sites

How are they to prove you have removed things? How can you get into trouble? please explain? are you a bailiff?

 

Exactly. What if you've leant your friend your laptop and the bailiff calls? Have you removed it?

 

The only trouble you can get into is removing/concealing goods that are the subject of a Walk In Possession Agreement.

23/05/06 DPA Sent to Halifax

I Love You All :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

The advice I was given by CAB -

DON'T LET THEM PAST YOUR FRONT DOOR. Preferably DON'T open it.

Once they are in - especially Bailiffs, they have the RIGHT to break into your home to obtain goods. The law is on their side believe it or not.

IF they don't see the goods, then remove any items you wish to remain in your possession. What they don't see, they can't quibble over.

IF they do see it - don't remove it. They have a note of it. You will be in trouble.

If it isn't yours, make sure who ever it belongs to has a reciept for it.

They cannot remove a vehicle if it is used for work or related issues.

 

YOU DO NOT HAVE TO SIGN ANYTHING - NOT EVEN IF IT COMES THROUGH THE LETTERBOX. DON'T SIGN IT.

SEEK FINANCIAL ADVICE - CAB - they have a whole list of can and can'ts

There's a load so ask them for the info.

 

I have removed my own car from my property - it's off the road anyway, so it's a good excuse.

:eek::confused: Totallylost :confused::eek:

I only want what's mine.

 

Cabot (Halifax CC) £3304.31 - trying to negotiate min payment.- Sept 09

They sent copy of original agreement (bad copy).Felt I had to comply to stall. :mad:

 

Halifax/BMidshires - Mortgage - £18000 - In process of beginning to sue for them selling the house (after REPO) below the market value. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What happens if you get a baliff at your door, they come in (by right) and take something that they are DEFINATELY not allowed to take? i.e. my computer, which I regard as a business tool which my company owns. Yes, I did buy it personally, I do have ther eceipt, but no they may not take it because my company will go bust as it holds my accounts, I work with it and I use it to communicate business matters.

 

Ok I'm sure they won't as they are fully aware of their entitlements, but how do I defend my rights that second they pick it up?

 

... another question related to my last post (just above)... Would I be allowed to execute a citizens arrest if the above occurrs?

 

I'm quite happy to do that, but im just concerned that I would get done for assault (although all I would do is detain them and contact the correct authorities)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

I've just served Lloyds TSB with the S.10 of the DPA (1998) letter as my account is -740 due to their costs, and I have also served the SAR with the stat. £10, but they refuse to comply to either!

 

What can I do about this?

 

Cheers

 

Adrian

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...