Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it is not a fine, thread title updated and fine changed to charge in 1st post. also can you post up the defence you filed and the court directions have you received ukpc WS yet? if so scan all that up to. read upload carefully one mass pdf only. dx
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. Could you let us have the information we ask for in the forum sticky please? We need the information to start working on your case. Once we have that, I'll get you to answer a different set of questions. Best, HB
    • Hi there,  Long story short, I was working a year ago in a city centre and the site operator I was working with told me I could park in a private car park as they had an arrangement with the owner. I came back to a parking charge  from UK Parking Control, and the site operator subsequently couldn't get hold of the private car park owner and haven't been able to since. Fast forward to today, I have received multiple legal threats from DCB Legal acting for UK Parking Control I have now been issued with a court hearing along with a date. I have to file my witness statement for a court hearing later this summer.  I realise that I could have handled the situation better and am already aware of that. I was wondering what my options are at this stage? I am very keen to avoid a CCJ as it would obviously be disastrous for my credit score. Any advice appreciated. My current plan is to file a witness statement and hope the case is discontinued. Thank you for any advice in advance.
    • I run a small retail business selling cards & gifts ( all my sales are done on a face - face basis  ) & noticed one of the settlement amounts on the card terminal bank deposits was short so contacted the card company which said a customer has requested a chargeback on a sale the reason saying the goods bought was not fit for the purpose purchased for. I have old fashion till which does not show any sales or descriptions of what is bought, plus when the settlement statements match up i shred the sale receipts. The card company told me the transaction was paid for with the customers phone & shows on my portal. They have asked me for sales prof, cctv, terminal receipt of the transaction which I have none, as this was done a few weeks later. I have asked for pictures to prove the items are not fit for the purpose purchased for plus said if the customer can return them i would give them a full refund but have had nothing back plus no pictures. Also I have had no communication with the customer even asking me for a full refund. They have now closed the case & awarded the customer the full refund. Any advice would much be appreciated   
    • First Direct has relaunched its £175 switching deal just two weeks after its last switching deal ended due to demand from customers.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ska1664 Vs Halifax


ska1664
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5283 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Maybe we are just wasting our time writing all these letters, Maybe we should just send the a letter with the following -FYI _ I AM A CAGGER -DONT WASTE YOUR TIME- Should be enough for most of them to get the message!

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://i420.photobucket.com/albums/pp290/ska1664/HBOS/HalifaxCreditCard4.jpg

 

 

 

 

can i go back to the DN they say that they have DN's you and terminated the agreement whilst still in default

 

no cca

enforcement whilst in default of s78

 

is the DN effective? if it is not they have unlawfully repudiated any agreement that they say they have

 

can you post the DN up if they have done this you need to be accepting their unlawful rescission of the agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

I have been dispatching various DCA's without to much trouble with this account, however I have now been provided with this letter from Halifax ?

 

HalifaxCreditCard1A.jpg

HalifaxCreditCard1B.jpg

 

I have seen the statement before reference them claiming to have met the CCA in particular sec. 78, but I am not aware of the court case that they refer to in this letter and their claim that you are required to maintain repayments despite them not complying with the CCA, anyone?

 

I really would like some assistance with this one as I really am not sure of the correct way to deal with this?

 

ska

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure either. I think their letter is however miselading just by virtue of them referring to legal cases...(please send a copy of this to the OFT)...In the meantime I suggest this (have yout tried sending a SAR ?) - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/173201-why-you-shouldnt-use.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks 42man for the swift reply. I have already done a SAR and the only thing that was provided was this:

 

HalifaxCreditCard3.jpg

 

 

I believe this to be an application form?

 

Should I be considering the CPR route if under both a CCA and SAR they have failed to produce the signed CA that they would need to supply if they want to enforce the alleged debt?

 

ska

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is my signature on the document :( is this going to cause a problem? Also what I can make out on the form it is just an application form there are none of the necessary prescribed terms present?

 

This illegible document was sent via the SAR with a load of other bits and pieces, so do I make reference to the CCA or SAR when writing to them?

 

ska

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are wrong. A copy of the historic terms and conditions is not enough to fulfill a request under CCA, 1974.... but they have got around it by referring to info. in a later Act. Not a big problem... lots of creditors/DCAs try to pull this one.

 

So, all they can do is ask/intimidate you into paying.... and hope you don't realise. I would therefore thank them for their letter and for their clarification on the unforceability of the account without the original CCA (para 4)..... Say that you will not be contacting their recovery agents because no-one has yet substantiated any legal right to collect payments from you and, until such times as someone is able to produce a true and legible copy of the CCA that you allegedly signed, no further payments will be forthcoming to anyone.

 

By rec. delivery.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have drafted a letter in response to Halifax please take a look any improvements or comments welcome.

 

 

ska

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

 

I am in receipt of your recent letter dated xxxxx.

 

 

Thank you for your clarification on the unenforceability of the account without the original Credit Agreement.

 

 

Consumer Credit Act 1974 s78 (4) Where running-account credit is provided under a regulated agreement, the creditor shall give the debtor statements in the prescribed form, and with the prescribed content

 

 

(a) showing according to the information to which it is practicable for him to

refer, the state of the account at regular intervals of not more than twelve

months, and

(b) where the agreement provides, in relation to specified periods, for the

making of payments by the debtor, or the charging against him of interest

or any other sum, showing according to the information to which it is

practicable for him to refer the state of the account at the end of each of

those periods during which there is any movement in the account.

 

 

(6) If the creditor an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

 

 

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

The application form that I have in my possession is illegible and does not contain any of the prescribed terms therefore under the following:

 

 

 

Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents)Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1557)

 

 

2 Legibility of notices and copy documents and wording of prescribed Forms

 

 

(1) The lettering in every notice in a Form prescribed by these Regulations and in every copy of an executed agreement, security instrument or other document referred to in the Act and delivered or sent to a debtor, hirer or surety under any provision of the Act shall, apart from any signature, be easily legible and of a colour which is readily

distinguishable from the .

(2) The wording of any Form prescribed by these Regulations shall be reproduced in copies of unexecuted or executed

agreements or in Notices of Cancellation Rights sent [by an appropriate method] under section 64(1)(b) or (2) of the Act

without any alteration or addition, except that--

(a) the creditor or owner may enter the name and address of the debtor or hirer in any Cancellation Form prescribed

by these Regulations; and

(b) every Form shall be completed in accordance with any footnote.

(3) Any such footnote shall not be treated as part of any Form prescribed by these Regulations and may be reproduced

in addition to any such Form.

(4) Where any such footnote requires any words to be omitted, those words shall be omitted or deleted.

 

You had until xxxxxx to provide me with the true copy I requested. After that date you entered into default of my request and I am therefore advising that the matter is now in dispute. Whilst the matter is in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for any payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest on the account, make any further charges to the account or pass the account to anybody else.

 

I will not be contacting any of your recovery agents as no-one has yet substantiated any legal right to collect payments from myself and until such times as someone is able to produce a true legible copy of the Consumer Credit Agreement that I have allegedly signed, no further payments will be forthcoming to anyone.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter a statutory notice under Section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies including any defaults. Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’, you must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you fail to respond within 21 days, I will expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

 

Yours Faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have drafted a letter in response to Halifax please take a look any improvements or comments welcome.

 

 

ska

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

 

I am in receipt of your recent letter dated xxxxx.

 

 

Thank you for your clarification on the unenforceability of the account without the original Credit Agreement.

 

 

Consumer Credit Act 1974 s78 (4) Where running-account credit is provided under a regulated agreement, the creditor shall give the debtor statements in the prescribed form, and with the prescribed content

 

 

(a) showing according to the information to which it is practicable for him to

refer, the state of the account at regular intervals of not more than twelve

months, and

(b) where the agreement provides, in relation to specified periods, for the

making of payments by the debtor, or the charging against him of interest

or any other sum, showing according to the information to which it is

practicable for him to refer the state of the account at the end of each of

those periods during which there is any movement in the account.

 

 

(6) If the creditor an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

 

 

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

The application form that I have in my possession is illegible and does not contain any of the prescribed terms therefore under the following:

 

 

 

Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents)Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1557)

 

 

2 Legibility of notices and copy documents and wording of prescribed Forms

 

 

(1) The lettering in every notice in a Form prescribed by these Regulations and in every copy of an executed agreement, security instrument or other document referred to in the Act and delivered or sent to a debtor, hirer or surety under any provision of the Act shall, apart from any signature, be easily legible and of a colour which is readily

distinguishable from the .

(2) The wording of any Form prescribed by these Regulations shall be reproduced in copies of unexecuted or executed

agreements or in Notices of Cancellation Rights sent [by an appropriate method] under section 64(1)(b) or (2) of the Act

without any alteration or addition, except that--

(a) the creditor or owner may enter the name and address of the debtor or hirer in any Cancellation Form prescribed

by these Regulations; and

(b) every Form shall be completed in accordance with any footnote.

(3) Any such footnote shall not be treated as part of any Form prescribed by these Regulations and may be reproduced

in addition to any such Form.

(4) Where any such footnote requires any words to be omitted, those words shall be omitted or deleted.

 

You had until xxxxxx to provide me with the true copy I requested. After that date you entered into default of my request and I am therefore advising that the matter is now in dispute. Whilst the matter is in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for any payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest on the account, make any further charges to the account or pass the account to anybody else.

 

I will not be contacting any of your recovery agents as no-one has yet substantiated any legal right to collect payments from myself and until such times as someone is able to produce a true legible copy of the Consumer Credit Agreement that I have allegedly signed, no further payments will be forthcoming to anyone.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter a statutory notice under Section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies including any defaults. Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’, you must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you fail to respond within 21 days, I will expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

 

Yours Faithfully

 

they are in breach of the consumer credit act - not your request

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the following should be omitted?

 

You had until xxxxxx to provide me with the true copy I requested. After that date you entered into default of my request and I am therefore advising that the matter is now in dispute. Whilst the matter is in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for any payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest on the account, make any further charges to the account or pass the account to anybody else.

 

 

ska

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ska,

 

There's no point in quoting extracts of law to these people; they'll either fling it to one side or plod on regardless. Personally, I'd keep it short and to the point.... something like:

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Your Ref : xxxxx

 

Thank you for your letter of xx/xx/x.

 

You have once again failed to address any of my concerns, although I would like to draw your attention to paragraph 4 of your letter which confirms that a signed credit agreement would be required before you could attempt to legally re-enforce the alleged debt in question.

 

Since you and your "agents" have continually failed to provide me with this documentation however, any legal right to collect has yet to be substantiated. Therefore, no payments will be forthcoming to anyone until such times as an original Consumer Credit Agreement can be produced.

 

Please note that, should you decide to proceed with legal action in the continued absence of this document, that it will be vigourously defended and treated as both unlawful and vexatious.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks PriorityOne your help as ever greatly appreciated.

 

ska

 

Sorry.... forgot to include the following para as well...

 

Please note you may also consider this letter a statutory notice under Section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies including any defaults. Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’, you must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Send the letter by rec. delivery... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...