Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
    • So you think not pay until DN then pay something to the oc to delay selling to dcas?    then go from there? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Kangadrag v cabot


kangadrag
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5413 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks,

 

after tasty sweet success on hubby's part (his away serving country), I am now on a one woman mission to get rid of all his financial baggage left over from ex wife.

Now is the turn of cabot, hubby has been paying cabot for 2 old debts for about 3+years. Have just pulled out old paper work, one is for an MBNA card whose default balance is just shy of £4000 (hubby thinks limit was £1500) and HFC (he thinks this was from DFS). I feel especially in the case of the MBNA that their has obviously been a huge amount of charges put on it.

So, what do I do..... having read the threads I think I send a CCA letter to Cabot for both accounts. If they can't find one hubby stops paying until they find one. Addtionally, I send an SRA for both accounts to original creditors. This will show charges etc. Whether they find the CCA or not I get the charges refunded.

Now I understand that the letters should not be signed but does this just mean I type his name or does he need to print his name on the bottom of the letter?

 

Kind regards

 

Kanga

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks,

 

after tasty sweet success on hubby's part (his away serving country), I am now on a one woman mission to get rid of all his financial baggage left over from ex wife.

Now is the turn of cabot, hubby has been paying cabot for 2 old debts for about 3+years. Have just pulled out old paper work, one is for an MBNA card whose default balance is just shy of £4000 (hubby thinks limit was £1500) and HFC (he thinks this was from DFS). I feel especially in the case of the MBNA that their has obviously been a huge amount of charges put on it.

So, what do I do..... having read the threads I think I send a CCA letter to Cabot for both accounts. If they can't find one hubby stops paying until they find one. Addtionally, I send an SRA for both accounts to original creditors. This will show charges etc. Whether they find the CCA or not I get the charges refunded.

Now I understand that the letters should not be signed but does this just mean I type his name or does he need to print his name on the bottom of the letter?

 

Kind regards

 

Kanga

 

Yes Kanga.

 

CCA Cabot on both accounts...They'll send back te 2 £1 Postal Orders you send, saying they aren't liable but will get the info for you...

 

They'll go over the 12+2 days default - that's when you can stop paying them until they come up with documents (if ever) ..Save the SAR's until after they furnish you with the CCA agreements.

 

Don't sign the letters, well sign them but just make a signature up...Send recorded delivery too.

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi everyone,

just a quick update...... I received the standard letter from cabot about they don't have to do this but will send for it from the original creditor. Their letter was dated the 27th November. I still have not received anything from them. What should I do? I don't want to be rash in making a decision about not paying as it is hubbys debt but I would like to get rid of the excessive charges etc. He has been paying them for over 3 years and has only paid about 1/3 - 1/2 of the amount which is still in excess by about £1000 on what the original card limit was.

Any advice please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Patience Kanga, patience. You can't stop paying them yet!, much as you'd like to. You can, once the 12 + 2 days is up (as with HBOS!), until then, sit tight.

 

You're probably onto a good thing with MBNA - properly executed agreements from them are about as scarce as rocking horse dung. As for DFS, I wouldn't know.

 

Assuming that some, perhaps most, of these creditors can't provide you with the necessary documentation, you will be in for a long battle. It might be best to prepare for it now in terms of how you are going to deal with them.

 

If there is no hint of any dispute at the moment and if you have access to the accounts online, get in quick before they suspect anything and change your contact numbers. You can sign up for a free 07005 number which is voicemail. You won't regret it.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have heard back from Cabot, who have said neither of the original creditors have been able to provide the CCA's at the moment and they have therefore suspended the accounts until further notice.

Do I need to do anything now?

 

Thanks Folks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

UPDATE

 

Have received a letter from Cabot today with a copy of the CCA for MBNA and terms and conditions. The CCA does have application form stamped on it BUT I have compared it to those Steve has posted on the relevant sticky and it mets all the stated points so I believe it is an enforcable agreement. My only query with it is that it shows no card limit on it anywhere! I also received 2 "representation of letter dated....." letters. One is a letter "confirmation that the outstanding balance due under the above account has been assigned to Cabot Financial (Europe) Ltd...................All enquiries regarding this account, including accurate balance information, together with future payments, should be made directly to this company." (this is from MBNA to my hubby). Second, was a standard letter from Cabot stating they have purchased the debt.

They also enclosed a statement of the account since they have held it. Most of it is very straight forward showing the payment of £67 per month coming off the outstanding balance the questionable bits are from 2002 and just before hubby started paying it in 2005.

 

http://i712.photobucket.com/albums/ww121/kangadrag/pg2e-1.jpg

http://i712.photobucket.com/albums/ww121/kangadrag/pg1e-1.jpg[/url]

 

Firstly is the large interest payment added in Jun 2005. The second is that no payments seem to have been allocated to the account until this interest charge was paid. I did the calculations and it adds up to exactly the interest payment! Once this was paid the balance started to reduce. This is really annoying as I beleive the orignal limit was only £1000-£1500, Hubby isn't sure as it was such a long time ago.

 

So my questions.......

firstly does this seem OK (statement),

secondly, do I now send for an SAR and to whom?

 

BTW no site of anything for the Cabot (HFC) account!

 

Thanks

 

Kanga

 

I've also added the agreement for you

http://i712.photobucket.com/albums/ww121/kangadrag/agreementedit-1.jpg

Edited by kangadrag
needed to resize uploaded images...... I'm a beginner ... you can tell LOL
Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE

 

Have received a letter from Cabot today with a copy of the CCA for MBNA and terms and conditions. The CCA does have application form stamped on it BUT I have compared it to those Steve has posted on the relevant sticky and it mets all the stated points so I believe it is an enforcable agreement. My only query with it is that it shows no card limit on it anywhere! I also received 2 "representation of letter dated....." letters. One is a letter "confirmation that the outstanding balance due under the above account has been assigned to Cabot Financial (Europe) Ltd...................All enquiries regarding this account, including accurate balance information, together with future payments, should be made directly to this company." (this is from MBNA to my hubby). Second, was a standard letter from Cabot stating they have purchased the debt.

They also enclosed a statement of the account since they have held it. Most of it is very straight forward showing the payment of £67 per month coming off the outstanding balance the questionable bits are from 2002 and just before hubby started paying it in 2005.

 

http://i712.photobucket.com/albums/ww121/kangadrag/pg2e-1.jpg

http://i712.photobucket.com/albums/ww121/kangadrag/pg1e-1.jpg

 

Firstly is the large interest payment added in Jun 2005. The second is that no payments seem to have been allocated to the account until this interest charge was paid. I did the calculations and it adds up to exactly the interest payment! Once this was paid the balance started to reduce. This is really annoying as I beleive the orignal limit was only £1000-£1500, Hubby isn't sure as it was such a long time ago.

 

So my questions.......

firstly does this seem OK (statement),

secondly, do I now send for an SAR and to whom?

 

BTW no site of anything for the Cabot (HFC) account!

 

Thanks

 

Kanga

 

I've also added the agreement for you

http://i712.photobucket.com/albums/ww121/kangadrag/agreementedit-1.jpg

 

 

Hi Kanga,

 

That's very hard to read. Is what you have just as bad or did it not scan very well?

 

The credit limit is one of the prescribed terms "This may be a term or the manner in which it will be determined or that there is no credit limit". If it doesn't contain something like that then it probably should. Best wait for

one of the experts to come along.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is about as good as it gets to be honest, it is really hard to read. I can read my husbands handwriting clearly and can confirm it is definitely his signature. In fact the scaned copy is probably a little better because the copy I have is about an A6 copy!

I can't see the card limit anywhere on it and nothing on the standard T & C's they have sent out.

thx

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is about as good as it gets to be honest, it is really hard to read. I can read my husbands handwriting clearly and can confirm it is definitely his signature. In fact the scaned copy is probably a little better because the copy I have is about an A6 copy!

I can't see the card limit anywhere on it and nothing on the standard T & C's they have sent out.

thx

 

Kanga, I'm pretty sure that this in itself makes the thing unenforceable - it has to be legible. It seems to me that what they've sent you is a pile of dung. Does it have an APR?

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi folks....... still fighting cabot at the moment.

 

On of them is still on hold as they can't find a CCA.

 

The other (which is MBNA) is the one I have posted the copies of the CCA but it has no limit on it but they are now pushing to reinstate the payments and threatening to add a large sum of interest if we don't.

 

I'm assuming my next step is to send off for a SAR to them but I can't find the template letter.

 

Please help!!!!

 

Kanga

Link to post
Share on other sites

I reckon that agreement is a reproduction of a microfiche copy. That means they won't have the original. It is unreadable = unenforceable.

 

Now, before you do anything, if your other half is in the services / government services and requires special security clearance then credit problems will affect that. So be careful. If not then will he need that clearance in the near future?

 

Next question is, was the default notice served correctly by registered or recorded delivery. If not, the debt collectors are illegally processing your hubby's data.

Beaten:

RBS: £4,500

AMEX: £4,200

Barclaycard Visa: £12,100

Barclaycard M/Card: £12,600

(Including the numerous DCAs they have set on me.)

PPI reclaims (into my bank account): £25,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now, before you do anything, if your other half is in the services / government services and requires special security clearance then credit problems will affect that. So be careful. If not then will he need that clearance in the near future?

 

 

I'd just like to point out that this is not quite true. If you don't tell the DVA about any credit problems and they find out, then yes, you would have problems. However, if you are honest with them on the relevant forms, then they should have no problem. The biggest thing they are looking for is honesty.

 

 

OK, Bankruptcy may cause a problem, but the other thing to note is that if you are legitimately disputing a balance, then this can be declared on the forms required for clearance.

Edited by heliosfa

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd just like to point out that this is not quite true. If you don't tell the DVA about any credit problems and they find out, then yes, you would have problems. However, if you are honest with them on the relevant forms, then they should have no problem. The biggest thing they are looking for is honesty.

 

 

OK, Bankruptcy may cause a problem, but the other thing to note is that if you are legitimately disputing a balance, then this can be declared on the forms required for clearance.

 

Financial checks are not usually carried out as part of the vetting procedure unless the individual has regular access to assets that are protectively marked secret. The vast majority of service personnel are baseline-checked. Even then, as heliosfa says, unless you have a hole in your finances the size of an RBS pension you'll be ok.

 

The paperwork is a pain (I speak from experience); anyone who's lived in SLA or used a BFPO address gets the supplementary questionnaire because, I'm told by DVA, the CRAs don't hold info on those addresses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

We got them.................

 

Cabot (MBNA) - all complete and satisfied for £250 instead of the £2000 they tried to get!!!!!!!!!

 

Cabot (HFC) - still no sign of a CCA so guess that one is on hold too!!!!!!!!!!! yippeeeeeeeeeee

 

Just need to get BOS sorted now!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...