Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yep. they are all simply trading names of perch to try and scam people into thinking their debt is going up some kind to mystical legal chain...which is BS. all dca's pull these stunts and have done since the late 1970's
    • just type no need to hit quote. what you really need to do is forget about it now they have  just steer clear of THAT ONE STORE for a few months. other B&Q's are OK. even if you do go back in, they'll simple ask you to leave, then if you return again, could invoke trespass laws BUT WE HAVE NEVER SEEN IT HERE. as for getting out of your tree about police, prison, criminal record, arrested, knocks at doors, letter of claim....NONE OF THE CAN EVER HAPPEN. and has not on these joe public low level shoplifting incidence since 2012. you've already got a scary letter ratchetting on about some mystical FAKE civil restoration scheme .  you'll probably get a few more ...NOTHING THEY CAN EVER DO. bin shred burn give to your pet hamster any money people pay CRS/RLP/DEF etc regarding their letters goes straight into their pocket and off they go down the pub and LAUGH at people they mugged. the retailer never sees a penny.  i admire your action of send £5 to B&Q. its done now and its over with....move on with your live. dx
    • 4.  Under The Pre-Action Protocol 201?, a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior too and including ,The Pre action Protocol Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claimform dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 9.   The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2nd February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. re: 13 & 15...they dont need to produce the deed, thats a private b2b document only the judge can demand sight of. i would remove 13 totally as within their WS they have produced the Notice Of Assignment. and delete it from 15 a few ideas. dx  
    • Underp04 (I think it was him) put up the statement IDR used in court from some supposed expert mr edge. can you find it? It stated 10 years was the statute barred limit but also that the laws were very confusing. very much worth digging out!
    • You'll be fine don't worry.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cca's - Unenforceable Debt - Success Stories?


pinny24x7
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5176 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have decided to take the plunge and start facing upto my debts, I owe various credit card companies almost 15k in debt and now being chased by DCA's.

 

Would it be possible for people who have successfully had their debt written off due to a no agreement to sign into this tread in order for other forum members to view their threads to see what actions were take?

 

I shall be printing off CCA request letters today and will start a new thread for each credit card company.

 

Hope this does not sound like a stupid request

 

Thanks in advance

Pinny

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just after some advice on this, most if not all my credit card applications were done online, is there any point in sending off for CCA requests as surley the banks will have electronic copies, and if not they could just provide any agreements as my signature will not be present on any of them?

 

Apologies if this sounds like a stupid question....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pinny,

 

Even if they are done online they still have to send you a hard copy to sign which should contain al the prescribed elements as well as their signature.

 

So in answer to your question, yes it is worth going through the process.

 

BB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks BB, thought it was a stupid question hence the reason there were no replies so much appriciated!

 

Just a little confused about this as I thought if I ticked the signature box then that would be accepted as my signature?

 

I need to send off the cca's anyway to see what comes back..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

A wee bit info regarding online accounts..........

 

As The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Electronic Communications) Order 2004 came into force in December 2004 any online agreements entered into prior to this date still need a signed executed credit agreement.

Electronic signatures weren't considered valid until this date.

 

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi is there is a thread to show Unenforceable agreement successes and or a thread to show example agreements which are unenforceable. I think such threads would help others to decide to a certain extent if their agreement was enforceable or not.

 

Maybe a thread for example entitled

 

'Example Cap1 unenforceable agreements' , 'Example Egg unenforceable agreements' etc etc.

 

What do you reckon peeps/mods?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi is there is a thread to show Unenforceable agreement successes and or a thread to show example agreements which are unenforceable. I think such threads would help others to decide to a certain extent if their agreement was enforceable or not.

 

Maybe a thread for example entitled

 

'Example Cap1 unenforceable agreements' , 'Example Egg unenforceable agreements' etc etc.

 

What do you reckon peeps/mods?

 

I was actually going to ask exactly the same thing. I have read a lot on the process (e.g. here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/173201-why-you-shouldnt-use-4.html) and a lot on the fact that companies offering to act on your behalf shouldn't be used as one can do it oneself. But I am struggling to find example of success stories, as per the OP. I accept they may be buried in the forum somewhere, but as a central respository, with perhaps links to success (and indeed failure) cases I think it would prove invaluable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I think the reason why you may not have heard anything is that it is still fairly new.

 

Look how long it took for unfair bank charges to filter through.

 

I have been working on mine now since July 2008. I probably could have got a lot further a lot sooner but hav ebeen distracted by a number of other issues.

 

I am now totally focused and have some N1 claims going into the courts to get the banks to admit that they don't have a properly executed CCA.

 

However, I totally agree that there should be a separate section so that people can share their successes and the steps that they took and also their failures - so that they rest of us can learn from them.

 

BB

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would be really helpful. I have been to court twice now to get HSBC to comply with a SAR request originally sent in June 2007. They claim that even if they don't have the agreements (two loans) they can prove I paid the money and continue to register the defaults. I can't find anything to prove otherwise, just had a feeling that no agreements = not able to recover money or have the right to register a default????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LarneyLarnes,

 

If you have been to court twice before to get HSBC to supply the documents, as per the DPA it is your right to see them and I am surprised that a judge would not find in your favour and order HSBC to do so.

 

Have you also complained to the ICO?

 

BB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BB, thanks for your reply. I haven't yet complained to the ICO and that will be my next move. HSBC now have 21 days to comply with this court order and the order states that if they don't come up with them then it will be assumed that they don't/didn't exist. I am hoping then that I can apply to have the defaults removed on the basis of no agreements = no enforceable debt, but I have already sent a S.10 notice some time ago and it was completely ignored.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LL,

 

I would complain to the ICO anyway. They have a huge backlog and you can always amend/add this to your complaint.

 

What are you intending to do once the 21 days are up? Are you intending making a claim for the money you have paid?

 

BB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BB, I guess either send another S.10 with the judgement as ammo or issue a claim in court. I have been given some great advice pointing me to some relevant case law, but I can't find anything that directly relates to agreements being unenforceable, therefore defaults removed by court. I don't expect the money back, just want the defaults removed. I know I didn't sign an agreement on one of them because it was done in my local branch and was part of a consolidation exercise.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LL,

 

There was someone on here that had got quite a few defaults removed but I cannot remember the circumstances or whom.

 

I'm sure if you PM one of the site team they should know or do a search on the forum.

 

BB

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Has anyone else had any success with unenforceable agreements? Is it true a case went to court and was thrown out, meaning subsequent client claims are invalid?

 

Apologies, am very busy and don't have time at present to read through every thread/post.

 

I am tempted to pay a company to investigate. My friend has done it off his own back, and 12 months later and after a lot of grief he is no nearer sorting it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...