Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have an old outstanding debt from 1994 due to MBNA for £20,000. The debt has been passed to various DCAs and is currently with PRA Group.  I sent them a CCA letter in January 2024. They acknowledged this letter and stated they would come back when they had more information, however the information did not arrive within the 12 working day scenario.. I have just received a copy of the agreement which goes back to 1994 from them. In their response letter they have stated " Please find enclosed documentation received to date: we are waiting further documents in order to complete your request. We have currently deemed this debt as unenforceable which means we are not able to take court or further action against you to recover the outstanding balance". They then go on to state "we are still legally entitled to:  1.Contact you to ask and repay what you owe 2.Pass your details onto a third party collection agency 3. Continue to report your account with the credit reference bureaux (as appropriate)". I'm at a loss as to what I should do next and would appreciate any guidance on this matter. I am currently paying £5.00 pcm. TIA      
    • A sinister tactic known as shoulder surfing is on the rise in the UK. Fraudsters are watching unwitting people log in to their mobile banking apps over their shoulder.View the full article
    • My understanding is that they won't provide the name to me whether the investigation is Live or Closed, & I have no legal rep as I didn't have P.I. Cover on my policy, & am intending to claim using OIC.org.uk, but remain completely stuck as they 100% cannot open a claim on the portal without both the Reg. No. & Name of the other driver.  
    • thanks again ftmdave, your words are verey encouraging and i do appreciate them. i have taken about 2 hours to think of a letter to write to the ceo...i will paste it below...also how would i address a ceo? do i just put his name? or put dear sir? do you think its ok?  i would appreciate feedback/input from anybody if anything needs to be added/taken away, removed if incorrect etc. i am writing it on behalf of my friend..she is the named driver  - im the one with the blue badge and owner of the car - just for clarification. thanks in adavance to everyone.       My friend and I are both disabled and have been a victim of disability discrimination on the part of your agents.   I have been incorrectly 'charged' by your agent 'excel parking' for overstaying in your car park, but there was no overstay. The letter I recieved said the duration of stay was 15 minutes but there is a 10 minute grace period and also 5 minutes consideration time, hence there was no duration of stay of 15 minutes.   I would like to take this oppertunity to clarify what happend at your Gravesend store. We are struggling finacially due to the 'cost of living crisis' and not being able to work because we are both disabled, we was attracted to your store for the 10 items for £10 offer. I suffer dyslexia and depression and my friend who I take shopping has a mobility disability. We went to buy some shopping at your Gravesend branch of Iceland on 28th of December 2023, we entered your car park, tried to read and understand the parking signs and realised we had to pay for parking. We then realised we didnt have any change for the parking machine so went back to look for coins in the car and when we couldnt find any we left. As my friend has mobility issues it takes some time for me to help him out of the car, as you probably understand this takes more time than it would a normal able bodied person. As I suffer dyslexia I am sure you'll agree that it took me more time than a normal person to read and understand the large amount of information at the pay & display machine. After this, it took more time than an able bodied person to leave the car park especially as I have to help my friend on his crutches etc get back into the car due to his mobility disability. All this took us 15 minutes.   I was the driver of my friends car and he has a blue badge. He then received a 'notice to keeper' for a 'failure to purchase a parking tariff'. On the letter it asked to name the driver if you wasnt the driver at the time, so as he wasnt the driver he named me. I appealed the charge and told them we are disabled and explained the situation as above. The appeal was denied, and even more so was totally ignored regarding our disabilities and that we take longer than an able bodied person to access the car and read the signs and understand them. As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us. I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge.     After being discriminated by your agent my friend decided to contact 'iceland customer care team' on my behalf and again explained the situation and also sent photos of his disabled blue badge and proof of disability. He asked the care team to cancel the charge as ultimately its Iceland's land/property and you have the power over excel parking to cancel it. Again we was met with no mention or consideration for our disability and no direct response regarding the cancellation, all we was told was to contact excel parking. He has replied over 20 times to try to get the 'care team' to understand and cancel this but its pointless as we are just ignored every time. I believe that Ignoring our disability is discrimination which is why I am now contacting you.     I have noticed on your website that you are 'acting' to ease the 'cost of living crisis' : https://about.iceland.co.uk/2022/04/05/iceland-acts-to-ease-the-cost-of-living-crisis/   If you really are commited to helping people in this time of crisis ..and especially two struggling disabled people, can you please cancel this charge as it will only cause more damage to our mental health if you do not.  
    • I've also been in touch via the online portal to the Police's GDPR team, to request the name of the other Driver. Got this response:   Dear Mr. ---------   Our Ref: ----------   Thank you for your request which has been forwarded to the Data Protection Team for consideration.   The data you are requesting is third party, we would not give this information directly to you.   Your solicitor or legal team acting on our behalf would approach us directly with your signed (wet) consent allowing us to consider the request further.   I note the investigation is showing as ‘live’ at this time, we would not considered sharing data for suggested injury until the investigation has been closed.   If you wish to pursue a claim once the investigation has been closed please signpost your legal team to [email protected]   Kind regards   ----------------- Data Protection Assistant    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

problems with halifax


sussex1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3411 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have been having an arguments for some time with Halifax re this CCA which I originally felt was an application form and stated the account was therfore in dispute

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/halifax2-2.jpg

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/halifax-2.jpg

 

I heard nothing for a few months but did receive statements adding interest and late charges etc, even though i advised when account in dispute they cannot and today finally received this letter

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/halifaxoct2.jpg

 

I have only posted their responses to various issues i raised

 

What I am concerned with now is

 

is the CCA valid, the terms are on th ereverse of the doc and do have £25 fees but the front does say application and there is no Halifax signature

 

if it is enforecable fair enough but what about their commetns they can add fees etc (their answer number 3)even when an account is in dispute?

 

I am pretty certain they cannot but what would be my response and on what am i basing this?

 

many thanks for any suggestions

Edited by sussex1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 280
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi

 

I have been having an arguments for some time with Halifax re this CCA which I originally felt was an application form and stated the account was therfore in dispute

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/halifax2-2.jpg

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/halifax-2.jpg

 

I heard nothing for a few months but did receive statements adding interest and late charges etc, even tgough i advised when account in dispute they caano and today finally received this letter

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/halifaxoct2.jpg

 

I have only posted their responses to various issues i raised

 

What I am concerned with now is

 

is the CCA valid, the terms are on th ereverse of the doc and do have £25 fees but the front does say application and there is no Halifax signature

 

if it is enforecable fair enough but what about their commetns they can add fees etc (their answer number 3)even when an account is in dispute?

 

I am pretty certain they cannot but what would be my response and on what am i basing this?

 

many thanks for any suggestions

 

Hi this is just my opinion based on my own experiance and from reading and helping on other threads.

 

I have seen cases where an application form with all the prescribed terms within the document has been accepted by a court as an executable agreement. I would tend to agree with your interpretation that charging interest applying charges and reporting default etc is enforcing an account while in dispute.

 

Problem for me is that I have only disputed an account after obtaining advice on an agreement or lack of one, I have been advised that a creditor could start to apply charges etc when/if a dispute is resolved.

 

Sorry I cannot be more helpful dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

thamks, I am leading towards this may well be enforceable but am concerned with the charges.

 

Since the account was put in dispute the debt has goe up by £400 on a £3k balance and previously I had been paying £10 per month with interest etc frozen for a couple of years.

 

Any other views on how i should respond?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sussex

 

I have got the same application form.

I think Halifax are trying to be cocky and photocopying the T&C on the reverse.

 

I am prety sure the original agreement does not have the t&C on the reverse as I says on my agrement that I should have received a copy of the T&C in the post.

 

Something else that gives it away is the T&C conditions are leaflet size, photcopied at an angle and there is a leaflet ref number bottom right.

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with HAK, i dont think the second scan is part of the original signed doc, therefore i dont think they have an enforcable agreement.

 

Does it actually say on the page you signed that the prescribed terms are overleaf?

 

I would send them the account in dispute letter, and stop paying them.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

many thanks for your help, I have hoewver already sent the disputed letter and this is their reply. Is there anything more specific i could or should be saying?

 

I stopped paying them from the end of April when the account first 12+2 days were up. They have since added charges, late fees and interest and as you will see in the link above they say that when account is in dispute this means they just can't enforce it but can request payments and add charges. Any ideas what i should reply to this? Its just annoying to see the debt is now substantially higher frim when i first requested my CCA?

 

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received exactly the same front & diferent T&C on the back (different figures in the APR box & diff. Ref No in the bottom right hand corner).These are my thoughts on it from my own thread:

 

Yes, my name & address are correct.

My date of birth is wrong.

My bank's name is missing but the sort code is there & time with bank is there.

 

The basic form is in light lettering & then they have printed in bold letters each of the required fields (except as above).

 

They seem to be suggesting that this is a follow-on form after they have got the details from my Application Form & they have added them for me just to sign.

 

I am very "picky" and everything has to be just right with me.I even get told off for correcting the kids' homework lol so it would be VERY unusual for me just to let it go through.I underline my signature & the one on this form has the "underline" right through my name which again is not normal.

I was either having a very bad day or someone is in to cut & paste.

 

Might be interesting to see the original application form if one exists - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) perhaps?

 

There is printing on the back of the form.

It is called "Financial Information" and lists special promotion rate, APR, handling charges for cash, charges - but it has a different document reference (in tiny type on the bottom edge of the form) to the front!

i.e. it could have been photocopied to look as one page.

Think these would be the conditions of use?

 

I just have a "feeling" about it - such as the fact that it is presumably exactly the same as my application form.If I have already answered all of these questions in my handwriting why would they just copy them down neatly & send in essence the same form out for me to sign again?

And they haven't signed it.

 

If that one is enforceable why send out the shiny new 8 page contract with detailed T&C which isn't signed & only shows my current address?

I feel like they are trying to flannel me & am tempted at the moment to call their bluff.

 

My form is Feb 2004.

 

Would Sussex1 & Having_a_Knightmare mind measuring the distance from the top edge of the back page down to the top of "I" for Important Information? Mine measures 52mm.

 

If they are cut & pasting by hand then the distances should vary even if they have managed to keep them square.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry for delay I see what you mean re the print codes and the front and rear of mine are different as well. All the details on the front are correct though.

 

I have noticed the right side of the box "the agreement" is not boxed off. It makes no mention of the terms being overleaf or similar and it is not signed by them.

 

The distance from the top of the page to "I" on the reverse is 54mm and it is at an angle as you say.

 

Any view on what to say?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you remember receiving this "For Your Signature" form to sign?

I can't but it was 4+ years ago.I dont know why they would re-write the handwritten application just to have you sign a "neat" copy of the same?

 

Why not just progress to the proper agreement?

 

Did you get a lovely "bells & whistles" 8 page agreement beginning "Parties" and going into great detail?

 

Mine features my new address & is unsigned.I think it just shows what I should have received & their letter went into loads of blurb about "You've been happy enough to pay the acount for 4 years, what's the problem now".

 

........& a threatogram from Blair,Oliver & Snott on the same day.

 

Smells fishy.

 

I wouls SAR them & specifically ask for a copy of all app.forms & agreement.See if they can get the photocopying on the back of your form to match the one you already have lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have received exactley the same thing for my daughter. It looks like someone has tried quite hard to make sure the terms on the back are not to squiffy :D. We also received print outs of agreements which are not signed but stating that the agreement is between halifax and my daughter blah blah. Apart from the MBNA agreement , which is two photocopies of what looks like ripped paper this is the weirdest one I have recieved :D

 

Oh also can i just ask, Im going to also send a SAR to all of the creditiors, does this mean that they will send me a new CCA? Gotta try and get these charges back, i ould support a small country on what theyve had out of may daughter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all!

 

I also received a lovely "bells & whistles" agreement featuring my current address & unsigned. I also had the same "you've been happy enough to pay the account for 7 years yada, yada, yada...".

 

I have also now received a threatogram from Blair, Oliver and Snott claiming that I've been ignoring their attempts to contact me (wtf?!!?). Blatantly untrue as I asked for them to contact me by letter only, and haven't received a thing until their latest "love letter".

 

I've sent an S.A.R to Haliprats and told BOS to back off as the account is still in dispute.

 

Not sure what I'll receive next, but I'm sure it will be worth the wait....

 

I am worried about what their next move will be, but hopefully I'll find sufficient advice and support on CAG to respond in kind!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh also can i just ask, Im going to also send a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to all of the creditiors, does this mean that they will send me a new CCA? Gotta try and get these charges back, i ould support a small country on what theyve had out of may daughter.

 

When you say "new" CCA do you mean another ie repeat copy?

 

I asked this question on my own thread but never got an answer.

 

I would have thought that if a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) covered everything they held on you then they should suppy another CCA but they may say that you have already had that one.Not sure.

 

Their reply doesn't really add up as it's "too much".It probably covers their responsibilities under CCA but they may be answering a different question.

 

Can't understand why all my papers from them are covered in (fresh) staple holes? Even the single photocopy of the Signature sheet???:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have a massive issue with these cca's. Im trying to sort out my daughters nightmare finances, but and call me suspicious by nature, its not hard to photocopy bit and bobs where you want them. This is my whole problem of not seeing the true agreement, which i know they wont send me so what to do ????

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have a massive issue with these cca's. Im trying to sort out my daughters nightmare finances, but and call me suspicious by nature, its not hard to photocopy bit and bobs where you want them. This is my whole problem of not seeing the true agreement, which i know they wont send me so what to do ????

 

Learn to play poker lol.:D

 

Not for the money but you have to be able to play everyone else's hand as well as your own.I've only been into all this CAG stuff for a couple of months but I think you start to get a sense when they are struggling & flanneling.

 

As I said with mine they just went into overload - "you've been quite happy upto now" letter, tons of T&C, big shiny new agreement,BOS threats, so at the moment I'm treading water until I can afford the tenner to SAR them!

 

Unless things change I am happy to call their bluff because if they were holding "Pocket Aces" they would have upped the stakes by now.;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you remember receiving this "For Your Signature" form to sign?

I can't but it was 4+ years ago.I dont know why they would re-write the handwritten application just to have you sign a "neat" copy of the same

 

no i cant but like you it was back in 04

 

Did you get a lovely "bells & whistles" 8 page agreement beginning "Parties" and going into great detail?

 

yes but these are current terms. I've had nothing from BOS. I think I am just going to send the ususal non compliant letter and point out to them the print codes on either side and ask them to confrim they are the same document. Also they have not signed it and nowhere does it say refer to terms overleaf.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sussex i have the orginial terms for 2004 and they are not whats on the back of your cca...not even close:)

 

 

I'm not sure why, if they have the original of these docuemnts why, they would not copy the full terms. Perhaps thats it, they simply don't have the original!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure why, if they have the original of these docuemnts why, they would not copy the full terms. Perhaps thats it, they simply don't have the original!

 

I think they are making it up as they go along.

 

Nearly every sheet has multiple staple holes in it.

I think they swap the paperwork around to suit whoever is writing to them.

 

If you read their statements regarding CCA obligations they are probably correct but are answering a different question.

 

" I enclose the necessary documents to demonstrate a fully executed agreement under s.78 of the CCA 1974."

 

Yes, you have but the one original page that I have signed doesn't seem to!:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

right, i think I need to mention (again) they can't add charges when is dispute and question if what they have sent is one document or not.

 

I've used several differnt letters I have found on here (thanks to all the original posters) and intend to send them this....anyone got any views, particualrly re the authenticity of what they say is a valid CCA?

 

When an account is in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for

payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst

the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest to the

account, nor make any further charges to the account. In the absence of a properly executed agreement, such an act would also be an offence under the

Data Protection Act 1998.

To register information with a credit reference agency, you must

have written consent from the data subject to collate and share such

information. This consent is given in the form of a signed credit agreement,

so until you produce such an agreement, you may not do this.

To comply with section 61 of the consumer credit act 1974 which by

the way refers to the signing of an agreement (Not an application), a

document must conform to regulations made under the provisions of section

60(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 otherwise it cannot be properly executed

 

Now then, these regulations I refer to are the Consumer Credit (Agreements)

Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553). These regulations set out the form and

content of agreements. For an agreement to be compliant with the regulations

it MUST embody within the agreement, the prescribed terms laid out in the

SI1983/1553 without the prescribed terms the agreement does not conform to

section 60(1) 1974 and therefore cannot be properly executed as described in

section 61(1) CCA 1974.

 

For your information in case you are unsure. The prescribed

terms referred to are contained in schedule 6 column 2 of the Consumer

Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) and are inter alia: - A

term stating the credit limit or the manner in which it will be determined

or that there is no credit limit, A term stating the rate of any interest on

the credit to be provided under the agreement and A term stating how the

debtor is to discharge his obligations under the agreement to make the

repayments, which may be expressed by reference to a combination of any of

the following--

(a)Number of repayments;

(b)Amount of repayments;

©Frequency and timing of repayments;

(d)Dates of repayments;

(e)The manner in which any of the above may be determined;

or in any other way, and any power of the creditor to vary what is payable.

 

I also wish to point out that these terms MUST be contained

within the agreement and NOT in a separate document headed terms and

conditions or words to that effect. On the front of the document you have

supplied there is no reference to what is on the rear and neither is it

signed by you. On the front it also states it is an application and "I

understand Halifax PLC may use credit scoring techniques to assess my

application".

 

Furthermore, if you look at the printed codes on the bottom

right of both sides of this document they are different. If this was one

document would these not be the same? In addition, the conditions on side

two are at an angle and not central.

 

To summarise, I consider you have failed to comply with a lawful request for

a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents

mentioned in it, failed to send a full statement of the account and Failed

to provide any of the documentation requested.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be viewed as both UNLAWFUL

and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful

harassment.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under

section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in

relation to this account with immediate effect.

 

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your

own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a

detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

 

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a 'legal right'; you must

outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this

reasoning depends.

 

Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to

remove all such data.

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory

authorities as I see fit.

You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your

intentions to resolve this matter.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

Edited by sussex1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had another thought.

 

As we all have the same front form with different reverse side featuring Important Financial Information.

 

If it is a "true" double sided form on the original then that would mean that they had to get the whole lot of forms re-printed every time the interest rates on the back changed!

 

Would cost a fortune but it's either that or having the tea-boy print them off their own computer quickly enough to keep up with the credit card orders.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so if they have clearly 'doctored' the agreements even if its just by photocopying different terms on the back and there seems to be a fair few of us that have these then what do we do now?

 

I'm going to write back & tell them that they have not yet fulfilled their legal obligation to supply a "true" copy of the Agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent the letter i referred to ealrier and it was signed for on 11th october.

 

I received however the attached default notice today dsated 7th October

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/halifax14101-1.jpg

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/halifax14102.jpg

 

Has anyone got any opinion as to whether this been sent correctly (it was not sent recorded) and does it contain all that it should?

 

Given i have told them in a letter thery have reeived since this notice was sent what, if anything do i need to do?

 

many thanks again for any advice

Edited by sussex1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...