Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well yes, ... and the tax dodgers ... Trump May Owe $100 Million From Double-Dip Tax Breaks, Audit Shows A previously unknown focus of an I.R.S. audit is a dubious accounting maneuver that effectively meant taking the same write-offs twice on a Chicago skyscraper. nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM  
    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Maternity Leave and Holiday Accrual


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5661 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My company's holiday year runs from April 1st to March 31st each year and we get 25 days holiday each year.

 

My maternity leave started on 18th March 2008 and is due to end on 18th March 2009.

 

It is company policy that holiday cannot be carried over.

 

I wish to take my full statutory maternity pay. Can I ask for my complete

holiday entitlement to be added on to the end of my maternity leave as otherwise I have no other way of taking the holiday, or I have to lose it (unless they offer to pay me for it - but I'd rather take it!)

 

My thoughts are, if I have to take the full leave before the end of March 2009, then I have had to end my maternity leave early and it is my statutory right to be able to take those 52 weeks, which they are then surely overriding by making me "take the holiday or lose it"!

 

What are peoples thoughts? Do I have the right to ask to take the leave even though it falls into the new holiday year?

When you've had all the help you need, make sure you stick around to help others too!

Just think, if everyone left the site after they'd got their help, there might not be anyone left the next time YOU come back needing more assistance!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you have been on ordinary maternity leave, you are still entitled to all the benefits you would receive whilst working, which includes annual leave. Annual Leave is still accrued and as you are unable to take it due to the timing of your maternity leave, yes you can carry it over.

 

They may well try arguing that you can't, as many employers unfortunately aren't up with or choose to ignore maternity rights, but you are entitled to it.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I can use that in a letter I write :)

When you've had all the help you need, make sure you stick around to help others too!

Just think, if everyone left the site after they'd got their help, there might not be anyone left the next time YOU come back needing more assistance!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Haha 1

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm.. DirectGov says...

 

"You can add holiday to the beginning or end of your leave. You may not be able to carry over untaken holiday entitlement if your maternity leave goes over two holiday years, so it's often best to take this at the beginning of your leave."

 

But I didn't have this opportunity... .....! which is where the difficulty lies!

When you've had all the help you need, make sure you stick around to help others too!

Just think, if everyone left the site after they'd got their help, there might not be anyone left the next time YOU come back needing more assistance!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Ker.

 

I've been watching your thread, I was going to say It's always better to take it before your maternity leave.

 

Give ACAS a phone they should be able to advise.

 

Good luck with that.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be able to take your holiday at the beginning of your maternity leave so that your actual maternity leave doesn't start until April and you don't return until April 09 ... and have an entire new holiday years worth of time to take!

Link to post
Share on other sites

right, i wasn't given the opportunity (I left at the end of March 2008 due back end March 2009!)

 

Should I point this out that I wasn't given the opportunity to take the leave? What I'm really angling for is my 5 weeks holiday plus the 6 bank holidays on top of my leave so I get more time off!

When you've had all the help you need, make sure you stick around to help others too!

Just think, if everyone left the site after they'd got their help, there might not be anyone left the next time YOU come back needing more assistance!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a complicated area. I know that the law is not exactly clear in this area and there is some confusion about how to treat stat holiday and contractual holiday entitlements.

 

The best article I have found thus far is:EEF : Does holiday entitlement accrue whilst on maternity leave?

 

Perhaps the ECJ will clarify some of this when they eventually decide the Stringer v HMRC case which is a case about right to holidays when on long term sick.

 

All I can say is that I know employment law consultants who advise companies to try to make the employee take the leave before the mat leave commences and only carry over the stat entitlement (0.8 weeks?) or greater amount if that is provided for in staff handbook (often about 5 days), any additional being lost. I'm not saying this is right, especially for cases where the employee was unable to take the hols before the mat leave started (like you?) but I have heard it given as advice.

 

Even though I can't advise further on this it may help future posts if you separate out your stat and contractual holiday entitlement.

 

Thus just to clarify OP are you saying you got 25 days + the 8 BH (and I assume your were a five day a week worker)?

Edited by elche
Gramatical

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, Monday to Friday worker. Contractual holiday is 25 days plus bank holidays, but I left on the tuesday after Easter, so they are already accounted for.

When you've had all the help you need, make sure you stick around to help others too!

Just think, if everyone left the site after they'd got their help, there might not be anyone left the next time YOU come back needing more assistance!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I've just done some research :D

 

In its judgement in Gomez v Continental Industrias del Caucho SA ([2004], the ECJ said that women on maternity leave must be permitted to take their statutory annual leave entitlement at a time other than when they are on maternity leave.

 

I might just WIN :D :D :D

Edited by KER

When you've had all the help you need, make sure you stick around to help others too!

Just think, if everyone left the site after they'd got their help, there might not be anyone left the next time YOU come back needing more assistance!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ker

 

I don't think it is quite that straight forward (** EDIT ** that comment was because I'm sure that originally your post said 'I Win' which now says 'might just win') I agree that 'might just win' is a much better reflection of the position as I understand it :)

 

1) My understanding is that the Gomez case applied to Statutory Holiday entitlement not contractual (in Spain it was 30 days in 2001) - Thus there is no guarantee Gomez would apply to any contractual holiday entitlement that you may or may not lose, over and above your stat min.

 

2) Gomez is not authority for the fact that if your mat leave straddles a holiday year that you would be able to carry over your holiday entitlement.

 

You say your RTW was going to be 18th March 2009 BUT your company's hol year runs out 31st March 2009.

 

Thus in order to get all your holidays your company would have to permit you to carry some over. Whilst they may well allow this the Gomez decision does not set a precedent that they would have to as this would potentially conflict with the WTR as they currently stand:

 

While on its face the decision is a clear one to follow, it raises an interesting question for UK employers: Can a woman whose maternity leave straddles two holiday years carry over any accrued but untaken holiday from the first holiday year into the second? The WTR, as currently drafted, would not permit this and the Government may now have to take steps to amend them.

 

But that said of course Gomez is overall a good decision for you.

 

Che

Edited by elche
Semantics

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...