Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Tax Arrears - Occupancy Dispute


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5686 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I hope someone can help as I am struggling to sort out my problem. The situation is as follows

 

Myself and my partner rented a property in Glasgow for 2 years between 2004 and 2006 from a private landlord. We moved out of the property in our own property on the 4th August 2006.

 

All was fine until 18th August 2008 when we received letter from Debt Collect Agency BCW advising a summary warrant has been obtained for council tax arrears for £121.78.

 

Upon contacting Glasgow City Council they advised that the council tax had been paid up until the end of July 2006 and the amount due was for the period of August - September 2006.

 

My biggest problem is that I am unable to prove that myself and my partner did not reside in the property for the disputed period. We can prove that we were living in our current property but do not have a copy of a lease agreement and I am unsure whether we had a written lease agreement, all payments were cash in hand but a friend had previously rented the property and had no issues.

 

I advised the council that the letter from BCW was the first we knew about the arrears and if we had been aware of the problem then we would have fully co-operated to resolve the issue at the time. They have advised that they had sent a reminder letter to the property in September 2006 (after we had left) and then contacted the leasing company, property matters, which was news to us as we dealt solely with the landlord and landlady. The landlord and landlady had forwarding details for our new property as they were quick enough to get in contact when the final gas and electricity bills were sent to them (They were in the landlord's name) which we paid direct to the landlord via the bank details they had provided us. Glasgow City Council also confirmed they had been unable to contact the landlord of the property even though they had their details.

 

I have contacted BCW and they have halted proceedings until mid-septemeber to give us time to resolve the dispute with Glasgow City council but I am unconviced Glasgow City Council will do much.

 

I have contacted the landlord using a mobile contact number we had but when I stated my name and that I was calling regarding the property they hung up and now refuse to take any of my calls.

 

I have provided the landlord name, contact number and current address for the landlord to the council and they have promised to try and locate them but I will not hold my breath.

 

I am currently trying to locate as much documentation I can to build a case for us not staying in the property (on the advise of Citizens advice) such as details of full and final payment for the telephone line but without the lease I am currently getting nowhere.

 

As the council only know we resided in the property becuase we were paying the council tax and they have no copy of any tenacy agreement to say we did stay in the property how can they solely pursue ourselves for the debt and not even bother with the landlord.

 

Any suggestions how we can proceed in this matter would be greatly appreciated as I really cant afford to pay for something I am not responsible for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We did register for council tax for our current property and will be able to provide records to that effect but I am unsure this will help as the council will say we were liable for both properties as we could have been staying in both properties at the same time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i work for a local council and as far am aware you can not be charged for 2 properties at the same time. You should be able to get the bill amended, but don't go through balliffs go to the council office for the bill to be amended and for the council to recontact balliffs. You might find the balliff charges will still stand, you could could put in a appeal at the council office, depending if you notified the council at the time you moved out? the council should change the records and make your old landlord liable and the bill go to him

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have contacted Glasgow City Council who have been very helpful again and have advise dthey are going to investigate further and confirmed that we have been paying council tax in our current property from 4th August 2006 and if we can provide a final phone bill and proof of removal of household items (i.e. rental van receipt) then we would qualify for a unoccupied property exemption.

 

Hopefully this will resolveour issue. Ill keep you posted...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thanks daviesjlee I have now recevied a letter from GCC advising that there had been a mistake and that no further action will be taken on the account so £120 saved.

 

I am very surprised though as we did not provide GCC with any documentation from BT or proof that we had moved our possesions from the property as they had requested for the exemption. The only thing I can think is the landlord provided a copy of the lease to GCC but I would be amazed if that had happened.

 

The second letter we received on the same day as the GCC letter was from BCW advsing my partners wages would be arrested if we did not pay up but one phone to BCW confirmed they also have the issue as resolved. now just need to fight with them to get a letter confirming this as apparently "BCW do not do letters" as I was helpfully advised by one of their sterling advisors.

 

Suppose that will be a post for another day :D

 

Thanks once again one and all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

I have joined this in the hope that someone out there can help me.

 

This is a long story so please dont go

I recieved a commital to prison letter in may of this year for a poll tax bill, yes poll tax 1989/1990 and community charge bill for the year 1990/1991 amounting to £184.00.

I got in touch with Liverpool City Council and asked what this was about as I was then in full time employment, working FOR LIverpool City Council and paying my poll tax through attachment of earnings. They then said that it was my resposibility to make sure I was paying enough and as I was not (according to them) it is my fault. As I have not kept bills or reciepts for18 years I have NO way of proving I paid enough so asked them to send out a statement. I recieved the statement and on it was another bill for 1994 for council Tax to the amount of £115.00.

 

I pointed out about the statute of limitations law that says you can not claim a dept over 6 years unless it has a liability order on them and apparently they have (ALL NEWS TO ME.)

 

I then got a visit off the baliffs and because I have told the council that I am fighting this through the C.A.B. My costs are going up and the baliffs are being not very nice, and to top it off I have just heard from the C.A.B. that Liverpool City Council are now saying I owe nearly £900.00 from the year 1989 until the year 1996.

 

I relise that I have a huge battle ahead of me this has been going on since may, as I will be taking on the goverment. The reason being that when the statute of Limitations law was put in to force it was obviously voted on by our mps and Lo and behold who is exempt from that law.

 

1) Council Tax

2) Benafits

3) Income Tax and Tax Credits

 

all goverment related. I know I am getting a bit on my high horse and losing the plot as I need to sort out my council tax first BUT I thought it was us who run the country not the goverment that ran us. I don't remember it being a dictatorship.

 

So before I go in to that battle (with I hope an army) I need to know if anyone knows of anything I can do over this council tax dept that I knew nothing about.

 

Please Please help if you can I would really be very grateful.

 

Boda:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...