Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

SD received in the post day**WON WITH COSTS**


tiglet
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4573 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have received a lovely SD from Capquest today. Wonderful, just when I was starting to feel better again - another panic attack, anyone?

 

It was dated 7th August and only received it today so those 18 days are now down to 13 days. Great.

 

However, I have disputed the debt with Capquest on several occasions due to the OC not providing me with a copy of the CCA when requested. They have now sent me an application form, statements and copies of the T&C's from 2003 - however, I took out the card a couple of years earlier than this. Apparently, they have been charging me interest since they took over the debt (I've seen no notice of assignment) ad this is the first time I ahve seen this info.

 

Basically, do I have any grounds for asking for the SD to be set aside? I'm still not doing too well at the moment and my head feels a bit cloudy so I'm not exactly on the ball with what I should do next.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 232
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Here is the application form they sent - can you tell me if it's enforceable as a CCA as I don't want to get caught out: http://i509.photobucket.com/albums/s338/Tiggy-poos/capquestapplicationscan.jpg

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say also unenforceable.

 

I would try and get is set aside on the basis you dispute the debt and capquest have failed to produce any valid cca and full statment of account.

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not enforcable as it has none of the prescribed terms on it. These must as far as I am aware be contained within the four corners of the agreement and not as seperate T&Cs.

 

Failing to produce a valid CCA is reason enough tho have the SD Set Aside

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought not - tahnks guys.

 

Any idea how to word it on the form? i'm going to pop to the court tomorrow and sort it out. Will it cost me anything (apart from the bus fare!) to do this? If so, can I reclaim the costs from Capquest?

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was dated 7th August and only received it today so those 18 days are now down to 13 days. Great.

 

The time limit starts on the day the statutory demand is served... which is the day you recieve it. i take it this was a first class post SD? In which case they probably aren't too serious anyway.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not enforcable as it has none of the prescribed terms on it. These must as far as I am aware be contained within the four corners of the agreement and not as seperate T&Cs.

 

Failing to produce a valid CCA is reason enough tho have the SD Set Aside

 

Hmmm... youre the first to agree with me on that point, i wonder why?

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Those of you who know what I precarious emotional state I've been in recently would have been very proud of me today.

 

I telephoned the court where Capquest said I had to fill in the forms (about 50 miles away) and was told I could do it at my local court. BONUS!

 

I got the kids ready and, in my state, managed to leave everything at home. Fortunately, I remembered before I got on the bus and so went home and retrieved everything - i managed to catch the next bus.

 

Bus journey was a nightmare as I had another full-blown panic attack, but this time with no where to hide and breathe into a paperbag. But I got through it - didn't get off the bus, didn't turn round and come home, I got through it. I am proud of myself for that when every instinct was telling me just to run away home.

 

Fortuantely, the court is about a mile outside the centre of Canterbury, so I had a long walk in which to somewhat calm myself. I was still shaking when I went in, but the court staff were absolutely lovely with me.

 

I filled in the form and I think i did an OK job of it. i basically stated that the original creditor had been in default of my CCA request since February 2007 and I had invoked the complaints procedure at Capquest and they were well aware of the breach too. I quoted the relevant sections of the CCA 1974 (all prepared before hand) and my parting shot was that in my opinion Capquest were persuing this route as they knew it would be unenforceable in the small claims court. Hit panic again as while I was swearing the affadavit, my two year old wee'ed all over one of the chairs. They were very nice about that too.

 

I was obviously agitated, but the lady at the counter was lovely and took my phone number and promised someone would look over my form and phone me if there was a problem. Job done, feeling weak as a kitten and with a slightly damp child, I headed home.

 

I know many of you have gone through horrendous court cases etc., and I'm not for one minute comparing this, but for me at this moment in time, this was a big achievement and I want to say a big thanks to this site because if I hadn't gained all of the knowledge I've gained over the last couple of years, and hadn't had the support I'd had over the last couple of years, i probably would ahve taken out a loan and paid them off just to have some peace. Thank you all.

 

Clarity, if you're reading as I am well aware you have been - the lettter's in the post!

Edited by tiglet
..

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys - I do feel slightly guilty that the court has a chair smelling of wee though!

 

One funny point was when I was desperately trying to fill in the forms and very upset, a judge walked in. He had a brief word with someone at the counter about something and I think they told him I was distressed. he sat for about three minutes, in full gown and wig doing Donald Duck impressions for my children!

 

What a lovely guy.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is the best story ever. My child loves going to the court buildings with me- security guards, big metal detectors and people in funny costumes (hopefully judges). Heaven for a toddler.

 

Tiglet, I really admire you- I hope if and when I have to deal with a SD, I manage to do it as well as you. I had hysterics for about three days trying to do my court bundle for bank charges.

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys - I do feel slightly guilty that the court has a chair smelling of wee though!

 

One funny point was when I was desperately trying to fill in the forms and very upset, a judge walked in. He had a brief word with someone at the counter about something and I think they told him I was distressed. he sat for about three minutes, in full gown and wig doing Donald Duck impressions for my children!

 

What a lovely guy.

I don't think those were impressions, they actually talk like that, :)

 

On a more serious note:

In case anyone wants to see what a SD from Caqpest looks like I've scanned one in. Hopefully it is identicle to the one Tiglet had.

I'm not thread hijacking as I don't need help per se, just letting the people know what they look like and if indeed anything is wrong with them.

Mine DID come by 1st class.

 

Letter

 

Page 1

 

Page 2

 

Page 3

Link to post
Share on other sites

EXACTLY like mine (apart from the particulars and date).

 

Don't think you are hijacking at all sweetie - have you applied for this to be set aside yet? Trust me, if I can do it, anyone can.

 

Very funny to think all judges sound like Donald Duck!

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No doubt you will follow the advice of Most members on this forum and apply to have this joke set asoide. You should ask the court for written explanation from these clowns as to why they were unable to serve the SD personally

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks saintly - hasn't been agreed yet, so one step at a time, one step at a time ...

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Swines have just done the same to me :eek: Do they know who I am and that I have mates in high places like KM - the honorary member of the Cabot Fan Club? :D

 

Must be getting desperate for cash if they are sending these out ten a penny. I may have to compare notes with a few of you, not had one of these before :mad:

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...