Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

cp plus and trethowans solicitors


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5105 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all and thanks for a usefull and informative site!

 

my problem:

 

went shopping to morrisons in ???? in the middle of may.

they have a pay-at-the-machine-and-get-a-refund-at-the-till car park.

we didnt have enough change so didnt pay for the parking.

(when we had no money to pay once before, we had been told by a staff member that it was ok as long as we were in the store shopping!)

came out 20 mins later to find a £40 "fine" (invoice?) on the car.:-x

after researching this site i just filed the ticket away and waited for the reminder/last chance to pay us anything letter.

got my FIRST correspondence in the post today, - a letter from trethowans solicitors demanding £40 by 8 august or cp plus would instruct that court procedings would commence with no further notice! heavy handed or what?

so after my initial shock, my thoughts are to treat it as if it were a debt collection letter, send back a letter asking trethowans to refer the case back to cp plus as it is in dispute and then send the standard template "prove-it" letter to cp plusltd.

 

does this sound sensible, or would anyone recommend a differant course?

 

thanks m.w.n.n.

Edited by manwithnoname
edited to remove any details that might give my ID to CP plus!
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

word on the street is that Trethowans have set up a little team to chase up PPC debts. A dangerous game for a solicitor to play...

Was the Trethowans letter signed by someone with the first of "Sue".

Word on the street is that she heads up this new team - though I expect letters to be signed by some general bod, I wouldn't expect a real solicitor to sign their name to these [problem] letters and so risk their licence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

ok, couldnt make sense of the faq on attachments, will try linking.

 

this first link is the letter i got first, about which the above posts are about.

 

wld9ja.jpg

 

this link is the latest instalment, the next please please give us some money letter.

it shows what thin ice these companys skate on.

 

8zmt5d.jpg

 

my favorite bits:

1st letter: if not recieved in 14 days court procedings will be issued without further notice

2nd letter: necessary to refer back to cp plus for instructions.

 

both letters: no further notification will be sent. (so whats this then??)

 

heading of 2nd letter: cp plusltd v yourself - trying to make it look scary and legal!

 

hope they give you a good laugh

 

regards m.w.n.n.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're not even entitled to the £1, since if the OP can prove that he/she had made a purchase in the store, the £1 was refundable. Therefore, no loss to the store whatsoever.

MBNA - Agreed to refund £970 in full without conditions. Cheque received Sat 5th Aug.:D

Lloyds - Settled for an undisclosed sum.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

 

Found this thread when searching for trethowans as I have received a request to release my details from the DVLA for a supposed parking offence. The comments make interesting reading and I would like to know if the claim from trethowans was dropped or if they continued persuing the claim? Are the comments based on peoples experience/law?

 

Thanks very much!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not an offence - nobody will be going to prison.

 

From the people posting on here and Pepipoo, Trethowans send two letters and that's that.

 

We know of no case of them taking anyone to court. They are solicitors after all (albeit with this strange sideline activity of sending threatening letters) and know full well they wouldn't get very far in court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hey all, I had a similar circumstance with CP Plus Ltd issuing me with an 'invoice' for £40 based on me parking my car 'outwith a designated bay'.

 

I felt that the whole episode was entrapment as I had previously parked in exactly the same spot (along with others) and paid the required sums for the priviledge of doing so. They did away with the 'pay and display' tickets as parking fees in hospital car parks are no longer valid in Scotland.

 

They are trying to recoup the losses of car park revenue by catching patients out. I was issued with a ticket and was so angry that I decided not to pay and await some form of follow up from them.

 

I have received today 'letter 1' from Trethowans and am not going to follow this one up. Both CP Plus and Trethowans fail to offer you a phone contact to discuss matters, only a payment line!!!

 

Its a total [problem] and whilst I don't wish to go to court, I would love to make an argument out of it! Its not ciriminal, just a difference of opinion and its up to them if they wish to take me all the way!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi all

 

just thought i would post to let anyone who is interested know that i never heard anymore after the 2 scary solicitors letters.

so just ignore seems a good tactic.

 

something interesting i spotted today while in the morrisons where i originally got the unsolicited invoice was that the cp-plus badged pay and display machine cash boxes were being emptied by morrisons staff!

 

indicated a closer tie between the two company's than morrisons would have you think!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morrisons usually knock a pound off your bill at the checkout.

 

Which means you need two pound coins before you even start shoping - one for the car park and one for the trolley. Grrr.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

1) First of all check the signs on that car park and if the word PENALTY appears anywhere on the signs then the ticket is invalid. Be quick as they are in the process of changing them to make them legal.

Only Parking Charge Notices can be issued on private land.

 

2) The PCN is issued to the driver of the vehicle so if 1 does not apply then write to them and tell them you were not the driver. You are under NO obligation to tell them who was driving.

 

GOLDRINGER

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...