Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • statute barring in Scotland is 5yrs from last payment/use date or date of default Notice + 14 days, whichever is the later. dont confuse that with the 6yrs debts show on credit files (DN's 6th bday regardless to payment or not). they'd never get a claim raised by august in 99% of cases . as long all these debts were taken out whilst resident in scotland and you have not moved since taking them out but failed to inform the original creditor before the debt sale....... then stay radio silent until sb date is reached. then if you wish send our scottish sb letter. just remember unlike E&W in scotland debts are extinguished, dead , gone , parrot. once SB'd dx  
    • Hi all, Love this site and it's no nonsense advice, have dipped in and out of the consumer forums over the years, mostly to assure myself that what I was doing was the right thing when dealing with various businesses (almost 100% success rate, thanks in part to reading and more reading here.). Anyway, the time is almost approaching where I might need to ask for some specific help and I have a couple of queries that I can't see definitively answered. Due to financial mismanagement and severe anxiety issues I stopped paying all unsecured debt in December 2018 (one slipped to the first week in Jan 2019 when the last payment was made having rechecked my bank statement from that period - all my unsecured debt direct debits were cancelled in early Jan 2019). This has left half a dozen debts;  a couple of credit cards, a bank loan, Shop Direct and some Hitachi Finance stuff having been sold on and passing the rounds through the usual suspects, Lowells, Link, PRA Group, others related to them, and then back to them again. I have somehow successfully managed to maintain radio silence and avoided anything more worrying than their begging letters.  I have blocked their phone calls and texts, bumped all emails to the spambox and had a chuckle at their desperate letters.  I've never had anybody at the door.  I have been at the same address since before I defaulted and all correspondence comes to my current home address.  I have NEVER contacted them or admitted any debt. In anticipation of them perhaps ramping up action at the last minute I've had a look at my credit report on Credit Karma (rec'd from this very place) and I see that the default dates on these range from May 2019 to November 2019. Also in preperation I've been reading, reading and reading lots here as advised. Obviously being in Scotland there are a lot fewer posts relating to these matters and it's always quite annoying when OP's do not follow up with any outcome on their cases - how rude! This has also left me a bit confused of when I am able to finally breathe easy (although cancelling all the direct debits in Jan 2019 was the biggest sigh of relief as I knew it was all going to be unmanageable and, well, default one, default all.). I've been reading that defaults should be filed 3-6 months after the missed payment but one of my larger debts was defaulted on 27th August 2019 when the last payment I made was 10th December 2018, meaning the first missed payment was 10th Jan 2019.   My query for now is - when should I infer that these debts are prescribed?  From when the payment was missed, or taking the default date plus 5 years from the credit report? The three I have with the May date are moot anyway as either way they are gone  - some letters from Lowell offering me 90% off to settle is what got me thinking these must have been near SB status, however I have one big 10k+ with a July date and another 10k+ at the end of August I am feeling a bit anxious again, even though I know there is nothing to worry about with the begging letters.  Reading the various forums I am not sure why the OC's didn't take action against me when I read time and again the surprise that other posters haven't already been taken to court for lesser amounts - I'm also surprised I've avoided any action this long as there are plenty in this forum and sub forum who are whisked off to the court by the beggers minions after only a year or so after defaulting.  There are no CCJ/decrees listed on my credit report and I have not received any such judgements against me.  I still just regularly receive the begging emails to the spambox, the blocked phone calls and the letters from the they. I'm also reading that there is no need in Scotland to send an LBC so what should I be looking out for to know that the time has come to engage with CCA requests etc? I'm afraid in a fit I threw a lot of the paperwork out but I have a box of stuff I'm going to go through which may have the original letters from the OC's. Thanks in advance for any advice.  
    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

orfoster vs Natwest


orfoster
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4018 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 260
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello all,

 

Im back. Now then!

 

The 2nd account i have with NatWest im claiming back £1200 and the account is £1021 overdrawn so the account is solely made up over charges on an unauthorised borrowing rate, can i have people advise please. I have been reading about people claiming this back at a contractual rate.

 

Unarranged borrowing

 

Current, Current Plus and Advantage Gold2.19% a month (EAR 29.69%) variable

 

So if i go over my overdraft and they charge me their EAR rate 29.69% variable can i then put this in instead of my 8%, what are the risks in doing this?? Im going to be putting in on MCOL by 2moro night but if i see that this other interest rate will work i will look further into this.

 

Help and feedback would be great. Cheers.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

Im back. Now then!

 

The 2nd account i have with NatWest im claiming back £1200 and the account is £1021 overdrawn so the account is solely made up over charges on an unauthorised borrowing rate, can i have people advise please. I have been reading about people claiming this back at a contractual rate.

 

Unarranged borrowing

 

Current, Current Plus and Advantage Gold2.19% a month (EAR 29.69%) variable

 

So if i go over my overdraft and they charge me their EAR rate 29.69% variable can i then put this in instead of my 8%, what are the risks in doing this?? Im going to be putting in on MCOL by 2moro night but if i see that this other interest rate will work i will look further into this.

 

Help and feedback would be great. Cheers.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CONGRATULATIONS.........please fill in the survey >:)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok after alot of reading i have found this to be most helpful. I am now going to go for the charges PLUS the contractual rate. Im not sure on which rate to claim. Is it the unarranged borrowing fee @ 29.69% or is it the normal Typical 18.86% EAR. Im really not sure which it is, anyone?

 

The other question i have is like NWSM has said above, is it possible to do this on money claim or will i need to do this through the courts??

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone help me with who i should address my pre lim letter to at natwests head office in bishopsgate. I addressed my S.A.R request to the data controller but not sure who to address the pre lim letter to. Any help would be greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

NatWest. It will get to the right people.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

orfoster,

 

With regards to your loan, it is illegal for a person under 18 to obtain credit full stop as you were under 18 it was illegal. I don't know how they have gotten away with selling a loan to someone who was under 18. I would suggest that you persue it, not only to get back any charges but to have it writen off if you are still paying for it and to claim any interest that was charged, BUT!! If you do persue this I would strongly advise you to seek advice from a solicitor, it is not something easily tackled by ones self. IMO it is a clear cut case, you would win, but i would think it would go higher than the small claims court as there is a serious breech of the law.

 

Good luck with any other claims and congrats on your successful one. Let me know how the loan one goes.

 

Adam

NatWest Credit Card - All charges refunded (£350.41) after first request sent :D

HSBC - 1st Approach Letter sent (£62.41) 12/09/2006. LBA sent recorded delivery 26/09/2006.

6/10/2006 - We believe that if this went to court etc we would win letter, but we are refunding you the charges made, we accept no liability - LOL I think by refundng me you accept that you are wrong!! I win :D

Capital One - 1st Approach Letter sent (£40) 20/09/2006. 29/09/2006 Full refund offered, letter dated 25/09/2006.

Barclaycard - £235 charges - Pending Action. WON!!

Halifax - Prepairing letters for £125 in charges on closed account. WON!!

Natwest Creditcard again

£12 late payment charge 13/11/2006 - LBA sent 17/11/2006. WON!!

Fight the power, you owe the banks nothing and they owe you everything!!

Now it's 3-0 to me :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your reply. Yes i will take the matter further, im going to claim back all of my bank charges which i have done 2/3 of it now, i have one account left to do then i will be taking this further if i can. I will seek advise first. I have paid back all of the loan. I actually left college half way through my course to pay it back as they were gonna take me to court. Isn't it funny how they CANNOT "locate" ANY documents relating to a loan account with them yet it clearly shows on my statements "Personal Term Loan" payments. I have no evidence other than the payments into the loan that it existed.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you not have a copy of the agrement? If you take them to court over it they will probably miraculously find the documentation. My natwest account still shows the loan account I had when I had to take out a loan to pay for my legal training, I paid it off last year early, they tried to charge me an early settlement fee but I sad no, and had it refunded :-)

NatWest Credit Card - All charges refunded (£350.41) after first request sent :D

HSBC - 1st Approach Letter sent (£62.41) 12/09/2006. LBA sent recorded delivery 26/09/2006.

6/10/2006 - We believe that if this went to court etc we would win letter, but we are refunding you the charges made, we accept no liability - LOL I think by refundng me you accept that you are wrong!! I win :D

Capital One - 1st Approach Letter sent (£40) 20/09/2006. 29/09/2006 Full refund offered, letter dated 25/09/2006.

Barclaycard - £235 charges - Pending Action. WON!!

Halifax - Prepairing letters for £125 in charges on closed account. WON!!

Natwest Creditcard again

£12 late payment charge 13/11/2006 - LBA sent 17/11/2006. WON!!

Fight the power, you owe the banks nothing and they owe you everything!!

Now it's 3-0 to me :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

No i don't have a copy simply because i didn't want people to find it at home. The account can't be seen anywhere on my account history apparently, even if they did find the document what would they be able to do with it? The only thing i have is copies of payments leaving my account, however i don't think this will be enough evidence to take them over this. What do you think??

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a tough one!! Well you have payments going out to pay back a loan. If they searched your financial history for the time when you had the loan they would only find that loan (unless you had others?), so put 2 and 2 together, those payments were to pay that loan. My legal opinion, get advice, there is a slim chance you could have them on something. Also there will be a copy of your loan agreement out there somewhere, its a question of finding it. The action could casue the bank to 'magically find it' or it could casue them to panic because they have genuinely lost it (unlikely). This could bring up another issue for the bank, you would be sueing them under a civil case, the outcome of which could then bring about a criminal case against the bank as you were sold a loan when you were under 18 (illegal). Give me a few days to do some research on the matter, see if there have been any similar cases to yours, if i have anymore questions I will let you know. In the meantime seek further legal advice on where you stand, you could be sitting on something major here with the underage loan (i am still struggling to see how they sold a loan to someone who was under 18), sit tight, get more advice and I will look into things for you.

 

Good Luck, im behind you all the way on this one.

NatWest Credit Card - All charges refunded (£350.41) after first request sent :D

HSBC - 1st Approach Letter sent (£62.41) 12/09/2006. LBA sent recorded delivery 26/09/2006.

6/10/2006 - We believe that if this went to court etc we would win letter, but we are refunding you the charges made, we accept no liability - LOL I think by refundng me you accept that you are wrong!! I win :D

Capital One - 1st Approach Letter sent (£40) 20/09/2006. 29/09/2006 Full refund offered, letter dated 25/09/2006.

Barclaycard - £235 charges - Pending Action. WON!!

Halifax - Prepairing letters for £125 in charges on closed account. WON!!

Natwest Creditcard again

£12 late payment charge 13/11/2006 - LBA sent 17/11/2006. WON!!

Fight the power, you owe the banks nothing and they owe you everything!!

Now it's 3-0 to me :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I contacted FSA and Financial Ombudsman, i won't do anything till i claim back my last account with them that is solely made up of charges then i'll do whatever so thats prob a few weeks as i have to send them in a letter telling them i'm claiming contractual interest. Thanks for your help. I've not really got very far looking into it. I have copies of my credit file and there is no search on it. Nothing, thats the only loan i held. They called me up and said how my account was overdrawn 80% of which was due to bank charges and they offered me this loan which i paid off. I take responsibility for my actions now but when i was 16 i was scared of going to court and telling my parents i was in debt so took this loan out without mentioning it. I then left college to pay it off, lucky im now in a rly good job otherwise i would be in trouble, i actually blame them for that! Many thanks for your help. I'll wait to hear from you. Cheers.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, heres the plan.

 

2nd October I will be going to the local courts to file my claim against NatWest for an account solely made up of charges.

 

Total amount claimed = £1368.95

Court Costs = £120.00

Total Claimed = £1486.95

Im claiming this at the contractual interest rate @ 29.69% which is NatWests rate for unauthorised overdrafts. My Particulars of the claim are below, if anyone thinks they are wrong please let me know but they have been edited for anyone wanting to do this:

1. The Claimant has an account, Account Number XXXXXXXX Sort Code XXXXXX with the Defendant which was opened on or around 11th November 2005

2. During the period in which the Account has been operating the Defendant debited numerous charges to the Account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant and also charged interest on the charges once applied. The Claimant understands that the Defendant contends that the charges were debited in accordance with the terms of the contract between itself and the Claimant.

3. A list of the charges applied is attached to these particulars of claim.

4. The Claimant contends that:

a) The charges debited to the Account are punitive in nature; are not a genuine pre-estimate of cost incurred by the Defendant; exceed any alleged actual loss to the Defendant in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant; and are not intended to represent or related to any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enrich the Defendant which exercises the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit. In the event that the charges are not a penalty, then they are unreasonable under the Supply of goods and Services Act 1982 section 15. The defendant has declined to justify the charges, dispite repeated requests to do so.

b) The contractual provision that permits the Defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable by virtue of the Unfair Contract Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (1999), the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and the common law.

5. Accordingly the Claimant claims:

a) the return of the amounts debited in respect of charges in the sum of £1149.51 and any interest charged thereon;

b) Court costs;

c) the Claimant claims interest at the contractual rate of 29.69% per annum, from the date of each transaction to 3rd October 2006, which is £217.44, as set out in the attached list of charges. The Claimant further claims interest, on the resulting total of £1366.95, at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment, at a daily rate of £0.93 per day. The Claimant believes this rate to be justified under the principle of mutuality and reciprocity, and is based on the Defendants interest rate that would be applied under the terms of the above mentioned account.

Should the court find that this interest rate is not applicable, then in the alternative the Claimant claims interest pursuant to Section 69 of the County Court Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum calculated from the date of each transaction to 3rd October 2006, which is £58.84 and also interest at the same rate until date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.25.

Statement of truth:

I believe that the facts in the particulars of the claim are true.

 

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ORF,

 

Very similar to a couple of my claims. I got bored with the sect 69 interest. No results yet though. Remember, if the case is defended, Taunton will transfer the claim to Bristol. It will waste a month and you will be invited to a case management hearing. My CMH is next week. Of course I could have settled approx 50% offer which arrived a couple weeks ago. My feeling is maybe soon, someone will get to court.

Regards Haydn (also from Taunton)

Its WAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, where are you living now? Ah rite cool well hopefully i will get to court considering all the time i have spent researching what i would use in court. I have like a massive file of things at home. I actually want to go to court so i can bring up other things on why their charges are unfair in my case. I think they will pay up before court but we shall see. Let me know how it goes.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I'm just starting off a NatWest claim for £1470 of charges on my girlfriend's account and have been reading with interest Mindzai vs Lloyds and taylormandy vs Nationwide, both of which are going for contractural interest.

 

Will be interesting ot see the outcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NatWest have till the 18th to respond to my claim. They haven't done anything yet. I will keep you updated.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

E-mail from Watchdog asking me for my mobile number to discuss my situation with them. They want me to talk over the phone and possibly come in to them. ahhhhh...... cool.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

wow excellent, that would be great exposure and hopefuly get others to take action too. Also it may lead into a big inquirey over the loan to a minor issue.

 

Nice one

NatWest Credit Card - All charges refunded (£350.41) after first request sent :D

HSBC - 1st Approach Letter sent (£62.41) 12/09/2006. LBA sent recorded delivery 26/09/2006.

6/10/2006 - We believe that if this went to court etc we would win letter, but we are refunding you the charges made, we accept no liability - LOL I think by refundng me you accept that you are wrong!! I win :D

Capital One - 1st Approach Letter sent (£40) 20/09/2006. 29/09/2006 Full refund offered, letter dated 25/09/2006.

Barclaycard - £235 charges - Pending Action. WON!!

Halifax - Prepairing letters for £125 in charges on closed account. WON!!

Natwest Creditcard again

£12 late payment charge 13/11/2006 - LBA sent 17/11/2006. WON!!

Fight the power, you owe the banks nothing and they owe you everything!!

Now it's 3-0 to me :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

17th October 2006,

 

NatWest filed a acknowledgment with the intentions of defending the claim. Oh dear what a shame. I will await their further resposne so they now have i think till the..............1st November to do anything?

 

On another note, i have had a e-mail from someone at the BBC Watchdog wanting me to give them my contact details about explaining my stories.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I had a payout of a claim for £134 for charges. I did a boo boo, when they paid up, i clicked on judgment by addmission. I now know not to do that! Whoops, didn't realise that but think i've solved the problem now.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right well i have heard nothing from NatWest. So i take it that today as long as i have no post when i get home i can take in my judgment to the local courts and apply for default judgment?? I think i've got my dates right. I hope.

Well today is the 28th day. Is it today or 2moro i can file for judgment?

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...