Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It's genuinely amazing how you managed to rebuke pretty much all of my points without giving a single shred of evidence to prove it. When asked for evidence all you claim is that "it's clear cut" but how is anyone here meant to know if you won't show it?   I agree with this. If you can't convince us, how are you going to convince the judges when this inevitably goes to court?
    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unenforceable Credit Agreement?


platinumone
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4785 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You can adapt this to suit

 

Letter before Action

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: − Account/Reference

 

I refer to our recent correspondence regarding the above account where I requested a signed copy of the credit agreement (which you have not been able to produce) or (which is not executed in accordance with the Consumer Credit Act 1974) and do not recognise any liability to you or your legal right to pursue this alleged debt.

 

As you are aware, a credit agreement that is not properly documented and signed by the customer is totally unenforceable under the CCA and therefore is a complete defence to any court claim that is issued. The following examples are from high court and the court appeal case law which backs up any legal defence, or counter claim under Consumer Credit Act 1974 s.142

 

Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 633, Sir Andrew Morritt, Vice Chancellor said:

• The creditor must…be taken to have made a voluntary disposition, or gift, of the loan monies to the debtor. The creditor had chosen to part with the monies in circumstances in which it was never entitled to have them repaid

 

In the case of Dimond v Lovell [2000] UKHL 27, Lord Hoffmann said:

• Parliament intended that if a consumer credit agreement was improperly executed, then subject to the enforcement powers of the court, the debtor should not have to pay.

 

Should I wish to pursue court action there are firms now willing to do this on a no win no fee basis and this would incur considerable expense to your self both in litigation costs and my legal costs

 

As a compromise I suggest you write off this alleged debt and remove all reference from my credit files.

 

Should I not receive a satisfactory reply then I will be considering enforcing my legal rights through the courts and would suggest you pass this letter to your legal department for their attention.

 

Yours faithfully

Your name

Name

Live Life-Debt Free

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 259
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi sorry to hijack this thread , but i,m a bit new to this .

 

I am thinking of challenging my credit card agreements but i have a few questions......

 

Has anybody actually had confirmation from the credit card companies that they will not persue the debt......and on the flip side has anybody actually been forced to carry on paying

 

Is it ok to stop making payments and if so when

 

Has anybody suffered adverse credit rating because of their claim

 

What are the main points to look for on the agreement to see if its unenforceable.

 

Once again apologies for for hijacking.

 

Thanks in advance to anyone who replies

 

Digger

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi landersd

 

There are lots of cases of CC companies accepting full and final settlements which is the same thoimgs agreeing tnot to puruse the debt.

 

Only stop payments if the CC company is in default under the CCA 1974

 

The cannot give you an advers credit score just because you claim - there are strict procedures they have to follow (and, if they don't you can make them)

 

I suggest you either post a scan of your agreement here (personal details removed) so we can have a look, but to see what to look for, have a look at http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/162851-consumer-credit-agreements.html

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

Can anyone assist, I am currently facing bailiff action at my house from the county court on behalf of Hillesden Securities Ltd. I have read several of the articles and there seems to be grey areas as to whether the original finance house is allowed to pass my deatails on to a third party collection service.

My question is what can i do if anything ??

 

Regards

 

Silverfox1968

Edited by Silverfox1968
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BB - I am in the process of sending a "Subject Access Request", from reading your thread the creditor (Marbles) have 40 days to reply. In the event that they do not forward the signed agreement, should I then proceed with a "Formal Complaint Letter" and then followed by a "Letter before action" which suggests the debt be wiped clean or court action be taken ?

 

In addition you have mentioned that you will be receiving all monies that you have paid ? is this compensation and how did you progress with this action ?

 

Look forward to your response and thank you.

 

Regards

Michael

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fao Steven 4064, or anyone

 

attached are 2 loan agreements for new vehicles. These are customer copys , not copies of the originals. i dont know if the originals were signed or if they even have them.

 

Is it worth sending a cca request in the hope that they dont reply in time?

 

 

Regards

 

Digger

 

 

p.s one of my credit cards is a leeds card and have been taken on by barclays...... where do send the s78

site plan0011.pdf

site plan0012.pdf

Edited by landersd
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know if anyone can help me but I have been looking into this and phone a number of companies who have all quoted me silly prices for carrying this out on my behalf. I was wondering if I could challenge the companies myself. If I can what wording am I looking for in the credit agreements? Does it only apply to agreements made before April 1997? Will the remaining balance be written off or do you ask for compensation. Would be grateful for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys

 

Been in the process of dealing with Capital one and after going through all the processes, their next step has been to send me a letter from Capquest debt recovery stating they need to start the litigation process to resolve the matter.

 

They have appointed Marcus Butterworth as my case handling supervisor and to assist litigation process.

 

The case will be processed and sent to solicitors on 16 June

 

Anyone receive these type of letters??? not sure what to do next or totally understand the process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi landersd

 

There are lots of cases of CC companies accepting full and final settlements which is the same thoimgs agreeing tnot to puruse the debt.

 

Only stop payments if the CC company is in default under the CCA 1974

 

The cannot give you an advers credit score just because you claim - there are strict procedures they have to follow (and, if they don't you can make them)

 

I suggest you either post a scan of your agreement here (personal details removed) so we can have a look, but to see what to look for, have a look at http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/162851-consumer-credit-agreements.html

 

Steven,

 

I have sent recorded delivery to the credit card company requesting a true copy of my CCA. It is now 15 working days and they have failed to reply - does this mean I can put the account in dispute and stop my payments ? However, if I do this will they put adverse credit rating on my file ?

 

Thanks

Michael

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Whu1,

 

First things first start your own specific thread as it is diffiuclt to give and receive advice specific to you when it is confused with everything else that is being posted here.

 

When you do that, please also upload a copy of what Capital One has sent you as an agreement removing your details and explain what has happened to get you to this stage. Use Photobucket or the like but make sure you keep the secure settings so that not everyone can look in at your documents!

 

Once we have that info, we will be in a better position to advise you as to your next steps.

 

Best wishes,

 

BB

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

i am new to this forum so apologise if what i am asking has been covered, i have read through the mass of information but there is a lot to take in , i am about to try and reclaim about £15k of debt from HSBC and EGG using a recommended firm of solicitors, my main worry would be any adverse ratings on my credit history, has anyone who has suceeded in having their cards rendered unenforceable recieved any negaitve or adverse credit rating? When asked on here if this may be the case this seems to go answered, can anyone elaborate? thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi YeahYeah and welcome,

 

I have had a £15k credit card debt written off by HSBC and all info that was with the credit reference agencies has been wiped.

 

On the other hand, there is no incentive by the banks etc to 'write' anything off if you are still paying them so the decision you have to make is as follows.

 

Have you done your homework to ensure that you have enough of a case to at least get the agreement declared unenforceable?

 

If it goes to a stalemate - they stop pursuing but don't remove the info, are you happy to have your credit file ruined for 6 years?

 

Are yuo prepared to go all the way if need be? By that I mean, utilising your solictors advice, complaining rigourously to the relevant bodies and having your day in court?

 

Some banks under certain situtaions will throw in the towel, others and I can speak from experience, will do their best to grind you down by dragging it out for months and even years.

 

I suspect the reason you haven't read or seen a specific answer is down to that reason and that reason alone!

 

BB

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply belstarbomb, i am amking all my replayments on time at the moment but i am just at teh early stages of considering using a firm of solicitors to handle my claim, a friend of mine has already started the process and the owner of the firm is a good friend of his for the last 25 yrs and he is no fool so i am only comfortable in using this company. The only information regarding if my 2 cards may be unenforceable is the fact that they are pre April 2007, the cost is £495 per card but is refunded if unsuccessful, total cost would them be £99, i was warned they may take away my overdraft facility but i can live with this. I am willing to pay solicitors the fees to take the strain as i am too busy to handle it myself, can you advise me on how to start a thread on this forum regarding people experiences of possibly recieving negative credit scores after the event, or is this all too new for some to have reached a conclusion? thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi YeahYeah, before you part with the best part of £500 can you scan your agreements, block out the personal information and post it up here so that we can take a look?

 

I got the £15k written off with the help of the people on CAG and CCS. At least we may be able to tell you if there is a case to answer.

 

BB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys.

I had this CCA which I requested the agreement from the lender, they failed to send the stuff within 14 working days plus another 30 working days expired. They now sent the agreement after the expiry of 42 days. Meanwhile, the agreement does not fully conform with the CCA 1974, but then is it still enforceable now? and what do I do next? They threatened me with arrears and MOJ warnings. Is this right? Please help.

 

Credware

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

 

I am currently in the middle of court proceedings with Bryan Carter solicitors over an Egg credit card debt.

 

I have recently filed my defense claiming that I do not feel I owe Egg money and they have finally enclosed my Egg Card Agreement and have also offered to accept a reduced amount to settle now.

 

Are they just trying there luck or trying to save us both some time in court??

 

I am not sure whether the agreement I have is unenforceable or not, could someone please cast their eyes over it and let me know their thoughts?

 

Thank you very much,

06-29-2009.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi trident i think the sun has gone to my head today but i have ready the above letter from the solicitors, are you trying to settle with egg for £2500? a reduced debt amount? did you owe near to 10k? of are you in dispute with the solictors regards m

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bryan Carter solicitors are taking me to court to try and get back money used on a credit card with Egg.

 

I told Egg that I didnt think they had an enforceable credit agreement as they had refused to send me a copy of it each time I asked.

 

The debt is approx £2500, however they are offering me a reduced amount to settle the debt now and out of court.

 

Should I take this as the agreement is in fact enfoceable or should I take them to court as the agreement is unenforceable?

 

Thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4785 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...