Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

so, what do the experts think?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5766 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hey,

 

just found the site, wish id found it two month ago! its fantastic

 

anyway, heres my predicament

 

my partner had rented a property in Greenwich with NB real estate.

Now shes left the property and there are new tenants she wants her deposit back, heres the problem

 

her half of the deposit was about £750 which i understood was required by law to be returned within ten days, after the agreed sum of course.

 

well even though my partner keeps an immaculate house the landlord still decided that she could only have £320 of her deposit back (which he did manage to justify - even though each charge was a bit steep)

 

youd think that after a monumental win on their part theyd send the money and be over with it right?

 

well 2 months down the line and finaly with the threat of small claims theyre offering to send a cheque, but as far as im aware its too little FAR too late right?

 

like i said, within 10 days we should have had that money (we needed it as part of our deposit on our first place)

 

we got all sorts of excuses, ranging from well im going on holiday tomorrow for 2 weeks to theres a problem with the bank details (although they could quite hapily withdraw money from the account)

 

and when i got involved and bought up the deposit protection act demanding a settlement i was ignored further and told that the guy dealing with me would talk to his boss, there was talk of meetings and decisions but they were just ways to keep me off their backs

 

2 weeks later (of constant pushing) his boss finally contacted me asking me what was th problem (he hadnt even been told!) anyway another few days of explaining and asking for a settlement sum eventually he just stoped talking to me so small claims it is i guess

 

the other problem was she was never informed of of what scheme was protecting her deposit, letalone within 14 days...and when the boss was presented with this point he told me my partner had been sent a lettewr which he sent me a scan of she is adamant shes never seen such a letter, can they just print off letters to cover their asses and get away with it?

 

do they have a leg to stand on? i mean 10 days and 2 months are quite different....and unacceptable

 

landlords....a dodgey breed! :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure where youve got the 10 days "by law" from. I know the various TDS schemes have various time scales which they aim to return your deposit in, I know one is 10 days the others are 14 days I believe, but these time scales arent law.

 

As theres obviously been some kind of dispute involving the return of the deposit (which has been dealt with through scheme mediation?) the 10 days time scale is obviously not going to apply. I was also under the impression that with shared deposit for joint ASTs only a "lead tenant" will be registered with the deposit scheme (was this your partner?), that could account for the problems in speaking with them.

 

I would aim my small claim at the 14 day rule and actually getting the deposit back. Whats the situation with the other tenants half of the deposit? as any small claim should include all interested parties.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My personal opinion is to take the cheque. TDS is not yet tested enough in this respect(i.e. where you are in fact getting the deposit returned) to bother wasting time and money over suing PURELY for the compensation level.

 

Agree with Planner, that unsure where you have got your timescales from. There is certainly no legal requirement in this respect, and personally I class reasonable(albeit an "outside edge" of reasonable) as 28 days.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

direct.gov.uk/en/TenancyDeposit/DG_066373

 

an that cant be right there has to be rules and regulations to stop landlords just deciding to keep your money for an extra year

 

ok a reasonable wait could be 28 days but like i say i was told 10, and that what i read on the government site above its now 65 days....

 

am i being told they can actually do this? i was sure that it was made 10 days because when you leave one place its wise to assume that you will move into somewhere else....which youll need a deposit for (like now)

 

and what about her deposit being protected? like i say they never told her, and now there just printing off some letter which noone has ever seen!

 

the deposit was given in 2 parts split down the middle by each tenant, the other tenant is on the case too

 

so you think we should just back out now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK my question would be as follows. What do you WANT as the outcome of this? OK the return of the deposit has been slightly delayed, but they are in fact returning it, therefore you are receiving the money to which you are entitled. What would you like in addition to this?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im still confused..... have you negotiated this settlement through the TDS scheme the deposit was held in? or have you just been discussion the issues with the landlords/agents?

 

Now you know which deposit scheme its held in, you should contact them and register a dispute (I would be tempted to dispute the full amount you are owed). If you submit a small claims, the jusge will ask why you havent used the schemes in house mediation service before submitting a claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i cant work out for the life of me how to make a complaint via TDS, my partner has no login details etc, and you cant register

 

the letter "sent" contains a reference for the account but (not surprisingly) when i enter this code into the site, there is no record of the account

Link to post
Share on other sites

Call them...?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Call them (and the other two schemes) and verify if the deposit was ever registered (it still should be I believe). I think the agents may be pulling your plonker on this one and it was never protected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your options are as follows IMO:

 

- Turns out deposit was not protected by TDS - sue for full deposit amount and 3 x deposit as compensation

- Deposit was protected by TDS - no options IMO, or at least none I would recommend

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks MrSHED

 

if it is protected i have to follow it, i cant let people just take the P**s like that like i said 10 days, cool, 14, fair enough, 28 pushing it a bit but 63 days before they offer to send a cheque which they could have done on day one and for such a reduced amount, weve had to dip into my overdraft to pay the new deposit

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah, i got through..... i called the fax number :(

 

they have no record, an said maybe the agent mixed up the upper and lower case letters, or maybe they got the company mixed up

 

so the agent either lied or is completely ignorant

 

like i said, my partner never rcieved this letter, the blaitently just wrote it up, hoping id go via small claims as the judge would ignore the claim as i didnt go to TDS first right? :)

 

im starting to think like you guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need something "official" from the TDS services to show if its ever been held or not. They should be able to search on just the address. You need it in writing, email or letter saying yes it has or no it hasnt.

 

If its yes it has, then ypou should log a dispute and go through their mediation.

 

If its no its not then you should register a county court claim for TDS non-compliance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, agents sent wrong ref no. got it now.... so the general consensus is to leave it now as it was protected?

 

they were incompetent enough to get the reference number right

incompetent enough to send proof of protection within 14 days

too incompetent to return the money with 2 months forcing me to overdraw my bank.....

 

should i bail out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Certainly my opinion is to leave it - it is now a point of principle, which will gain you little or nothing.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...