Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated possession, possession orders, bailiffs  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called. I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job. However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still haven't sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My debt... more from the dreaded HFO Services *** Discontinued ***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4468 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Also tell OFT about the photos of your home.

 

Can you also scan any documents sent you prior to issuing the Claim

 

It sounds like the CCA documents sent you - illegible application form etc are also suspect - where there any Terms and Conditions with it?

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Firstly, apologies for starting a new thread! Hopefully these can be merged. I will post this here and then move over to the old thread here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?150311-My-debt...-more-from-the-dreaded-HFO-Services.../

 

POC is as follows:

 

Claimant: HFO CAPTIAL LIMITED

 

Particulars of Claim

 

 

  1. The Claimant is engaged in the business of purchasing debt and purchases debt from various lenders. The Claimant's group company, HFO Capital Limited, incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands with company registration number MC-138277 (“HFO Cayman”), purchased the Defendant's account and all rights and benefits attaching thereto from Barclaycard (“The Original Lender”) on 6 November 2007.
  2. The Defendant's account was subsequently transferred to the Claimant pursuant to an intra-group sale agreement dated 31 January 2008.
  3. The Claimant's claim is for monies owed under an interest bearing credit agreement dated 23 March 1999 (“The Credit Agreement”), which is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, between the Defendant and the Original Lender, the debt due there under having been assigned to the Claimant.
  4. Under the Credit Agreement the said sum was to be repaid by the Defendant by way of monthly instalments. The Defendant has defaulted on payment and is in breach of the payment clause of the Credit Agreement.
  5. In compliance with Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925, the Defendant was given written notice of the assignment of the Defendant's account to the Claimant.
  6. Despite numerous requests made by the Claimant's collection agents the Defendant has failed to pay the said sum and remains indebted to the Claimant.
  7. The Claimant is entitled to claim contractual interest pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement at a rate of 12.00% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of judgment or sooner payment being at a daily rate of £0.48.
  8. The Claimant is entitled to claim post judgment contractual interest pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement at a rate of 12.00% per annum.
  9. Alternatively, pursuant to Section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate if 8.00% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of judgment or sooner payment.

 

AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS

 

 

 

  1. Principle sum of XXXXXX
  2. Contractual interest on (1) above from date of assignment to date of issue in the sum of XXXXX.
  3. Contractual interest on (1) above from date of issue to date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.48.
  4. Or in the alternative, statuatory interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 to be assessed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bl**dy hell where have you been!
Hi again! I will give HFO/TR one thing... they are tenacious.

 

OK, POC is as follows:

 

Claimant: HFO CAPTIAL LIMITED

 

Particulars of Claim

 

 

  1. The Claimant is engaged in the business of purchasing debt and purchases debt from various lenders. The Claimant's group company, HFO Capital Limited, incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands with company registration number MC-138277 (“HFO Cayman”), purchased the Defendant's account and all rights and benefits attaching thereto from Barclaycard (“The Original Lender”) on 6 November 2007.
  2. The Defendant's account was subsequently transferred to the Claimant pursuant to an intra-group sale agreement dated 31 January 2008.
  3. The Claimant's claim is for monies owed under an interestlink3.gif bearing credit agreement dated 23 March 1999 (“The Credit Agreement”), which is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, between the Defendant and the Original Lender, the debt due there under having been assigned to the Claimant.
  4. Under the Credit Agreement the said sum was to be repaid by the Defendant by way of monthly instalments. The Defendant has defaulted on payment and is in breach of the payment clause of the Credit Agreement.
  5. In compliance with Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925, the Defendant was given written notice of the assignment of the Defendant's account to the Claimant.
  6. Despite numerous requests made by the Claimant's collection agents the Defendant has failed to pay the said sum and remains indebted to the Claimant.
  7. The Claimant is entitled to claim contractual interest pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement at a rate of 12.00% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of judgment or sooner payment being at a daily rate of £0.48.
  8. The Claimant is entitled to claim post judgment contractual interest pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement at a rate of 12.00% per annum.
  9. Alternatively, pursuant to Section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate if 8.00% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of judgment or sooner payment.

 

AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS

 

 

 

  1. Principle sum of XXXXXX
  2. Contractual interest on (1) above from date of assignment to date of issue in the sum of XXXXX.
  3. Contractual interest on (1) above from date of issue to date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.48.
  4. Or in the alternative, statuatory interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 to be assessed.

Since they refer to "credit agreement dated 23 March 1999" and have never provided me with such I assume this is what I should be asking for under the CPR31?

 

The fuzzy application forms they have provided (see here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?150311-My-debt...-more-from-the-dreaded-HFO-Services...&p=1761879&viewfull=1#post1761879) are dated 15.3.99 and so clearly NOT the credit agreement they refer to in their POC.

 

In answer to dadofholly: "Did HFO recentley send you a Default Notice prior to the court proceedings? if so can you scan it - If it is like others i have seen it will not be compliant - and after the Brandon appeal today the Court cannot enforce the debt on the back of a faulty DN."

 

In Sept 2010 I received a copy of PAGE 1 of a Default Notice - it is dated 9 Sept 2005 but there is no logo or letterhead indicating who sent and the bottom of the page says "(continued)" however the rest of the letter is missing. I will scan this in properly tomorrow, as I don't currently have a scanner at home!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Shadow.

 

Coledog: thanks for your suggested CPR31 - amazing. This will be sent off tomorrow, and I'll call BC, and contact Polly at OFT.

 

A quick question - what if TR don't send me the requested documents within 7 days, and my Defense is due? Presumably I can request more time?

 

Thanks again everyone, I really can't thank you enough for your quick responses. This is a huge weight lifted for this evening.

Link to post
Share on other sites

YES... once you have sent the document give them a day to receive it and phone them... demand they give you an extension of 14 days AFTER they have sent you their response and seek that agreement in writing. If they say they wont agree to an extension warn them you will apply to the court and seek the application costs from them.

 

Once you get the agreement in writing advise the court by letter so they know too.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. CPR31 letter sent today special delivery.

 

I spoke to Barclaycard on the phone who confirmed that the last payment was on 6th July 2007; and that the debt was purchased by HFO Capital on 23rd October 2007 (a date different to ones they refer to in their POC). Barclaycard will provide me this info in writing, within 21 days. SAR request to BC will go out this week.

 

I have also spoken to someone at OFT and have been asked to provide a Witness Statement for use in their ongoing investigation of HFO/TR.

 

Any advice based on the info BC have given me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you made a formal CCA Request - and if so do you have evidence of this?

 

This was the first thing I did, over 3 years ago. They have never been able to supply me with a true copy of the agreement (see previous posts).

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. CPR31 letter sent today special delivery.

 

I spoke to Barclaycard on the phone who confirmed that the last payment was on 6th July 2007; and that the debt was purchased by HFO Capital on 23rd October 2007 (a date different to ones they refer to in their POC). Barclaycard will provide me this info in writing, within 21 days. SAR request to BC will go out this week.

 

I have also spoken to someone at OFT and have been asked to provide a Witness Statement for use in their ongoing investigation of HFO/TR.

 

Any advice based on the info BC have given me?

 

Did you record the call? If not jot down everyhting you recall from the call - name of person you spoke to, time and date etc.

 

Also ask if BC can supply you with that in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Odd for Barclaycard to sell a debt just three months after the last payment... did you find out when they claim to have issued a DN?

 

Just to clarify, I had actually missed quite a few payments and was contacted by Wescot (I think - need to confirm this) in 2007 who said they were basically the debt collection side of BC. I made a couple of payments to them, and the date of July 2007 will likely be my last payment to them.

 

The reason why I did not make any further payments is because I was waiting for them to send me some documentation, which they never did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, call made. TR said they will go back to the claimant and request copies of all the documents I have asked for and will also grant an extension of time for my defense, though they were unable to confrm any exact dates over the phone, they did say they will confirm this in writing next week.

 

They also said that the CPR request I am making does not apply to small claims court, but they will provide the information anyway.

 

So, my question now: my current defense due date is Wednesday 2nd, if I do not receive written confirmation from TR granting an extension before the 2nd, what do I do? I presume I must write to the court and explain that I have been granted an extention but am waiting for written confirmation from the claimant?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, call made. TR said they will go back to the claimant and request copies of all the documents I have asked for and will also grant an extension of time for my defense, though they were unable to confrm any exact dates over the phone, they did say they will confirm this in writing next week.

 

Hang on – TR actually runs HFO Services’ operations, and HFO is the agent for HFO Capital – they are one and the same. They simply have to switch computer screens. Fibs. Remember, when you get the agreement to extension it’s up to YOU to advise the court.

 

They also said that the CPR request I am making does not apply to small claims court, but they will provide the information anyway.

 

Since when do HFO or TR decide the track? That’s up to the judge. Call them back and make clear that until a judge decides, the case is effectively multitrack and CPR 31 does apply. They are misleading you as to the true legal situation.

 

So, my question now: my current defense due date is Wednesday 2nd, if I do not receive written confirmation from TR granting an extension before the 2nd, what do I do? I presume I must write to the court and explain that I have been granted an extention but am waiting for written confirmation from the claimant?

 

Did you record the call? You MUST call them back and INSIST they email confirmation of an extension to you so you can advise the court. DO NOT TRUST THEM. If they refuse, say that it is not good enough, and you will be seeking a court order for them to produce the documents under CPR – which will incur costs for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...