Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

parking control services


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4250 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have just received a pcn from Vehicle Control Services for parking in the car park of the flats in Regent Court, Sheffield, where I was visiting my friend. There were lots of notices around, but there they operate a guest pass scheme, where you put a little green day pass in your car on the dashboard, admittedly this was partly obscured by a pair of gloves, but was there all the same. Ive emailed to appeal, and after reading posts on this forum I may have made a mistake as they now have my address. Is this £80 legal, do I have to pay it? I have had a ticket before from the council and that ticket spoke of quite specific legal consequences I think, but this is more ambiguous and talks of additional charges through debt recovery. PLEASE HELP! thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

its a speculative invoice NOT a council FINE

 

as with everyone else that has posted in this thead

 

IGNORE

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

From Parking Control Services website...

What happens if vehicles don’t pay the PCN.

The details of the registered keeper will be requested from the DVLA and passed over to our retained Collections Company who will pursue collection; in addition to this should the offending vehicle be seen on site again it will be removed and impounded as PCN’s our outstanding against the vehicle

 

Putting aside the dreadful grammar for a moment (..impounded as PCN's OUR outsanding against the vehicle... I think they mean ARE...) the entire statement is laughable. NO PRIVATE PARKING COMPANY HAS THE RIGHTS TO REMOVE OR DISABLE A VEHICLE DUE TO AN UNPAID (AND UNENFORCEABLE) INVOICE.

As for clamping a vehicle ON THE OWNERS PRIVATE PREMISES! All I can say is, I'd like to see them try!

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a look at their website and they talk of "illegal parking" "offenders" . Someone should have a word with them.

Are they BPA members?

The entire website is, in my opinion, very poorly written and littered with errors (both law relating AND English grammar!)... BUT the worrying thing is, seeing as the website is intended to secure new clients (and not really intended to provide help and information for "offenders"), potential clients are being mis-informed and are putting themselves at risk by association.

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

If you have time, look at my FOI request here http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/minutes_of_dvla_and_bpa_meetings#comment-22222

 

If it's still there, go to the 'minutes' of the 8th October 2008 section 9. I would appear that Parking Control Services were about to be investigated because they were suspected of obtaining information on behalf of Trustcard Ltd.

 

This info may be of use to someone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • 5 months later...

Hi Guys.

This thread may be quite old and dated now however I would like to point a few very important things out.

 

I am in no way shape or form linked to PCS however ive been browsing and looking through these forums for quite some time

and this subject is one that has angered me slightly.

 

Id like to also inform you that the user pcs 4971 is an ex PCS employee who was linked very closely with the director [EDIT].

He is just a bitter man who lost his job due to some "cowboy" doings himself.

 

I have seen many people on here complaining, some of them right, some of them wrong however one thing I do say is,

how would you like or appreciate if someone who you had charged at a shop because thats the price you had been told to charge,

then turned up at your personal home with a group of "peaceful" protesters who caused damage to your home?

 

PCS is a business, it runs as a business.

The managing director controls the business,

however the employees carry out the actions.

 

So if a clamper clamps your car because its not showing a permit,

is that then the fault of the MD or the clamper?

 

Clampers are not nice people, they are trained to take abuse, and they arent always above board.

 

Have you never thought that they may of clamped your car with no rights to do so, do you think they announce this money? Of course they dont! They then keep it for themselves.

 

So although complaints are to be addressed to MD's, some of the complaints that are being made quite frequently can subsequently be down to an employee's actions?

 

Please take some consideration into this as yes you may feel you need to lay the blame with someone, make sure it is the right person?

 

I am new to this forum however plan to be heavily involved in some of the issues on here so watch this space! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PCS 4671, I've had a parking charge notice of these cowboys in Cardiff, It was half past 7 at night and I stopped for 10 minutes round the corner from my house because there were no spaces on my street and had to unload shopping. They are so sneaky and must have just been waiting for people to pull up. They want £75 or £150 after 14 days and I'm determined not to pay it, what are the chances of them taking me to court over it? A lot of people around are saying just don't pay them and ignore the letters etc. My other thought was just send them 20 odd post dated cheques for £3.25 for the next 20 months and say its all I can afford :lol:. I was going to appeal but after reading your last post I dont think I'll bother. Has anyone else just not paid them?

 

Im sorry to be the one to tell you this, however PCS 4671 is the only operative that worked the Cardiff area as thats where he lived! So your preaching to the wrong man. I think you'd find that hes the one that actually clamped you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im sorry to be the one to tell you this, however PCS 4671 is the only operative that worked the Cardiff area as thats where he lived! So your preaching to the wrong man. I think you'd find that hes the one that actually clamped you.

 

Who's saying anything about clamping?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

May I ask a question from another point of view and would welcome any suggestions? I own (freehold) a garage and forecourt and have a continual problem of people parking on the forecourt and even right up against my garage doors. This then makes it impossible to get my car in and out of my garage. Additionally I am required, under the house deeds to keep the forecourt free for access to allow other garage owners to drive over my forecourt to access their own garages.

 

Over the last couple of years I and many other home owners on our estate have used PCS to great effect. We can actually use our garages and on the rare occasion of someone ignoring the notices not to park a phone call to PCS gets the matter sorted out. If I can' t employ a parking company to fine, clamp, remove offenders what can I do. From what I have read here I don't think I wish to continue with them but I do need to have some legal way of deterring and dealing with the illegal and inconsiderate parkers. Can any one here offer advice or point me in the direction of a reputable company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand your concerns and that you are also caught in a double bind. You do need to understand that the common business model of private parking companies (PPC's) is predicated on enforcing against infringement. There is no money in deterrence only in enforcement and from this point of view PPC's can only be described as self-serving - you tell them that you have a problem and they will continue to prove that you do - but then that's the only way that they can make their money.

 

As you have probably realised clamping on private land will become illegal at the beginning of next month and so aside from the fact that you have chosen not to use PCS, longer term you need an alternative. Its difficult to make meaningful suggestions without a detailed knowledge of the site but as general things to consider there are lockable posts (Halfords used to sell these and may still do so) outside your and your neighbours garages or a lockable barrier across the access to your forecourt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had thought about some form of barriers but access must be allowed for emergency vehicles. Yet another reason why in my deeds I am to keep my forecourt clear. But how can I comply that's the problem? I have also read that clamping is to be allowed in the future but only for authorised/registered companies. In other words the cowboy companies will become a thing of the past. If that's true then it would make sense as there must be some legal means available to people to deter illegal parking. Otherwise any one can park on any persons driveway they care to and get away with it. Surely that can't be right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sympathise with you about your parking problems but clamping is surely not your answer, you need traffic flow so you say. Clamping would hold the problem vehicle there adding to the problem.

hello all:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very true but it is amazing how quickly the owners seem to appear once a car is clamped. The company can also remove the vehicle if required. After the first two clampings the message was out there and it made such a difference. I don't dread getting up at 4am to go to work wondering if I can get the car out and then returning in the evening at 20:30 wondering if I can garage my car. I know I could give up using the garage but I don't relish the thought in the early hours in the morning having to clear snow off and around the car before setting off. There would also be an increase in my car insurance if I can't garage the car.

 

It would be a return of a nightmare if there is no way to deter these selfish parkers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...