Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sunak actually nailed it in his boring speech yesterday  Starmers only offering is vote to be depressed  Just about sums up lefties  Humourless and Depresive🤣
    • Ah ok I will see if we receive it in the post tomorrow before I go to work. We want to see theirs so we know what documents they will list ? If their N265 is not received then best to send ours so that we do not miss the claimants deadline as per their draft directions.  What would happen if we did miss the deadline even by 1 day ? The claimant would use it against us in court ?  I scanned and posted in #159 the claimants continuation sheet attached to the N244 where they give a background of the case and reference e-mails etc. After this I will continue to work on the WS which is also causing me anxiety. This will also be used to object to their SJ application. I will advise tomorrow if anything else is received.  
    • Last September our 2019 plate Motorhome went to Brownhills of Newark for its annual habitation check/service. Whilst on their site for the day one of their drivers managed to drive it into a lamp post and put a 2m long scratch down the side of the body. They didn't own up to the damage, but luckily we noticed it before leaving the site, at which point the admitted fault and said they would fix it in house rather than go through the insurance. As they are an authorised Motor home repairer etc we agreed to this and a time frame of 3 weeks was given for the repair, which was booked in for late November. It could not be booked in sooner for the repair as we had a weekends away etc booked with the vehicle until mid November.  3 weeks, and a simple re-spray has now evolved to 18 weeks of them having the vehicle, due to the spray job having to be done 3 times, a window seal not been re-fitted correctly, leading to rain water pouring into the van and the replacement decals been applied wrong twice & having to be re-ordered from Elddis who originally built the camper. We finally got the vehicle back in late April, still minus 1 of the decals. Back in March we had an email from Brownhills asking what compensation we would accept due to the delays in returning the vehicle to us (They have had it for 18 weeks instead of the initial 3 weeks which was agreed). Once we finally got the vehicle back we told them what we expected (the value that the camper has depreciated by in the extra 15 weeks they have had it and which time we were unable to use it). They are now refusing to honour any compensation and are only offering us a free service for when this is due in September. Legally where do we stand?  Obviously we are not taking it back to them for a service, given that last time they managed to crash it and its taken so long for them to make such a simple repair. We are considering legal action, but are not really sure under what grounds/legislation we could claim. Any advice would be much appreciated.
    • Usual alarmist tripe from the Guardian exposed🤣     Many of the ‘Climate Experts’ Surveyed by the Guardian in Recent Propaganda Blitz Turn Out to be Emotionally-Unstable Hysterics – The Daily Sceptic DAILYSCEPTIC.ORG Last week, the Guardian published a survey of 383 'climate experts' and – shock – many of them turned out to be... The Guardian last week published its survey of ‘climate experts’. The results are a predictable mush of fire-and-brimstone predictions and emotional incontinence. This stunt may have convinced those already aligned to the newspaper’s ideological agenda to redouble their characteristically shrill rhetoric, but encouraging scientists to speculate and emote about the future of the planet looks like an act of political desperation, not scientific communication.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

kingofkings v Halifax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4170 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Send them this...you'll need to edit...

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

Thank you for the above referenced letter,although I am totally bemused as to why I have received it.

 

The author of the letter seems to have taken no notice of the present state of the account as it stands,for the following reasons :-

 

1) In August of last year,in the High Court various banks applied for and were granted, a ‘stay’, to claims for ‘penalty charges ‘.Part of the High Court Order states that NO ENFORCEMENT ACTION IS TO BE TAKEN BY THE BANK TO RECOVER any supposed charges made by them ,until the OFT Test Case has been resolved.AND in addition should any action be taken by the Bank,then the ‘stay’will be lifted,and no doubt ,judgement would be awarded in my favour..

 

2) I am sure that Halifax conform to The Banking Code,and as such I will draw your attention to s13.6, reference information you may NOT pass on,IF an account is in dispute.The High Court Order I would suggest is reasonable evidence to assume that this account is in dispute.

 

3) I am also sure that Halifax are fully au fait with the, Office of Fair Tradings code for

Debt Collection Guidance,and I draw your attention to the latest information from their publication,July 2003(updated December 2006);-

 

The following are deemed to be at the very least UNFAIR practices.

 

a) Section 2,2 b,Leaving out or presenting information ,in such a way that it creates a false or misleading impression .or exploits debtors’ lack of knowledge.

HOW you could miss the ‘stay’on the account is beyond me.

 

b)Psychological harassment,as described in Section 2.6 g,making threatening statements or gestures ,or taking actions suggesting harm.

Your last paragraph of your letter threatening collection agencies etc.

 

c) Section 2.6 h,Ignoring or disregarding claims ,that debts are settled or disputed ,and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment.

 

d) Section 2.6 I,Disclosing or threatening to disclose,debt details to third parties ,unless legally entitled to do so.

 

e) Section 2.6 k,Not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt

 

I can only assume that based on the above,that this letter must have been sent in error,as I am certain you would not wish it to be seen as VEXATIOUS.

 

Your letter has obviously caused me a great deal of unnecessary concern,and worry,resulting in me having to take third party advice,undergo law and internet research,and take time out from my employment,as well as postage costs,to reply to your letter.As you are a Bank,and regularly make charges to customers,I have taken the liberty of charging you the sum of £35,which I will add to my costs against yourselves.

 

I further feel,that as a show of good faith by the Bank,that any further fees and/or interest should be frozen,pending the outcome of the OFT Test Case.

 

I would also point out that I intend to maintain my legal rights,and if necassary, file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action.including the High Court.

 

I trust you will give this due diligence,and look forward to your reply within the next 14 days.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

 

I recently got a new Bank Statement from Halifax (there new format of statements).

 

And in the Interest Rates section on the front of my statement it says the following.

 

Each standing order and direct debit we do not pay on any day (Unpaid Item Fee) is £15 (max 3 charges per day)

 

It doesn't state how much the charge is if they pay the item but they say this.

 

"There is no overdraft facility on Easycash accounts. If you are aged 18 and over and have an unarranged overdraft, we will charge you interest and make you pay any fees for unpaid Direct Debits and Standing Orders which may apply. In this case, we will charge you 2.20% debit interest per month (29.8% Equivalent Annual Rate variable). There is no fee or debit interest payable if you are aged under 18.

 

When I has a Easycard account before, I thought that the charges were in the range of £30-£35 for unpaid or paid items.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This has been taken from Halifax's website. It explains the fees.

 

Type of FeeWhat the fee is forHalifax Ultimate Reward Current Account, Halifax High Interest Current Account, Halifax moneyback Current Account and Halifax Current AccountCardcashStudentsAll other

customers

Over 18Under 18Paid item fee A fee we charge when a card transaction, cheque (whether guaranteed or not), standing order,direct debit or other instruction that we pay results in or increases an unarranged overdraft.

£20

No more than one fee a day

£35

No more than three times a day

Does not apply

 

 

 

Unpaid Item feeA fee we charge when we decide to return unpaid, or not to pay, any cheque, card transaction, standing order, direct debit or other instruction that would result in or increase an unarranged overdraft.

£20

No more than one fee a day

£35

No more than three times a day £35

No more than three times a day No charge Unarranged overdraft fee

A fee we charge for every month in which you at any time have an unarranged overdraft.

.

£28

Up to once a month

£28

Up to once a month

 

 

£28

Up to once a month

No charge

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

So by looking at what you have replied, if Halifax were to charge me more than £15, and was to question it.

 

For example if they charged me £35 for an unpaid item, I could provide them with the terms on my statement that states they would only charge me £15 per Unpaid item and have them refund £20 of that £35 charge.

 

Not that I have been charged on my new account, but was just posting to see if any one else has seen a change in Halifax's charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't pay the mortgage last week as I was £100 short in the account.

 

As a result, the DD request was returned.

 

It was requested again yesterday morning. Again there were insufficient funds in the account (this time by £150) but the DD was paid.

 

Any idea why the first request was returned but the second paid?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well heard nothing since, but just an updated, got a letter at the weekend from Albion that states. 'Our Client has advised us that it is referring your outstanding debt for further proceedings."

 

So looks like I will be sent a Court Letter in the coming weeks one would assume.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sir.

 

Once again I am bemused at receiving your letter. As this account is made up entirely of excessive penalty charges.

 

As per my last letter I have deducted £35 from the balance for having to write you this letter

 

Therefore, I would indeed welcome the opportunity to place this before the court. Furthermore should you proceed with the threats of legal action I will make an immediate application to have it set aside for the grounds outlined above, also I shall refer the judge to our correspondence when the matter of costs falls due

 

I trust this outlines my position clearly enough for you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update on the Situation, nothing has happened since my last letter and reply to this thread. But I have recently received this letter, from

 

Blair, Oliver and Scott Limited

Debt Collectors

 

Dear Sir / Madam,

 

Client: HALIFAX

Account Number: ###########

Balance £1,803.53

 

Blair, Oliver & Scott Ltd. is a professional Debt Collection Agency instructed by our above named client to obtain payment of the the balance owed by you. Our client requires patment of the full balance outstanding as soon as possible.

 

What action should you take?

Make payment in full to the account; or

Contact our agents on the Helpline number below to discuss possible payment options.

 

What will happen if you do not take any action?

We can instruct one of our local door-to-door agents to call on you and discuss patment of the debt; or

Court action may be taken to seek a judgment against you. If you are a homeowner and do not pay the amount the court orders you to pay, we may then reapply to the court for a charging order on your property. This will give us repayment of the outstanding debt from the proceeds whenever the property is sold.

 

TO MAKE A PAYMENT:

Call the Helpline number, below, for payments by debit/credit card or to set up a standing order.

For internt & telephone banking, quote your account number (found at the top of this letter) as the reference and pay to the sort code and account number ##### ######.

Sned a cheque or postal order to the address at the top of this letter, remembering to write your account number (as above) on the reserve of the payment.

 

 

--------------

 

So what do I need to do with these guys, as I can't send any letter I've already sent to Halifax and Albion, so is there another letter that I need to send to these guys. As in an earlier replay I stated that Albion sent me a letter to state that they were no longer dealing with the debt.

 

Regards

kingofkings

Edited by kingofkings
Didn't finish the reply, pressed enter too soon.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi, I am in need for a little advice on the current situation that I am in, 

 

And today I have received a letter for a notice of intended court action. I have sent letters to Blair, Oliver and Scott to which they have not replied. And they have rang me 3 times whilst I've been at work and left messages, but I am not prepared to deal with them on the phone.

 

So by the looks of the following letter, it seems I now will be going to court and be forced to pay the full amount outstanding, even though I am still trying to reclaim Bank charges from Halifax. At this present moment I have misplaced my USB Drive with the letters I sent to Blair, Oliver and Scott, but Halifax are due around £800 in Bank Charges, and that includes the 8% Interest.

 

Here are the letters I received from Blair, Oliver and Scott..

(Please note I have reduced the quality of the letters to a 2-bit gif image for faster loading times).

 

Letter 1 - Dated 5th January 2009

 

Letter 2 - Dated 19th January 2009

 

Letter 3 - Date 19th February 2009

 

Is anyone able to give me advice on this situation? As I'm stuck as to what to do, other than paying the balance which I cannot afford at the moment as I've just had to spend out on Baby stuff, since my girlfriend is expecting, and due in a two months time, so this isn't a good time for me to get a Court Order and possibly Prison.

 

Thanks,

 

Kingofkings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have posted this here, just in case I get a better response, instead of duplicating a thread, please can you check this out.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/186050-blair-oliver-scott-dca.html

 

I think Halifax won't give in and I'm about to be out of pocket.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First off - send this letter to BOS:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account Ref xxxx

 

Please be advised that I will only communicate with you in writing.

 

Should it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

As said by rightside up.. being in debt is no longer a criminal offence. You are never going to see a prison over this.

 

Blair, Oliver and Scott never ever ever reply to any correspondence. They only send template letters by the thousand every month and those letters are never tailored to your personal circumstances or previous communications. So don't worry about it.

 

For instance:

 

http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t42/davey77_2007/5copy.jpg

http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t42/davey77_2007/1copy-1.jpg

http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t42/davey77_2007/6copy.jpg

http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t42/davey77_2007/3copy-1.jpg

http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t42/davey77_2007/2copy.jpg

 

Court action taken by BOS. NONE

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies, I knew not to get so worked up, I just got annoyed really by lack of repsonse from them, and I sent a letter to all three addresses on the top of their letters.

 

And originally I was dealing with Albion on behalf of Halifax, as the other threads will tell you, they threatened court action and then it was closed and Blair, Oliver and Scott took over. Any letters I sent to Albion were replied to by Halifax, not received a letter back from Blair, Oliver and Scott but I will sent them another nice letter.

 

Halifax started chasing for the debt through Albion and now Blair, Oliver and Scott from October 2008, which is when I last communicated with Halifax where they said they wouldn't refund charges due to the 'Test Case' and I would have to wait until that case was resolved before doing anything else.

 

I'll update as needed on this situation, thanks for the guidance on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Kingofkings.

 

How far did you get with your charges claim ?

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Get your claim in asap ;)

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

AS above proceed with the claim but also as you admit the remainder of the debt is due and you are perpared to pay £50 per month why not send a payment along with a letter including your proposal ( I seen you did send a prosposal earlier but i take it you haven't made the any payments)

 

send a letter saying they are claiming x amount, x amount disputed via charges, you are proposing to pay x amount per month for the remainder of the balance. incluse you first payment with this. Even if the accept a letter stating not enough, just keep paying what you have propsed

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

 

I have received a letter today from Halifax, even though it seems they can't read as where I have said I propose to pay them back at £50 a week, towards the end of their reply they changed it to month.

 

Also they have said if I file a Court Claim against them, they will instantly throw it out.

 

Here is the letters

 

Halifax Reply Letter

So, now where do I go from here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...