Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Last month was confirmed to be the hottest-ever May on record, in terms of global average temperatures, completing an entire calendar year of month-by-month records.  The average temperature last month was 1.52C above the pre-industrial average, according to the Copernicus Climate Change Service, known as C3S. The average global temperature for the 12-month period to the end of May was 1.63C (2.9F) above the pre-industrial average
    • This time you do need to reply to them with a snotty letter to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did try court. We will help this evening.  
    • Hi, I just wanted to update the post and ask some further advice  I sent the CCA and CPR request on the 14th May, to date I have had no reply to the CCA but I received a load of paperwork from the CPR request a few days ago. I need to file the defence today and from the information I have read the following seems to be what is required.  I would be grateful if some one could confirm suitability. Many thanks   Claim The claim is for the sum of £255.69 due by the Defendant under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a PayPal account with an account reference of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)  The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 15-09-21, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £0.00. The Claimant claims the sum of £255.69   Defence  The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have had financial dealings with PayPal  in the past but cannot recollect the account number referred to by the Claimant. 2. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am not aware of service of a Default Notice by the original creditor the Claimant refers to within its particulars of claim.  3. Paragraph 3 is noted. On the 17/5/2024 I requested information related to this claim by way of a Section 77 request, which was received and signed for by the claimant on 20/5/2024. As of today, the Claimant has failed to respond to this request, and therefore remains in default of the section 77 request and therefore unable to enforce any alleged agreement until its compliance. 4. Therefore it is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, and the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and: (b) Show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice Pursuant to s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 5. Paypal (Europe) S.A.R.L is out of the juristriction of English Courts. 6. As per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 7. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed, or any relief.
    • Thanks @dx100ukI followed the advice given on here... then it went very quiet!  The company was creditfix I think then transferred to Knightsbridge (or the other way around) The scammer independent advisor was Roger Wallis-having checked his LinkedIn profile just this morning, it does look like he's still scamming vulnerable people... I know I was stupid for taking his advice, but i do wonder how many others he has done this to over a longer period of time (it came as a  massive shock to him when our IVA suddenly failed). Lowell have our current address (and phone numbers if the rejected calls over the past couple of days is anything to go by!) No point trying the SB because of the correspondence in 2019? Thanks
    • I have received the following letter from BW Legal today.  Also includes form if I admit the debt and wanting my income details.  Do I reply to this LETTER OF CLAIM please?  Looks like they are ready for court now??  Thank You BW Legal - Letter of Claim.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st Credit moving for CCJ for house charge order


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5807 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

My very first post and hoping someone will advise. Due to severe ill health, lost extremely well paid job some years ago, Ended up with huge debts. Ignorance took me on usual route of refinancing, even adding to our morgage to no avail, debts just got worse.

 

But 4 years ago started a DMP with CCCS our remaining debt is divided between I'm embarassed to say 10 other creditors., all unsecured debts who've so far accepted our repayments which are always made on time.

 

Now letter from 1st Credit who say they have been assigned a credit card debt for £2100, which has suddenly become £2300 from HFC . Never been informed by HFC debt was being tranferred to 1st Credit but unsure if Default notice ever sent. 1st Credit said a DCA can add admin charges under T &C, I don'tr believe this tho..

 

 

Now got standard letter from thier solicitor LCS, saying County Court action will start in 14 days.

 

Understand that with evidence of DMP they may not be awarded a higher repayment sum, as nothing left after paying bills and debt repayment, that bit is not the problem.

 

But our mortgage provider does not allow any 2nd interest in property and I'm worried that we could lose our morgage facility if charge order is granted. and also what other implications a charge order has.

 

Always been willing to repay debts and accept shouldn't have got into debt in first place, but to avoid a CCJ and charge order would it be worth trying to ask for CCA, and other relevant documents.

 

Really unsure what to do for the best, all I want for them is to accept my CCCS offer of repayment. So upset that this pressure is all starting again despite my best efforts, and it is now affecting my health badly.

Edited by veryweary
personal info removed for security
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you should CCA them veryweary. Don't be embarrassed about your debts - we all know here how things can spiral out of control. As you say, you've been paying them through CCCS anyway.

I CANNOT BELIEVE 1st Credit!!!:x:x:x

First rule is NEVER NEVER NEVER speak to them on the phone!! They will say anything to depress, demean and humiliate you.

Keep posting here, it will be okay and you will soon start to feel better about them (and probably as angry with them as many of us here!)

Well done for posting :) xx

  • Haha 1

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for advice greatly appreciated. Have found template for CCA and will post out as per instructions on Monday.

 

Have never reclaimed any charges on accounts tho remember there were multiple late, overlimit fees applied to them all for months before CCCS repayment plan started.

 

Know now from reading on forum , not to phone them but they keep sending letters asking me to contact them, each time on a slightly different number. On the occasions I had phoned them all they were interested in was my house and mortgage, in amongst threats of bailiffs, and belittling me for being in debt.

 

CCCS have confirmed they have refused repayment offer, tho payments have been made to them direct from CCCS.

 

1stCredit have our financial breakdown from CCCS so know our budget is bare minimum tight. Income comes from work ill health pension. And that repayment amount is decided and split fairly amongst all creditors by CCCS. Feel sure they after C.O and CCJ to enable C.O. as repayments will take a while and I'm not a spring chicken!.

Edited by veryweary
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi veryweary, welcome to CAG.

 

You're in the right place now to get the best possible help and advice you need to put 1st credit in thier place.

 

Have they accepted the payments from CCCS or have they returned them? If they have acccepted them they are deemed to have accepted the agreement.

 

They're on dodgy ground here as they're breaking a number of OFT guidlines:

 

Physical/psychological harassment

2.5 Putting pressure on debtors or third parties is considered to be oppressive.

2.6 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

a. contacting debtors at unreasonable times and at unreasonable intervals

b. pressurising debtors to sell property, to raise funds by further

borrowing or to extend their borrowing

c. using more than one debt collection business at the same time

resulting in repetitive and/or frequent contact by different parties

d. not ensuring that an adequate history of the debt is passed on as

appropriate resulting in repetitive and/or frequent contact by different

parties

e. not informing the debtor when their case has been passed on to a

different debt collector

f. pressurising debtors to pay in full, in unreasonably large instalments,

or to increase payments when they are unable to do so

g. making threatening statements or gestures or taking actions which

suggest harm to debtors

 

Deceptive and/or unfair methods

2.7 Dealings with debtors are not to be deceitful and/or unfair.

2.8 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

a. sending demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that

they are the debtor in question, for example, threatening debt recovery

action to 'the occupier' or sending a payment demand to all people sharing

the same name/date of birth as a debtor in the hope that contact with the

correct debtor will be made.

b. disclosing debt details to an individual when it is uncertain that they are

the debtor in question, for example, disclosing details to 'the occupier' of

an address.

c. refusing to deal with appointed or authorised third parties, such

as Citizens Advice Bureaux, independent advice centres or money

advisers

d. contacting debtors directly and bypassing their appointed representatives

e. operating a policy, without reason, of refusing to negotiate with

debt management companies

 

Here's the full OFT guidlines:

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

 

I've highlighted the relevant sections to your circumstances and you should continue to ask CCCS to act on your behalf.

 

DO NOT PHONE 1st credit, and if they call you, say politely "in writting only" and hang up.

 

As has been mentioned CCA them and also check for charges on all your accounts.

 

Good luck and best wishes.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

As you're in a repayment plan they shouldn't be chasing you at all - they are trying it on. You need to report them to Trading Standards (your one and THEIR one to stop TS passing the buck between departments). CCCS should also send them a letter stating you have other creditors.

 

You shouldn't really send them an income and expenditure form unless CCCS have done so already - let CCCS do the work for a change... but sadly they will probably say admit the debt and get the CCJ. As you are on a low income they could end up getting a token £1 payment - in fact all your creditors should be made the token offer if they up the pressure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks and will follow up T. S. complaint links after I've done my CCCA letter request.

 

1st Credit have received at least 1 payment direct from CCCS for April, altho somehow the o/s balance on their latest letter has been reduced by 3 of monthly payments, perhaps 2 payments made to HFC transferred to them?.

 

Letter from CCCS says they will continue making payments, but 1stCredit have told them they are unable to accept reduced payment offered because larger payment required. Also told DCA don't have to accept reduced payments at any time. CCCS always send DCA financial breakdowns and lists of other debtors and payment amounts.

 

CCCS advise I don't need to take any action at this time, as 1stCredit may pass debt onto another DCA., and to contact them again if CCJ proceedings start for further advice.

 

But after reading about 1stCredit on this forum, don't think I can take risk waitng for CCJ to go thru uncontested, if CO issued later against house may lose mortgage facility from RBS.

 

So sending CCA letter tomorrow, but do I have to also write to LCS solicors acting for 1stCredit advising them that I've sent CCA request to 1stCredit, as they may start court proceedings before 12 day time limit for CCA request is up?

 

hope this all makes sense!

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Copy your request and send it to LCS to cover yourself. Send everything recorded and NEVER sign anything, just print your name. Use a £1 postal order for the fee keeping a note of the number to check if they cash it.

 

As for a CO affecting your mortgage terms this is highly unlikely to happen especially as that would give 1st crudit preferential treatment over all your other creditors who are co-operating with CCCS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi veryweary, welcome to CAG.

 

You're in the right place now to get the best possible help and advice you need to put 1st credit in thier place.

 

Have they accepted the payments from CCCS or have they returned them? If they have acccepted them they are deemed to have accepted the agreement.

 

 

 

.

 

Just as a point of note, the creditor accepting CCCS payment is not proof of acceptance of an arrangement. In fact, they are required by law to accept this payment and apportion it to your account. Even if a creditor refuses to accept the payment, the CCCS tend to continue to send it anyway.

 

Once your credit agreement is received (if at all), check the fine print for these so-called admin fees, they can only add fees if specifically stated on the agreement.

 

Should they continue to push for a CCJ, you can defend it, and I would recommend you request that the hearing be transferred to a local court wherever possible so that you can represent yourself in person, though you can submit your defense in writing via the court issued defense forms - often creditors will use the nearest county court to where their peferred solicitors are based. It may not be the case with your creditor, but it is worth taking into account.

 

If a charge IS granted, then it will not effect your mortgage in any way, shape or form. Your mortgage, and any other secured loans will rank higher, in order of when they were applied. When you sell your property however, if it doesn't cover the full outstanding debt from all charges, then the creditors who will not receive full payment of balance may request some sort of confirmation that you have obtained the best possible market price for your property. This is normally done via the conveyancing estate agent, who will rpovide a signed 'Best Price Certificate'.

 

The purpose of this, by the way, is for the creditors to ensure that you are not trying to get a quick sale, or selling to a relative/friend etc.. for less than full market value.

 

I hope the above is useful.

Edited by Deshaine
Link to post
Share on other sites

[

 
quote=Deshaine;.

If a charge IS granted, then it will not effect your mortgage in any way, shape or form. [/quote]

thanks for all comments, have learned so much in just a few days. Was concerned because remember reading in T &C of mortgage offer something about bank not allowing 2nd interest or securities on property. Worried that a successful C.O on property could mean I've broken terms and conditions of mortgage and bank could withdraw mortgage facility. Can't find paperwork to get exact words so haveasked bank to send out copy of T&C's.

 

Also as repayments will take many years, creditor could technically ask court to force house sale?.

 

Last year received letter from HFC offering an interest free loan for 60%repayment of this debt, said it got me off their bad debt books and made them look better. Couldn't pay as they needed extra £2 per month and CCCS can't increase payments to single creditor, so now they've assigned to 1stCredit without telling me..

 

 

 

Thanks again to all the wonderful people on this site who are so supportive and give their time to help others. It's made a huge difference to me.

Edited by veryweary
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent CCA request to 1stCredit 12/5, have electronic proof of receipt. Received letter from1stCredit 17/5 with big letters YOU HAVE RAISED A DISPUTE/QUERY very carefully saying they have received my letter of dispute, but no mention or confrmation that I've requested a CCA.

 

Goes on to say that unless querying full balance to contact them to discuss payment of the debt amount I accept is due and payable.

 

Are they playing a word game here, do I have to write again reminding them I've requested a CCA, or do I just wait. Concerned that this leaves it open for them to start other proceedings.

 

Also received mortgage T&C which states 'No other standard security or legal charge in favour of another lender is permitted. You must not allow another lender to secure another loan on your home without our consent.'

 

So if 1stCredit are successful in gaining a C.O on house, I'm sure I'll lose mortgage facility.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The term "without our consent" may help you re: your mortgage company, but I really don't think it'll come to that.

 

As previously mentioned, you being in a DMP and your other unsecured creditors playing fair leaves 1st credit looking very bad as they are trying to scare you with threats which would mean they want a very unfair advantage by threatening you with a possible CCJ and then going for a charging order.

 

Contact CCCS ASAP and INSIST they help you. Also contact Trading Standards and make a complaint about their tactics, both yours and thiers, so there is no passing the buck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

An update. 1stCred have serioulsy defaulted in providing anything whatsoever in response to my CCA copy request, and I've now sent them a formal complaint. They replied with a pre-legal letter, threatening court proceedings, charging order and possible bankruptcy.:).

 

Consumer Direct have put a complaint in on my behalf with TS in Reigate.

Now in process of writing compaint to OFT, complete with a taped conversation where an advsior sadly breaks more than a few OFT debt collecting guidelines. I hope when the OFT listen to it, they get a taste of how greedy and misleading this company are.

I urge anyone having problems with this company to complain, as the OFT told me if they receive complaints about any of the 13 compnaies they've warned then it means big trouble. Not that I am inferring that 1stCredit are one of the 13.:wink:

 

In my case 1stCred see homeowner and equity, in the taped conversation, their advisor cheerfully explains that the reason they want the charging order is so they can apply for further interest and charges.

The only thing stopping them so far I think is the fact they don't have my agreement. And I've read on here that they sometimes still issue proceedings without providing the CCA just to chance their arm on a default judgement.

 

I'm no longer afraid of them thank to this site, my only concern is my unreliable heart and health let me down at a crtiical moment, and things end up pear shaped because of that. So I guess I better get prepared in advance , my thanks to all the people who have posted threads aobut their CCJ and Charging Order battles, gives someone like me a chance to learn how to fight back.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't need their permission.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sending you legal proceeding letter after the you have raised adispute letter is standard procedure for 1st credit. and nothing to be really worried about, i know i am a bit late with this. Veryweary kudos to you, you last post is both confident and optimistic keep us posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trading Standards and the OFT can advise on that point.

 

Thanks Babybear for keeping an eye on my thread. Have read your thread on the battle you had with these vermin and I salute you.:) TS have told me to do a written transcript of the call and hand it in with all my other paperwork. A very enthusiatic young gentleman is going to look at my case in relation to the new CPUTR legislation. Hopefully if TS keep getting a stream of complaints about this company, something will be done.

 

As I also have letter from 1stCredit confirming they know they can't enforce a debt without producing the agreement, it seems stupid of them to have sent more letters threatening court action and bankruptcy. And that phone call is naughty. Wish I'd asked what the interest rate on that refinancing package they recommend would be for someone like me:shock:.

 

Thanks Freewilling, have reconciled myself that I will probably have to fight 1stCredit in court at some later stage, probably if they come up with an application form with no prescribed terms, and chance it. But I'll hopefully be ready for them, and it will just cost them money in lost fees and my expenses:D.

 

This forum and the many members who regularly devote their time to help others are just inspiring. I've made a committment to make a small donation each month in way of thanks, every little helps:D.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad to hear you've got TS on your side Veryweary as sometimes they need a little encouragement ;)

 

Please post back when they give their opinion re: CPUTR 2008, as this will prove very useful to the whole forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...