Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
    • Farage rails and whines about not being allowed on the BBC ... ... but pulls out at the last minute of a BBC Panorama interview special. It was denied it was anything to do with his candidates being outed as misogynists and Putin apologists, or that farage was afraid Nick Robinson might throw some difficult questions at him ... despite farages recent practice at quickly cowering in fear.   It was claimed 'it wasn't in Nigels diary'     Nigel Farage pulls out of BBC interview at last minute amid Hitler row WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘Panorama’ special postponed as Reform UK party faces row over candidate who claimed UK would have been ‘better off’ if it had...   Waaahhhh
    • i'd say put lowells to strict proof of where the payment came from. cant hurt to send SB letter, even if proved not. at least they get your correct address. they'd have to link the old IVA times scale to a payment  these IVA F&F pots (if thats where it came from) most mugs dont even know they are not only taking most of your payments on fees but also creaming money off to supposedly offer F&F's.  funny when the IVA fails or is complete these sums of money in F&F pots never get given back or even mentions... these IVA firm directors esp with regard to knightsbridge and creditfix were fined and struck off more times than Paul Burdell of Link Fame and still managed to continue to scam people.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

rented house given back to bank!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5889 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

can someone please help me as reading the housing act is all greek to me. i rent a house and pay rent monthly, the landlord phoned me up on the 2nd of april stating that they are handing the house back to the bank at the end of april!!!! THIS ONLY GIVES ME FOUR WEEKS TO FIND ANOTHER ACCOMODATION, FOR ME AND MY SON.what do i do? i thought that i had to be given two months notice in writing? is this correct??? also as it was on the 2nd of april, the notice should be a full two months ,ie, if notice was given after the rent date (runs from the first of each month) so the tennancy should finnish on the 31st june 2008, is this correct??. the landlord stated that he was handing the keys back to the bank on the 31st april, what do i do?? IM STUCK ,WHERE DO I STAND, CAN I STAY TILL THE 31ST JUNE???(AS THE BANK WILL BE IN POSSESION OF THE HOUSE THEN!!). COULD SOMEONE PLEASE SHED SOME LIGHT ON THIS MATTER FOR ME,THANKS.

the wee man fights on!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would check all your facts first - there is not a 31st April, or even 31st June. If he has put this in writing then all facts need to be correct...

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I know, if the LL hands the keys back to the bank, then he's handing them with you in it, whether the bank (or the LL) likes it or not. There is no obligation for you to leave then, and is the bank want you out, they'll have to take you to court to get an eviction order.

 

Go to your local council and get yourself on the housing list. Then wait for the court date and go to court, don't fight the eviction order, as soon as it has been granted and a date set for when you have to leave the property, notify the council.

 

If you leave now, the council will consider that you have made yourself intentionally homeless and won't do anything for you. If you are evicted by court order, on the other hand, they have a legal obligation to rehouse you.

 

There's even possibly better news: Unless I am mistaken, once the LL hands back the keys, you no longer have to pay rent to him since he's no longer your LL... but neither do you have to pay rent to the bank, since you have no rent agreement with them. Effectively, you will be a squatter for that time until you have to leave.

 

I'm sure someone will correct me if I am wrong, but that's my understanding of things as they stand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the LL follow this up in writing?

 

This must be in the prescibed format ensuring that the relevant sections of housing law are quoted.

 

Speak to you council renting department. They can be most helful.

 

I was originally given 1 months notice. I pointed this out to the LL and they changed it to 2 months, but put in on a piece of A5 ripped from a notepad.

 

When I went to the housing office to claim deposit assistance, they took one look at it and told me it was invalid. They phoned the LL and got them to re-do it. Even though we met the original date, we could have stuck out for another 6 weeks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your replies,

the LL only notified me by phone, not in writing.

the LL said in the phone conversation that they will hand back to me this months rent, which i will recieve from them on the 30th april when i vacate the premises. they are in arrears on the morgage which i found out, thats why the house is being handed back to the bank, (before it has a reposetion order imposed). thanks

the wee man fights on!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's even possibly better news: Unless I am mistaken, once the LL hands back the keys, you no longer have to pay rent to him since he's no longer your LL... but neither do you have to pay rent to the bank, since you have no rent agreement with them. Effectively, you will be a squatter for that time until you have to leave.

This may depend on the wording of the tenancy. Some make reference to the LL or his successor, which in this case would be the bank. If so, the bank would have to honour the original tenancy (and you would have to pay them rent). This means that the bank would have to give you the usual 2 months notice.

 

Of course, if the LL didn't tell the bank that he was letting the property, that doesn't apply.

 

You might find the following link useful:

http://www.bdl.org.uk/images/17_how_can_my_landlord_end_my_assured_tenancy.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your good advice,

but there is one thing,

how do i go about finding out if the LL told the bank that they were letting the house out? do i get in touch with the bank? do i ask the LL ?

should i get in touch with the LL and ask for a notice to quit, as i will need this to show to the council, etc?

i have sent an email to shelter asking there thoughts on this matter,

thanks again for your good work in your replies, and i will post the reply from my LL and shelter. thanks dicky6

the wee man fights on!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the LL didn't tell the bank, then it is likely the bank will not be the successor, because they will not know about the tenancy. Therefore you will not owe the bank any rent. However, this means the bank could apply to the court for you to leave in 14 days. If that were to happen, then as Bookworm says, go to your council immediately.

 

Whatever happens, any notice to quit must be in writing (and on the correct form) for it to be valid. The phone call does not count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to be served formal notice under Section 8 of the Housing Act 1988Only when that notice has expired can the landlord/bank commence possession proceedings. In addition the original tenancy agreement needs to make reference to the fact that possession may be sought on such grounds.

 

The two months notice is to do with Section 21 of the Housing Act 1988 and is known as 'notice only' ground. That is used when the fixed term has expired and the notice period is 2 months to expire at the conclusion of the fixed term if served during the fixed term; or 2 months to expire on a rent day if served after the conclusion of the fixed term.

 

NO ONE can lawfully evict you without a court order. To do so is a criminal offence and attracts a maximum sentence of 2 years. Even once a possession order is made and the possession date passed; the only people who can physically evict you are Court bailiffs acting under a Warrant of Possession.

 

My advice would be to stay put and await any notice. THEN seek professional legal advice (via Legal Aid if need be). Council's will tell you to remain until the day bailiffs execute a Warrant of Possession. Leave the property before then and you are classed as intentionally homeless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to know which bank is involved in this, if they are aware that the property is let they will write to you. Otherwise you need to contact them and notify them of the situation. Once the keys are handed back they will more than likely arrange for the locks to be changed and you may well be out when they do this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chester's right - as soon as the bank thinks they have a right to the ppty, they may try and get locks changed anyway.

 

At the time the LL surrenders the ppty, it would be sensible to have someone at home if poss. If not, leave a clear note on the front door (preferably on the inside but clearly visible through glass) that the property is lawfully occupied and no changing of locks or attempt to gain entry should be attempted. Leave a contact no on the note.

 

No one should be able to take possession of the ppty without a court order and the court bailiff present.

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, after you have received your S21 Notice of Seeking Possession, the lanldlord whoever that may be, cannot start proceedings against you until after the date stated within that notice. When I deal with this sort of thing I always put a clear 9 weeks on the notice cover myself. The Courts are very picky of late and even one day out with the NOSP can get it chucked out of Court. So, after the date on the NOSP the landlord applies to Court. Depending on where you are in the country and the level of workload within your Court it could be up to 6 weeks before a date is given for a hearing. A S21 NOSP means the judge cannot have any leeway to allow you to stay - he must give possession. BUT - I would say you can argue hardship because of the way this has been handled and the judge could exercise his only right to help you and that would be to give you 42 days (6 weeks to vacate). Ask for this as it will give you yet more time to find somewhere else.

 

You should take your NOSP to the Council, you are going to become homeless, it is not your fault (unintentional) therefore they have a duty towards you. The duty is to avoid your homelessness by whatever means available at the time - it doesn't mean they will provide you with a Council house (but again this depends where you live as some Councils have a plethora of properties they cannot let whereas here in the South there is not enough social housing to go around). SO, assuming there is no Council house for you yet, they can put you in BB (but not for long as it is detrimental to family life particularly children - this is where you might end up whilst they investigate but if you go to them now they have plenty of time to investigate and avoid this). They may help you with Rent in Advance and Deposit for a private let which you source yourself, or they may place you into hostel accommodation which they will provide themselves.

 

Also be prepared if you have pets - you may have to rehome them, although if the Council accepts a duty towards you they MAY put them into boarding for you if they are vaccinated but this will not be free.

 

I hope this helps, and you can see you can stay longer in your home if you know the system! Good luck, I am sure in a year's time all will be ok and you will be settled and I hope its LA or HA accommodation with a secure or assured tenancy.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi all, i would like to thank you all for your advice on my predicament.

i still have not had a formal notice sent to me yet(s8 housing act 1988), i phoned my ll to ask for one, and my ll did not know what i was asking for!.

the ll said that he was giving me back this months rent when i hand over the keys on the 30th april 2008,at 8.30pm, does he still have to give me my deposit back also? just had a call from a mate, a house has come up for rent, which i accepted as i dont have much time left. i will keep all posted what the outcome is, thanks to all dicky6.

the wee man fights on!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont want to take over tjhis thread but im in the same situation as dicky6 and would like to ask all of your advice. i am in receipt housing benifit and have not paid rent for 2 weeks do i tell the hb office that i am no longer paying rent? and give them back the 2 weeks hb?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Craigc,

 

Could you start your own thread in this forum - use the New Thread button and you're away.

 

Please also give details there of why you've not paid the rent. This will likely determine how you should d/w this issue.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...