Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • JK: Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have. Thanks DX, I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Morgan Stanley/Goldfish Cabot are now chasing advice please


trumpetmaest
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4810 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a Morgan Stanley Card & I have been paying it off along with all my debts via a DMP with CCCS.

 

I have just received a letter from Cabot saying they have bought my Goldfish Account and to call them to sort out payments etc.

 

After checking with CCCS they told me that Goldfish took over Morgan Stanley.

 

Anyway, I have sent Cabot a CCA request letter and £1 payment.

 

I have also told CCCS not to pay Cabot even though they told me that I should because Cabot have bought lots of Goldfish Accounts recently!!!

 

Now should I send a SAR? and who to? Morgan Stanley, Goldfish, or Barclaycard? Who I believe have just bought goldfish!

 

Any advice :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 287
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

To SAR them is tantamount to acknowledging the debt - asking for details of a debt that you are placing in dispute and for which they may have no agreement. Wait to see if they come up with a legitimate agreement.

 

The thing about CCCS is that once they set up a DMP they like to be in control of it. You are entitled to ask for any debt to be removed from it and the fact that Cabot took over a lot of Goldfish cards recently is irrelevant. They are asking you to pay a debt for which there may be no agreement.

I had a DMP with CSSS until last November - I gave it up because they became a shambles - they made payments late and statements made no sense. When I told them I was closing it, they called me to warn me that agencies might add interest if I tried to pay them myself. I said I was aware of that and closed the DMP. I CCA'd all of them and 8 out of 9 have gone - no agreements. The other one I chose to pay and that will be finished this year.

For me, CCCS is fine to give you a breathing space but is not a long-term solution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR'ing is not in itself acknowledging a debt. All you are doing is making a legitimate request for all the information that they hold on you.

 

I would send the SAR to whoever you were last paying. It will find its way up the chain to whoever has your data now. Then you will be able to deal with them once you know where to communicate.

 

And is it just the case that Goldfish have dumped you having taken over the account, even though you were paying through your DMP?

Link to post
Share on other sites

BECAUSE Pinky, it would be nice to know BEFOREHAND if there are any areas that would assist in negotiating a better settlement should it come to the crunch. And even should the debt be unenforcable, it may even turn out that charges and penalties are in excess of the alleged debt. Which would be recoverable from the OC.

 

At the very least, it enables you to identify EXACTLY where you stand. And who knows what other juicy tidbits might be uncovered? ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The amount is put on hold whilst it is in dispute and Cabot do that so there won't be charges recoverable whilst it remains in dispute. It doesn't make sense to say "I do not ackowledge any debt to your company" followed by "but I want to know the details in case there is anything I can claim back". You either acknowledge the debt or you don't and if you do acknowledge it and want your charges back, there is no point in asking for a copy of the credit agreement so you can dispute the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update...

 

I have just got a letter back from Cabot along with my original letter & £1 cheque!

 

The letter reads that they acknowledge receipt of my request. However, they say they are not obliged to provide this information and they do not accept the fee required under 77 and/ or 78 of the consumer credit act and they have therefore returned the fee.

 

The letter tells me to contact them to discuss my payment options!

 

It is from Emma Robertson.

 

What should I do now ?:confused:

 

I am very confused... should I re-send or SAR Goldfish?

Btw the amount they quote is now £10800!! it has gone up over £2000 since Morgan Stanley had it

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is the standard reply from Cabot - does it also say they will ,however, ask for a copy of the credit agreement to be "helpful?" They are not being "helpful" at all - they must by law provide a copy of the agreement on request, no matter what they say. Keep the Postal Order in your records to prove you sent it. Don't contact anyone by phone - ever - but write to remind them the account is in dispute and you await the copy of the credit agreement. There may be quite a bit of correspondence before you finally complain that they have committed an offence after the time for that has expired.

 

You have had 2 views of the timing of SAR's. I personally would deal with the existence of an agreement and disputing the debt first but if you are going to SAR them then I would send it to Goldfish. You may be interested to know I had an MSDW card that Cabot tried to pursue and there is no agreement for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pinky,

 

Can I ask if you have some connection with Cabot? It's just that your post does sound very much like the response you might get straight from Cabot or a.n.other DCA.

 

Sorry Pinky - that might have been uncalled for. My Apologies if I've offended you, it was your post at 18.10 I saw, not the later ones.

 

When you send an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to ANY company or organisation you are simply asking for all information that that company or organisation holds on you as is your legal right to do so.

 

Actually, just as an aside, I was quite interested to read on the website of my local city council where they made reference to S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) requests. They openly said that they realised that people usually made these requests when they were annoyed with the council for some reason and they asked people to phone up directly and voice their complaint instead of going through the formal (and obviously quite costly) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) them is tantamount to acknowledging the debt - asking for details of a debt that you are placing in dispute and for which they may have no agreement. Wait to see if they come up with a legitimate agreement.

 

The thing about CCCS is that once they set up a DMP they like to be in control of it. You are entitled to ask for any debt to be removed from it and the fact that Cabot took over a lot of Goldfish cards recently is irrelevant. They are asking you to pay a debt for which there may be no agreement.

I had a DMP with CSSS until last November - I gave it up because they became a shambles - they made payments late and statements made no sense. When I told them I was closing it, they called me to warn me that agencies might add interest if I tried to pay them myself. I said I was aware of that and closed the DMP. I CCA'd all of them and 8 out of 9 have gone - no agreements. The other one I chose to pay and that will be finished this year.

For me, CCCS is fine to give you a breathing space but is not a long-term solution.

 

I agree with you on that one Pinky. I too pulled out of a DMP with the CCCS. Of my debts, the majority are unenforceable and of the ones that are OK, I've SAR'd one of them and plan to do the same with the rest. I haven't done so far because they're still accepting the payments I made when I was on my DMP, without adding interest and without asking for more. Once they do, I'll SAR them. The plan is to get a couple more months out of the way when I will have sufficient funds to make them a full and final offer.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. Yes Cabot do say they will send me the details to be helpful!

 

Should I wait for the 10+2 days and then send them another letter?

 

Does it matter that they have returned my letter & payment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Brassed Off said, leave them to get in touch with you. IF there is no agreement, the next letter will be to say they have sent the original creditor a reminder. Then they will write to say they haven't been able to get an agreement and you can ask MSDW yourself for one if you like! After that you won't hear from them again. Patience - and try not to worry (easier said than done!).

Link to post
Share on other sites

If my experience is anything to go by, once you have the "contact them yourself" letter, you won't hear from Cabot again. That does not mean to say they won't pass it on to another DCA, which in my case didn't happen. Each individual case is different so there is no way what will actually happen in your case. I give you my experience with Cabot in support. I think you will have understood this and don't need the obvious pointed out to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that after a couple of recent court cases, Cabot have well and truly had their fingers burnt. Perhaps they are a bit more wary now about litigation when all they have is a dodgy agreement to rely on.

 

However, bear in mind that even if Cabot cease all contact, it's very likely that there wil be default registered against you, making life difficult for a few years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If my experience is anything to go by, once you have the "contact them yourself" letter, you won't hear from Cabot again. That does not mean to say they won't pass it on to another DCA, which in my case didn't happen. Each individual case is different so there is no way what will actually happen in your case. I give you my experience with Cabot in support. I think you will have understood this and don't need the obvious pointed out to you.

 

I agree with Seahorse and I think you should send a SAR. Afterall if they have no agreement they do not have any authority to be processing your data. A SAR will confirm what if any information they have about you and it usually also contains a few nuggets of information you can use against Cabot if need be at a later stage.

 

For the avoidance of doubt and to avoid any confusion a SAR is not an admission of a debt. It is your legal right under the DPA.

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to add, in my experience which isn't really that much in relation to Cabot (I jest with you)

 

Cabot don't give up that easily, even if they don't have an agreement they are like a dog with a bone.

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

I give you my experience with Cabot in support. I think you will have understood this and don't need the obvious pointed out to you.

 

We can all beat our chests in relation to our experiences with Cabot...

 

For example here is my thread with over two thousand posts

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/dca-legal-successes/36665-cabot-again-urgent-help.html

 

Here is my thread when I started litigation against Cabot

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/80270-litigation-tbern123-cabot-financial.html

 

Oh here is my thread detailing how I stopped Cabot Calling

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/33320-no-more-calls-cabot.html

 

Seahorse isn't exactly a stranger to the workings of Cabot either

 

With nearly 1,000 posts

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/54029-seahorse-cabot.html

 

Seahorse also runs a very informative blog and was responsible for a lot of investigation into the inner workings of Cabot....

 

I would personally (I have in the past) follow any advice given by Seahorse as he has done it and got the teashirt (or should that be the website)

 

This is nothing personal against you pinky, I just feel the original poster should be able to make an informed decision in relation to which advice he should follow

  • Haha 1

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

:mad: Wot about the rest of the Cabot Fan Club matey? :mad:

 

 

millyuns of posts - millyuns and millyuns we almost got a personal invite from our Ken! :D

 

 

Oi don't you start..... Women !!!!!! All they want is attention attention attention

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

They weren't like a dog with a bone with me - they just disappeared. As for SAR's, I think that one has been flogged to death. Different views have been expressed and it is for the poster to choose what he wants to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...