Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, Apologies for bringing up the same topic regarding these individuals. I wish I had found this forum earlier, as I've seen very similar cases. However, I need your help in figuring out what to do next because we've involved our partners/resellers. I work as an IT Manager in a company outside of the UK. We acquired a license from a certified reseller (along with a support agreement) and also obtained training sessions from them. The issue arose when we needed to register two people for the training sessions, so we used an external laptop for the second user to keep up with the sessions for only a month. During this period, the laptop was solely used for the training sessions. After two weeks, my boss forwarded an email to me from Ms Vinces, stating that we are using illicit software from SolidWorks. Since this has never happened to me or anyone we know, I went into panic mode and had a meeting with her. During the meeting, we explained that we were using an external laptop solely for the training sessions and that the laptop had not been used within the company since her email. She informed us that for such cases, there are demos and special licenses (though our reseller did not mention these types of licenses when we made our initial purchase). She then mentioned that we had utilized products worth approximately €25k and presented us with two options: either pay the agreed value or acquire SolidWorks products. We expressed that the cost was too high, and our business couldn't support such expenses. I assured her that we would discuss the matter with the company board and get back to her. After the meeting, we contacted the company reseller from whom we purchased the license, explained the situation, and mentioned the use of an external laptop. They said they would speak to Maria and help mediate the situation. We hoped to significantly reduce the cost, perhaps to that of a 1-year professional license. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The reseller mediated a value €2k less than what Maria had suggested (essentially, we would need to acquire two professional lifetime licenses and two years of support for a total of €23k). This amount is still beyond our means, but they insisted that the price was non-negotiable and wouldn't be reduced any further. The entire situation feels odd because she never provided us with addresses or other evidence (which I should have requested), and she's pressuring us to resolve the matter by the end of the month, with payment to be made through the reseller. This makes me feel as though the reseller is taking advantage of the situation to profit from it. Currently, we're trying to buy some time. We plan to meet with the reseller next week but are uncertain about how to proceed with them or whether we should respond to the mediator.
    • Thanks London  if I’ve read correctly the questionaire wants me to post his actual name on a public forum… is that correct.  I’ve only had a quick read so far
    • Plenty of success stories, also bear in mind not everyone updates the forum.  Overdale's want you to roll over and pay, without using your enshrined legal right to defend. make you wet yourself in fear that a solicitor will Take you to court, so you will pay up without question. Most people do just that,  but you are lucky that you have found this place and can help you put together a good defence. You should get reading on some other Capital One and Overdale's cases on the forum to get an idea of how it works.  
    • In both versions the three references to "your clients" near the end need to be changed to "you" or "your" as Alliance are not using solicitors, they have sent the LoC themselves. Personally I'd change "Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept" to "Dear Kev".  It would show you'd done your homework, looked up the company, and seen it's a pathetic one-man band rather than having any departments.  The PPCs love to pretend they have some official power and so you should be scared of them - showing you've sussed their sordid games and you're confident about fighting them undermines all this.  In fact that's the whole point of a snotty letter - to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did do court so better to drop you like a hot potato and go and pursue mugs who just give in instead. In the very, very, very, very unlikely case of Kev doing court, it'd be better that he didn't know in advance all the legal arguments you'd be using, so I'd heavily reduce the number of cards being played.
    • Thanx Londoneill get on to it this evening having a read around these forums I can’t seem to find many success stories using your methods. So how successful are these methods or am I just buying time for him  and a ccj will be inevitable in the end. Thanks another question is, will he have to appear at court..? I am not sure he has got it in him
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Surprised...... Help Needed URGENT


kevsaints
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5844 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recieved a letter this morning from robinson, way & company limited, stating a formal demand for payment of 2.5k.

 

Only ref on letter was EX HFC BANK. I called RW to try and find out what this was for, they could not say for what or where the money was borrowed but advised me this was taken out in 1989...the default was 10 yrs later in 1999.

 

Totally amazed as:

1. I didn't have any finance during that period

2. Unless I was in a daze and don't remember I certainly wasn't making monthly payments for 10 years of my life.

3. Convinced I was going mad I even called my ex wife who confirmed she too had never heard of the company, and that we had no finance at that time.

 

The plot thickens as a lady from RW then advised me during our call that there is another outstanding debt to this company of £1K + for the same time 1989 - 1999.

 

RW have said they bought the debt in 2006 and have threatened legal action in their letter. I have asked for a copy of the credit agreement but they was unable to help (and think HFC will no longer have this).

 

I really don't understand why RW have not contacted me until now, as they have my details from a debt I am currently paying (one I do know of) that will be fully paid in June this year.

 

RW did mention that this debt was registered at my previous address, I was not living there between 1989 - 1999 so am concerned how this could be!

 

I explained to them have never heard anything at all about this until now no recollection at all what this could be for and I am extremely worried...thanks for taken time to read post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will move this thread into the Debt Forum.

 

I think you could well find that the debt is statute barred, if it IS your debt. But it rather sounds like they have their wires crossed.

Someone in the Debt forum will be able to give you more help on this.

 

Regards, Rooster.

  • Haha 1

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

It could be mistracing. I would report the matter to Consumer Direct who will forward the matter to your local Trading Standards. Consumer Direct - Contact us

  • Haha 1

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NEVER SPEAK TO A DCA ON THE PHONE

In the meantime if the RWC muppets get in touch with you again send them this

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

NEVER SPEAK TO A DCA ON THE PHONE

Link to post
Share on other sites

what dispicable behaviour, chasing debts of 20yrs ago that are very very obviously statute barred and not even your's i bet!

 

how much longer have we got to put up with these fools that abide by no rules whatsoever.

 

just think of the 1000's of people that could get caught by this & some will pay because of their tactics and lies.

 

dx:mad:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That unfortunately how these companies make such huge profits. They by up old and unenforacble debts for pennies in the pound and the try to CONvince people to pay up even though they havent a LEGAL leg to stand on

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same here. Dealing with a company trying to say they have a right to chase an account I dont remember of acknowledge I told them, but default issued appatantly 96 i'm unaware of and told them 12 years is pushing any chance of giving a person chance to resolve this other than statute barred. I have memory probs down to medication any how but was looked after by money advice who dealt with it all years ago.

 

So annoying they can appear years later, but I suppose thats what they do and its a pain in the a***. Confusing thing is they say they represent a company who represents a company who represents the lender, I got lost straight away. I wish they would!:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thankyou for taking time to read this thread.

 

I received a formal demand from a dca asking for a total of 2.5k,

I phoned the number as I have no memory of this debt, was then told there is a further 1k as we'll.

asked them to provide a cca one arrived today, but still waiting for the 2.5k one to arrive. ( this took them app 24 days.)

 

I have recalled what this was for and know now I did purchase these items.

 

However they are saying purchased in june 97, both items same day same company, and Defaulted in feb 99/ march 99.

 

Have heard nothing until this dca purchased debt in june 06 (apparently) and they only let me know about this in march 08.

 

To make matters worse I have been paying this dca money which ends soon from march06 for another debt I had. £38 left to pay.

 

they said they have only just linked address..haha a bit late.

 

Is this Statute Barred? as far as I'm aware they purchased this debt 7 yrs after default, I have printed SB letter to send them but what should be there reply, and also what should be my next action taken?

 

many thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for taking time to read this thread.

 

I received a formal demand from a dca asking for a total of 2.5k,

I phoned the number as I have no memory of this debt, was then told there is a further 1k as we'll.

asked them to provide a cca one arrived today, but still waiting for the 2.5k one to arrive. ( this took them app 24 days.)

 

I have recalled what this was for and know now I did purchase these items.

 

However they are saying purchased in june 97, both items same day same company, and Defaulted in feb 99/ march 99.

 

Have heard nothing until this dca purchased debt in june 06 (apparently) and they only let me know about this in march 08.

 

To make matters worse I have been paying this dca money which ends soon from march06 for another debt I had. £38 left to pay.

 

they said they have only just linked address..haha a bit late.

 

Is this Statute Barred? as far as I'm aware they purchased this debt 7 yrs after default, I have printed SB letter to send them but what should be there reply, and also what should be my next action taken?

 

many thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am certainly not an expert, but I would have thought that yes - the debt is statute barred. I think it is 6 years in you acknowldged the debt. e.g admitted you owe it to them either on the phone or by letter.

 

I would make it plain in any correspondence that you do not acknowledge the debt.

 

Who are the DCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

reply : debt collection agency. thx

 

I have not admitted debt to them also have just received letter stating :

Further to your request for a copy statement/ agreement for your account our client confirms that all relevant information has previously been sent to you, and that the balance outstanding as stated is correct.

 

they only provided a copy of original cca for the 1k had nothing regarding 2.5k

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds to me like the usual bullying tactics we are all used to.

 

Have you made it clear in all correspondence that you do not acknowledge the debt? In CCAing them could they argue that you acknowledged the debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sequenci as far as i'm aware of there is no court order as the letter notifying me of the debt threatened court action if not paid within 7 days.

this was issued by the dca invovled.

i had totally forgot all about this debt but was told it is statute barred as it defaulted in 02/99......The dca purchased debt in 06/06.......notified me of debt in 03/08.

so 9yrs since default .... surely statute barred?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sequenci as far as i'm aware of there is no court order as the letter notifying me of the debt threatened court action if not paid within 7 days.

this was issued by the dca invovled.

i had totally forgot all about this debt but was told it is statute barred as it defaulted in 02/99......The dca purchased debt in 06/06.......notified me of debt in 03/08.

so 9yrs since default .... surely statute barred?

 

Sounds possible!

 

Send them this!

 

Your Name:

Your Address:

Date

 

To:

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account No:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 "an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued".

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that "it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period".

 

The last correspondence/payment/acknowledgement or payment of this debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from me/us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, I/we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against me/us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that "continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970".

 

I/we await your written confirmation that no further contact will be made concerning the above account and confirmation that this matter is now closed.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

(Your signature)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi everyone great site,

 

I received a letter from Robinson Way & Co,

This letter stated I owed £2,500.00, so I phoned them to ask what for,

was told this was for Ex HFC and also there was another £1,000.00 for a seperate account.

 

The account's defaulted in March 99, they purchased the debts in June 06, and then notified me with a demand or court action if not paid within 7 day's in March 98. I do not know if I was taken to court during that time as there is nothing on my credit report for HFC however as it's over 9 yrs ago this would have come off my file by now. On my credit report there is HFC as listed as looking at my report in 1999, but that is it.

 

I was told this debt was statute barred by member's of this site, and I even phoned National Debt line and was told the same. May I add they have not recieved any payment's from me since 03/99.....and I have not made any negotiation's with them since.

 

However I have since asked for the CCA agreement's of which I have only received the one for £1K total, then I sent a letter stating these account's are STATUTE BARRED ( recorded delivery) over the last few day's i have had about 10 call's from them, I will not talk to them over the phone however I stated to them if I continue to receive phone calls from them I will report them to the relevant bodies, I also asked for a reply to my letter and they have now said they are proceeding with court action.

 

Help.....where do I go from here and what's the best way to deal with it?

 

any help much apprieciated thx.

These people are driving me mad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

 

Dear Sirs / Madam

 

I am writing Further to my letter to yourselves dated 29th February 2008 which was sent recorded delivery and signed for by yourselves on the 3rd of March 2008 (copy attached).

 

In my previous letter I drew your attention to the OFT Debt Collection Guidance which states that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970”.

 

In light of the fact that I have not received any written communication from yourselves providing the required evidence of payment or written contact from me in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act I am shocked that you have ignored the OFT guidelines and continued to telephone me everyday this week (a log is being kept and will be produced should further action be required).

 

Take notice that I will only communicate with yourselves in writing and if you continue to telephone me I will treat this as Harassment as detailed in section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 and will accordingly submitted complaints to Oftel, the FOS and Trading Standards.

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

I would also like your official complaints procedure within 14 days.

 

I look forward to your reply.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the letter addressed to Graham Prosser / Managing Director / Robinson Way....

 

Also send this letter to your local MP, the OFT, Trading Standards, and your local police chief

 

And write at the bottom

 

CC

(your local MP)

(your local police chief)

(OFT)

(your local trading standards)

(Attila The Hun) ;)

(and Gareth Thomas - Parliamentary Under Secretary Of State - Trade and Consumer Affairs) His address is 1 Victoria St, London SW1H0ET

 

I'm serious about all of these above (apart from 1 of course !!!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would consider recording some of these phone calls, and seeking to get them to threaten you with going to jail, or making similar threats;)

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...