Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. Anyway I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest just took most of my money I need to live on.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5920 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

Just had a letter from NatWest about my Step account.

All that goes into that account is my Job Seekers Allowance.

It's all I have to live on at the moment and I only opened

the account about 3 months ago due to my Abbey account

spiraling out of control with £1300 in charges on it.

 

On friday I had my Job Seekers paid into my account.

Saturday I get a letter from Natwest saying they've

added unpaid item fees to my account. No mention as to

what they were till I looked up their charges online.

They've taken £76 of the £118.30 I need to live on for the

next two weeks. (all be cause I went overdrawn by £12)

and they returned two direct debits as unpaid.

 

This is going to hit me really hard and next month I can

see my account being hit for even more charges, as

I won't have enough in my account to cover the 3 direct

debits I have. So then they'll be taking almost everything

and once again the debt spiral begins. :mad:

 

I've read bits on here that they shouldn't be taking benefits

and someone mentioned that it was

illegal under s.187 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992

 

Does anyone have a letter template I can send to Natwest, in the hope they'll refund the charges?

 

Thanks in advance.

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

187 Certain benefit to be inalienable

(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, every assignment of or charge on—

(a) benefit as defined in section 122 of the Contributions and Benefits Act;

[(aa) a jobseeker's allowance;]

[(ab) state pension credit;]

[(ac) an employment and support allowance;]

(b) any income-related benefit; or

© child benefit,

 

 

 

and every agreement to assign or charge such benefit shall be void; and, on the bankruptcy of a beneficiary, such benefit shall not pass to any trustee or other person acting on behalf of his creditors.

(2) In the application of subsection (1) above to Scotland—

(a) the reference to assignment of benefit shall be read as a reference to assignation, “assign” being construed accordingly;

(b) the reference to a beneficiary's bankruptcy shall be read as a reference to the sequestration of his estate or the appointment on his estate of a judicial factor under section 41 of the Solicitors (Scotland) Act 1980.

 

 

 

(3) In calculating for the purposes of section 5 of the Debtors Act 1869 or section 4 of the Civil Imprisonment (Scotland) Act 1882 the means of any beneficiary, no account shall be taken of any increase of disablement benefit in respect of a child or of industrial death benefit.

 

NOTES

Derivation

 

Sub-s (1) derived from the Social Security Act 1975, s 87(1), the Child Benefit Act 1975, s 12(1), and the Social Security Act 1986, s 86, Sch 10, para 48(a); sub-s (2) derived from the Social Security Act 1975, s 87(2), the Child Benefit Act 1975, s 12(2), and the Solicitors (Scotland) Act 1980, s 66, Sch 6, para 2; sub-s (3) derived from the Social Security Act 1975, s 87(3).

Initial Commencement

Specified date

 

Specified date: 1 July 1992: see s 192(4).

 

 

 

 

 

Amendment

 

Sub-s (1): para (aa) inserted by the Jobseekers Act 1995, s 41(4), Sch 2, para 72.

Sub-s (1): para (ab) inserted by the State Pension Credit Act 2002, s 14, Sch 2, Pt 2, paras 8, 23.

Date in force (for the purpose only of exercising any power to make regulations or orders): 2 July 2002: see SI 2002/1691, art 2(l).

Date in force (for remaining purposes): 6 October 2003: see SI 2003/1766, art 2(a).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sub-s (1): para (ac) inserted by the Welfare Reform Act 2007, s 28(1), Sch 3, para 10(1), (31).

Date in force: to be appointed: see the Welfare Reform Act 2007, s 70(2).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HI there

 

thats section 187 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992

 

i hope it helps

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Fuzzybobble.

 

There's a letter here you can send them..........

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/42170-right-appropriation-stop-bank.html

 

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will send that letter, as it may stop them grabbing more off me later this month.

 

What do I send to get them to hand back the £76 they grabbed on friday? Bit stuck with how to word it.

 

So annoying this happening, as I had only just got myself financially straight again, after Abbey stuffed me good n proper last year.

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give them a phone, fuzzybobble.

You never know, explain your situation and they may refund the £76. If not, you will have to go through the process of claiming back your charges, which will take a while and your case will be stayed until after the 'test case' result.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi fuzzybobble.

 

My sister had a similar situation witht he same bank who did refund the charges after she went to the branch and explained to them the whole situation.

 

It's worth a try and good luck.

Mr & Mrs Ananya's story so far -

Welcome Finance - account closed - no CCA - 02/07 - £1500

NatWest - settled in full 09/06 - £600

NatWest - settled in full 06/07 - £72

Verso - Settled in full 07/08 - £2002

C.K. Edrupt/Provident - account closed - no CCA - 04/07 - £640

Littlewoods/Shop Direct - 2 accounts closed - Statute Barred - 04/10 - £800

D.C.A.s who've given up so far -10

Link to post
Share on other sites

you could also speak to the benefits agency as they no what the law is and they no they are not allowed to take the money.

some JC/BO will actually write to the bank and say to them they hve 14 days to return this money to you or then will take back the money from the bank and then give it to you in the form of a giro.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

They done the same to me with my Child Tax. Phone them up and tell them you need your money as it is benefits and they are legally not allowed to take it. They will probably make you go to a branch and take it out over the counter. You can then sort out the charges. Apparently they are allowed to re imburse three charges (so they told me) as part of a good will gesture so try to get on to it now bfore more charges go on.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...